1,559
Views
162
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent protein binding relevant to toxicity

, , &
Pages 783-802 | Received 29 Jun 2010, Accepted 13 Sep 2010, Published online: 02 Aug 2011

References

  • Agius RM, Nee J, McGovern B, Robertson A. 1991. Structure activity hypotheses in occupational asthma caused by low molecular weight substances. Ann Occup Hyg 35:129–137.
  • Alvarez-Sánchez R, Basketter D, Pease C, Lepoittevin JP. 2003. Studies of chemical selectivity of hapten, reactivity, and skin sensitization potency. 3. Synthesis and studies on the reactivity toward model nucleophiles of the 13C-labeled skin sensitizers, 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazol-3-one (MCI) and 2-methylisothiazol-3-one (MI). Chem Res Toxicol 16:627–636.
  • Aptula AO, Enoch SJ, Roberts DW. 2009. Chemical mechanisms for skin sensitization by aromatic compounds with hydroxy and amino groups. Chem Res Toxicol 22:1541–1547.
  • Aptula AO, Patlewicz G, Roberts DW. 2005. Skin sensitization: Reaction mechanistic applicability domains for structure-activity relationships. Chem Res Toxicol 18:1420–1426.
  • Aptula AO, Patlewicz G, Roberts DW, Schultz TW. 2006. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: A non-animal approach to skin sensitization. Toxicol In Vitro 20:239–247.
  • Aptula AO, Roberts DW. 2006. Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: General principles and application to reactive toxicity. Chem Res Toxicol 19:1097–1105.
  • Aptula N, Roberts DW, Schultz TW, Pease C. 2007. Reactivity assays for non-animal based prediction of skin sensitisation potential. Toxicology 231:117–118.
  • Ashby J, Basketter DA, Paton D, Kimber I. 1995. Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay. Toxicology 103:177–194.
  • Bajot F, Cronin MT, Roberts DW, Schultz TW. 2011. Reactivity and aquatic toxicity of aromatic compounds transformable to quinone-type Michael acceptors. SAR QSAR Environ Res 22:51–65.
  • Banks TM, Bonin AM, Glover SA, Prakash AS. 2003. Mutagenicity and DNA damage studies of N-acyloxy-N-alkoxyamides–the role of electrophilic nitrogen. Org Biomol Chem 1:2238–2246.
  • Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I, Loveless SE. 1996. The local lymph node assay: A viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. Food Chem Toxicol 34:985–997.
  • Barratt MD. 2003. QSAR, Read-across and REACH. Altern Lab Anim 31:463–465.
  • Barratt MD, Basketter DA, Chamberlain M, Admans GD, Langowski JJ. 1994a. An expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. Toxicol In Vitro 8:1053–1060.
  • Barratt MD, Basketter DA, Chamberlain M, Payne MP, Admans GD, Langowski JJ. (1994b). Development of an expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. Toxicol In Vitro 8:837–839.
  • Benigni R, Bossa C. (2011). Mechanisms of chemical carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: A review with implications for predictive toxicology. Chem Rev 111:2507–2536.
  • Bergström MA, Andersson SI, Broo K, Luthman K, Karlberg AT. (2008). Oximes: Metabolic activation and structure-allergenic activity relationships. J Med Chem 51:2541–2550.
  • Caccia S. (2007). N-dealkylation of arylpiperazine derivatives: Disposition and metabolism of the 1-aryl-piperazines formed. Curr Drug Metab, 8, 612–622.
  • Chipinda I, Hettick JM, Simoyi RH, Siegel PD. (2007). Oxidation of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in latex gloves and its possible haptenation pathway. Chem Res Toxicol 20:1084–1092.
  • Comber M, Simpson B. 2007. Grouping of Petroleum substances EUR report no 22481 EN. Available from ECB website: http://ecb.jrc.it/qsar/background/index.php?c=CAT.
  • Cronin MTD, Enoch SJ, Hewitt M, Madden JC. 2010. Formation of mechanistic categories and local models to facilitate the prediction of toxicity. ALTEX 27:127–131.
  • Desler C, Johannessen C, Rasmussen LJ. (2009). Repair of DNA damage induced by anthanthrene, a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) without bay or fjord regions. Chem Biol Interact 177:212–217.
  • de Groot AC, White IR, Flyvholm MA, Lensen G, Coenraads PJ. (2010). Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: Relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact Derm 62:2–17.
  • de Groot AC, Flyvholm MA, Lensen G, Menné T, Coenraads PJ. (2009). Formaldehyde-releasers: Relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Contact allergy to formaldehyde and inventory of formaldehyde-releasers. Contact Derm, 61:63–85.
  • Diderich B. 2010. Tools for category formation and read-across. Overview of the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox. In Cronin MTD, Madden JC. (Eds.) In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications Cambridge, UK, RSC.
  • Dimitrov SD, Low LK, Patlewicz GY, Kern PS, Dimitrova GD, Comber MH, Phillips RD, Niemela J, Bailey PT, Mekenyan OG. (2005). Skin sensitization: Modeling based on skin metabolism simulation and formation of protein conjugates. Int J Toxicol 24:189–204.
  • EC. 2003. Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Off J Eur Union L 66/26–L 33/35 of 11.3.2003.
  • EC. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off J Eur Union L 396/1 of 30.12.2006.
  • EC. 2007. REACH technical guidance (located at http://ecb.jrc.it/reach/rip/).
  • ECHA. 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. available from: http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
  • Elahi EN, Wright Z, Hinselwood D, Hotchkiss SA, Basketter DA, Pease CK. (2004). Protein binding and metabolism influence the relative skin sensitization potential of cinnamic compounds. Chem Res Toxicol 17:301–310.
  • Ellison CM, Madden JC, Judson PN, Cronin MTD. 2010. Using in silico tools in a weight of evidence approach to aid toxicological assessment. Molecular Informatics 29:97–110.
  • Ellison CM, Sherhod R, Cronin MT, Enoch SJ, Madden JC, Judson PN. (2011). Assessment of Methods To Define the Applicability Domain of Structural Alert Models. J Chem Inf Model 51:975–985.
  • Enoch SJ. 2010. Chemical category formation and read-across for the prediction of toxicity. In Puzyn T, Leszczynski J, Cronin MTD. (Eds.) Recent advances in QSAR studies: Methods and applications. Springer.
  • Enoch SJ, Cronin MT. (2010). A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent DNA binding. Crit Rev Toxicol 40:728–748.
  • Enoch SJ, Cronin MT, Ellison CM. (2011). The use of a chemistry-based profiler for covalent DNA binding in the development of chemical categories for read-across for genotoxicity. Altern Lab Anim 39:131–145.
  • Enoch SJ, Cronin MTD, Madden JC, Hewitt M. 2009a. Formation of structural categories to allow for read-across for teratogenicity. QSAR & Combinatorial Science 28:696–708.
  • Enoch SJ, Cronin MT, Schultz TW, Madden JC. (2008a). Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition. Chem Res Toxicol 21:513–520.
  • Enoch SJ, Madden JC, Cronin MT. (2008b). Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:555–578.
  • Enoch SJ, Roberts DW, Cronin MT. (2009b). Electrophilic reaction chemistry of low molecular weight respiratory sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 22:1447–1453.
  • Enoch SJ, Roberts DW, Cronin MTD. 2010. Mechanistic category formation for the prediction of respiratory sensitisation. Chemical Research in Toxicology 23:1547–1555.
  • Fabjan E, Hulzebos E, Mennes W, Piersma AH. (2006). A category approach for reproductive effects of phthalates. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:695–726.
  • Gerberick GF, Vassallo JD, Bailey RE, Chaney JG, Morrall SW, Lepoittevin JP. (2004). Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. Toxicol Sci 81:332–343.
  • Gerner I, Barratt MD, Zinke S, Schlegel K, Schlede E. (2004). Development and prevalidation of a list of structure-activity relationship rules to be used in expert systems for prediction of the skin-sensitising properties of chemicals. Altern Lab Anim 32:487–509.
  • Giri S, Nieber K, Bader A. (2010). Hepatotoxicity and hepatic metabolism of available drugs: Current problems and possible solutions in preclinical stages. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 6:895–917.
  • Granville CA, Ross MK, Tornero-Velez R, Hanley NM, Grindstaff RD, Gold A, Richard AM, Funasaka K, Tennant AH, Kligerman AD, Evans MV, DeMarini DM. (2005). Genotoxicity and metabolism of the source-water contaminant 1,1-dichloropropene: Activation by GSTT1-1 and structure-activity considerations. Mutat Res 572:98–112.
  • Grisham MB, Jefferson MM, Melton DF, Thomas EL. (1984). Chlorination of endogenous amines by isolated neutrophils. Ammonia-dependent bactericidal, cytotoxic, and cytolytic activities of the chloramines. J Biol Chem 259:10404–10413.
  • Hart J. 2007. Nickel compounds - a category approach for metals in EU Legislation. A report to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. http://cms.mim.dk/NR/rdonlyres/07DB028E-134E-4796-BF6D-97B9AD5F9E82/0/Nikkel.pdf.
  • Hermens JL. (1990). Electrophiles and acute toxicity to fish. Environ Health Perspect 87:219–225.
  • Hewitt M, Ellison CM, Enoch SJ, Madden JC, Cronin MT. (2010). Integrating (Q)SAR models, expert systems and read-across approaches for the prediction of developmental toxicity. Reprod Toxicol 30:147–160.
  • Holsapple MP, Jones D, Kawabata TT, Kimber I, Sarlo K, Selgrade MK, Shah J, Woolhiser MR. (2006). Assessing the potential to induce respiratory hypersensitivity. Toxicol Sci 91:4–13.
  • Hulzebos E, Walker JD, Gerner I, Schlegel K. 2005. Use of structural alerts to develop rules for identifying chemical substances with skin irritation or skin corrosion potential. QSAR & Combinatorial Science 24:332–342.
  • Hulzebos EM, Maslankiewicz L, Walker JD. 2003. Verification of literature-derived SARs for skin irritation and corrosion. QSAR & Combinatorial Science 22:351–363.
  • Illing HP, Malmfors T, Rodenburg L. (2009). Skin sensitization and possible groupings for ‘read across’ for rosin based substances. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 54:234–241.
  • Jaeschke H, Gores GJ, Cederbaum AI, Hinson JA, Pessayre D, Lemasters JJ. (2002). Mechanisms of hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Sci 65:166–176.
  • Jaworska J, Nikolova-Jeliazkova N. (2007). How can structural similarity analysis help in category formation? SAR QSAR Environ Res 18:–207.
  • Kalgutkar AS, Didiuk MT. (2009). Structural alerts, reactive metabolites, and protein covalent binding: How reliable are these attributes as predictors of drug toxicity? Chem Biodivers, 6:2115–2137.
  • Kalgutkar AS, Gardner I, Obach RS, Shaffer CL, Callegari E, Henne KR, Mutlib AE, Dalvie DK, Lee JS, Nakai Y, O’Donnell JP, Boer J, Harriman SP. (2005). A comprehensive listing of bioactivation pathways of organic functional groups. Curr Drug Metab, 6:161–225.
  • Kimber I, Agius R, Basketter DA, Corsini E, Cullinan P, Dearman RJ, Gimenez-Arnau E, Greenwell L, Hartung T, Kuper F, Maestrelli P, Roggen E, Rovida C; European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods. (2007). Chemical respiratory allergy: Opportunities for hazard identification and characterisation. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 60. Altern Lab Anim 35:243–265.
  • Lalko JF, Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Gerberick GF, Sarlo K, Api AM. (2011). Chemical reactivity measurements: Potential for characterization of respiratory chemical allergens. Toxicol In Vitro 25:433–445.
  • Lei M-Y, Xiao Y-J, Liu W-M, Fukamizu K, Chiba S, Ando K, Narasaka K. 2009. Nucleophilic substitution reaction at an sp2 carbon of vinyl halides with an intramolecular thiol moiety: Synthesis of thio-heterocycles. Tetrahedron 65:6888–6902.
  • Marqui C. 2001. Chemical reactions in cottonseed protein cross-linking by formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, and glyoxal for the formation of protein films with enhanced mechanical properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49:4676–4681.
  • Mekenyan O, Todorov M, Serafimova R, Stoeva S, Aptula A, Finking R, Jacob E. (2007). Identifying the structural requirements for chromosomal aberration by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals. Chem Res Toxicol 20:1927–1941.
  • Natsch A, Gfeller H. (2008). LC-MS-based characterization of the peptide reactivity of chemicals to improve the in vitro prediction of the skin sensitization potential. Toxicol Sci 106:464–478.
  • Nendza M, Muller M. 2001. Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action: 2. Physico-chemical descriptors. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships 19:581–598.
  • Nendza M, Müller M. (2007). Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action: 3. Substructure indicators. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18:155–168.
  • Nendza M, Wenzel A. (2006). Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action. 1. (Eco)toxicity profiles. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 13:192–203.
  • Noll DM, Mason TM, Miller PS. (2006). Formation and repair of interstrand cross-links in DNA. Chem Rev 106:277–301.
  • Magnusson B, Kligman AM. (1969). The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J Invest Dermatol 52:268–276.
  • Obach RS, Kalgutkar AS, Soglia JR, Zhao SX. (2008). Can in vitro metabolism-dependent covalent binding data in liver microsomes distinguish hepatotoxic from nonhepatotoxic drugs? An analysis of 18 drugs with consideration of intrinsic clearance and daily dose. Chem Res Toxicol 21:1814–1822.
  • OECD. 2007. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals. (available from: http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,3425,en_2649_34379_39404999_119829_1_1_37407,00.html).
  • OECD. 2009. The OECD QSAR Application Toolbox. (available from: http://www.qsartoolbox.org/)
  • Patlewicz G, Jeliazkova N, Gallegos Saliner A, Worth AP. (2008). Toxmatch-a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:397–412.
  • Patlewicz G, Dimitrov SD, Low LK, Kern PS, Dimitrova GD, Comber MI, Aptula AO, Phillips RD, Niemelä J, Madsen C, Wedebye EB, Roberts DW, Bailey PT, Mekenyan OG. (2007). TIMES-SS–a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 48:225–239.
  • Patlewicz GY, Wright ZM, Basketter DA, Pease CK, Lepoittevin JP, Arnau EG. (2002). Structure-activity relationships for selected fragrance allergens. Contact Derm 47:219–226.
  • Payne MP, Walsh PT. (1994). Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitization potential: Development of structural alerts for use in knowledge-based toxicity prediction systems. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 34:154–161.
  • Peskin AV, Winterbourn CC. (2001). Kinetics of the reactions of hypochlorous acid and amino acid chloramines with thiols, methionine, and ascorbate. Free Radic Biol Med 30:572–579.
  • Piga R, Saito Y, Chen Z, Yoshida Y, Niki E. (2005). Characterization of monochloramine toxicity on PC12 cells and protective effect of tocopherol via antioxidative function. Arch Biochem Biophys 436:101–109.
  • Roberts DW, Basketter DA. (2010). Reactivity assays: Dealing with substances and samples in an in vitro world - the solution and the real problem. Contact Derm 63:55–56.
  • Roberts DW, Aptula AO, Patlewicz G. (2006). Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization. Chem Res Toxicol 19:1228–1233.
  • Roberts DW, Aptula AO, Patlewicz G. (2007a). Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay. Chem Res Toxicol 20:44–60.
  • Roberts DW, Patlewicz G, Kern PS, Gerberick F, Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Ryan CA, Basketter DA, Aptula AO. (2007b). Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization. Chem Res Toxicol 20:1019–1030.
  • Roberts DW, Patlewicz G, Dimitrov SD, Low LK, Aptula AO, Kern PS, Dimitrova GD, Comber MI, Phillips RD, Niemelä J, Madsen C, Wedebye EB, Bailey PT, Mekenyan OG. (2007c). TIMES-SS–a mechanistic evaluation of an external validation study using reaction chemistry principles. Chem Res Toxicol 20:1321–1330.
  • Russom CL, Bradbury SP, Broderius SJ. 1997. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales Promelas). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16:948–967.
  • Sakuratani Y, Sato S, Nishikawa S, Yamada J, Maekawa A, Hayashi M. (2008). Category analysis of the substituted anilines studied in a 28-day repeat-dose toxicity test conducted on rats: Correlation between toxicity and chemical structure. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:681–696.
  • Schaafsma G, Kroese ED, Tielemans EL, Van de Sandt JJ, Van Leeuwen CJ. (2009). REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 53:70–80.
  • Schultz TW, Dumont JN, Sankey FD, Schmoyer RL Jr. (1983a). Structure activity relationships of selected naphthalene derivatives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 7:191–203.
  • Schultz TW, Sparfkin CL, Aptula AO. (2010). Reactivity-based toxicity modelling of five-membered heterocyclic compounds: Application to Tetrahymena pyriformis. SAR QSAR Environ Res 21:681–691.
  • Schultz TW, Carlson RE, Cronin MT, Hermens JL, Johnson R, O’Brien PJ, Roberts DW, Siraki A, Wallace KB, Veith GD. (2006). A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: Modeling soft electrophilicity. SAR QSAR Environ Res 17:413–428.
  • Schultz TW, Netzeva TI, Roberts DW, Cronin MT. (2005a). Structure-toxicity relationships for the effects to Tetrahymena pyriformis of aliphatic, carbonyl-containing, alpha,beta-unsaturated chemicals. Chem Res Toxicol 18:330–341.
  • Schultz TW, Ralston KE, Roberts DW, Veith GD, Aptula AO. (2007a). Structure-activity relationships for abiotic thiol reactivity and aquatic toxicity of halo-substituted carbonyl compounds. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18:21–29.
  • Schultz TW, Rogers K, Aptula AO. (2009). Read-across to rank skin sensitization potential: Subcategories for the Michael acceptor domain. Contact Derm 60:21–31.
  • Schultz TW, Sinks GD, Cronin MTD. 1997b. Identification of mechanisms of toxic action of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis from molecular descriptors. In Chen F, Schuurmann G. (Ed.) Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in Environmental Sciences VII. Florida SETAC.
  • Schultz TW, Yarbrough JW. (2004). Trends in structure-toxicity relationships for carbonyl-containing alpha,beta-unsaturated compounds. SAR QSAR Environ Res 15:139–146.
  • Schultz TW, Yarbrough JW, Hunter RS, Aptula AO. (2007b). Verification of the structural alerts for Michael acceptors. Chem Res Toxicol 20:1359–1363.
  • Schultz TW, Yarbrough JW, Johnson EL. (2005b). Structure-activity relationships for reactivity of carbonyl-containing compounds with glutathione. SAR QSAR Environ Res 16:313–322.
  • Schwöbel JA, Koleva YK, Enoch SJ, Bajot F, Hewitt M, Madden JC, Roberts DW, Schultz TW, Cronin MT. (2011). Measurement and estimation of electrophilic reactivity for predictive toxicology. Chem Rev 111:2562–2596.
  • Smith KJ, Hurst CG, Moeller RB, Skelton HG, Sidell FR. (1995). Sulfur mustard: Its continuing threat as a chemical warfare agent, the cutaneous lesions induced, progress in understanding its mechanism of action, its long-term health effects, and new developments for protection and therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 32:765–776.
  • Tsen CC. 1963. The reaction mechanism of azodicarbonamide in dough. Cereal Chemistry 40:638–647.
  • Turro NJ, Hammond WB. 1966. Cyclopropanone. Journal of the American Chemical Society 88:3672–3673.
  • US EPA. 2009. Chemical categories report (http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems/pubs/chemcat.htm).
  • Van Der Jagt K, Munn S, Torslov J, De Bruijn J. 2004. Alternatives approaches can reduce the use of test animals under REACH (available from: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/REACH/PUBLICATIONS).
  • van Leeuwen K, Schultz TW, Henry T, Diderich B, Veith GD. (2009). Using chemical categories to fill data gaps in hazard assessment. SAR QSAR Environ Res 20:207–220.
  • Verhaar HJM, Van Leeuwen CJ, Hermens JLM. 1992.) Classifying environmental pollutants. 1: Structure-activity relationships for prediction of aquatic toxicity. Chemosphere 25:471–491.
  • von der Ohe PC, Kühne R, Ebert RU, Altenburger R, Liess M, Schüürmann G. (2005). Structural alerts–a new classification model to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels of organic compounds in the acute daphnid assay. Chem Res Toxicol 18:536–555.
  • Walker JD, Printup H. 2008. Structure-activity relationships for aldehyde categories. QSAR and Combinatorial Science 27:475–482.
  • Wu S, Blackburn K, Amburgey J, Jaworska J, Federle T. (2010). A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 56:67–81.
  • Xue W, Warshawsky D. (2005). Metabolic activation of polycyclic and heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and DNA damage: A review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 206:73–93.
  • Zinke S, Gerner I, Schlede E. (2002). Evaluation of a rule base for identifying contact allergens by using a regulatory database: Comparison of data on chemicals notified in the European Union with “structural alerts” used in the DEREK expert system. Altern Lab Anim 30:285–298.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.