5,542
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 43-53 | Received 10 Apr 2015, Accepted 11 Aug 2015, Published online: 09 Oct 2015

References

  • Barlow S. Threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) – a tool for assessing substances of unknown toxicity present at low levels in the diet. ILSI Europe Concise Monograph Series. Brussels, Belgium; 2005. Available at: http://www.ilsi.org/Europe/Pages/ViewItemDetails.aspx?WebId=84D7FA4A-0FD5-40CD-A49A-2DA6FCDFD654&ListId=0348EB34-DF85-49DD-9ADE-77ED136643F1&ItemID=119 [accessed 20 June 2015].
  • Council of Canadian Academies. Integrating emerging technologies into chemical safety assessment. Ottawa, Canada: Council of Canadian Academies; 2012.
  • Cramer GM, Ford RA, Hall RL. Estimation of toxic hazard – a decision tree approach. Food Cosmetic Toxicol 1978;16:255–276.
  • Doe JE, Lander D, Doerrer NG, Heard N, Hines RN, Lowit AB, Pastoor TP, et al. Use of the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: human health risk assessment of the use of a pyrethroid in bed netting. In preparation, 2015.
  • EFSA. Draft scientific opinion on exploring options for providing preliminary advice about possible human health risks based on the concept of threshold of toxicological concern (TTC). EFSA J 2012a;10:2750.
  • EFSA. EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR); Scientific opinion on evaluation of the toxicological relevance of pesticide metabolites for dietary risk assessment. EFSA J 2012b;10:2799.
  • Embry M, Bachman A, Bell D, Boobis A, Cohen, S, Dellarco M, Dewhurst I et al. The Risk Assessment in the 21st Century (RISK21): roadmap and matrix. Crit Rev Toxicol 2014;44 (Suppl 3):6–16.
  • European Commission. SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), SCHER(Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks), SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Preliminary report on Addressing the New Challenges for Risk Assessment, 8 October 2012. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_037.pdf [accessed 20 June 2015].
  • Hennes EC. An overview of values for the threshold of toxicological concern. Toxicol Lett 2012;211:296–303.
  • Kroes R, Kleiner J, Renwick AG. The threshold of toxicological concern in risk assessment. Toxicol Sci 2005;86:226–230.
  • Meek ME, Boobis AR, Crofton KM, Heinemeyer G, Raaij MV, Vickers C. Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: a WHO/IPCS framework. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2011;60: S1–S14.
  • Munro I, Ford RA, Kennepohl E, Sprenger JG. Correlation of a structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. Food Chem Toxicol 1996;34:829–867.
  • National Research Council. Exposure science in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
  • National Research Council. Phthalates and cumulative risk assessment the task ahead. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.
  • National Research Council. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
  • National Research Council. Toxicity testing in the twenty-first century: a vision and a strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
  • Pastoor TP, Bachman A, Bell D, Cohen S, Dellarco M, Dewhurst I, Doe J, et al. A 21st century roadmap for human health risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 2014;44 (Suppl 3):1–5.
  • Patlewicz G, Jeliazkova N, Safford RJ, Worth AP, Aleksiev B. An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2008;19:495–524.
  • SCCS, SCHER, SCENIHR. Joint opinion on the use of the threshold of toxicological Concern (TTC) approach for human safety assessment of chemical substances with focus on cosmetics and consumer products, 8 June 2012. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_092.pdf [accessed 20 June 2015].
  • Toccalino PL, Norman JE. Health-based screening levels to evaluate U.S. Geological Survey ground-water quality data. Risk Anal 2006;26:1339–1348.
  • USEPA. A Framework for a Computational Toxicology Research Program in ORD. U. S Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-03/065; 2003.
  • USEPA. Framework for Human Health Risk Assessment to Inform Decision Making. EPA/100/R-14/001. Washington, D.C.: Risk Assessment Forum, Office of the Science Advisor, USEPA; 2014. http://www.epa.gov/raf/files/hhra-framework-final-2014.pdf [accessed 20 June 2015].
  • World Health Organisation (WHO). Guidelines for drinking-water quality – third edition incorporating the first and second addenda; 2008. Available at: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/gdwq3rev/en/. [accessed 20 June 2015]