Insights into the MCM functional mechanism: lessons learned from the archaeal MCM complex

References

• Alexandrov AI, Botchan MR and Cozzarelli NR. 2002. Characterization of simian virus 40 T-antigen double hexamers bound to a replication fork. The active form of the helicase. J Biol Chem 277:44886–44897.
   Google Scholar
• Anachkova B, Djeliova V and Russev G. 2005. Nuclear matrix support of DNA replication. J Cell Biochem 96:951–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae B, Chen YH, Costa A, Onesti S, Brunzelle JS, Lin Y, Cann IK and Nair SK. 2009. Insights into the architecture of the replicative helicase from the structure of an archaeal MCM homolog. Structure 17:211–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry ER, Mcgeoch AT, Kelman Z and Bell SD. 2007. Archaeal MCM has separable processivity, substrate choice and helicase domains. Nucleic Acids Res 35:988–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry ER, Lovett JE, Costa A, Lea SM and Bell SD. 2009. Intersubunit allosteric communication mediated by a conserved loop in the MCM helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1051–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell SP and Dutta A. 2002. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 71:333–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochman ML and Schwacha A. 2007. Differences in the single-stranded DNA binding activities of MCM2-7 and MCM467: MCM2 and MCM5 define a slow ATP-dependent step. J Biol Chem 282:33795–33804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochman ML and Schwacha A. 2008. The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. Mol Cell 31:287–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochman ML and Schwacha A. 2009. The mcm complex: unwinding the mechanism of a replicative helicase. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73:652–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochman ML, Bell SP and Schwacha A. 2008. Subunit organization of Mcm2-7 and the unequal role of active sites in ATP hydrolysis and viability. Mol Cell Biol 28:5865–5873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster AS, Wang G, Yu X, Greenleaf WB, Carazo JM, Tjajadia M, Klein MG and Chen XS. 2008. Crystal structure of a near-full-length archaeal MCM: functional insights for an AAA+ hexameric helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:20191–20196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster AS, Slaymaker IM, Afif SA, and Chen XS. 2010. Mutational analysis of an archaeal MCM exterior hairpin reveals critical residues for helicase activity and DNA binding. Submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock PA. 1997. The initiation of simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 32:503–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentieri F, De Felice M, De Falco M, Rossi M and Pisani FM. 2002. Physical and functional interaction between the mini-chromosome maintenance-like DNA helicase and the single-stranded DNA binding protein from the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. J Biol Chem 277:12118–12127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong JP, Hayashi MK, Simon MN, Xu RM and Stillman B. 2000. A double-hexamer archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein is an ATP-dependent DNA helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1530–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook PR. 1999. The organization of replication and transcription. Science 284:1790–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Pape T, Van Heel M, Brick P, Patwardhan A and Onesti S. 2006a. Structural basis of the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus MCM helicase activity. Nucleic Acids Res 34:5829–5838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Pape T, Van Heel M, Brick P, Patwardhan A and Onesti S. 2006b. Structural studies of the archaeal MCM complex in different functional states. J Struct Biol 156:210–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey MJ, Indiani C and O’Donnell M. 2003. Reconstitution of the Mcm2-7p heterohexamer, subunit arrangement, and ATP site architecture. J Biol Chem 278:4491–4499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmez I and Patel SS. 2006. Mechanisms of a ring shaped helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 34:4216–4224.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark EJ and Joshua-Tor L. 2006. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 442:270–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark EJ and Joshua-Tor L. 2008. On helicases and other motor proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18:243–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning E and Zhao K. 2009. SV40 DNA replication: from the A gene to a nanomachine. Virology 384:352–359.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher RJ, Bishop BE, Leon RP, Sclafani RA, Ogata CM and Chen XS. 2003. The structure and function of MCM from archaeal M. Thermoautotrophicum. Nat Struct Biol 10:160–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher RJ, Shen J, Gãmez-Llorente Y, Martã-N CS, Carazo JM and Chen XS. 2005. Double hexamer disruption and biochemical activities of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum MCM. J Biol Chem 280:42405–42410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsburg SL. 2004. Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:109–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsburg SL. 2008. The MCM helicase: linking checkpoints to the replication fork. Biochem Soc Trans 36:114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Gai D, Li D, Finkielstein CV, Ott RD, Taneja P, Fanning E and Chen XS. 2004a. Insights into the oligomeric states, conformational changes, and helicase activities of SV40 large tumor antigen. J Biol Chem 279:38952–38959.
   Google Scholar
• Gai D, Zhao R, Li D, Finkielstein CV and Chen XS. 2004b. Mechanisms of conformational change for a replicative hexameric helicase of SV40 large tumor antigen. Cell 119:47–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Llorente Y, Fletcher RJ, Chen XS, Carazo JM and Martin CS. 2005. Polymorphism and double hexamer structure in the archaeal minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. J Biol Chem 280:40909–40915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenleaf WB, Shen J, Gai D and Chen XS. 2008. Systematic study of the functions for the residues around the nucleotide pocket in simian virus 40 AAA+ hexameric helicase. J Virol 82:6017–6023.
   Google Scholar
• Ishimi Y. 1997. A DNA helicase activity is associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 protein complex. J Biol Chem 272:24508–24513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer LM, Leipe DD, Koonin EV and Aravind L. 2004. Evolutionary history and higher order classification of AAA+ ATPases. J Struct Biol 146:11–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson ER and Chong JPJ. 2006. Minichromosome maintenance helicase activity is controlled by N- and C-terminal motifs and requires the ATPase domain helix-2 insert. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7613–7618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan DL, Davey MJ and O’Donnell M. 2003. Mcm4,6,7 uses a “pump in ring” mechanism to unwind DNA by steric exclusion and actively translocate along a duplex. J Biol Chem 278:49171–49182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman Z and White MF. 2005. Archaeal DNA replication and repair. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:669–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman Z, Lee JK and Hurwitz J. 1999. The single minichromosome maintenance protein of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum DeltaH contains DNA helicase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14783–14788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskey RA and Madine MA. 2003. A rotary pumping model for helicase function of MCM proteins at a distance from replication forks. EMBO Rep 4:26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau E, Tsuji T, Guo L, Lu SH and Jiang W. 2007. The role of pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) components in oncogenesis. FASEB J 21:3786–3794.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JK and Hurwitz J. 2001. Processive DNA helicase activity of the minichromosome maintenance proteins 4, 6, and 7 complex requires forked DNA structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon RP, Tecklenburg M and Sclafani RA. 2008. Functional conservation of beta-hairpin DNA binding domains in the Mcm protein of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum and the Mcm5 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179:1757–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Zhao R, Lilyestrom W, Gai D, Zhang R, Decaprio JA, Fanning E, Jochimiak A, Szakonyi G and Chen XS. 2003. Structure of the replicative helicase of the oncoprotein SV40 large tumour antigen. Nature 423:512–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Pucci B, Rossi M, Pisani FM and Ladenstein R. 2008. Structural analysis of the Sulfolobus solfataricus MCM protein N-terminal domain. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3235–3243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo IA, Hough PV, Wall JS, Dodson M, Dean FB and Hurwitz J. 1989. ATP-dependent assembly of double hexamers of SV40 T antigen at the viral origin of DNA replication. Nature 338:658–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeoch AT, Trakselis MA, Laskey RA and Bell SD. 2005. Organization of the archaeal MCM complex on DNA and implications for the helicase mechanism. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:756–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau MJ, Mcgeoch AT, Lowe AR, Itzhaki LS and Bell SD. 2007. ATPase site architecture and helicase mechanism of an archaeal MCM. Mol Cell 28:304–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris PD, Byrd AK, Tackett AJ, Cameron CE, Tanega P, Ott R, Fanning E and Raney KD. 2002. Hepatitis C virus NS3 and simian virus 40 T antigen helicases displace streptavidin from 5′-biotinylated oligonucleotides but not from 3′-biotinylated oligonucleotides: evidence for directional bias in translocation on single-stranded DNA. Biochemistry 41:2372–2378.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer SE, Lewis PW and Botchan MR. 2006. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10236–10241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape T, Meka H, Chen S, Vicentini G, Van Heel M and Onesti S. 2003. Hexameric ring structure of the full-length archaeal MCM protein complex. EMBO Rep 4:1079–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SS and Picha KM. 2000. Structure and function of hexameric helicases. Annu Rev Biochem 69:651–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucci B, De Felice M, Rossi M, Onesti S and Pisani FM. 2004. Amino acids of the Sulfolobus solfataricus mini-chromosome maintenance-like DNA helicase involved in DNA binding/remodeling. J Biol Chem 279:49222–49228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucci B, De Felice M, Rocco M, Esposito F, De Falco M, Esposito L, Rossi M and Pisani FM. 2007. Modular organization of the Sulfolobus solfataricus mini-chromosome maintenance protein. J Biol Chem 282:12574–12582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remus D, Beuron F, Tolun G, Griffith JD, Morris EP and Diffley JF. 2009. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 139:719–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg E, Trakselis MA, Bell SD and Ha T. 2007. MCM forked substrate specificity involves dynamic interaction with the 5′-tail. J Biol Chem 282:34229–34234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakakibara N, Kasiviswanathan R, Melamud E, Han M, Schwarz FP and Kelman Z. 2008. Coupling of DNA binding and helicase activity is mediated by a conserved loop in the MCM protein. Nucleic Acids Res 36:1309–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakakibara N, Kelman LM and Kelman Z. 2009. Unwinding the structure and function of the archaeal MCM helicase. Mol Microbiol 72:286–296.
   Google Scholar
• Sclafani RA, Fletcher RJ and Chen XS. 2004. Two heads are better than one: regulation of DNA replication by hexameric helicases. Genes Dev 18:2039–2045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JH, Heo GY and Kelman Z. 2009. The Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus MCM helicase is active as a hexameric ring. J Biol Chem 284:540–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons DT. 2000. SV40 large T antigen functions in DNA replication and transformation. Adv Virus Res 55:75–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singleton MR, Dillingham MS, Gaudier M, Kowalczykowski SC and Wigley DB. 2004. Crystal structure of RecBCD enzyme reveals a machine for processing DNA breaks. Nature 432:187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smelkova NV and Borowiec JA. 1997. Dimerization of simian virus 40 T-antigen hexamers activates T-antigen DNA helicase activity. J Virol 71:8766–8773.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smelkova NV and Borowiec JA. 1998. Synthetic DNA replication bubbles bound and unwound with twofold symmetry by a simian virus 40 T-antigen double hexamer. J Virol 72:8676–8681.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi TS, Wigley DB and Walter JC. 2005. Pumps, paradoxes and ploughshares: mechanism of the MCM2-7 DNA helicase. Trends Biochem Sci 30:437–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye BK and Sawyer S. 2000. The hexameric eukaryotic MCM helicase: building symmetry from nonidentical parts. J Biol Chem 275:34833–34836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle M, Chen XS, Donate LE, Fanning E and Carazo JM. 2006. Structural basis for the cooperative assembly of large T antigen on the origin of replication. J Mol Biol 357:1295–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Manna D and Simmons DT. 2007. Role of the hydrophilic channels of simian virus 40 T-antigen helicase in DNA replication. J Virol 81:4510–4519.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel R, Schweizer J and Stahl H. 1992. Simian virus 40 T-antigen DNA helicase is a hexamer which forms a binary complex during bidirectional unwinding from the viral origin of DNA replication. J Virol 66:804–815.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• You Z, Komamura Y and Ishimi Y. 1999. Biochemical analysis of the intrinsic Mcm4-Mcm6-mcm7 DNA helicase activity. Mol Cell Biol 19:8003–8015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Feng D and Liang C. 2004. Pairwise interactions of the six human MCM protein subunits. J Mol Biol 340:1197–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar