Mechanism and regulation of DNA end resection in eukaryotes

References

• Adkins NL, Niu H, Sung P, Peterson CL. (2013). Nucleosome dynamics regulates DNA processing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:836–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akamatsu Y, Murayama Y, Yamada T, et al. (2008). Molecular characterization of the role of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nip1+/ctp1+ gene in DNA double-strand break repair in association with the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 complex. Mol Cell Biol 28:3639–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alani E, Padmore R, Kleckner N. (1990). Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 61:419–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres SN, Appel CD, Westmoreland JW, et al. (2015). Tetrameric Ctp1 coordinates DNA binding and DNA bridging in DNA double-strand-break repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22:158–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M. (2004). The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 23:4868–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae SH, Bae KH, Kim JA, Seo YS. (2001). RPA governs endonuclease switching during processing of Okazaki fragments in eukaryotes. Nature 412:456–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan L, Polaczek P, Pokharel S, et al. (2010). Dna2 exhibits a unique strand end-dependent helicase function. J Biol Chem 285:38861–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow JH, Lisby M, Rothstein R. (2008). Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1. Mol Cell 30:73–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni E, Viscardi V, Cartagena-Lirola H, et al. (2004). The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 24:4151–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennardo N, Cheng A, Huang N, Stark JM. (2008). Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet 4:e1000110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergerat A, de Massy B, Gadelle D, et al. (1997). An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386:414–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein KA, Mimitou EP, Mihalevic MJ, et al. (2013). Resection activity of the Sgs1 helicase alters the affinity of DNA ends for homologous recombination proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195:1241–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizard AH, Hickson ID. (2014). The dissolution of double Holliday junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6:a016477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma V, Moatti N, Segura-Bayona S, et al. (2015). MAD2L2 controls DNA repair at telomeres and DNA breaks by inhibiting 5′ end resection. Nature 521:537–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonetti D, Villa M, Gobbini E, et al. (2015). Escape of Sgs1 from Rad9 inhibition reduces the requirement for Sae2 and functional MRX in DNA end resection. EMBO Rep 16:351–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. (1998). Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J 17:1819–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman P, Aly A, Escandell JM, et al. (2010). 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:688–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressan DA, Olivares HA, Nelms BE, Petrini JH. (1998). Alteration of N-terminal phosphoesterase signature motifs inactivates Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11. Genetics 150:591–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush GS, Morrow DM, Hieter P, Kelly TJ. (1996). The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:15075–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd ME, Campbell JL. (2009). Interplay of Mre11 nuclease with Dna2 plus Sgs1 in Rad51-dependent recombinational repair. PLoS One 4:e4267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buis J, Wu Y, Deng Y, et al. (2008). Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 135:85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting SF, Callen E, Kozak ML, et al. (2012). BRCA1 functions independently of homologous recombination in DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Mol Cell 46:125–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting SF, Callen E, Wong N, et al. (2010). 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 141:243–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callen E, Di Virgilio M, Kruhlak MJ, et al. (2013). 53BP1 mediates productive and mutagenic DNA repair through distinct phosphoprotein interactions. Cell 153:1266–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannavo E, Cejka P, Kowalczykowski SC. (2013). Relationship of DNA degradation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae exonuclease 1 and its stimulation by RPA and Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 to DNA end resection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E1661–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannavo E, Cejka P. (2014). Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks. Nature 514:122–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon B, Kuhnlein J, Yang SH, et al. (2013). Visualization of local DNA unwinding by Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 using single-molecule FRET. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:18868–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney JP, Maser RS, Olivares H, et al. (1998). The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 93:477–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejka P, Cannavo E, Polaczek P, et al. (2010). DNA end resection by Dna2–Sgs1–RPA and its stimulation by Top3–Rmi1 and Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2. Nature 467:112–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman JR, Barral P, Vannier JB, et al. (2013). RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Mol Cell 49:858–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman JR, Jackson SP. (2008). Phospho-dependent interactions between NBS1 and MDC1 mediate chromatin retention of the MRN complex at sites of DNA damage. EMBO Rep 9:795–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman JR, Sossick AJ, Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. (2012). BRCA1-associated exclusion of 53BP1 from DNA damage sites underlies temporal control of DNA repair. J Cell Sci 125:3529–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Donnianni RA, Handa N, et al. (2015). Sae2 promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E1880–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lisby M, Symington LS. (2013). RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins. Mol Cell 50:589–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Nievera CJ, Lee AY, Wu X. (2008). Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J Biol Chem 283:7713–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PL, Liu F, Cai S, et al. (2005). Inactivation of CtIP leads to early embryonic lethality mediated by G1 restraint and to tumorigenesis by haploid insufficiency. Mol Cell Biol 25:3535–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Cui D, Papusha A, et al. (2012). The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489:576–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Niu H, Chung WH, et al. (2011). Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:1015–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Paudyal SC, Chin RI, You Z. (2013). PCNA promotes processive DNA end resection by Exo1. Nucleic Acids Res 41:9325–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiruvella KK, Liang Z, Wilson TE. (2013). Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 5:a012757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. (2010). The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 40:179–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici M, Mantiero D, Guerini I, et al. (2008). The Yku70–Yku80 complex contributes to regulate double-strand break processing and checkpoint activation during the cell cycle. EMBO Rep 9:810–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. (2005). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J Biol Chem 280:38631–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. (2006). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO Rep 7:212–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici M, Trovesi C, Galbiati A, et al. (2014). Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single-stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends. EMBO J 33:198–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly JC, Kirkham LA, Leach DR. (1998). The SbcCD nuclease of Escherichia coli is a structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family protein that cleaves hairpin DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:7969–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneo B, Wendland RL, Deriano L, et al. (2007). Rag mutations reveal robust alternative end joining. Nature 449:483–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costelloe T, Louge R, Tomimatsu N, et al. (2012). The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 489:581–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies OR, Forment JV, Sun M, et al. (2015). CtIP tetramer assembly is required for DNA-end resection and repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22:150–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng SK, Gibb B, de Almeida MJ, et al. (2014). RPA antagonizes microhomology-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:405–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng SK, Yin Y, Petes TD, Symington LS. (2015). Mre11–Sae2 and RPA collaborate to prevent palindromic gene amplification. Mol Cell 60:500–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Virgilio M, Callen E, Yamane A, et al. (2013). Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 339:711–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digilio FA, Pannuti A, Lucchesi JC, et al. (1996). Tosca: a Drosophila gene encoding a nuclease specifically expressed in the female germline. Dev Biol 178:90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinkelmann M, Spehalski E, Stoneham T, et al. (2009). Multiple functions of MRN in end-joining pathways during isotype class switching. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:808–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupre A, Boyer-Chatenet L, Sattler RM, et al. (2008). A forward chemical genetic screen reveals an inhibitor of the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 complex. Nat Chem Biol 4:119–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eapen VV, Sugawara N, Tsabar M, et al. (2012). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol Cell Biol 32:4727–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid W, Steger M, El-Shemerly M, et al. (2010). DNA end resection by CtIP and exonuclease 1 prevents genomic instability. EMBO Rep 11:962–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shemerly M, Janscak P, Hess D, et al. (2005). Degradation of human exonuclease 1b upon DNA synthesis inhibition. Cancer Res 65:3604–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano-Diaz C, Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, et al. (2013). A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol Cell 49:872–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck J, Coates J, Jackson SP. (2005). Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 434:605–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Fong KW, Wang J, et al. (2013). RIF1 counteracts BRCA1-mediated end resection during DNA repair. J Biol Chem 288:11135–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Dibitetto D, De Gregorio G, et al. (2015). Functional interplay between the 53BP1-ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 complex regulates resection, end-tethering and repair of a double-strand break. PLoS Genet 11:e1004928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster SS, Balestrini A, Petrini JH. (2011). Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-associated DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 31:4379–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q, Chow J, Bernstein KA, et al. (2014). Phosphorylation-regulated transitions in an oligomeric state control the activity of the Sae2 DNA repair enzyme. Mol Cell Biol 34:778–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuse M, Nagase Y, Tsubouchi H, et al. (1998). Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J 17:6412–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia V, Phelps SE, Gray S, Neale MJ. (2011). Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479:241–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel J, Modrich P. (2003). Mechanism of 5′-directed excision in human mismatch repair. Mol Cell 12:1077–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobbini E, Cesena D, Galbiati A, et al. (2013). Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 12:791–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobbini E, Villa M, Gnugnoli M, et al. (2015). Sae2 function at DNA double-strand breaks is bypassed by dampening Tel1 or Rad53 activity. PLoS Genet 11:e1005685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP. (2008). DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22:2767–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy J, Churikov D, Geli V, Simon MN. (2014). Sgs1 and Sae2 promote telomere replication by limiting accumulation of ssDNA. Nat Commun 5:5004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JC, Haber JE. (2006). Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 40:209–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoa NN, Kobayashi J, Omura M, et al. (2015). BRCA1 and CtIP are both required to recruit Dna2 at double-strand breaks in homologous recombination. PLoS One 10:e0124495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfner KP, Craig L, Moncalian G, et al. (2002). The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature 418:562–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfner KP. (2014). ATP puts the brake on DNA double-strand break repair: a new study shows that ATP switches the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 repair factor between signaling and processing of DNA ends. Bioessays 36:1170–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins BB, Paull TT. (2008). The P. furiosus mre11/rad50 complex promotes 5′ strand resection at a DNA double-strand break. Cell 135:250–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huertas P, Cortes-Ledesma F, Sartori AA, et al. (2008). CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455:689–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huertas P, Jackson SP. (2009). Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J Biol Chem 284:9558–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, et al. (2004). DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail IH, Gagne JP, Genois MM, et al. (2015). The RNF138 E3 ligase displaces Ku to promote DNA end resection and regulate DNA repair pathway choice. Nat Cell Biol 17:1446–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadyk LC, Hartwell LH. (1992). Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:387–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanja KK, Cox SW, Duxin JP, et al. (2012). DNA2 and EXO1 in replication-coupled, homology-directed repair and in the interplay between HDR and the FA/BRCA network. Cell Cycle 11:3983–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. (1997). Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr GW, Sarkar S, Arumugam P. (2012). How to halve ploidy: lessons from budding yeast meiosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 69:3037–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Vijayakumar S, Reger M, et al. (2008). Functional interactions between Sae2 and the Mre11 complex. Genetics 178:711–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner DS, Daley JM, Sung P, Niu H. (2015). Interplay between Ku and replication protein A in the restriction of Exo1-mediated DNA break end resection. J Biol Chem 290:18806–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogh BO, Llorente B, Lam A, Symington LS. (2005). Mutations in Mre11 phosphoesterase motif I that impair Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 complex stability in addition to nuclease activity. Genetics 171:1561–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammens K, Bemeleit DJ, Mockel C, et al. (2011). The Mre11:Rad50 structure shows an ATP-dependent molecular clamp in DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 145:54–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langerak P, Mejia-Ramirez E, Limbo O, Russell P. (2011). Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet 7:e1002271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzaro F, Sapountzi V, Granata M, et al. (2008). Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J 27:1502–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Lee SE. (2007). Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining. Genetics 176:2003–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SE, Bressan DA, Petrini JH, Haber JE. (2002). Complementation between N-terminal Saccharomyces cerevisiae mre11 alleles in DNA repair and telomere length maintenance. DNA Repair (Amst) 1:27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengsfeld BM, Rattray AJ, Bhaskara V, et al. (2007). Sae2 is an endonuclease that processes hairpin DNA cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Mol Cell 28:638–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Suhandynata RT, Zhou H. (2015). Phosphorylation of Sae2 mediates forkhead-associated (FHA) domain-specific interaction and regulates its DNA repair function. J Biol Chem 290:10751–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao S, Toczylowski T, Yan H. (2008). Identification of the Xenopus DNA2 protein as a major nuclease for the 5′->3′ strand-specific processing of DNA ends. Nucleic Acids Res 36:6091–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim HS, Kim JS, Park YB, et al. (2011). Crystal structure of the Mre11–Rad50–ATPγS complex: understanding the interplay between Mre11 and Rad50 . Genes Dev 25:1091–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbo O, Chahwan C, Yamada Y, et al. (2007). Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol Cell 28:134–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R. (2004). Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118:699–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorente B, Symington LS. (2004). The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5′ to 3′ resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 24:9682–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd J, Chapman JR, Clapperton JA, et al. (2009). A supramodular FHA/BRCT-repeat architecture mediates Nbs1 adaptor function in response to DNA damage. Cell 139:100–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobachev KS, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. (2002). The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 108:183–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo G, Yao MS, Bender CF, et al. (1999). Disruption of mRad50 causes embryonic stem cell lethality, abnormal embryonic development, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7376–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Pannicke U, Schwarz K, Lieber MR. (2002). Hairpin opening and overhang processing by an Artemis/DNA-dependent protein kinase complex in nonhomologous end joining and V(D)J recombination. Cell 108:781–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makharashvili N, Tubbs AT, Yang SH, et al. (2014). Catalytic and noncatalytic roles of the CtIP endonuclease in double-strand break end resection. Mol Cell 54:1022–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfrini N, Guerini I, Citterio A, et al. (2010). Processing of meiotic DNA double strand breaks requires cyclin-dependent kinase and multiple nucleases. J Biol Chem 285:11628–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantiero D, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. (2007). Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep 8:380–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee AH, Kleckner N. (1997). A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics 146:797–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon PJ, Caldecott KW. (2007). DNA strand break repair and human genetic disease. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 8:37–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Symington LS. (2008). Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455:770–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Symington LS. (2009). DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst) 8:983–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Symington LS. (2010). Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J 29:3358–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modrich P. (2006). Mechanisms in eukaryotic mismatch repair. J Biol Chem 281:30305–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS. (1999). The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Biol 19:556–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau S, Morgan EA, Symington LS. (2001). Overlapping functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11, Exo1 and Rad27 nucleases in DNA metabolism. Genetics 159:1423–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, et al. (2008). Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J 27:2400–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami H, Keeney S. (2014). Temporospatial coordination of meiotic DNA replication and recombination via DDK recruitment to replisomes. Cell 158:861–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myler LR, Gallardo IF, Zhou Y, et al. (2016). Single-molecule imaging reveals the mechanism of Exo1 regulation by single-stranded DNA binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E1170–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. (2003). ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev 17:1957–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura K, Kogame T, Oshiumi H, et al. (2010). Collaborative action of Brca1 and CtIP in elimination of covalent modifications from double-strand breaks to facilitate subsequent break repair. PLoS Genet 6:e1000828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S. (2005). Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436:1053–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo GH, Balakrishnan L, Dubarry M, et al. (2014). The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp stimulates DNA resection by Dna2–Sgs1 and Exo1. Nucleic Acids Res 42:10516–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo GH, Lydall D. (2015). The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp coordinates resection at DNA double strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 43:5017–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo HP, Lydall D. (2010). Survival and growth of yeast without telomere capping by Cdc13 in the absence of Sgs1, Exo1, and Rad9. PLoS Genet 6:e1001072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolette ML, Lee K, Guo Z, et al. (2010). Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5′ strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:1478–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimonkar AV, Genschel J, Kinoshita E, et al. (2011). BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes Dev 25:350–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimonkar AV, Ozsoy AZ, Genschel J, et al. (2008). Human exonuclease 1 and BLM helicase interact to resect DNA and initiate DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16906–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu H, Chung WH, Zhu Z, et al. (2010). Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467:108–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Driscoll M. (2012). Diseases associated with defective responses to DNA damage. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 4:a012773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orthwein A, Noordermeer SM, Wilson MD, et al. (2015). A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells. Nature 528:422–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmbos PL, Wu D, Daley JM, Wilson TE. (2008). Recruitment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dnl4–Lif1 complex to a double-strand break requires interactions with Yku80 and the Xrs2 FHA domain. Genetics 180:1809–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paques F, Haber JE. (1999). Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:349–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull TT, Gellert M. (1998). The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 1:969–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull TT, Gellert M. (1999). Nbs1 potentiates ATP-driven DNA unwinding and endonuclease cleavage by the Mre11/Rad50 complex. Genes Dev 13:1276–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson SE, Li Y, Wu-Baer F, et al. (2013). Activation of DSB processing requires phosphorylation of CtIP by ATR. Mol Cell 49:657–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce AJ, Hu P, Han M, et al. (2001). Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 15:3237–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polato F, Callen E, Wong N, et al. (2014). CtIP-mediated resection is essential for viability and can operate independently of BRCA1. J Exp Med 211:1027–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz S, Amon A, Klein F. (1997). Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 146:781–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puddu F, Oelschlaegel T, Guerini I, et al. (2015). Synthetic viability genomic screening defines Sae2 function in DNA repair. EMBO J 34:1509–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rass E, Grabarz A, Plo I, et al. (2009). Role of Mre11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:819–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattray AJ, Shafer BK, Neelam B, Strathern JN. (2005). A mechanism of palindromic gene amplification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 19:1390–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reczek CR, Szabolcs M, Stark JM, et al. (2013). The interaction between CtIP and BRCA1 is not essential for resection-mediated DNA repair or tumor suppression. J Cell Biol 201:693–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts SA, Sterling J, Thompson C, et al. (2012). Clustered mutations in yeast and in human cancers can arise from damaged long single-strand DNA regions. Mol Cell 46:424–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. (2008). Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77:229–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, et al. (2007). Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450:509–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz DG, Swanson PC. (2011). V(D)J recombination: mechanisms of initiation. Annu Rev Genet 45:167–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller CB, Lammens K, Guerini I, et al. (2012). Structure of Mre11–Nbs1 complex yields insights into ataxia-telangiectasia-like disease mutations and DNA damage signaling. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:693–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfeir A, de Lange T. (2012). Removal of shelterin reveals the telomere end-protection problem. Science 336:593–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfeir A, Symington LS. (2015). Microhomology-mediated end joining: a back-up survival mechanism or dedicated pathway? Trends Biochem Sci 40:701–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata A, Moiani D, Arvai AS, et al. (2014). DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice is directed by distinct MRE11 nuclease activities. Mol Cell 53:7–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim EY, Chung WH, Nicolette ML, et al. (2010). Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J 29:3370–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim EY, Hong SJ, Oum JH, et al. (2007). RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 27:1602–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiotani B, Zou L. (2009). Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Mol Cell 33:547–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart GS, Maser RS, Stankovic T, et al. (1999). The DNA double-strand break repair gene hMRE11 is mutated in individuals with an ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder. Cell 99:577–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracker TH, Petrini JH. (2011). The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:90–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzenegger A, Burdova K, Kanagaraj R, et al. (2014). DNA2 cooperates with the WRN and BLM RecQ helicases to mediate long-range DNA end resection in human cells. J Biol Chem 289:27314–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Treco D, Szostak JW. (1991). Extensive 3′-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell 64:1155–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symington LS, Gautier J. (2011). Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45:247–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symington LS, Rothstein R, Lisby M. (2014). Mechanisms and regulation of mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 198:795–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szankasi P, Smith GR. (1992). A DNA exonuclease induced during meiosis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem 267:3014–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szankasi P, Smith GR. (1995). A role for exonuclease I from S. pombe in mutation avoidance and mismatch correction. Science 267:1166–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangavel S, Berti M, Levikova M, et al. (2015). DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells. J Cell Biol 208:545–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishkoff DX, Amin NS, Viars CS, et al. (1998). Identification of a human gene encoding a homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, an exonuclease implicated in mismatch repair and recombination. Cancer Res 58:5027–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tkac J, Xu G, Adhikary H, et al. (2016). HELB is a feedback inhibitor of DNA end resection. Mol Cell 61:405–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toczylowski T, Yan H. (2006). Mechanistic analysis of a DNA end processing pathway mediated by the Xenopus Werner syndrome protein. J Biol Chem 281:33198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, Catherine Hardebeck M, et al. (2014). Phosphorylation of EXO1 by CDKs 1 and 2 regulates DNA end resection and repair pathway choice. Nat Commun 5:3561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, Deland K, et al. (2012). Exo1 plays a major role in DNA end resection in humans and influences double-strand break repair and damage signaling decisions. DNA Repair (Amst) 11:441–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trovesi C, Falcettoni M, Lucchini G, et al. (2011). Distinct Cdk1 requirements during single-strand annealing, noncrossover, and crossover recombination. PLoS Genet 7:e1002263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo KM, Sung P. (2001). DNA structure-specific nuclease activities in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50*Mre11 complex. J Biol Chem 276:35458–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong LN, Li Y, Shi LZ, et al. (2013). Microhomology-mediated end joining and homologous recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:7720–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubouchi H, Ogawa H. (2000). Exo1 roles for repair of DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic crossing over in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 11:2221–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto Y, Mitsuoka C, Terasawa M, et al. (2005). Xrs2p regulates Mre11p translocation to the nucleus and plays a role in telomere elongation and meiotic recombination. Mol Biol Cell 16:597–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH. (2001). A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 7:1255–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui T, Ohta T, Oshiumi H, et al. (1998). Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell 95:705–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarreal DD, Lee K, Deem A, et al. (2012). Microhomology directs diverse DNA break repair pathways and chromosomal translocations. PLoS Genet 8:e1003026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltes R, Kalb R, Gatei M, et al. (2009). Human RAD50 deficiency in a Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder. Am J Hum Genet 84:605–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li Y, Truong LN, et al. (2014). CtIP maintains stability at common fragile sites and inverted repeats by end resection-independent endonuclease activity. Mol Cell 54:1012–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Shao Z, Shi LZ, et al. (2012). CtIP protein dimerization is critical for its recruitment to chromosomal DNA double-stranded breaks. J Biol Chem 287:21471–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Shi LZ, Wong CC, et al. (2013). The interaction of CtIP and Nbs1 connects CDK and ATM to regulate HR-mediated double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet 9:e1003277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Aroumougame A, Lobrich M, et al. (2014). PTIP associates with Artemis to dictate DNA repair pathway choice. Genes Dev 28:2693–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Haber JE. (2004). Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biol 2:E21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West SC, Blanco MG, Chan YW, et al. (2015). Resolution of recombination intermediates: mechanisms and regulation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 80:027649.
   Google Scholar
• Westmoreland JW, Resnick MA. (2016). Recombinational repair of radiation-induced double-strand breaks occurs in the absence of extensive resection. Nucleic Acids Res 44:695–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CI, Haber JE. (1990). Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 9:663–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GJ, Williams RS, Williams JS, et al. (2011). ABC ATPase signature helices in Rad50 link nucleotide state to Mre11 interface for DNA repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:423–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RS, Dodson GE, Limbo O, et al. (2009). Nbs1 flexibly tethers Ctp1 and Mre11–Rad50 to coordinate DNA double-strand break processing and repair. Cell 139:87–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RS, Moncalian G, Williams JS, et al. (2008). Mre11 dimers coordinate DNA end bridging and nuclease processing in double-strand-break repair. Cell 135:97–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltshire TD, Lovejoy CA, Wang T, et al. (2010). Sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition identifies ubiquitin-specific peptidase 11 (USP11) as a regulator of DNA double-strand break repair. J Biol Chem 285:14565–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Weaver DT. (1997). Conditional gene targeted deletion by Cre recombinase demonstrates the requirement for the double-strand break repair Mre11 protein in murine embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 25:2985–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie A, Kwok A, Scully R. (2009). Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative nonhomologous end joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:814–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Chapman JR, Brandsma I, et al. (2015). REV7 counteracts DNA double-strand break resection and affects PARP inhibition. Nature 521:541–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan H, Toczylowski T, McCane J, et al. (2011). Replication protein A promotes 5′->3′ end processing during homology-dependent DNA double-strand break repair. J Cell Biol 192:251–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SH, Zhou R, Campbell J, et al. (2013). The SOSS1 single-stranded DNA binding complex promotes DNA end resection in concert with Exo1. EMBO J 32:126–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You Z, Chahwan C, Bailis J, et al. (2005). ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1. Mol Cell Biol 25:5363–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You Z, Shi LZ, Zhu Q, et al. (2009). CtIP links DNA double-strand break sensing to resection. Mol Cell 36:954–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharyevich K, Ma Y, Tang S, et al. (2010). Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand break resection and resolution of double Holliday junctions. Mol Cell 40:1001–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Caron P, Legube G, Paull TT. (2014). Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 42:e19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Petersen S, Tessarollo L, Nussenzweig A. (2001). Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr Biol 11:105–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, et al. (2008). Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134:981–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zierhut C, Diffley JF. (2008). Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J 27:1875–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann M, de Lange T. (2014). 53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair. Trends Cell Biol 24:108–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann M, Lottersberger F, Buonomo SB, et al. (2013). 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5′ end resection. Science 339:700–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Elledge SJ. (2003). Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar