Protein Structure Prediction: Recognition of Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Structural Features from Amino Acid Sequence

References

• Abagyan R., Frishman D. I., Argos P. Recognition of distantly related proteins through energy calculations. Proteins 1994a; 19: 132–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abagyan R., Totrov M., Kuznetsov M. ICM—a new method for protein modeling and design: applications to docking and sttuctun prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Comp. Chem. 1994b; 15: 488–506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abagyan R., Totrov M. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 235: 983–1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abagyan R. A. Towards protein folding by global energy optimization. FEBS Lett. 1993; 325: 17–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abagyan R. A., Argos P. Optimal protocol and trajectory visualization for conformational searches of peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 225: 519–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abagyan R. A., Maiorov V. N. A simple quantitative representation of polypeptide chain folds: comparison of protein tertiary structures. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1988; 5: 1267–1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abagyan R. A., Maiorov V. N. An automatic search for similar spacial arrangements of alfa-helices and beta-strands in globular proteins. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1989; 6: 1045–1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abola E. E., Bemstein F. C., Bryant S. H., Koetzle T. F., Weng J., Allen F. H., Bergerhoff G., Sievers R. Crystallographic databases—information content, software systems, scientific applications. Chester Data Commission of the International Union of Crystallography, Bonn, Cambridge 1987; 107–132, Protein data bank
   Google Scholar
• Adzhubei A. A., Stemberg M. J. E. Left-handed polyproline II helices commonly occur in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 229: 472–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleman C., Oroczo M. On the suitability of semiempirical calculations as sources of force field parameters. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1992; 6: 3311–3348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrov N. N., Takahashi K., Go N. Common spacial arrangements of backbone fargments in homologous and non-homologous proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 225: 5–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrov N. N., Go N. Biological meaning, statistical significance, and classification of local spatial similarities in non-homologous proteins. Prot. Sci. 1994; 3: 866–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anfinsen C. B. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973; 181: 223–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argos P. Analysis of sequence similar pentapep-tides in unrelated protein tertiary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1987; 197: 331–348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argos P. Sensitive methods for determining the relatedness of proteins with limited sequence homology. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 1994; 5: 361–371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold G. E., Dunker K., Johns S. J., Douthart R. J. Use of conditional probabilities for determining relationships between amino acid sequence and protein secondary structure. Proteins 1992; 12: 382–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson H.-E. G., Royer W. E., Jr., Hendrickson W. A. Quantification of tertiary structural conservation despite primary sequence drift in the globin fold. Prot. Sci. 1994; 3: 1706–1711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aszodi A., Taylor W. R. Folding polypep-tide α-carbon backbones by distance geometry methods. Biopolymers 1994; 34: 489–505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood T. K., Beck M. E. PRINTS—a protein motif fingerprint database. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 841–848
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bachar O., Fischer D., Nussinov R., Wolfson H. A computer vision based technique for 3-D sequence-independent structural comparison of proteins. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 279–288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bairoch A. The Prosite dictionary of sites and patterns in proteins, its current status. Nucl. Acid Res. 1993; 21: 3097–3103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairoch A., Boeckmann B. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank, recent developments. Nucl. Acid Res. 1993; 21: 3093–3096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker D., Sohl J. L., Agard D. A. A protein-folding reaction under kinetic control. Nature 1992a; 356: 263–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker D., Sohl J. L., Agard D. A. Protease Pro region required for folding is a potent inhibitor of the mature enzyme. Proteins 1992b; 12: 339–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes E. J., Hut P. Error analysis of a tree code. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 1989; 70: 389–417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barre S., Greenberg A. S., Flajnik M. K., Chothia C. Structural conservation of hypervariable regions in immunoglobins evolution. Nature Struct. Biol. 1994; 1: 915–920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton G. J., Stemberg M. J. E. LOPAL and SCAMP: techniques for the comparison and display of protein structures. J. Mol. Graph. 1988; 6: 190–196
   Google Scholar
• Bascle J., Garel T., Orland H., Velikson B. Biasing a Monte Carlo chain growth method with Ramachandran's plot: application to twenty-L-alanine. Biopolymers 1993; 33: 1843–1849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassolino-Klimas D., Bruccoleri R. E. Application of a directed conformational search for generating 3-D coordinates for protein structures from acarbon coordinates. Proteins 1992; 14: 465–474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer A., Beyer A. An improved pair potential to recognize native protein folds. Proteins 1994; 18: 254–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann G., Frömmel C., Sander C. Polarity as criterion in protein design. Prot. Eng. 1989; 2: 329–324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beglov D. B., Lipanov A. A. Charge grouping approaches to calculation of electrostatic forces in molecular dynamics of proteins. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1991; 9: 205–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell L. H., Coggins J. R., Miher-White E. J. Mix‘n’Match: an improved multiple sequence alignment procedure for distantly related proteins using secondary structure predictions, designed to be independent of the choice of gap penalty and scoring matrix. Prot. Eng. 1993; 7: 683–690
   Google Scholar
• Bemstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J. B., Meyer E. F., Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. Protein data bank. a computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1977; 112: 535–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge D. L., DiCapua F. M. Free energy via molecular simulation. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1989; 18: 431–492
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biou V., Gibrat J. F., Lervin J. M., Robson B., Gamier J. Secondary structure prediction: combination of three different methods. Prot. Eng. 1988; 2: 185–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaber M., Zhang X.-J., Matthews B. W. Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensities. Science 1993; 269: 1637–1640
   Google Scholar
• Blaber M., Zhang X.-J., Lindstrom J. L., Pepiot S. D., Baase W. A., Matthews B. W. Determination of alpha-helix propensities within the context of a folded protein: sites 44 and 131 in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 235: 600–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohr H., Bohr J., Brunak S., Cotterill R. M. J., Fredholm H., Lautrup B., Petersen S. B. A novel approach to the prediction of the 3-dimensional structures of protein backbones by neural networks. FEBS Lett. 1990; 261: 434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohr J., Bohr H., Bmak S., Cotterill R. M. J., Fredholm H., Lautrup B., Petersen S. B. Protein structures from distance inequalities. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 231: 861–869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchert T. V., Abagyan R., Rahda Kishan K. V., Zeelen J. P., Wierenga R. K. The crystal structure of an engineered triose-phosphate isomerase, monoTIM: the correct modeling of an eight-residue loop. Structure 1993; 1: 205–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bork P. Mobile modules and motifs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1992; 2: 413–421
   Google Scholar
• Bork P., Sander C., Valencia A. An AT-Pase domain common to prokaryotic cell cycle proteins, sugar kinases, actin, and hsp70 heat shock proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 7290–7294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bork P., Preissner R. On α-helices terminated by glycine. II. Recognition by sequence pattern. Biophys. Biochem. Res. Comm. 1991; 180: 666–672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzida D., Kumar S., Swendson R. H. Efficient Monte Car 10 methods for computer simulation of biological molecules. Phys. Rev. A 1992; 45: 8894–8901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie J. U., Clarke N. D., Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Identification of protein folds: matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins 1990; 7: 257–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie J. U., Lüthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional stricture. Science 1991; 253: 164–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braakman I., Helenius J., Helenius A. Role of ATP and disulfde bonds during protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nuture 1992; 356: 260–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks B. R., Bruccoleri R. E., Olafson B. D., States D. J., Swaminathan S., Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 1983; 4: 187–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown W. J., North A. C. T., Phillips D. C., Brew K., Vanaman T. C., Hill R. L. A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine α-lactalbumin based on that of hen's egg-white lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 1969; 42: 65–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruccoleri R. E. Application of systematic con-formational search to protein modeling. Mol. Simul. 1993; 10: 151–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brünger A. T., Karplus M. Molecular dynamics simulation with experimental restraints. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991; 24: 54–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant S. H., Lawrence C. E. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 1993; 16: 92–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busetta B. The use of folding patterns in the search of protein structural similarities: a three-dimensional model of phosphoribosyl transferases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1988; 957: 21–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busetta B., Barrans Y. The prediction of protein topologies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1982; 709: 73–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busetta B., Barrans Y. The prediction of protein domains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1984; 790: 117–124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bussian B. M., Sander C. How to determine protein secondary structure in solution by Raman spectroscopy: practical guide and test case DNase I. Biochemistry 1989; 28: 4271–4277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byme D., Li J., Platt E., Robson B., Weiner P. K. Novel algorithms for searching confor-mational space. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1994; 8: 67–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casari G., Beyer A. 1994, personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Casari G., Sippl M. J. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins are able to identify native folds. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 224: 725–732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelvanayagam G., Roy G., Argos P. Easy adaptation of protein structure to sequence. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 173–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chothia C. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 1992; 357: 543–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chothia C., Ltsk A. M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and struchue in proteins. EMBO J. 1986; 5: 823–826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou K.-C., Zhang C.-T. A correlation-coefficient method to predicting protein-structural classes from amino acid composition. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992; 207: 429–433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou K.-C., Zhang C.-T. A new approach to prediction protein folding types. J. Prot. Chem. 1993; 12: 169–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou P. Y. Prediction of protein structural classes from amino acid composition. Prediction of protein structure, G. D. Fasman. Plenum Press, New York 1989; 549–586
   Google Scholar
• Chou P. Y., Fasman G. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry 1974a; 13: 222–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou P. Y., Fasman G. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry 1974b; 13: 211–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou P. Y., Fasman G. Prediction of secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv. Enrymol. 1978; 47: 145–147
   Google Scholar
• Chou P. Y., Zhang C.-T. A joint prediction of the folding types of 1490 human proteins from their genetic codons. J. Theor. Biol. 1993; 161: 251–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens M., Van Cutsem E., Lasters I., Wodak S. J. Modeling the polypeptide backbone with 'spare parts' from known protein structures. Prot. Eng. 1989; 2: 335–345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claverie J.-M. Database of ancient sequences. Nature 1993; 364: 19–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen B. I., Presnell S. R., Cohen F. E. Pattern-based approaches to protein structure prediction. Methods in Enzymology, J. J. Langone. Academic Press, San Diego 1991; Vol. 202: 252–268
   Google Scholar
• Cohen B. I., Presnell S. R., Cohen F. E. Origins of structural diversity within sequentially identical hexapeptides. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 2134–2145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen F. E., Abarbanel I. D., Kuntz I. D., Fletterick R. J. Turn prediction in proteins using a pattern matching approach. Biochemistry 1986; 25: 266–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen F. E., Sternberg M. J. E. On the prediction of protein structure: the significance of the root-mean-square deviation. J. Mol. Biol. 1980; 138: 321–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloc'h N., Etchebest C., Thoreau E., Henrissat B., Momon J.-P. Comparison of three algorithms for the assignment of secondary structure in proteins: the advantage of a consensus assignment. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 377–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collura V., Higo J., Gamier J. Modeling of proteins loops by simulated annealing. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 1502–1510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colovos C., Yeates T. O. Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 1511–1519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa P. E. The building of protein structures from α-carbon coordinates. Proteins 1990; 7: 366–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer C. J., Truhlar D. G. An SCF solvation model for the hydrophobic effect and absolute free energies of aqueous solvation. Science 1992; 256: 213–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creamer T. P., Rose G. D. Side-chain entropy opposes α-helix formation but rationalizes experimenbtally determined helix-forming propensities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 5937–5941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creamer T. P., Rose G. D. α-helix-forming propensities in peptides and proteins. Proteins 1994; 19: 85–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton T. E. Protein Folding. Freeman, New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Crippen G. M. Prediction of protein folding from amino acid sequence over discrete conformation spaces. Biochemistry 1991; 30: 4232–4236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippen G. M., Snow M. A 1.8–Å resolution potential function for protein folding. Biopoly-mers 1990; 29: 1479–1489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippen G. M., Viswanadhan V. N. Sidechain and backbone potential function for conformational analysis of proteins. Int. J. Peptide Prot. Res. 1985; 25: 487–509
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandekar T., Argos P. Potential of genetic algorithms in protein folding and protein engineering simulations. Prot. Ens. 1992; 5: 637–645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dadekar T., Argos P. Folding the main chain of small proteins with the genetic algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 236: 844–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauber-Osguthorpe P., Roberts V. A., Osgu-Thorpe D. J., Wolff J., Genest M., Hagler A. T. Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase-trimethoprim, a drug-receptor system. Proteins 1988; 4: 31–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauber-Osguthorpe P., Osguthorpe D. J. Partitioning the motion in molecular dynamics simulations into characteristic modes of motion. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 1259–1271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David C. W. Sprouting side chain conformations in X-PLOR simulations of peptides. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 715–717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David C. W. Hydrating peptides using a sprouting technique. J. Comp. Chem. 1994; 15: 23–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M. E. The inducible multipole solvation model: a new model for solvation effects on solute electrostatics. J. Chem. Phys. 1994; 100: 5149–5159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M. E., McCammon J. A. Electrostatics in biomolecular structure and dynamics. Chem. Rev. 1990; 90: 509–521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fillipis V., Sander C., Vriend G. Redicting local structural changes that result from point mutations. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 1203–1208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Degli Eposti M., Crimi M., Venturoli G. A critical evaluation of the hydropathy profile of membrane proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 1990; 190: 207–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deisenhofer J., Michel H. The photosyn-thetic reaction centre from the purple bacterium Rhodopseudomonas viridis. EMBO J. 1989; 8: 2149–2170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet J., De Maeyer M., Hazes B., Lasters I. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in side-chain positioning. Nature 1992; 356: 539–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond R. On the multiple simultaneous superposition of molecular structures by rigid body superposition. Prot. Sci. 1992; 1: 1279–1287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding H.-Q., Karasawa N., Goddard W. A. III, Atomic level simulations on a million particles: the cell multipole method for Coulomb and London interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1992; 97: 4309–4315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donelly D., Overington J. P., Blundell T. L. The prediction and orientation of α-helices from sequence alignments: the combined use of environmentdependent substitution tables, Fourier transform methods and helix capping rules. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 645–653
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doolittle R. F. Similar amino acid sequences: chance or common ancestry. Science 1981; 214: 149–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle R. F. Counting and discounting the universe of exons. Science 1991; 253: 677–679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorit R. L., Schoenbach L., Gilbert W. How big is the universe of exons. Science 1990; 250: 1377–1381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorit R. L., Schoenbach L., Gilbert W., Reply to Doolittle R. F., Patthy L. Science 1991; 253: 679–680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorofeev V. E., Mazur A. K. Investigation of conformational equilibrium of polypep-tides by internal coordinate stochastic dynamics. Met5-enkephalin. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1993; 10: 143–167
   Google Scholar
• Drexler K. E. Molecular engineering: an approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1981; 78: 5275–5278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubchak I., Holbrook S. R., Kim S.-H. Prediction of protein folding class from amino acid composition. Proteins 1993; 16: 79–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbrack R. L., Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to sidechain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 230: 543–574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbrack R. L., Karplus M. Conformational analysis of the backbonedependent rotamer preferences of proteins sidechains. Nature Struct. Biol. 1994; 1: 336340
   Google Scholar
• Dunfield L. G., Burgess A. W., Scheraga H. A. Energy parameters in polypeptides. VIII. Empirical potential energy algorithm for the conformational analysis of large molecules. J. Phys. Chem. 1978; 82: 2609–2616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efimov A. V. Favoured structural motifs in globular proteins. Structure 1994; 2: 999–1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg D., Bowie J. U., Lüthy R., Choe S. Three-dimensional Protdes for analysing protein sequence-structure relationships. Farad. Disc. 1992; 93: 25–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986; 319: 199–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhaber F., Lijnzaad P., Argos P., Sander C., Scharf M. The double cubic lattice method: efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and for generating dot surfaces of molecular assemblies. J. Comp. Chem. 1995; 16: 273–284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhaber F., Argos P. Improved strategy in analytic surface calculation for molecular systems: handling of singularities and computational efficiency. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 1272–1280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmenger F., Argos P., Abagyan R. A. A method to configure protein sidechains from the mainchain trace in homology modeling. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 231: 849–860
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elofsson A., Nilsson L. How consistent are molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 233: 766–780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans D. J., Murad S. Singularity free algorithm for molecular dynamics simulation of rigid polyatomics. Mol. Phys. 1977; 34: 327–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Factor A. D., Mehler E. L. Graphical representation of hydrogen bonding patterns in proteins. Prot. Eng. 1991; 4: 421–425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fetrow J. S., Bryant S. H. New programs for protein tertiary structure prediction. Biorechnology 1993; 11: 479–484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fincham D. Leapfrog rotational algorithms for linear molecules. Mol. Simul. 1993; 11: 79–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A. V., Janin J. The price of lost freedom: entropy of bimolecular complex formation. Prot. Eng. 1989; 3: 1–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finkelstein A. V., Reva B. A search for the most stable folds of protein chains. Nature 1991; 351: 497499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores T. P., Orengo C. A., Moss D. S., Thornton J. M. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 1811–1826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel A. S. Complexity of protein folding. Bull. Math. Biol. 1993; 55: 1199–1210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman H. L. Image approximation to the reaction field. Mol. Phys. 1975; 29: 1533–1543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frishman D. I., Argos P. Recognition of distantly related protein sequences using conserved motifs and neural networks. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 228: 951–962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frömmel C. Use of averaged mutation rate in pieces of protein sequences to predict the location of antigenic determinations. J. Theor. Biol. 1988; 132: 171–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furois-Corbin S., Smith J. C., Kneller G. R. Picosecond timescale rigid-helix and side-chain motions in deoxymyoglobin. Proteins 1993; 16: 141–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamier J., Osguthorpe D. J., Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1978; 120: 97–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamier J., Levin J. M. The protein structure code: what is its present status. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1991; 7: 133–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genfa Z., Xinhua X., Zhang C.-T. A weighting method for prediction of protein structural class from amino acid composition. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992; 210: 747–749
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geourjon C., Deléage G. SOPM: a self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 157–164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber P. Peptide mechanics: a force field for peptides and proteins working with entire residues as smallest units. Biopolymers 1992; 32: 1003–1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gething M. J., Sambrook J. Protein folding in the cell. Nature 1992; 355: 3345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibrat J.-F., Gamier J., Robson B. Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs. J. Mol. Biol. 1987; 198: 42543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibrat J.-F., Robson B., Gamier J. Influence of the local amino acid sequence upon the zones of the torsional angles phi and psi adopted by residues in proteins. Biochemistry 1991; 30: 1578–1586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson K. D., Scheraga H. A. Decisions in force field development. Reply to Kollman and Dill. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1991; 8: 1109–1111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson T. J., Thompson J. D., Abagyan R. A. Proposed structure for the DNA-binding domain of the Helix-Loop-Helix family of eucaryotic gene regulatory proteins. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 41–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson T. J., Hyvönen M., Musacchio A., Saraste M., Birney E. PH domain: the first anniversary. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994; 19: 349–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godzik A., Kolinski A., Skolnick I. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 227: 227–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godzik A., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Lattice representations of globular proteins: How good are they. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 1194–1202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godzik A., Skolnick J. Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to supersecondary and tertiary structure determination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 12098–12102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein R., Luthey-Schulten Z. A., Wolynes P. G. Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992a; 89: 4918–4922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein R., Luthey-Schulten Z. A., Wolynes P. G. Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized hamiltonians with local interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992b; 89: 9029–9033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein R. F. Efficient rotamer elimination applied to protein side-chains and related spin glasses. Biophys. J. 1994; 66: 1335–1340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracy J., Chiche L., Sallantin J. Improved alignment of weakly homologous protein sequences using structural information. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 821–829
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green P., Lipman D., Hillier L., Waterstone R., States D., Claverie J.-M. Ancient conserved regions in new gene sequences and in the protein databases. Science 1993; 259: 1711–1715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greengard L. Fast algorithms for classical physics. Science 1994; 265: 909–914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer J. Comparative model-building of the mammalian serine proteases. J. Mol. Biol. 1981; 153: 1027–1042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoret L. M., Cohen F. E. Novel method for the rapid evaluation of packing in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 211: 959–974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gribskov M., McLachlan A. D., Eisenberg D. Protile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1987; 84: 4355–4358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gribskov M., Uthy L. R., Eisenberg D. Protile analysis. Methods Enzymol. 1990; 183: 16–159
   Google Scholar
• Grindley H. M., Artymiuk P. J., Rice D. W., Willett P. Identification of tertiary structure resemblance in proteins using a maximal common subgraph isomorphism algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 229: 707–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronbech-Jensen N., Doniach S. Long-time overdamped Langevin dynamics of molecular chains. J. Comp. Chem. 1994; 16: 997–1012
   Google Scholar
• Gros P., van Gunsteren W. F. Crystatlo-graphic refinement and structure-factor time-averaging by molecular dynamics in the absence of a physical force field. Mol. Simul. 1993; 10: 377–395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guamieri F., Still W. C. A rapidly convergent simulation method: mixed Monte Carlo/ stochastic dynamics. J. Comp. Chem. 1994; 15: 1302–1310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulukota K., Wolynes P. G. Statistical mechanics of kinetic proofreading in protein folding in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 9292–9296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han K.-K., Martinage A. Possible relationship between coding recognition of amino acid sequence motif or residue(s) and post-translational chemical modification of proteins. Int. J. Biochem. 1992; 24: 1349–1363
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hancock J. F., Magee A. I., Childs J. E., Marshall C. J. All ras proteins are polyiso-prenylated but only some are palmitoylated. Cell 1989; 57: 1167–1177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R. W. Stiffness and energy conservation in molecular dynamics: an improved integrator. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 1112–1122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl F. U. Secrets of a double-doughnut. Nature 1994; 371: 557–559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey S. C. Treatment of electrostatic effects in macromolecular modeling. Proteins 1989; 5: 78–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havel T., Snow M. E. A new method for building protein conformations from sequence alignments with homologues of known structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1991; 217: 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward S., Collins J. F. Limits on α-helix prediction with neural network models. Proteins 1992; 14: 372–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head-Gordon T., Stillinger F. H., Arrecis J. A strategy for finding classes of minima on a hypersurface: implications for approaches to the protein folding problem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991; 88: 11076–11080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head-Gordon T., Stilhger F. H. Predicting polypeptide and protein structures from amino acid sequence: Antlion method applied to melittin. Biopolymers. 1993; 33: 293–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellinga H. W., Richards F. M. Optimal sequence selection in proteins of known structure by simulated evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 5803–5807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Baldwin J. M., Ceska T. A., Zemlin F., Beckmann E., Downing K. H. Model for the structure of bacterior-hodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 213: 899–929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendlich M., Lackner P., Weitckus S., Floeckner H., Froschauer R., Gottsbacher K., Casari G., Sippl M. J. Identification of native protein folds among a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 216: 167–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henikoff S., Henikoff J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 10915–10919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henikoff S., Henikoff J. G. Position-based sequence weights. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 243: 574–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herczyk P., Hubbard R. E. A reduced representation of proteins for use in restraint satisfaction calculations. Proteins 1993; 17: 310–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert M., Böhm G., Jaenicke R. Structural relationships of homologous proteins as a fundamental principle in homology modeling. Proteins 1993; 17: 138–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds D. A., Levitt M. A lattice model for protein structure prediction at low resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 2536–2540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds D. A., Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 243: 668–682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst J. D., Stemberg M. J. E. Prediction of structural and functional features of protein and nucleic acid sequences by neural networks. Biochemistry 1992; 31: 7211–7218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook S. R., Muskal S. M., Kim S.-H. Predicting surface exposure of amino acids from protein sequence. Prot. Eng. 1990; 3: 659–665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holley L. H., Karplus M. Protein secondary structure prediction with a neural network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989; 86: 152–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm L., Ouzounis C., Sander C., Tuparev G., Wend G. A database of protein structure families with common folding motifs. Prot. Sci. 1992; 1: 1691–1698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm L., Sander C. Fast and simple Monte Car 10 algorithm for side chain optimization in proteins: application to model building by homology. Proteins 1992a; 14: 213–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm L., Sander C. Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference. J. Mol. Biol. 1992b; 225: 93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 233: 123–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm L., Sander C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucl. Ac. Res. 1994a; 22: 3600–3609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm L., Sander C. Searching protein structure databases has come of age. Proteins 1994b; 19: 165–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst M., Kozack R. E., Saied F., Subramaniam S. Treatment of electrostatics effects in proteins: multigrid-based Newton iterative method for solution of the full non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Proteins 1994a; 18: 231–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst M., Kozack R. E., Saied F., Subramaniam S. Protein electrostatics: rapid multigrid-based Newton algorithm for solution of the full nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1994b; 11: 1437–1445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst M., Saied F. Multigrid solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 105–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp T. P. Retrospective: 12 years of Antigenic determinant predictions, and more. Peptide Res. 1993; 6: 183–190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopp T. P., Woods K. R. Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1981; 78: 3824–3828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard S. J., Eisenmenger F., Thomton J. M. Modeling studies of the change in conformation required for cleavage of limited proteolytic sites. Prot. Sci. 1994; 3: 757–768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hucho F., Göme-Tschelnokow U., Strecker A. β-Structure in the membrane-spanning part of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (or how helical are transmembrane helices?). Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994; 19: 383–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, Wolf H. The antigenic index: a novel algorithm for predicting antigenic determinants. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1988; 4: 181–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janin J., Wodak S. J., Levitt M., Maigret M. Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1978; 125: 357–386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny T. F., Benner S. A. Evaluating predictions of secondary structure in proteins. Biophys. Biochem. Res. Comm. 1994; 200: 149–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M. S., Overington J. P., Blundell T. L. Alignment and searching for common protein folds using a data bank of structural templates. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 231: 735–752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M. S., Snnivasan N., Sowdhamini R., Blundell T. L. Knowledge-based protein modeling. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1994; 29: 1–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M. S., Overington J. P. A structural basis for sequence comparison. An evaluation of scoring methodologies. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 233: 716–738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson W. C., Jr. Protein secondary structure and circular dichroism: a practical guide. Proteins 1990; 7: 205–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., Thomton J. M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992; 358: 86–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D. T. De novo protein design using pairwise potentials and a genetic algorithm. Prot. Sci. 1994; 3: 567–574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones T. A., Thirup S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J. 1986; 5: 819–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juffer A. H., Botta E. F. F., van Keulen B. A. M., van der Ploeg A., Berendsen H. J. C. The electric potential of a macromolecule in a solvent: a fundamental approach. J. Comp. Phys. 1991; 97: 144–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Cryst. 1976; A432: 922–923
   Google Scholar
• Kabsch W., Sander C. How good are predictions of protein secondary structure. FEBS Lett. 1983a; 155: 179–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structures: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983b; 22: 2577–2637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabsch W., Sander C. On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1984; 81: 1075–1078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamimura M., Takahashi Y. phi-psi confor-mational pattern clustering of protein amino acid residues using the potential function method. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994; 10: 163–169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang H. A., Kurochkina N. A., Lee B. Estimation and use of protein backbone angle Drobabilities. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 229: 448–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlin S., Zuker M., Brocchieri L. Measuring residue associations in protein structures. Possible implications for protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 239: 227–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpen M. E., de Haseth P. L., Neet K. E. Comparing short protein substructures by a method based on backbone torsion angles. Proteins 1989; 6: 155–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus M., Ichiye T., Pettitt B. M. Con-figurational entropy of native proteins. Biophys. J. 1987; 52: 1083–1085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus M., Schultz G. E. Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins. Naturwissenschaften 1985; 72: 212–213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karshikov A. D., Engh R., Bode W., Atanasov B. P. Electrostatic interactions in proteins: calculations of the electrostatic term of free energy and the electrostatic potential field. Eur. Biophys. J. 1989; 17: 287–297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp B. E., Pearson R. B. Protein kinase recognition sequence motifs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1990; 15: 342–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitao A., Hayward S., Go N. Comparison of normal mode analyses on a small globular protein in dihedral angle space and Cartesian coordinate space. Biophys. Chem. 1994; 52: 107–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein P. Prediction of protein structural class by discriminant analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1986; 874: 205–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein P., DeLisi C. Prediction of protein structural class from the amino acid sequence. Biopolymers 1986; 25: 1659–1672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneller D. G., Cohen F. E., Langridge R. Improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by enhanced neural networks. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 214: 171–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneller G. R., Geiger A. A method to calculate the g-coefficients of the molecular pair correlation function from molecular dynamics simulations. Mol. Simul. 1989; 3: 283–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher J.-P. A., Rooman M. J., Wodak S. J. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 235: 1598–1613
   Google Scholar
• Koehl P., Delarue M. Polar and nonpolar atomic environments in the urotein core: implications for folding and binding. Proteins 1994a; 20: 264–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehl P., Delarue M. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J. Mol. Biol. 1994b; 239: 249–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollman P. A., Dill K. A. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1991; 8: 1103–1107, Decisions in force field development: an alternative to those described by Roterman et al. (J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 7.421 (1989))
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono H., Doi J. Energy minimization method using automata network for sequence and side-chain confornation prediction. Proteins 1994; 19: 244–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostrowicki J., Scheraga H. A. Application of the diffusion equation for global optimization to oligopeptides. J. Phys. Chem. 1992; 96: 7442–7449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiihlbrandt W., Wang D. N., Fujiyoshi Y. Atomic model of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography. Nature 1994; 367: 614–621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydrophobic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1982; 157: 105–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert M. H., Scheraga H. A. Pattern recognition in the prediction of protein structure. II. Chain conformation from a probability-directed search procedure. J. Comp. Chem. 1989; 10: 798–816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasters I., Desmet J. The fuzzy-end elimination theorem: correctly implementing the side chain placement algorithm based on the dead end elimination theorem. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 717–722
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lathrop R. H. The protein threading problem with sequence amino acid interaction preferences is NP-complete. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 1059–1068
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lathrop R. H., Smith T. F. A branch-and-bound algorithm for optimal protein threading with pairwise (contact potential) amino acid interactions. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamos 1994; 365–374
   Google Scholar
• Lau K. T., Dill K. A. Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990; 87: 638–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughton C. A. Prediction of protein side-chain conformations from local three-dimensional homology relationships. J. Mol. Biol. 1994a; 235: 1088–1097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughton C. A. A study of simulated annealing protocols for use with molecular dynamics in protein structure prediction. Prot. Eng. 1994b; 7: 235–241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavery R., Sklenar H., Zakrzewska K., Pullman B. The flexibility of nucleic acids. o. The calculation of internal energy and applications to mononucleotide repeat DNA. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1986; 3: 989–1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C., Subbiah S. Prediction of protein side-chain conformation by packing optimization. J. Mol. Biol. 1991; 217: 373–388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee F. S., Chu Z. T., Warshel A. Microscopic and semimicroscopic calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins by the POLARIS and ENZYMM programs. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 161–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K. H., Xie D., Freire E., Amzel L. M. Estimation of changes in side chain configu-rational entropy in binding and folding: general methods and application to helix formation. Proteins 1994; 20: 68–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmon M. A., Engelmann D. M. Helix-helix interactions inside lipid bilayers. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1992; 2: 511–518
   Google Scholar
• Leopold P. E., Montal M., Onuchic J. N. The protein folding funnels: a kinetic approach to the sequence-structure relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 8721–8725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesk A. M., Chothia C. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J. Mol. Biol. 1980; 136: 225–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessel U., Schomburg D. Similarities between protein 3-D structures. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 1175–1187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin J. M., Pascarella S., Argos P., Gamier J. Quantification of secondary structure prediction improvement using multiple alignments. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 849–854
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin J. M., Gamier J. Improvements in a secondary structure prediction method based on a search for local sequence homologies and its use as a model building tool. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1988; 955: 283–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal C. Are there pathways for protein folding. J. Chem. Phys. 1968; 65: 44–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 1976; 104: 59–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt M. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 226: 507–533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt M., Chothia C. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature 1976; 261: 552–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt M., Sharon R. Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988; 85: 7557–7561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z., Scheraga H. A. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1987; 84: 6611–6615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim V. I. Algorithms for prediction of α-helical and β-structural regions in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1974; 88: 873–894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lis H., Sharon N. Protein glycosylation. Structural and functional aspects. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993; 218: 1–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liwo A., Pincus M. R, Wawak R. J., Rackovsky S., Scheraga H. A. Calculation of protein backbone geometry from α-carbon coordinates based on peptide-group dipole alignment. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 1697–1714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y., Jiang X., Lai L., Qu C., Xu X., Tang Y. Building protein backbones from Cα coordinates. Prot. Eng. 1992; 5: 147–150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo Y., Lai L., Xu X., Tang Y. Defining topological equivalences in protein structures by means of a dynamic programming algorithm. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 373–376
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luthardt G., Frömmel C. Local polarity analysis: a sensitive method that discriminates between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 627–631
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lüthy R., McLachlan A. D., Eisenberg D. Secondary structure-based Protiles: use of structureconserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins 1991; 10: 229–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüthy R., Bowie J. U., Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimentional Protiles. Nature 1992; 356: 83–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüthy R., Xenarios I., Bucher P. Improving the sensitivity of the sequence Protile method. Prot. Sci. 1994; 3: 139–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madej T., Mossing M. C. Hamiltonians for protein tertiary structure prediction based on three-dimensional environment principle. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 233: 480–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiorov V. N., Crippen G. M. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 227: 876–888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal C., Linthicum D. S. PROGEN: an automated modeling algorithm for the generation of complete protein structures from the α-carbon atomic coordinates. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1993; 7: 199–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao B., Chou K.-C., Zhang C.-T. Protein folding classes: a geometric interpretation of the amino acid composition of globular proteins. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 319–330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mao B., Friedman A. R. Molecular dynamics simulation by atomic mass weighting. Biophys. J. 1990; 58: 803–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maple J. R., Hwang M.-H., Stockfish T. P., Bur U., Waldmann M., Ewig C. S., Hagler A. T. Derivation of class II force fields. I. Methodology and quantum force field for the alkyl functional group and the alkane molecules. J. Comp. Chem. 1994; 15: 162–180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark A. E., van Gunsteren W. F., Berendsen H. J. C. Calculation of relative free energy via indirect pathways. J. Chem. Phys. 1991; 94: 3808–3816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo Y., Kanehisa M. An approach to systematic detection of protein structural motifs. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993; 9: 153–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsuo Y., Nishikawa K. Protein database search and structure prediction by 3D-1D compatibility method. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 1163
   Google Scholar
• Matthew J. B. Electrostatic effects in proteins. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1985; 14: 387–417
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May A. C. W., Johnson M. S. Protein structure comparisons using a combination of a genetic algorithm, dynamic programming and least-squares minimization. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 475–485
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazur A. K., Dorofeev V. E., Abagyan R. A. Derivation and testing of explicit equations of motion for polymers described in internal coordinates. J. Comp. Phys. 1991; 92: 261–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marur A. K., Abagyan R. A. New methodology for computer-aided modeling of biomolecular structure and dynamics. I. Non-cyclic structures. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1989; 6(4)815–832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrah D. B., Judson R. S. Analysis of the genetic algorithm method for molecular conformation determination. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 1385–1395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGwzor M. J., Flores T. P., Sternberg M. J. E. Prediction of betaturns in proteins using neural networks. Prot. Eng. 1989; 2(7)521–526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLachlan A. D. A mathematical procedure for superimposing atomic coordinates of proteins. Acta Cryst. 1972; A28: 656–657
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan A. D. Rapid comparison of protein structures. Acta Cryst. 1982; 438: 871–873
   Google Scholar
• Mehler E. L., Solmajer T. Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models. Prot. Eng. 1991; 4: 903–910
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metfessel B. A., Saurugger P. N., Connelly D. P., Rich S. S. Cross-validation of protein structural class prediction using statistical clustering and neural networks. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 1171–1182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A. W., Rosenbluth M. N., Teller A. H. Equation of state calculations for fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953; 21: 1087–1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezei M. Calculation of solvation free-energy differences for large solute change from computer simulations with quadrature-based nearly linear thermodynamic integration. Mol. Simul. 1993; 10: 225–239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezei M. A heuristic procedure for the detection of locally similar substructures of two equivalent structures. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 331–333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell E. M., Artymiuk P. J., Rice D. W., Willett P. Use of techniques derived from graph theory to compare secondary structure motifs in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1989; 212: 151–166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto S., Kollman P. A. SETTLE an analytical version of SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J. Comp. Chem. 1992; 13: 952–962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazawa S., Jernigan R. L. Estimation of interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasichemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985; 18: 534–552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge A., Friesner R. A., Honig B. An algorithm to generate low-resolution protein tertiary structures from knowledge of secondary structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 5027–5029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore C., Fasman G. D. The random coil conformation of proteins. Chemtracts _-Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993; 4: 67–74
   Google Scholar
• Mottonen J., Strand A., Symerski J., Sweet R. M., Danley R. E., Geoghegen K. F., Gerard R. D., Goldsmith E. J. Structural basis of latency in plasrninogen activator inhibitor-1. Nature 1992; 355: 270–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moult J., James M. N. G. An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segemnts in proteins by systematic search. Proteins 1986; 1: 146–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muggleton S., King R. D., Sternberg M. J. E. Protein secondary structure prediction using logic-based machine learning. Prot. Eng. 1992; 5: 647–657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muggleton S., King R. D., Sternberg M. J. E. Corrigenda: protein secondary structure prediction using logic-based machine learning. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 549
   Google Scholar
• Murthy M. R. N. A fast method of comparing protein structures. FEBS Lett. 1984; 168: 97–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musacchio A., Gibson T. J., Rice P., Thompson J. D., Saraste M. The PHdomain: a common piece in the structural patchwork of signalling proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1993; 18: 343–348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muskal S. M., Kim S.-H. Predicting protein secondary structure content: a tandem neural network approach. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 225: 713–727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy P. L., Bitar J. E., Smith D. A. Comparison of the molecular mechanics + generalized Born/surface area and the ab initio + Monte Carlo simulation methods in estimating confonnational equilibria in aqueous solution. J. Comp. Chem. 1994; 15: 1228–1240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima H., Nahikawa K., Ooi T. The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. J. Biochem. 1986; 99: 153–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayeem A., Vila J., Scheraga H. A. A comparative study of the simulated-annealing and Monte-Carlo-with-minimization approaches to the minimum-energy structures of polypep-tides: [Met]-enkephalin. J. Comp. Chem. 1991; 12: 594–605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemethy G., Pottle M. S., Scheraga H. A. Energy parameters in polypeptides. IX. Updating of geometrical parameters, nonbonded interactions, and hydrogen bond interactions for the naturally occuring amino acids. J. Phys. Chem. 1983; 87: 1883–1887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemethy G., Gibson K. D., Palmer K. A., Yoon C. N., Paterlini G., Zagari A., Rumsey S., Scheraga H. A. Energy parameters in polypeptides. X. Improved geometrical parameters and non-bonded interactions for use in the ECEPPD algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides. J. Phys. Chem. 1992; 96: 6472–6484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo T. J., Marks J. Computational complexity of a problem in molecular structure prediction. Prot. Eng. 1992; 5: 313–321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishikawa K., Kubota Y., Ooi T. Classification of proteins into groups based on amino acid composition and other characters. II. Grouping into four types. J. Biochem. 1983a; 94: 997–1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa K., Kubota Y., Ooi T. Classification of proteins into groups based on amino acid composition and other characters. I. Angular distribution. J. Biochem. 1983b; 94: 981–995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa K., Matsuo Y. Development of pseudoenergy potentials for assessing protein 3-D-1-D compatibility and detecting weak homologies. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 811–820
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishikawa K., Ooi T. Correlation of the amino acid composition of a protein to its structural and biological characters. J. Biochem. 1982; 91: 1821–1824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguti T., Go N. Efficient Monte Carlo method for simulation of fluctuating conformations of native proteins. Biopolymers 1985; 24: 527–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonnan G. E., Podlipchuk V. Y., Valuev A. A. Equations of motion and energy conservation in molecular dynamics. Mol. Simul. 1994; 9: 417–424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novomy J., Bruccoleri R. E., Karplus M. An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 1984; 177: 787–818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny J., Rashin A. A., Bruccoleri R. E. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. Proteins 1988; 4: 13–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberoi H., Allewell N. M. Multigrid solution of the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation and the calculation of titration curves. Biophys. J. 1993; 65: 48–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto Y. Helix-forming tendencies of non-polar amino acids predicted by Monte Carlo simulated annealing. Proteins 1994; 19: 14–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okunbor D. I., Skeel R. D. Canonical numerical methods for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comp. Chem. 1994; 15: 72–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewsky K. A., Piela L., Scheraga H. A. Mean field theory as a tool for inter-molecular conformational optimization. 1. Tests on terminally blocked alanine and Met-enkephalin. J. Phys. Chem. 1992; 96: 4672–4676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi T., Oobatake M., Nemethy G., Scheraga H. A. Accessible surface areas as measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1987; 84: 3086–3090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orengo C. A., Brown N. P., Taylor W. R. Fast structure alignment for protein databank searching. Proteins 1992; 14: 139–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orengo C. A., Mores T. P., Taylor W. R., Thomton J. M. Identification and classification of protein fold families. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 485–500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orengo C. A., Taylor W. R. A rapid method of protein structure alignment. J. Theor. Biol. 1990; 147: 517–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oroczo M., Luque F. J. Ab initio study of bond stretching: implications in force-field parametrization for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 881–894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzounis C., Sander C., Scharf M., Schneider R. Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. Aligning sequences to contact Protiles derived from three-dimensional structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 232: 805–825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overington J. P., Donelly D., Johnson M. S., Sali A., Blundell T. L. Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Prot. Sci. 1992; 1: 216–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabo C. O. Designing proteins and peptides. Nature 1983; 301: 200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahe G. H., Scheraga H. A. Prediction of the native conformation of a polypeptide by a statistical-mechanical procedure. III. Probable and average conformations of enkephalin. Biopolymers 1987; 26: 1125–1162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer K. A., Scheraga H. A. Standard geometry chains fitted to X-ray-derived structures: validation of the rigid geometry approximation. I. Chain closure through a l;imited search of “loop” conformations. J. Comp. Chem. 1991; 12: 505–526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer K. A., Scheraga H. A. Standard geometry chains fitted to X-ray-derived structures: validation of the rigid-geometry approximation. II. Systematic searches for short loops in proteins: Application to bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A and human lysozyme. J. Comp. Chem. 1992; 13: 329–350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancoska P., Blazek M., Keiderling T. A. Relationships between secondary structure fractions for globular proteins. Neural network analysis of crystallographic data sets. Biochemistry 1992; 31: 10250–10257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker J. M. R., Guo D., Hodges R. S. New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 1986; 25: 5425–5432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella S., Argos P. Analysis of insertions/deletions in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1992a; 224: 461–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella S., Argos P. A data bank merging related protein structures and sequences. Prot. Eng. 1992b; 5: 121–137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pastor R. W. Analyses of statistical errors in dynamics simulations. Proteins Structure, Dynamics and Design, V. Renugopalakrishnan, P. R. Carey, I. C. P. Smith, S. G. Huang, A. C. Storer. ESCOM, Leiden 1991; 229–233
   Google Scholar
• Pastore A., Saudek V., Ramponi G., Williams R. J. P. Three-dimensional Structure of acylphosphatase. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 224: 427–440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patthy L. Exons—original building blocks of proteins. Bioessays 1991; 13: 187–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne P. W. Reconstruction of protein conformations from estimated positions of the C, coordinates. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 315–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman D. A. A comparison of alternative approaches to free energy calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 1994; 98: 1487–1493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perczel A., Hollósi M., Tusnády G., Fasman G. D. Convex constraint analysis: a natural deconvolution of circular dichroism curves of proteins. Prot. Eng. 1991; 4: 669–679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson B., Flinta C., von Heijne G., Jömwall H. Structures of N-terminally acetylated proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 1985; 152: 523–527
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson B., Argos P. Prediction of trans-membrane regions in proteins utilising multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 237: 182–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett S. D., Saqi M. A. S., Sternberg M. J. E. Evaluation of the sequence template method for protein structure prediction. Discrimination of the (beta/alpha) 8-barrel fold. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 228: 170–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett S. D., Sternberg M. I. E. Empirical scale of sidechain conformational entropy in protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 231: 825–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picot D., Loll P. J., Garavito M. The X-ray crystal structure of the membrane protein prostaglandin H2 synthase-1. Nature 1994; 367: 243–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piela L., Kostrowicki J., Scheraga H. A. The multiple-minima problem in the conformational analysis of molecules. Determination of the potential energy surface by the diffusion equation. J. Phys. Chem. 1989; 93: 3339–3346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pletnev V. Z., Popov E. M., Kadymova F. A. Approximated potential functions of non-bonded interactions of methyl groups. Theoret. Chim. Acta 1974; 35: 93–96
   Google Scholar
• Ponder J. W., Richards F. M. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J. Mol. Biol. 1987; 193: 775–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reissner R., Bork P. On α-helices terminated by glycine. I. Identification of common structural features. Biophys. Biochem. Res. Comm. 1991; 180: 660–665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presnell S. R., Cohen B. I., Cohen F. E. A segment-based approach to protein secondary structure prediction. Biochemistry 1992; 31: 983–993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purisima E. O., Scheraga H. A. Conversion from a virtual-bond chain to a complete polypeptide backbone. Biopolymers 1984; 23: 1207–1224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purisima E. O., Scheraga H. A. An approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding by relaxing dimensionality. Tests on enkephalin. J. Mol. Biol. 1987; 196: 697–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian N., Sejnowski T. J. Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. J. Mol. Biol. 1988; 202: 865–884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao J. K., Argos P. A conformational preference parameter to predict helices in integral membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1986; 869: 197–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reczko M., Bohr H., Subramaniam S., Pamigighantam S., Hatzigeorgiou A. Fold-class prediction by neural networks. Protein structure by distance analysis, H. Bohr, S. Brunak. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Tokyo 1994; 277–286
   Google Scholar
• Reczko M., Bohr H. The DEF data base of sequence based protein fold class predictions. Nucl. Acid. Res. 1994; 22: 3616–3619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington S. J., Matthews B. W. A systematic approach to the comparison of protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1980; 140: 77–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resh M. D. Myristylation and palmitylation of Src family members: the fats of the matter. Cell 1994; 76: 411–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey A., Skolnick J. Efficient algorithm for reconstruction of a protein backbone from the α-carbon coordinates. J. Comp. Chem. 1992; 13: 443–456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds J. A., Gilbert D. B., Tanford C. Emprical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1974; 71: 2925–2927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards F. M., Kundrot C. E. Identification of structural motifs from protein coordinate data: secondary and first-level supersecondary structure. Proteins 1988; 3: 71–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson J. S. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Adv. Prot. Chem. 1981; 34: 168–339
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J. S., Richardson D. C., Tweedy N. B., Gernet K. M., Quinn T. P., Hecht M. H., Ericson B. W., Yan Y., McClain R. D., Donlan M. E., Surles M. C. Looking at proteins: representations, folding, packing, and design. Biophys. J. 1992; 63: 1186–1209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond T. J. Solvent accessible surface area and excluded volume in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1984; 178: 63–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring C. S., Kneller D. G., Langridge R., Cohen F. E. Taxonomy and conformational analysis of loops in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 224: 685–699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll D. R., Piela L., Vasquez M., Scheraga H. A. On the multiple minima problem in the conformational analysis of polypeptides. V. Application of the self-consistent electrostatic field and the electrostatically driven Monte carlo methods to bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proteins 1991; 10: 188–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson B., Platt E. Relined models for computer calculations in protein engineering. Calibration and testing of atomic potential functions with ore efficient calculations. J. Mol. Biol. 1986; 188: 259–281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde K., Bork P. A fast, sensitive pattem-matching approach for protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993; 9: 183–189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roitberg A., Elber R. Modeling side chains in peptides and proteins: application of the locally enhanced sampling and the simulated annealing methods to find minimum energy conformations. J. Chem. Phys. 1991; 95: 9277–9287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooman M. J., Kocher J.-P. A., Wodak S. J. Prediction of protein backbone conformations based on seven structure assignments. J. Mol. Biol. 1991; 221: 961–979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooman M. J., Kocher J.-P. A., Wodak S. J. Extracting information on folding from the amino acid sequence: accurate predictions for protein regions with preferred conformations in the absence of tertiary interactions. Biochemistry 1992; 31: 10226–10238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooman M. J., Wodak S. J. Identification of predictive sequence motifs limited by protein structure database size. Nature 1988; 335: 45–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J., Eisenmenger F. A fast unbiased comparison of protein structures by means of the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm. J. Mol. Evol. 1994; 32: 340–354
   Google Scholar
• Rossmann M. G., Argos P. Exploring structural homology of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1976; 105: 75–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossmann M. G., Argos P. The taxonomy of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1977; 109: 99–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost B., Sander C., Schneider R. Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 235: 13–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost B., Sander C. Secondary structure prediction of all-helical proteins in two states. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 831–836
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rost B., Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 1994a; 19: 55–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost B., Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 1994b; 20: 216–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost B., Sander C. 1D secondary structure prediction through evolutionary Protiles. Protein structure by distance analysis, H. Bohr, S. Brunak. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Oxford, Tokyo 1994c; 257–216
   Google Scholar
• Roterman L. K., Gibson K. D., Scheraga H. A. A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. I. Conformational predictions for the tandemly repeated peptide (Asn-Ala-Asn-Pro)9. J. Bio-mol. Struct. Dyn. 1989a; 7: 391–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roterman I. K., Lambert M. H., Gibson K. D., Scheraga H. A. A comparison of the CHARMM., AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. II. phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N'-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests. J. Bio-mol. Struct. Dyn. 1989b; 7: 421–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnicki W. R., Lesyng B., Harvey S. C. Lagrangian molecular dynamics using selected conformational degrees of freedom, with application to pseudorotation dynamics of hose rings. Biopolymers 1994; 34: 383–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufino S. D., Blundell T. L. Structure-based identification and clustering of protein farnilies and superfamilies. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1994; 8: 5–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel R. B., Barton G. J. Structural features can be unconserved in proteins with similar folds. An analysis of side-chain to side-chain contacts, secondary structure and accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 244: 332–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel R. B., Barton G. J. Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins 1992; 14: 309–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel R. B., Barton G. J. The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 234: 951–957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitoh S., Nakai T., Nishikawa K. A geometrical constraint approach for reproducing the native backbone conformation of a protein. Proteins 1993; 15: 191–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sali A., Shakhnovich E., Karplus M. Kinetics of protein folding. A lattice model study of the requirements for folding to the native state. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 235: 1614–1636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sali A., Blundell T. L. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures. A procedure involving comparison of prooperties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 212: 403–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sali A., Blundell T. L. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 234: 779–815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzberg S., Cost S. Predicting protein secondary structure with a nearest-neighbor algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 227: 371–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samorjai R. L. Novel approach for computing the global minimum of proteins. I. General concepts, methods and approximations. J. Phys. Chem. 1991; 95: 4141–4146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander C., Schneider R. Database of homol-ogy-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 1991; 9: 56–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer M., Frömmel C. A precise analytical method for calculating the electrostatic energy of macromolecules in aqueous solutions. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 216: 1045–1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer C. A., Caldwell J. W., Kollman P. A., Stroud R. M. Prediction of homologous pre tein structures based on conformational searches and energetics. Proteins 1990; 8: 30–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer C. A., Caldwell J. W., Stroud R. M., Kollman P. A. Inclusion of solvation free energy with molecular mechanics energy: alanyl dipeptide as test case. Prot. Sci. 1992; 1: 396–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer C. A., Caldwell J. W., Kollman P. A., Stroud R. M. Protein structure prediction with a combined solvation free energy-molecular mechanics force field. Mol. Simul. 1993; 10: 121–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz U., Ulyanov N. B., Kumar A., James T. L. Molecular dynamics with weighted time-averaged restraints for a DNA octamer. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 234: 373–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrauber H., Eisenhaber F., Argos P. Rowers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid sidechain conformations in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 230: 592–612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber H., Steinhauser O. Taming cut-off induced artefacts in molecular dynamics studies of solvated polypeptides. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 228: 909–923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroll W. K., Van Zandt L. L., Saxena V. K. Low-frequency parametrization of hydrogen bonding. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1991; 8: 1057–1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully J. L., Hermans J. Multiple time steps: limits on the speedup of molecular dynamics simulations of aqueous systems. Mol. Simul. 1993; 11: 67–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalloway D. Application of the renormalization group to deterministic global minimization of molecular conformation energy functions. J. Glob. Optim. 1992; 2: 281–311
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan R. P., Dixon J. S., Venkataraghavan R., Kuntz I. D., Scott K. P. Amino acid composition and hydrophobicity patterns of protein domains correlate with their structures. Biopolymers 1985; 24: 1995–2023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shestopalov B. V. Prediction of protein secondary stucture by a doublet code. Mol. Biol. 1990; 24: 1117–1125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin J. K., Jhon M. S. High directional Monte Carlo procedure coupled with the temperature heating and annealing as a method to obtain the global energy minimum structure of polypeptides and proteins. Biopolymers 1991; 31: 177–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shake A., Rupley J. A. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J. Mot. Biol. 1973; 79: 351–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibanda B. L., Thornton J. M. Conformation of beta-hairpins in protein structures: classifcation and diversity in homologous structures. Meth. Enzymol. 1991; 202: 59–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbald P., Argos P. Weighting aligned protein or nucleic acid sequences to correct for unequal representation. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 216: 813–818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon I., Glasser L., Scheraga H. A. Calculation of protein conformation as an assembly of stable overlapping segments: application to bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991; 88: 3661–3665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipos L., von Heijne G. Predicting the topology of eukaryotic membrane proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993; 213: 1333–1340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sippl M. J. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 213: 859–883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sippl M. J. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1993a; 7: 473–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sippl M. J. Recognition of errors in threedimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 1993b; 17: 355–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sippl M. J., Weitckus S. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformation. Proteins 1992; 13: 258–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklenar H., Etchebest C., Lavery R. Describing protein structure: a general algorithm yielding complete helicoidal parameters and a unique overall axis. Proteins 1989; 6: 46–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklenar H., Eisenhaber F., Poncin M., Lavery R. Including solvent and counterion effects in the force field of macromolecular mechanics: the field integrated electrostatic approach (FIESTA). Theoretical Biochemistry & Molecular Biophysics, D. L. Beveridge, R. Lavery. Adenine Press, New York 1990; 317–335
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Brown M. J., Kominos D., Levy R. M. Global folding of proteins from a limited number of distance constraints. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 605–614
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snow M. A novel parametrization scheme for energy equations and its use to calculate the structure of protein molecule. Proteins 1993; 15: 183–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solovyev V. V., Makarova K. S. A novel method of protein sequence classification based on oligopeptide frequency analysis and its application to search for functional sites and to domain localization. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993; 9: 17–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonnhammer E. L. L., Durbin R. A workbench for large-scale sequence homology analysis. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994; 10: 301–307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonnhammer E. L. L., Kahn D. The modular anangement of proteins as inferred from analysis of homology. Prot. Sci. 1994; 3: 482–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreerama N., Woody R. W. Protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spec-troscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 242: 497–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starzyk R., Webster T., Schimmel P. Evidence for disposable sequences inserted into a nucleotide fold. Science 1987; 237: 1614–1618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbach P. J., Brooks B. R. New spherical-cutoff methods for long-range forces in macromolecular simulation. J. Comp. Chem. 1994; 15: 667–683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberg M. J. E., Chickos J. S. Protein side-chain conformational entropy derived from fusion data-comparison with other empirical scales. Prot. Eng. 1994; 7: 149–155
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens R. C., Gouaux J. E., Lipscomb W. N. Structural consequences of effector binding to the T state of aspartate carbamoyl-transferase: crystal structure of the unligated and ATP- and CTP-complexed enzymes at 2.6–Å resolution. Biochemistry 1990; 29: 7691–7701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Still W. C., Tempczyk A., Hawley R. C., Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J. Am. Chem., Soc. 1990; 112: 6127–6129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbarao N., Haneef I. Defining to-pological equivalence in macromolecules. Prot. Eng. 1991; 4: 877–884
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Summers N. L., Karplus M. Construction of side-chains in homology modeling. Application to the C-terminal lobe of rhizopuspepsin. J. Mol. Biol. 1989; 210: 785–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S. Reduced representation model pf protein structure prediction: statistical potential and genetic algorithm. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 762–785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe M. J., Hayes F. R. F., Blundell T. L. Knowledge-based modeling of homologous proteins. II: Rules for conformations of substituted side chains. Prot. Eng. 1987; 1: 385–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swindells M. B., Thornton J. M. A study of structural determinants in the interleukin-1 fold. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 711–715
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka S., Scheraga H. A. Medium and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structure of proteins. Macromolecules 1976; 9: 945–950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanford C., Kirkwood J. G. Theory of protein titration curves. I. General equations for impenetrable spheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957; 79: 5333–5339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor W. R. Protein fold refinement: building models from idealized folds using motif constraints and multiple sequence data. Prot. Eng. 1993; 6: 593–604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor W. R., Orengo C. A holistic approach to protein structure alignment. Prot. Eng. 1989; 2: 505–519
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor W. R., Orengo C. A. Protein structure alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 1989; 208: 1–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. Improved sensitivity of pfle searches through the use of sequence weights and gap excision. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994; 10: 19–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toma K. Protein threedimensional structure generation with an empirical hydrophobic penalty function. J. Mol. Graph. 1994; 11: 222–232
   Google Scholar
• Topham C. M., McLeod A., Eisenmenger F., Overington J. P., Johnson M. S., Blundell T. L. Fragment ranking in modeling of protein structure. Conformationally constrained environmental aminoacid substitution tables. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 229: 194–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramontano A., Chothia C., Lesk A. M. Structural determinants of the conformations of medium-sized loops in proteins. Proteins 1989; 6: 382–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramontano A., Chothia C., Lesk A. M. Framework residue 71 is a major determinant of the position and conformation of the second hypervariable region in the V, domains of the immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 1990; 215: 175–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuffery P., Etchebest C., Hazout S., Lavery R. A new approach to the rapid determination of protein side chain conformations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1991; 8: 1267–1289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuffery P., Etchebest C., Hazout S., Lavery R. A critical comparison of search algorithms applied to the optimization of protein side-chain conformations. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 790–798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunon I., Silla E., Pascual-Ahuir J. L. Molecular surface area and hydrophobic effect. Prot. Eng. 1992; 5: 715–716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unger R., Moult J. Genetic algorithms for protein folding simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 231: 75–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger R., Moult J. Finding the lowest free energy conformation is M NP-hard problem: proof and implications. Bull. Math. Biol. 1994; 55: 1183–1198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajda S., DeLisi C. Determining minimum energy confornations of polypeptides by dynamic programming. Biopolymers 1990; 29: 1755–1772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder C. W. G., Leusen F. J. J., Leunissen J. A. M., Noordik J. H. A molecular dynamics approach for the generation of complete protein structures from limited coordinate data. Proteins 1994; 18: 174–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gunsteren W. F., Berendsen H. J. C. Algorithms for macromolecular dynamics and constraint dynamics. Mol. Phys. 1977; 34: 1311–1327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gunsteren W. F., Berendsen H. J. C. Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: methodology, application and perspectives in chemistry. Angaw. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1990; 29: 992–1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heel M. A new family of powerful multivari-ate statistical sequence analysis (MSSA) techniques. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 216: 877–887
   Google Scholar
• van Schaik R. C., Berendsen H. J. C., Torda A. E., van Gunsteren W. F. A structure refinement method based on molecular dynamics in four spatial dimensions. J. Mol. Biol. 1993a; 234: 751–762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schaik R. C., van Gunsteren W. F., Berendsen H. J. C. Conformational search by potential energy annealing: algorithm and application to cyclosporin A. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1993b; 6: 97–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandcrbilt D., Louie S. G. A Monte Carlo simulated annealing approach to optimization over continuous variables. J. Comp. Phys. 1984; 56: 259–271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasmatzis G., Brower R., De Lisi C. Predicting immunoglobulin-like hypervariable loops. Biopolymers 1994; 34: 1669–1680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez M., Scheraga H. A. Use of buildup and energy minimization procedures to compute low-energy structures of the backbone of enkephalin. Biopolymers 1985; 24: 1437–1447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra D. L., Ferguson D. M., Kollman P. A. How transferable are hydrogen parameters in molecular mechanics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 1992; 13: 971–978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venneri G. D., Hoover W. G. Simple exact test for well-known molecular dynamics algorithms. J. Comp. Phys. 1987; 73: 468–475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieth M., Kolinski A., Brooks C. L., III, Skolnick J. Prediction of the folding pathways and the structure of the GNC4 leu-cine zipper. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 237: 361–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila J., Williams R. L., Vasquez M., Scheraga H. A. Empirical solvation models can be used to differentiate native from near-native conformations of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proteins 1991; 10: 199–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Freyberg B., Richmond T. J., Braun W. Surface area included in energy refinement of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 233: 275–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Freyberg B., Braun W. Minimization of empirical energy functions including hydro-phobic surface area effects. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 510–521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Heijne G. The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with trans-membrane topology. EMBO J. 1986; 5: 3021–3027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Heijne G. Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 225: 487–494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorobyev Y. N., Grant J. A., Scheraga H. A. A combined iterative and boundary element approach for solution of the nonlinear Pois-son-Boltzmann equation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 3189–3196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vriend G., Eijsink V. Prediction and analysis of structure, stability and unfolding of thermolysin-like proteases. J. Comp.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1993; 7: 367–396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vriend G., Sander C. Detection of common three-dimensional substructures in proteins. Proteins 1991; 11: 52–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vriend G., Sander C. Quality control of protein models: directional atomic contact analysis. J. Appl. Cryst. 1993; 26: 47–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wako H., Blundell T. L. Use of amino acid environment-dependent substitution tables and conformational propensities in structure prediction from aligned sequences of homo-logues proteins. I. Solvent accessibility classes. J. Mol. Biol. 1994a; 238: 682–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wako H., Blundell T. L. Use of amino acid environment-dependent substitution tables and conformational propensities in structure prediction from aligned sequences of homologous proteins. II. Secondary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1994b; 238: 693–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallqvist A. On the implementation of Friedman boundary conditions in liquid water simulations. Mol. Simul. 1993; 10: 13–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallqvist A., Ullner M. A simplified amino acid potential for use in structure prediction of proteins. -Proteins 1994; 18: 267–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther D. 1994, personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Warshel A., Åqvist J. Electrostatic energy and macromolecular function. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Chem. 1991; 20: 267–298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiner S. J., Kollman P. A., Nguyen D. T., Case D. A. An all atom force field for simulations of proteons and nucleic acids. J. Comp. Chem. 1986; 7: 230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss M. S., Schulz G. E. Structure of poM refined at 1.8 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 227: 493–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendoloski J. J., Salemme F. R. PROBIT. a statistical approach to modeling proteins from partial coordinate data using substructure libraries. J. Mol. Graph. 1992; 10: 124–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wesson L., Eisenberg D. Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution. Prot. Sci. 1992; 1: 227–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmanns M., Eisenberg D. Threedimensional Protiles from residue-pair preferences: identification of sequences with beta/alfa-barrel fold. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993; 90: 1379–1383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C., Gregoret L. M., Agard D. A. Modeling side-chain conformation for homologous proteins using an energy-based rotamer search. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 229: 9961–006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C., Cui W. Application of simulated annealing to peptides. Biopolymers 1990; 29: 149–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C., Doniach S. A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding: studies with crambin. Proteins 1989; 6: 193–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak S. J., Rooman M. J. Generating and testing protein folds. Curr. Opinion. Struct. Biol. 1993; 3: 247–259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootton J. C. Sequences with 'unusual' amino acid compositions. Cum. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1994; 4: 413–421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ycas M. Computing tertiary structures of proteins. J. Prot. Chem. 1990; 9: 177–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yee D. P., Dill K. A. Families and the structural relatedness among globular proteins. Prot. Sci. 1993; 2: 884–899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi T.-M., Lander E. S. Protein structure prediction using nearest-neighbor methods. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 232: 1117–1129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip V., Elber R. Calculations of a list of neighbors in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comp. Chem. 1989; 10: 921–927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C.-T., Chou K.-C. Monte Carlo simulation studies on the prediction of protein folding types from amino acid composition. Biophys. J. 1992a; 63: 1523–1529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C.-T., Chou K.-C. An optimization approach to predicting protein structural class from amino acid composition. Prot. Sci. 1992b; 1: 401408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G., Schlick T. LIN: a new algorithm to simulate the dynamics of biomolecules by combining implicit-integration and normal mode techniques. J. Comp. Chem. 1993; 14: 1212–1233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K. Y. J., Eisenberg D. The threedimensional Protile method using residue preference as a continuous function of residue environment. Prot. Sci. 1994; 3: 687–695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T., Bertelsen E., Alber T. Entropic effects on disulfide bonds on protein stability. Nature Struct. Biol. 1994; 1: 434–438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X., Mesirov J. P., Waltz D. L. Hybrid system for protein secondary structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 1992; 225: 1049–1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q., Rosenfeld R., Vajda S., De Lisi C. Loop closure via bond scaling and relaxation. J. Comp. Chem. 1993a; 14: 556–565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q., Rosenfeld R., Vajda S., De Lisi C. Determining protein loop conformation using scaling-relaxation techniques. Prot. Sci. 1993b; 2: 1242–1248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q., Kyle D. J. Multiple copy sampling: rigid versus flexible protein. Proteins 1994; 19: 324–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong L., Johnson W. C., Jr. Environment affects amino acid preference for secondary stmcture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 4462–4465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmennann K. When awaiting ‘Bio’ Champollion: dynamic programming regularization of the protein secondary structure predictions. Prot. Eng. 1989; 7: 1197–1202
   Google Scholar
• Zuker M., Somorjai R. L. The alignment of protein structures in three dimensions. Bull. Math. Biol. 1989; 51: 55–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar