Laboratory information and management system: A tool to increase laboratory productivity

References

• Boeijen FPM. The total qualified laboratory. Scientific computing and instrumentation online. 1999. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• Mcdowall RD. A matrix for the development of a strategic laboratory information management system. Anal Chem 1993;69:896A–901A.
   Google Scholar
• Hunkapiller T, Hood L. LIMS and the Human Genome Project. Bio/Technol 1991;9:1344–1345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahaffey RR. LIMS applied information technology for the laboratory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Avery G, McGee C, Falk S. Implementing LIMS: a “how-to” guide. Anal Chem 2000;57:A-62-A.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM LIMS Guide. In 1994 Book of ASTM standards; American Society for Testing and Materials 1994; Vol. 14.01.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall RD, Mattes DC. Architecture for a comprehensive laboratory information management system. Anal Chem 1990;62:1069A–1076A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan F. Strategic Analysis of US Laboratory Information Management Systems markets. Pharmaceutical Technology Europe; 2009. p 31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kalani S, Gupta D. Good laboratory practices: compliance using lims. Pharma Times 2010;42:41–43.
   Google Scholar
• Steele TW, Lauiger A, Falco F. The Impact of LIMS design and functionality on Laboratory quality achievements. Presented at European Conference on Quality Revoluation in Clinical Laboratory QRCL; Belgium, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Webber J. A survey of LIMS satisfaction. Scientific Computing and Instrumentation Online. 2000. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• Miller S. A practical approach to LIMS selection. Scientific Computing and Instrumentation Online. 2001. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• Verost W. Strategies in Hand-Held LIMS. ScientificComputing and Instrumentation Online. 2001. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• Bartow G. Custom LIMS help maximize laboratory productivity. Scientific Computing and Instrumentation Online. 1998. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• Ganjei JK, Bergen AW. LIMS customization for biomedical research. Scientific Computing and Instrumentation Online. 2001. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• Redman J. The laboratory equipment control interface specification. Scientific Computing and Instrumentation Online. 1999. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• Staab TA. Next generation LIMS. Scientific Computing and Instrumentation Online. 1999. Available online at: www.scamag.com
   Google Scholar
• McDowall RD. Practical computer validation for pharmaceutical laboratories. J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 1995;14:13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. Guideline on general principles of process validation. Division of manufacturing and product quality (HFD-320). Office of Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. General principles of software validation; Final guidance for industry and FDA Staff. Center for Devices and Radiological Health; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Grigonis GJ Jr, SubakEJ Jr, Wyrick M. “Validation Key Practices for Computer Systems Used in Regulated Operations,”. Pharmaceutical Technology, June 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Segalstad SH, Synnevåg MJ. A practical guide to validating LIMS, chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems. LIMS 1994;26:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• GAMP. Good practice guide, validation of laboratory computerized systems. Tampa, FL: International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Grigonis GJ Jr., Wyrick M. Computer system validation: auditing computer systems for quality. Pharmaceutical Technology; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE Standard 1233–1998. Guide for developing software requirements specifications. Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE Standard 829–1998. Software test documentation. Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers; 1998.
   Google Scholar