Factors Affecting the Oral Uptake and Translocation of Polystyrene Nanoparticles: Histological and Analytical Evidence

References

• Alpar H. O., Field W. N., Hyde R., Lewis D. A. The transport of microspheres from gastro‐intestinal tract to inflammatory air pouches in the rat. J. Pharm. Pharmacol (1989); 41: 194–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldridge J. H., Hammond C. J., Meulbroek J. A., Staas J. K., Gilley R. M., Tice T. R. Controlled vaccine release in the gut‐associated lymphoid tissues: orally administered biodegradable microspheres target the Peyer's patches. J. Contr. Rel (1990); 11: 205–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florence A. T., Jani P. U. Particulate delivery: the challenge of the oral route. Pharmaceutical Particulate Carriers, Therapeutic Applications, A. Rolland. Marcel Dekker, New York (1993); 65–107
   Google Scholar
• Hillery A. M., Jani P. U., Florence A. T. Comparative, quantitative study of lymphoid and non‐lymphoid uptake of 60nm polystyrene particles. J. Drug Targeting (1994); 2: 151–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain N., Jani P. U., Florence A. T. Oral uptake of Lectin‐conjugated microspheres through the murine intestine. (1994), in preparation
   Google Scholar
• Illum L., Davis S. S. The organ uptake of intravenously administered colloidal particles can be altered using a nonionic surfactant (poloxamer 338). FEBS Lett. (1984); 167: 79–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illum L., Hunneyball I. M., Davis S. S. The effect of hydrophilic coatings on the uptake of colloidal particles by the liver and by peritoneal macrophages. Int. J. Pharm (1886); 29: 53–65
   Google Scholar
• Jani P. U., Halbert G. W., Langridge J., Florence A. T. The uptake and translocation of latex nanospheres and microspheres after oral administration to rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol (1989); 41: 809–812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jani P. U., Halbert G. W., Langridge J., Florence A. T. Nanoparticle uptake by the rat gastrointestinal mucosa: Quantitation and Particle size dependency. J. Pharm. Pharmacol (1990); 42: 821–826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jani P. U., Florence A. T., McCarthy M. E. Further histological evidence of the gastrointestinal absorption of polystyrene nanospheres in the rat. Int. J. Pharm (1992a); 84: 245–252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jani P. U., McCarthy D. E., Florence A. T. Nanosphere and microsphere uptake via Peyer's patches: observation of the rate of uptake in the rat after a single dose. Int. J. Pharm (1992b); 86: 239–246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jani P. U., McCarthy D. E., Florence A. T. Titanium dioxide (rutile) particle uptake from the rat GI tract and translocation to systemic organs after oral administration. Int. J. Pharm (1994); 105: 157–168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins P. G., Howard K. A., Blackhall N. W., Thomas N. W., Davis S. S., O'Hagan D. T. The quantitation of absorption of micropaticles into the intestinal lymph of Wistar rats. Int. J. Pharm (1994); 102: 261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J., Martic P. A., Tan J. S. Protein adsorption on Pluronic copolymer‐coated polystyrene particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci (1989); 131: 252–266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee V. H.L. Changing needs in drug delivery in the era of peptide and protein drugs. Peptide and Protein Drug Delivery, V. H.L. Lee. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Le Fevre M. E., Boccio A. M., Joel D. D. Intestinal barrier to large particulates in mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med (1989); 190: 23–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Fevre M. E., Vanderhoff J. W., Laissue J. A., Joel D. D. Accumulation of 2μm latex particles in mouse Peyer's patches during chronic latex feeding. Experientia (1978a); 34: 120–122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Fevre M. E., Olivo R., Vanderhoff J. W., Joel D. D. Accumulation of latex in Peyer's patches and its subsequent appearance in villi and mesenteric lymph nodes. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med (1978b); 159: 298–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Fevre M. E., Hancock D. C., Joel D. D. Intestinal barrier to large particulate in mice. J. Tox. Environ. Health (1980); 6: 691–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehr C‐M., Poelma F. G.J., Junginger H. E., Tukker J. J. Estimation of the turnover time of intestinal mucus layer in the rat in situ loop. Int. J. Pharm (1990); 70: 235–240
   Google Scholar
• Lehr C. M., Bouwstra J. A., Kok W., Noach A. B. J., de Boer A. G., Junginger H. E. Bioadhesion by means of specific binding of tomato lectin. Pharm. Res (1990); 9: 547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naisbett B., Woodley J. The potential use of tomato lectin for oral drug delivery: lectin binding to rat small intestine in vitro. Int. J. Pharm (1994a); 107: 223–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naisbett B., Woodley J. The potential use of tomato lectin for oral drug delivery: mechanism of uptake in vitro. Int. J. Pharm (1994b); 110: 127–136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hagan D. T., Christy N. M., Davis S. S. Particulate and Lymphatic Drug Delivery. Lymphatic Transport of Drugs, W. N. Charman, V. J. Stella. CRC Press. (1992); 279–315
   Google Scholar
• Pimentia C., Chouinard F., Labib A., Leaerts V. Effect of various poloxamer coatings on in vitro adhesion of isohexyl‐cyanoacrylate nanospheres to rat ileal segments under liquid flow. Int. J. Pharm (1992); 80: 1–8
   Google Scholar