References
- Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, Nygaard I, eds. Danforth’s obstetrics and gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2008:257–75
- Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al., eds. Williams obstetrics. 21st ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2001:567--618
- Jaschevatzky OE, Rosenberg RP, Shalit A, et al. Protein/creatinine ratio in random urine specimens for quantitation of proteinuria in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:604–6
- Aggarwal N, Suri V, Soni S, et al. A prospective comparison of random urine protein-creatinine ratio versus 24 h urine protein in women with preeclampsia. Medscape J Med 2008;10:98–102
- Durnwald C, Mercer B. A prospective comparison of total protein/creatinine ratio versus 24 h urine protein in women with suspected preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:848–52
- Papanna R, Mann LK, Kouides RW, Glantz JC. Protein/creatinine ratio in preeclampsia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:135–44
- Côté AM, Brown MA, Lam E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of urinary spot protein:creatinine ratio for proteinuria in hypertensive pregnant women: systematic review. Br Med J 2008;336:1003–6
- Morris RK, Riley RD, Doug M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of spot urinary protein and albumin to creatinine ratios for detection of significant proteinuria or adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with suspected preeclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 2012;345:e4342. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4342
- Waugh JJ, Clark TJ, Divakaran TG, et al. Accuracy of urinalysis dipstick techniques in predicting significant proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:769–77
- Phelan LK, Brown MA, Davis GK, Mangos G. A prospective study of the impact of automated dipstick urinalysis on the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2004;23:135–42
- Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, et al. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement for the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy 2001;20:9–14
- Brown MA, Buddle ML. Inadequacy of dipstick proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;35:366–9
- Meyer N, Mercer B, Friedman S, Sibai BM. Urinary dipstick protein: a poor predictor of absent or severe proteinuria. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:137–41
- Gangaram R, Naicker M, Moodley J. Accuracy of the spot urinary microalbumin: creatinine ratio and visual dipsticks in hypertensive pregnant women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144:146–8
- Dwyer BK, Gorman M, Carroll IR, Druzin M. Urinalysis versus urine protein--creatinine ratio to predict significant proteinuria in pregnancy. J Perinatol 2008;28:461–7
- Payne B, Magee LA, Cote AM, et al. PIERS proteinuria: relationship with adverse maternal and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011;33:588–97
- Makihara N, Yamasaki M, Morita H, Yamada H. A dipstick test combined with urine specific gravity improved the accuracy of proteinuria determination in pregnancy screening. Kobe J Med Sci 2010;56:E165–72
- Ferrazzani S, Caruso A, De Carolis S, et al. Proteinuria and outcome of 444 pregnancies complicated by hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:366–71
- Stettler R, Cunningham F. Natural history of chronic proteinuria in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1219–24
- Brown MA, Buddle ML. Hypertension in pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes according to laboratory and clinical features. Med J Aust 1996;165:360–5
- Thornton CE, Makris A, Ogle RF, et al. Role of proteinuria in defininig pre-eclampsia: clinical outcomes for women and babies. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2010;37:466–70
- Seshadri L, Venkataraman I. Hypertension in pregnancy. Outcomes, proteinuric versus nonproteinuric. J Reprod Med 1997;42:88–90
- Chan P, Brown M, Simpson JM, Davis G. Proteinuria in pre-eclampsia: how much matters? Br J Obstet Gynecol 2005;112:280–5