New Alternatives in the Preparation of Chemically Fixed Human Umbilical Veins as Arterial Substitutes

Bibliography

• Barker W. F., Crawford E. S., Mannick J. A., Kylie E. J. The current status of femoropopliteal bypass for arteriosclerotic occlusive disease: a panel discussion. Surgery 1976; 79: 30–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mindich B., Silverman M., Elguezabel. Human umbilical cord vein for vascular replacement: preliminary report and observations. Surgery 1977; 81: 152–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dardik H., Ibrahim I. M., Jarrah M. Three year experience with glutaraldehyde-stabilized umbilical vein for limb salvage. Brit. J. Surg. 1980; 67: 229–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anders A., Zunlke H., Häring R. Implantation of formalin-preserved umbilical veins as dialysis shunts. A new method of allogenic blood vessel graft. Thorax Chirurgie 1977; 25: 415–421
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura A., Sawada Y., Nakanishi Y. Use of the umbilical cord for reconstructive vascular surgery. Adaptability of vascular wall, Z. Reinis, J. Pokorny, J. Linhart. Advencum Czechoslovak Medical Press, Prague 1980; 270–271
   Google Scholar
• Sigot-Luizard M. F., Sigot M., Guidoin R. Influence des milieux de conservation sur la biocompatibilité des prothèses vasculaires biologiques. J. Chir. 1981; 118: 269–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chasnoff I. J., Fletcher M. A. True knot of the umbilical cord. Am. J. Obstet. Gyn. 1977; 127: 425–427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter D., Russel P. Four vessel umbilical cord associated with multiple congenital anomalies. Obstet. Gyn. 1977; 50: 505–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvounis E. E., Dimmick J. E., Wright V. J. Angiomyxoma of umbilical cord. Arch. Path. Lab. Med. 1978; 102: 178–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fortune D. W., Ostor A. G. Angiomyxomas of the umbilical cord. Obstet. Gyn. 1980; 55: 375–378
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonchek L. I. Prevention of endothelial damage during preparation of saphenous vein for bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1980; 79: 911–915
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumann F. G., Catinella F. P., Cunningham J. N., Jr., Spencer F. C. Vein contraction and smooth muscle extensions as causes of endothelial damage during graft preparation. Ann. Surg. 1981; 194: 199–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penciolelli P. Indicateur et contrle de stérilisation en milieu hospitalier. Rev. Europ. Biotech. Med. 1979; 1: 241–242
   Google Scholar
• Yates S. G., Nakagawa Y., Berger K., Sauvage L. R. Surface thrombogenicity of arterial prostheses. Surg. Gyn. Obstet 1973; 136: 12–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roon A. J., Moore W. S., Goldstone J. Comparative surface thrombogenicity of implanted vascular grafts. J. Surg. Res. 1977; 22: 165–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigot-Luizard M. F., Sigot M. Etude in vitro de l'affinité cellulaire de différents supports protéiques susceptibles d'etre utilisés comme prothèses vasculaires Compte rendu. Acad. Sc. 1977; 284: 1839–1842, série D
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg S. The evaluation of explanted umbilical vein grafts. NBS Special publication. Implant retrieval: material and biological analysis 1981; 601: 449–469
   Google Scholar
• Dardik H., Baier R. E., Meenaghan M. Morphologic and biophysical assessment of long term human umbilical cord vein implants used as vascular conduits. Surg. Gyn. Obstet. 1982; 154: 1726
   Google Scholar
• Haun W. E., Brantigan C. O., Sawyer R. B. Intimal breakdown causing failure of human umbilical vein graft. Arch. Surg. 1981; 116: 230–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okamura K., Chiba C., Iriyama T. Antigen depressant effect of glutaraldehyde for aortic heterografts with a valve, with special reference to a concentration right fit for the preservation of grafts. Surgery 1980; 87: 170–176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brucks S. D. Considerations of species related hematological differences on the evaluation of biomaterials. Biomat. Med. Dev. Art. Org. 1977; 5: 97–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dardik I. I., Dardik H. The fate of human umbilical cord vessels used as interposition arterial grafts in the baboon. Surg. Gyn. Obstet. 1975; 140: 567–571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guidoin R., Noél H. P., Bénichoux R. La veine ombilicale humaine traitée au glutaraldehyde comme substitrut artériel de petit diamètre. Expérimentation sur le singe. J. Chir., to be printed
   Google Scholar
• Guidoin R., Marois M., Levaillant P. A. Le chien comme modèle expérimental d'évaluation des prothèses vasculaires d'origine biologique. Ses limites. Sc. Tech. An. Lab. 1979; 4: 247–256
   Google Scholar
• Akers C. K., Dardik I., Dardik H., Wodka M. Computational methods comparing the surface properties of the inner walls of isolated human veins and synthetic biomaterials. J. Coll. Interface Sc. 1977; 59: 461–467
   Google Scholar
• Baier R. E., Akers C. K., Natiella S. Physiochemical properties of stabilized umbilical vein. Vasc. Surg. 1980; 14: 145–157
   Google Scholar
• Bernier J., Guidoin R., Morin H. G. Predicting the success of blood vessel replacement by means of vascular grafts. A prospective study using multivariate analysis. Proc. ISAO 1981, to be printed
   Google Scholar
• Drezner A. D., Turner R. J. Technical requirements for a successful human umbilical vein implant. Vascrg. 1980; 14: 158–167
   Google Scholar
• Guido R., Blais P., Martin L. Healing characteristics of polyethylene terephthalate vascular prosthses in dogs as replacement for the thoracic aorta. Adv. Biomat. 1982; 3: 567–576
   Google Scholar
• Sulkin M. D., Gervin A. S. Fibrinolytic activity in pseudointima of Dacron aortic grafts. Am. Surgeon 1974; 40: 675–679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dardik I. I., Ibrahim I. M., Dardik H. Experimental and clinical use of human umbilical cord vessels as vascular substitutes. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1977; 18: 555–559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oblath R. W., Buckley F. O., Jr., Donnelly W. A. Human umbilical veins and autogenous veins as canine arterial bypass grafts. Ann. Surg. 1978; 188: 158–161
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esato K., Shintani K., Yasutake S. Modification and morphology of human umbilical cord vein as canine arterial bypass grafts. Ann. Surg. 1980; 191: 443–451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roedersheimer L. R., Feins R. H., Schwartz S. I. Comparaison of platelet adherence and aggregation in modified human umbilical vein and autogenous vein grafts. Am. J. Surg. 1980; 140: 591–595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guidoin R., Noël H. P., Marois M. Another look at the Sparks-Mandril arterial graft precursor for vascular repair. Pathology by scanning electron microscopy. Biomat. Med. Dev. Art. Org. 1980; 8: 145–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardik H., Ibrahim I. M., Sussman B. Technical factors in the use of glutaraldehyde-tanned umbilical vein prosthesis for vascular reconstruction in the lower extremity. Vasc. Surg. 1981; 14: 51–60
   Google Scholar
• Giordano J. M., Keshishian J. M. Aneurysm formation in human umbilical vein grafts. Surgery 1982; 97: 343–345
   Google Scholar