Investigation of the influence of external factors on the conformational dynamics of rhodopsin-like receptors by means of molecular dynamics simulation

References

• Deupi X, Standfuss J. Structural insights into agonist-induced activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:541–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa T, Cotecchia S. Historical review: negative efficacy and the constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci [Review] 2005;26:618–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenakin T. Efficacy at G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002;1:103–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canals M, Lane JR, Wen A, et al. A Monod-Wyman-Changeux mechanism can explain G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) allosteric modulation. J Biol Chem [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] 2012;287:650–9
   Google Scholar
• Nygaard R, Zou Y, Dror RO, et al. The dynamic process of β 2-adrenergic receptor activation. Cell 2013;152:532–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Chung KY, Manglik A, et al. The role of ligands on the equilibria between functional states of a G protein-coupled receptor. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:9465--74
   Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Liggett S. Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics of adrenergic receptor signaling: clinical implications and future directions. Clin Pharmacol Therapeut 2011;89:366–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litonjua AA. The significance of β 2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms in asthma. Curr Opin Pulmonary Med 2006;12:12–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth CB, Hanson MA, Stevens RC. Stabilization of the human β 2-adrenergic receptor TM4–TM3–TM5 helix interface by mutagenesis of glu 3.41, a critical residue in gpcr structure. J Mol Biol 2008;376:1305–19
   Google Scholar
• Javitch JA, Fu D, Liapakis G, Chen J. Constitutive activation of the β2 adrenergic receptor alters the orientation of its sixth membrane-spanning segment. J Biol Chem 1997;272:18546–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma S, Dai Y. Principal component analysis based methods in bioinformatics studies. Brief Bioinform 2011;12:714--22
   Google Scholar
• Hayward S, Kitao A, Go N. Harmonicity and anharmonicity in protein dynamics: a normal mode analysis and principal component analysis. Proteins [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] 1995;23:177–86
   Google Scholar
• Amadei A, Linssen A, De Groot B, et al. An efficient method for sampling the essential subspace of proteins. J Biomol Struct Dynam 1996;13:615–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novikov G, Sivozhelezov V, Shaitan K. Study of structural dynamics of ligand-activated membrane receptors by means of principal component analysis. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2013;78:403–11
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels PJ, Wurch T. Review: amino acid domains involved in constitutive activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Mol Neurobiol 1998;17:109–35
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen SG, Jensen AD, Liapakis G, et al. Mutation of a highly conserved aspartic acid in the β2 adrenergic receptor: constitutive activation, structural instability, and conformational rearrangement of transmembrane segment 6. Mol Pharmacol 1999;56:175–84
   Google Scholar
• Scheer A, Cotecchia S. Minireview: constitutively active G protein-coupled receptors: potential mechanisms of receptor activation. J Recept Signal Trans 1997;17:57–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilser VJ, Thompson EB. Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007;104:8311–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal H, Karnik SS. Domain coupling in GPCRs: the engine for induced conformational changes. Trends Pharmacol Sci [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Review] 2012;33:79–88
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum DM, Zhang C, Lyons JA, et al. Structure and function of an irreversible agonist- β 2 adrenoceptor complex. Nature [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] 2011;469:236–40
   Google Scholar
• Scarselli M, Li B, Kim SK, Wess J. Multiple residues in the second extracellular loop are critical for M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation. J Biol Chem [Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural] 2007;282:7385–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley M, Simms J, Hawtin S, et al. Extracellular loops and ligand binding to a subfamily of family A G-protein-coupled receptors. Biochem Soc Trans 2007;35:717--20
   Google Scholar
• Bokoch MP, Zou Y, Rasmussen SG, et al. Ligand-specific regulation of the extracellular surface of a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] 2010;463:108–12
   Google Scholar
• Peeters M, Van Westen G, Li Q, Ijzerman A. Importance of the extracellular loops in G protein-coupled receptors for ligand recognition and receptor activation. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2011;32:35–42
   Google Scholar
• Novikov G, Sivozhelezov V, Shaitan K. Investigation of the conformational dynamics of the A2A adenosine receptor by molecular dynamics simulation. Biophysics 2013;58:483–92
   Google Scholar
• Nygaard R, Frimurer TM, Holst B, et al. Ligand binding and micro-switches in 7TM receptor structures. Trends Pharmacol Sci [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review] 2009;30:249–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanouni P, Schambye H, Seifert R, et al. The Effect of pH on β2 Adrenoceptor Function evidence for protonation-dependent activation. J Biol Chem 2000;275:3121–7
   Google Scholar
• Dror RO, Arlow DH, Maragakis P, et al. Activation mechanism of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:18684–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenakin TP. ‘7TM receptor allostery: putting numbers to shapeshifting proteins. Trends Pharmacol Sci [Review] 2009;30:460–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobilka BK, Deupi X. Conformational complexity of G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review] 2007;28:397–406
   Google Scholar
• Vaidehi N, Kenakin T. The role of conformational ensembles of seven transmembrane receptors in functional selectivity. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2010;10:775–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deupi X, Kobilka BK. Energy landscapes as a tool to integrate GPCR structure, dynamics, and function. Physiology (Bethesda). [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review] 2010;25:293–303
   Google Scholar
• Bond RA, IJzerman AP. Recent developments in constitutive receptor activity and inverse agonism, and their potential for GPCR drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2006;27:92–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit MJ, Vischer HF, Bakker RA, et al. Pharmacogenomic and structural analysis of constitutive g protein-coupled receptor activity. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review] 2007;47:53–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal S, Rajagopal K, Lefkowitz RJ. Teaching old receptors new tricks: biasing seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Review] 2010;9:373–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deupi X, Kobilka B. Activation of G protein-coupled receptors. Adv Protein Chem 2007;74:137–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bahar I. On the functional significance of soft modes predicted by coarse-grained models for membrane proteins. J Gen Physiol 2010;135:563–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaitan KV. The topological structure of hypersurfaces of conformational energy levels and physical mechanisms of the internal mobility of proteins. Macromolecular Symposia 1996;106:321--35
   Google Scholar