Multiple [³H]-Oxytocin Binding Sites in Rat Myometrial Plasma Membranes

References

• Soloff M. S., Swartz T. I. Characterization of a proposed oxytocin receptor in the uterus of the rat and sow. J. Biol. Chem. 1974; 249: 1376–1381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloff M. S., Swartz T. I., Steinberg A. H. Oxytocin receptors in human uterus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1974; 18: 1052–1056
   Google Scholar
• Crankshaw D. J., Romaniuk E., Branda L. A. Identification and characterization of receptors for oxytocin in the myometrium of the pregnant ewe. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 1982; 14: 202–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrova M., Soloff M. S. Oxytocin receptors and parturition in the guinea pig. Biol. Reprod. 1980; 22: 1106–1111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenson R. A., Flouret G., Hechter O. Oxytocin receptors coupled to uterine contraction in estrogen-dominated rabbits. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1980; 628: 209–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pliška V. Pharmacological approaches to the identification and classification of myometrial oxytocin receptors. J. Receptor Res. 1988; 8: 245–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crankshaw D. J. Receptor-binding studies using neurohypophyseal hormone analogs. Handbook of neurohypophyseal hormone analogs, K. Jošt, M. Lébl, F. Brtník. CRC Press, Boca Raton, LA 1986; Volume I: 63–81, part 2
   Google Scholar
• Goren H. J., Geonzon R. M., Hollenberg M. D., Lederis K., Morgan D. O. Oxytocin action: lack of correlation between receptor number and tissue responsiveness. J. Supramol. Struct. 1980; 14: 129–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuross N., Mahtani M., Marshall J. M. Comparison of effects of oxytocin and prostaglandin F2–alpha on circular and longitudinal myometrium from the pregnant rat. Biol. Reprod. 1987; 37: 348–355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crankshaw D. J. The sensitivity of the longitudinal and circular muscle layers of the rat's myometrium to oxytocin in vitro during pregnancy. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1987; 65: 773–777
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruzycky A. L., Crankshaw D. J. Role of inositol phospholipid hydrolysis in the initiation of agonist-induced contractions of rat uterus: effects of domination by 17β-estradiol and progesterone. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1987; 66: 10–17
   Google Scholar
• Pliška V., Heiniger J., Müller-Lhotsky A., Pliska P., Ekberg B. Binding of oxytocin to uterine cells in vitro, Occurrence of several binding site populations and reidentification of oxytocin receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1986; 261: 16984–16989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer R. K., Goldfien A. C., Goldfien A., Roberts J. M. Rabbit uterine oxytocin receptors and in vitro contractile response: abrupt changes at term and the role of eicosanoids. Endocrinology 1986; 119: 699–709
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maggi M., Genazzani A. D., Giannini S., Torrisi C., Baldi E., di Tomasso M., Munson P. J., Rodbard D., Serio M. Vasopressin and oxytocin receptors in vagina, myometrium, and oviduct of rabbits. Endocrinology 1988; 122: 2970–2980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guillon G., Balestre M. N., Roberts J. M., Bottari S. P. Oxytocin and vasopressin: distinct receptors in myometrium. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987; 64: 1129–1135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maggi M., Del Carlo P., Fantoni G., Giannini S., Torrisi C., Casparis D., Massi G., Serio M. Human myometrium during pregnancy contains and responds to VI vasopressin receptors as well as oxytocin receptors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1990; 70: 1142–1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi M., Malozowski S., Kassis S., Guardabasso V., Rodbard D. Identification and characterization of two classes of receptors for oxytocin and vasopressin in porcine tunica albuginea, epididymis, and vas deferens. Endocrinology 1987; 120: 986–994
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan W. Y., Cao L., Hill P. S., Hruby V. J. Oxytocin and vasopressin-binding sites in the rat uterus: competition binding and inhibitory pA2 studies with oxytocin and oxytocin antagonists. Endocrinology 1990; 126: 2095–2101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elands J., Barberis C., Jard S. [3H]-[Thr4, Gly7]OT: a highly selective ligand for central and peripheral OT receptors. Am. J. Physiol. 1988; 254: E31–E38
   Google Scholar
• Cuatrecasas P. Internalization and processing of peptide hormone receptors. Mechanisms of receptor regulation, G. Poste, S. T. Crooke. Plenum Press, New York 1985; 207–223
   Google Scholar
• Nahorski S. R. What are the criteria in ligand binding studies for use in receptor classification?. Perspectives on receptor classification, J. W. Black, D. H. Jenkinson, V. P. Gerskowitch. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York 1987; 51–59
   Google Scholar
• Scatchard G. The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1949; 51: 660–672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz I. M., Hunston D. L. Properties of graphical representations of multiple classes of binding sites. Biochemistry 1971; 10: 3065–3069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamness G. C., McGuire W. L. Scatchard plots: common errors in correction and interpretation. Steroids 1975; 26: 538–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norby J. G., Ottolenghi P., Jensen J. Scatchard plot: common misinterpretation of binding experiments. Analyt. Biochem. 1980; 102: 318–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgisser E. Radioligand-receptor binding studies: what's wrong with the Scatchard analysis?. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 1984; 5: 142–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crankshaw D. J., Branda L. A., Matlib M. A., Daniel E. E. Localization of the oxytocin receptor in the plasma membrane of rat myometrium. Eur. J. Biochem. 1978; 86: 481–486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analyt. Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler H. J., Engel G. Affinity spectra: a novel way for the evaluation of equilibrium binding experiments. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 1983; 322: 183–192
   Google Scholar
• Pliška V. Dose-response models: similarity with population growth dynamics. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 1987; 8: 50–52
   Google Scholar
• Hartigan J. A. Clustering Algorithms. J. Wiley α Sons, Inc., New York 1975; 84–107
   Google Scholar
• Pliška V. Heterogeneous binding sites in neurophysin-like macromolecules. Some theoretical and computational considerations. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1975; 248: 480–493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matlib M. A., Crankshaw J., Garfield R. E., Crankshaw D. J., Kwan C. Y., Branda L. A., Daniel E. E. Characterization of membrane fractions and isolation of purified plasma membranes from rat myometrium. J. Biol. Chem. 1979; 254: 1834–1840
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capponi A. M., Van K. H., Vallotton M. B. Differential effects of cations and guanyl nucleotides on agonist and antagonist binding to rat adrenal and uterine angiotensin II receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1985; 114: 325–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capponi A. M., Catt K. J. Angiotensin II receptors in adrenal cortex and uterus: Binding and activation properties of angiotensin analogues. J. Biol. Chem. 1979; 254: 5120–5127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore G. J. Photoaffinity labelling of angiotensin receptors: functional studies on responding tissues. Pharmac. Ther. 1987; 33: 349–381
   PubMedGoogle Scholar