Drug Treatment Effectiveness: An Examination of Conceptual and Policy Issues

References

• Acker C. J. Stigma or legitimization? A historical examination of the social potentials of addiction disease models. J. Psychoactive Drugs 1993; 25(3)193–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association, Task Force on Psychological Intervention Guidelines. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 1994, Report
   Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D., Hser Y.-I. Treatment of drug abuse. Drugs and Crime, M. Tonry, J. Q. Wilson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990; 393–460
   Google Scholar
• Apsler R. Is drug abuse treatment effective?. Am. Enterprise March/April, 1994; 5(2)46–53
   Google Scholar
• Apsler R., Harding W. M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug abuse treatment: Current status and recommendations for future research. Background Papers on Drug Abuse, Financing and Services Research. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1991, (NIDA Drug Abuse Services Research Series 1, pp. 58–81)
   Google Scholar
• Bennett W., Diiulio J. J., Walters J. P. Body Count: Moral poverty and How to Win America's War Against Crime and Drugs. Simon & Schuster, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Berg W. E. Evaluation of community-based drug abuse treatment programs: A review of the research literature. The Addiction Process: Effective Social Work Approaches, E. M. Freeman. Longman, New York 1992; 81–95
   Google Scholar
• Bernacki P. Pathways from Heroin Addiction: Recovery Without Treatment. Temple University Press, Philadelphia 1986
   Google Scholar
• Brickman P., Rabinowitz V. C., Karuza J., Coates D., Cohen E., Kidder L. Models of helping and coping. Am. Psychol. 1982; 37(4)368–384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower K. J., Blow F. C., Beresford T. P. Treatment implications of chemical dependency models: An integGative approach. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1989; 6: 147–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown B. J., Jr. Statistical controversies in the design of clinical trials: Some personal views. Controlled Clin. Trials 1980; 1: 13–27
   Google Scholar
• Brown B. S. Treatment of non-opiate dependency: Issues and outcomes. Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, R. G. Smart, F. B. Glaaser, Y. Israel, et al. Plenum Press, New York 1984; Vol. 8
   Google Scholar
• Buscema M. Artificial Neural Networks and Complex Social Systems: Theory, Models and Applications [special issue]. Subst. Use Misuse 1998; 33(1–3)1–916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow S. L. Statistical Significance: Rationale, Validity and Utility. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane A. L. Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London 1972
   Google Scholar
• Cook T. D., Campbell D. T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston 1979
   Google Scholar
• Research on the Treatment of Narcotics Addiction: State of the Art, J. R. Cooper, F. Altman, B. S. Brown, D. Czechowicz. National Institute on Drug Abuse, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1983, (NIDA Treatment Research Monograph)
   Google Scholar
• Courtwright D. T. A century of American narcotic policy. Treating Drug Problems, D. R. Gerstein, H. J. Harwood. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1992; Vol. 2
   Google Scholar
• De Leon G., Inciardi J. A., Martin S. M. Residential drug abuse treatment research: Are conventional control designs appropriate for assessing treatment effectiveness?. J. Psychoactive Drugs 1995; 27(1)85–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falco M. The Making of a Drug-Free America: Programs that Work. Time Books, New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein D. R., Harwood H. J. Treating Drug Problems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990; Vol. 1
   Google Scholar
• Gray B. H. The legislative battle over health services research. Health Affairs 1992; 11(4)38–66
   Google Scholar
• Hansen N. B., Lambert M. J. Clinical significance: An overview of methods. J. of Mental Health 1996; 5(1)17–24
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. L. Evaluation and treatment outcome. Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook, 2nd ed., J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, J. G. Langrod. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1992; 596–611
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson N. S., Follette W. C., Revenstrof D. Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behav. Ther. 1984; 15: 336–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson N. S., Truax P. Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1991; 59(1)12–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamerow D. B. Before and after guidelines. J. Fam. Pract. 1997; 44(4)344–346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kazdin A. E., Wilson G. Criteria for evaluating psychotherapy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1978; 35: 407–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon J. W. Agenda. Alternatives. and Public Policies. Harper Collins Publishers, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Kleber H. D. Treatment of drug dependence: What works. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 1989; 1: 81–100
   Google Scholar
• Krauthammer C. Drug treatment hustle. February 20, 1997, Washington Post
   Google Scholar
• Landry M. J. Overview of Addiction Treatment Effectiveness. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD 1995
   Google Scholar
• Lennard H. L., Allen S. D. The treatment of drug addiction: Toward new models. Int. J. Addict. 1973; 8(3)521–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcohol. Drug Abuse Weekly July 15, 1996; 8(28)3, Leshner says data back needle exchange; more studies to come
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom C. E., Woodhouse E. J. The Policy-Making Process, 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1993
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun R., Caulkins J. Examining the behavioral assumptions of the national drug control strategy. Drug Policy and Human Nature: Psychological Perspectives on the Prevention, Management, and Treatment of Illicit Drug Abuse, W. Bickel, R. DeGrandpre. Plenum Press, New York 1996; 177–197
   Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., O'Brien C. P., Metzger D., Alterman A. I., Cornish J., Urschel H. How effective is substance abuse treatment: Compared to what?. Addictive States, C. P. O'Brien, J. H. Jaffe. Raven Press, New York 1992; 231–252
   Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., Woody G. E., Metzger D., McKay J., Durrell J., Alterman A. I., O'Brien C. P. Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: Reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. Millbank Quart. 1996; 74(1)51–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbin M. J. Unelected Representatives: Congressional Staff and the Future of Representative Government. Basic Books, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Martin G. Treating Alcohol and Drug Problems in Ontario: A Vision for the 90's. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1990, Report submitted to the Minister Responsible for the Ontario Provincial Anti-Drug Strategy
   Google Scholar
• National Association Of State Alcohol And Drug Abuse Directors. Treatment Works: The Tragic Cost of Undervaluing Treatment in the “Drug War.”. National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors, Washington, DC 1990
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien C. P., McLellan A. T. Myths about the treatment of addiction. Lancet 1996; 347: 237–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. Identifying Health Technologies that Work: Searching for Evidence. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Peele S. Diseasing of America: Addiction Treatment Out of Control. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA 1989
   Google Scholar
• Peele S. Assumptions about drugs and the marketing of drug policies. Drug Policy and Human Nature, W. K. Bickel, R. J. DeGrandpre. Plenum Press, New York 1996; 199–220
   Google Scholar
• Peele S., Brodsky A. The Truth About Addiction and Recovery. Simon and Schuster, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Persons J. B. Psychotherapy outcome studies do not accurately represent current models of psychotherapy. Am. Psychol. 1991; 46(2)99–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus T. Consecutive patient questionnaire databases: A complementary alternative. J. NIH Res. 1997; 9(9)32
   Google Scholar
• Roper W. L., Winkenwerder W., Hackbarth G. M., Krakauer H. Effectiveness in health care. An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988; 319(18)1197–1202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sechrest L., Yeaton W. H. Magnitudes of experimental effects in social science research. Eval. Rev. 1982; 6(5)579–600
   Google Scholar
• Seligman M. E. The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. Am. Psychol. 1995; 50(12)965–974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Single E. Defining harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995; 14: 287–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisk J. E., Hatziandreu E. J., Hughes R. The Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Treatment: Implications for Controlling AIDS/HIV Infection. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC 1990, (AIDS-Related Issues Background Paper 6; OTA-BP-H-73)
   Google Scholar
• Strupp H. The tripartite model and the Consumer Reports study. Am. Psychol. 1996; 51(10)1017–1024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swindle R. W., Peterson K. A., Paradise M. J., Moos R. H. Measuring substance abuse program treatment orientations: the Drug and Alcohol Program Treatment Inventory. J. Subst. Abuse 1995; 7(1)61–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanenbaum S. J. Knowing and acting in medical practice: The epistemological politics of outcomes research. J. Health Polities 1994; 19(1)27–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingey R. C., Lambert M. J., Burlingame G. M., Hansen N. B. Assessing clinical significance: Proposed extensions to method. Psychother. Res. 1996; 6(2)109–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisz J. R., Weiss B., Donenberg G. R. The lab versus the clinic: Effects of child and adolescent psychotherapy. Am. Psychol. 1992; 47(12)1578–1585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells K. B. Treatment research at the crossroads: The scientific interface of clinical trials and effectiveness research. Am. J. Psychiatry 1999; 156(1)5–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky H. L. Social science and the public agenda: Reflections on the relation of knowledge to policy in the United States and abroad. J. Health Polities Policy Law 1997; 22(5)1241–1265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar