Change is Possible: The History of the International Drug Control Regime and Implications for Future Policymaking

References

• Ahmad, D. L. (2007). The opium debate and Chinese exclusion laws in the nineteenth-century American West. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, I., & Ghodse, H. (1999). Evolution of international drug control, 1945–1995. Bulletin on Narcotics, LI(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Beeching, J. (1975). The Chinese opium wars. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Berridge, V. (1984). Drugs and social policy: the establishment of drug control in Britain 1900–30. British Journal of Addiction, 79, 17–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berridge, V. (1999). Opium and the people: opiate use and drug control policy in nineteenth and early-twentieth century England. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berridge, V. (2005). “The British system” and its history: myth and reality. In J. Strang & M. Gossop (Eds.), Heroin addiction and ‘the British system’: understanding the problem: policy and the British system (pp. 7–16). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bewley-Taylor, D. R. (1999). The United States and international drug control, 1909–1997. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Block, A. A. (1989). European drug traffic and traffickers between the wars: the policy of suppression and its consequences. Journal of Social History, 23(winter), 315–337.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, M. (1998). Opium: a history. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruun, K., Pan, L., & Rexed, I. (1975). The gentlemen's club: international control of drugs and alcohol. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstairs, C. (2005). The stages of the international drug control system. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(1), 57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charras, I. (1998). L'Etat et les “stupéfiants”: Archéologie d'une politique publique répressive. Les Cahiers de la Sécurité Intérieure, 32(deuxième trimestre), 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. M. (2008, March 10). Making drug control “fit for purpose”: building on the UNGASS decade. Statement of the Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime to the 51st Session of the Commission on Narcotics Drugs, Vienna, Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Courtwright, D. T. (1982). Dark paradise: opiate addiction in America before 1940. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Courtwright, D. T. (2001a). Dark paradise: a history of opiate addiction in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Courtwright, D. T. (2001b). Forces of habit: drugs and the making of the modern world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Courtwright, D., Joseph, H., & Des Jarlais, D. (1989). Addicts who survived: an oral history of narcotic use in America 1923–1965. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Kort, M., & Korf, D. J. (1992). The development of drug trade and drug control in The Netherlands: a historical perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change, 17, 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• de Liederkerke, A. (2001). La Belle Epoque de l'opium. Paris: Editions de la Différence.
   Google Scholar
• de Ridder, M. (2000). Heroin: Vom Arzneimittel zur Droge. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Dikötter, F., Laamann, L., & Zhou, X. (2004). Narcotics culture. a history of drugs in China. Hong Kong: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, J., & Greenfield, V. (2001). The fall and rise of the global economy. Chicago Fed Letter, No. 164, The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, V. A. (1997). Promoting worker rights in developing countries: U.S. policies and their rationale. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, B. (2001). Learning to tax: the political economy of the opium trade in Iran, 1921–1941. Journal of Economic History, 61(1), 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Jelsma, M. (2005). The UN drug control debate: current dilemmas and prospects for 2008. Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?page=archives_ jelsma_budapest
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. (1997). The opium empire: Japanese imperialism and drug trafficking in Asia, 1895–1945. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D. (1975). Understanding British addiction statistics. UN Bulletin on Narcotics, 27(1), 49–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacCallum, E. P. (1928). Twenty years of Persian opium (1908–1928). Opium research committee of the foreign policy association. Reprinted In Grob G. (Ed.), Narcotic addiciton and American foreign policy. New York: Arno Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, W. (2000). Drug diplomacy in the twentieth century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, A. W. (1991). The politics of heroin: CIA complicity in the global drug trade. Brooklyn, NY: Lawrence Hill Books.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K., & Parssinen, T. (1998). Webs of smoke: smugglers, warlords, spies and the history of the international drug trade. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Musto, D. F. (1987). The American disease: origins of narcotics control. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, R. K. (1989). India and the Anglo-Chinese opium agreements, 1907–1914. Modern Asian Studies, 23, 525–560.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, R. K. (1995). Opium smoking in late imperial China. Modern Asian Studies, 29, 765–794.
   Google Scholar
• ONDCP (Office of National Drug Control Policy). (2001). What America's users spend on illegal drugs, 1988–2000. Washington, DC: Author. Prepared for ONDCP, Office of Programs, Budget, Research and Evaluation under HHS contract no. 282–98-0006 by ABT Associates, Inc of Cambridge, MA. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from http://www. whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/pdf/american_users_ spend_2002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D. (1934). British opium policy in China and India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paoli, L. (2000). Pilot project to describe and analyse local drug markets — first phase final report: illegal drug markets in Frankfurt and Milan. Lisbon: EMCDDA.
   Google Scholar
• Paoli, L., Greenfield, V. A., Charles, M., & Reuter, P. (2009). India: the third largest illicit opium producer? Addiction, 104(3), 347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoli, L. V., Greenfield, A., & Reuter, P. (2009). The world heroin market: can supply be cut? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. F. (2002). Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895. Modern Asian Studies, 36(May), 375–420.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, J. (1985). Opium in Java: a sinister friend. Journal of Asian Studies, 44(3), 549–560.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, J. (1991). Opium to Java. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, J. (1956). Iran suppresses opium production. Bulletin on Narcotics, 8(3), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerer, S. (1981). Die Genese der Betäubungsmittelgesetze in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und in den Niederlanden. Göttingen: Otto Schwarz.
   Google Scholar
• Senate of Canada Special Committee on Illegal Drugs. (2002). Cannabis: our position for a Canadian public policy (Report of the Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs). September. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://www.parl.gc.ca/ SenCommitteeBusiness/CommitteeReports.aspx?parl=37&ses= 1&Language=E&comm_id=85
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, S. L. (2001). The struggle of mankind against its deadliest foe: themes of counter-subversion in anti-narcotics campaigns, 1920–1940. Journal of Social History, 34(3), 591–610.
   Google Scholar
• Spear, B. (2005). The early years of Britain's drug situation in practice: up to the 1960s. In J. Strang & M. Gossop (Eds.), Heroin addiction and “the British system”: understanding the problem: policy and the British system (pp. 17–42). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, J., & Gossop, M. (2005). Misreported and misunderstood. the “British system” of drug policy. In J. Strang, & M. Gossop (Eds.), Heroin addiction and “the British system”: understanding the problem: policy and the British system (pp. 7–16). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tadashi Wakabayashi, B. (2000). From peril to profit: opium in the late Edo and Meiji eyes. In T. Brook & B. Tadashi Wakabayashi (Eds.), Opium regimes: China, Britain and Japan, 1839–1952 (pp. 55–77). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. H. (1969). American diplomacy and the narcotics traffic, 1900–1939: a study in international humanitarian reforms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trocki, C. (1999). Opium, empire and the global political economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. O. III. (1991). Opium and foreign policy: the Anglo-American search for order in Asia, 1912–1954. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. E. (1958). The battle against opium in Iran: a record of progress. Bulletin on Narcotics, X, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2005). The social life of opium in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. (1999). Anti-drug crusades in twentieth-century China: nationalism, identity and state building. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. (2000). Nationalism, identity and state building: the anti drug crusade in the People's Republic, 1949–1952. In T. Brook & B. Tadashi Wakabayashi (Eds.), Opium regimes: China, Britain and Japan, 1839–1952 (pp. 380–404). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar