Successful Completion: An Examination of Factors Influencing Drug Court Completion for White and Non-White Male Participants

REFERENCES

• Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review: 2001 Update. New York: Columbia University, National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, R. C. (2002). The adversary system and attorney role in the drug court treatment movement. In J. L. Nolan, Jr. (Ed.), Drug courts in theory and in practice (pp. 115–143). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (2010). Associations with substance abuse treatment completion among drug court participants. Substance Use and Misuse, 45, 1874–1891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Assistance (2011). Drug court clearinghouse project summary of drug court activity by state and county November 18, 2011. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Butzin, C. A., Saum, C. A., & Scarpitti, F. R. (2002). Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(12–13), 1615–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cissner, A. B., & Rempel, M. (2005). The state of drug court research: Moving beyond “Do they work?”. New York: The Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., & Neuhard, J. (2004). From day one: Who's in control as problem solving and client-centered sentencing take center stage? New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 29(1), 11–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. S. (1997). Drug court survey report: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• DeVall, K. E. (2008). The theory and practice of drug courts: Wolves in sheep clothing? (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, 2008) Dissertation Abstracts International, 69, 1166.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E., Li, L., & Hser, Y. (2009). Client and program factors associated with dropout from court-mandated drug treatment. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 204–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., Lee, P. A., Kirby, K. C., Bovasso, G., & McLellan, A. T. (2002). Status hearings in drug court: When more is less and less is more. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. (2003). The impact of drug courts. Criminology and Public Policy,2, 197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, D. C., Kearley, B. W., Najaka, S. S., & Rocha, C. M. (2007). How drug treatment courts work: An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(1), 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, A. R., & Saum, C. A. (2005). Mental health, gender, and drug court completion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, A. (2003). Judging drug courts: Balancing the evidence. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 207–212.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, A., & Roman, J. (2001). Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, A., & Smith, B. (1997). Evaluation of the District of Columbia superior court drug intervention program: Focus group interviews. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hickert, A. O., Boyle, S. W., & Tollefson, D. R. (2009). Factors that predict drug court completion and drop out: Findings from an evaluation of Salt Lake City's adult felony drug court. Journal of Social Science Service Research, 35, 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. (2002). The Denver drug court and its unintended consequences. In J. L. Nolan, Jr. (Ed.), Drug court in theory and in practice (pp. 67–87). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, W., & Marlowe, D. B. (2011). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (2007). Adult drug treatment courts: A review. Sociology Compass, 1, 552–571.
   Google Scholar
• Leukefeld, C., McDonald, H. S., Stanton, M., & Mateyoke-Scrivner, A. (2004). Employment, employment-related problems, and drug use at drug court entry. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(13–14), 2559–2579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, T. K., Williams, K., Leukefeld, C., & Minton, L. (2000). A drug court process evaluation: Methodology and findings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 369–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, F. E., & van Wormer, J. G. (2007). The nexus between drug and alcohol treatment program integrity and drug court effectiveness: Policy recommendations for success. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 226–245.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B., DeMatteo, D. S., & Festinger, D. S. (2003). A sober assessment of drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16, 153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B., Heck, C., Huddleston, C. W., & Casebolt, R. (2006). A national research agenda for drug courts: Plotting the course for second-generation scientific inquiry. Drug Court Review, 5(2), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., Webster, J. M., Stanton, M., & Leukefeld, C. (2004). Treatment retention predictors of drug court participants in a rural state. The American Journal of Drug Alcohol Abuse, 30, 605–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrall, E., & Bird, S. M. (2009). A statistical perspective on the design of drug court studies. Evaluation Review, 33, 257–280.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Shutt, J. E. (2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher, C. J., & Atkins, S. M. (2007). Drugs and drug policy: The control of consciousness alteration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals (1997). Defining drug courts: The ten key components. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. L. (2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. H., Haas, A. L., & Murrin, M. R. (1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2, 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rempel, M., & DeStefano, C. D. (2001). Predictors of engagement in court-mandated treatment: Findings at the Brooklyn treatment court 1996–2000. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation,33, 87–124.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, J. M., Predergast, M., Richardson, K., Burdon, W., & Ramirez, A. (2005). Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 641–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, J., Townsend, W., & Bhati, A. S. (2003). Recidivism rates for drug court graduates, Nationally based estimates. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Satel, S. (1998). Observational study of courtroom dynamics in selected drug courts. Drug Court Review,1, 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Saum, C. S., Scarpitti, F. R., Butzin, C. A., Perez, V. W., Jennings, D., & Gray, A. R. (2002). Drug court participants’ satisfaction with treatment and the court experience. Drug Court Review, 4(1), 39–82.
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, M., & Terry III, W. C. (1997). Predicting graduation from Broward County's dedicated drug treatment court. The Justice System Journal, 19, 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Seahawk” State Police (2010). 2010 all arrests reported by county/agency. Retrieved on February 7, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sechrest, D. K., & Shicor, D. (2001) Determinants of graduation from a day treatment drug court in California: A preliminary study. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senjo, S. R., & Leip, L. A. (2001). Testing and developing theory in drug court: A four-part logit model to predict program completion. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K. (2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review. Las Vegas, NV: University of Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K. Hartman, J. L., Listwan, S. J., Howell, T., & Latessa, E. J. (2011). Outcomes among drug court participants: Does drug of choice matter? International Journal of Offender therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(1), 155–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinak, J. M. (2003). Why defenders feel defensive: The defender's role in problem-solving courts. American Criminal Law Review, 40, 1617–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. A. (2002). Treatment inside the drug treatment court: The who, what, where, and how of treatment services. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(12–13), 1665–1689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. A. (2003). Substance abuse counselors’ treatment philosophy and the content of treatment services provided to offenders in drug court programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 census interactive population search. Retrieved from http: //2010.census.gov/ 2010census/popmap/. Accessed February 7, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & McKenzie, D. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. M., Sowards, K. A., & Wolf, D. A. (2003). Predicting retention of drug court participants using event history analysis. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 37, 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. & Belenko, S. (2002). Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 297–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar