Engaging Stakeholders in Review and Recommendations for Models of Outcome Monitoring for Substance Abuse Treatment

REFERENCES

• Accreditation Canada. (2009). Leading practice: Client directed outcome informed (CDOI). Retrieved December 15, 2011, from http://www.accreditation.ca/en/LeadingPractice.aspx? id=1538
   Google Scholar
• Adair, C. E., Simpson, E., Casebeer, A. L., Birdsell, J. M., Hayden, K., & Lewis, S. (2006). Performance measurement in healthcare: Part II—State of the science findings by stage of the performance measurement process. Healthcare Policy, 2, 56–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Services. (2010). Alcohol and other drug treatment services. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Retrieved January 12, 2012, from http://www.aihw.gov.au/drugs/aodtsnmds/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Alemi, F., Stephens, R., Parran, T., Llorens, S., Bhatt, P., Ghadiri, A., (1994). Automated monitoring of outcomes: Application to treatment of drug abuse. Medical Decision Making, 14, 180–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., & Comeau, C. (2008). Collaborative transformation: The key to high performance results in a complex world. Canadian Government Executive Magazine. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://www.intersol.ca/en/resources/collaborative-transformation-key-high-performance-results-complex-world
   Google Scholar
• CalOMS Treatment. (2011). CalOMS treatment. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.adp.ca.gov/caloms/ calomsmain.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation. (1996). A guide to the development and use of performance indicators. Ottawa, Canada: CCHSA.
   Google Scholar
• Carise, D., Cornely, W., & Gurel, O. (2002). A successful researcher-practitioner collaboration in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darke, S., Ross, J., & Teesson, M. (2007). The Australian treatment outcome study (ATOS): What have we learnt about treatment for heroin dependence? Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 49–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, M., Scott, C. K., & Funk, R. (2003). An experimental evaluation of Recovery Management Checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26, 339–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. L., Scott, C. K., Funk, R., & Foss, M. A. (2005). The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28, S51–S62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmall, M. C. (2006). The global toolkit. Guidance for the measurement of drug treatment demand. New York: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
   Google Scholar
• Drug and Alcohol Services Information System. (2009). Drug and alcohol services information system. Washington, DC: US Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Applied Studies. Retrieved January 15, 2012, from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/dasis.htm
   Google Scholar
• Drug and Alcohol Treatment Information System. (2011). Drug and alcohol treatment information system. Toronto, ON: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Retrieved January 22, 2012, from http://www.datis.ca/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., & Sparks, J. A. (2004). The heroic client: A revolutionary way to improve effectiveness through client-directed outcome-informed therapy (rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gleghorn, A. A., & Cotter, F. (2003). National and local perspectives on the center for substance abuse treatment practice/research collaborative and practice improvement collaborative initiatives. In J. L. Sorensen, R. A. Rawson, J. Guydish, & J. E. Zweben (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment through collaboration: Practice and research partnerships that works (pp. 213–225). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Grella, C., Scott, C., Foss, M., & Dennis, M. (2008). Gender similarities and differences in the treatment, relapse and recovery cycle. Evaluation Review, 32, 113–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guydish, J., Sorensen, J. L., Rawson, R. A., & Zweben, J. E. (2003). Conclusion: Recommendations for practice-research collaboration. In J. L. Sorensen, R. A. Rawson, J. Guydish, & J. E. Zweben (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment through collaboration: Practice and research partnerships that works (pp. 287–296). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. A., Beebe, T. J., Fulkerson, J. A., & Torgerud, C. R. (1996). The development of patient profiles for Minnesota's treatment outcomes monitoring system. Addiction, 91, 687–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Systems Research and Consulting Unit. (2009). The design of an evidence-informed integrated mental health, substance use and problem gambling service system for Ontario. Toronto, Canada: CAMH.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser, Y., Longshore, D., & Anglin, M. D. (2007). The life course perspective on drug use: A conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Evaluation Review, 31, 515–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iles, V., & Sutherland, K. (2001). Managing change in the NHS organizational change: A review for health care managers, professionals and researchers. London, UK: National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organization, National Health Service.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., & Brown, G. S. (1996). Data-based management for tracking outcome in private practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 172–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. I. (2003). Blending research and practice: Designing treatment studies to meet real-world needs. In J. L. Sorensen, R. A. Rawson, J. Guydish, & J. E. Zweben (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment through collaboration: Practice and research partnerships that works (pp. xvii–xx). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, J., Nizzoli, U., Corbelli, C., Margaron, H., Torres, M., Prada De Castro, I., (2000). New European instruments for treatment outcome research: Reliability of the Maudsley addiction profile and treatment perceptions questionnaire in Italy, Spain, and Portugal. European Addiction Research, 6, 115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorry, F., Garnick, D. W., Bartlett, J., Cotter, F., & Chalk, M. (2000). Developing performance measures for alcohol and other drug services in managed care plans. Washington circle group. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 26, 633–643.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKay, J. R. (2005). Is there a case for extended interventions for alcohol and drug use disorders? Addiction, 100, 1594–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan, A. T., Mckay, J. R., Forman, R., Cacciola, J., & Kemp, J. (2005). Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: From retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction, 100, 447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, R. H., Finney, J. W., Federman, E. B., & Suchinsky, R. (2000). Specialty mental health care improves patients’ outcomes: Findings from a nationwide program to monitor the quality. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 61, 704–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundt, J. C., Bohn, M. J., King, M., & Hartley, M. T. (2002). Automating standard alcohol use assessment instruments via interactive voice response technology. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 207–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Drug Treatment Monitoring System. (2010). National drug treatment monitoring system. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse. Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.ndtms.net/
   Google Scholar
• National Treatment Strategy Working Group. (2008). A systems approach to substance use in Canada: Recommendations for a national treatment strategy. Ottawa, Canada: National Treatment Strategy Working Group. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.nationalframework-cadrenational.ca/ uploads/files/TWS_Treatment/nts-report-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oudejans, S. C. C., Schippers, G. M., Merkx, M. J. M., Schramade, M. H., Koeter, M. W. J., & van den Brink, W. (2009). Feasibility and validity of low-budget telephonic follow-up interviews in routine outcome monitoring of substance abuse treatment. Addiction, 104, 1138–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush, B. (2008). Evaluation plan for implementation of core competencies for public health initiative. Ottawa, Canada: Office of Public Health Practice, Public Health Agency of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, B., Corea, L., & Martin, G. (2009). Monitoring alcohol and other drug treatment: What would an optimal system look like? Contemporary Drug Problems, 36, 545–574.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, B., Dennis, M. L., Scott, C. K., Castel, S., & Funk, R. R. (2008). The interaction of co-occurring mental disorders and recovery management checkups on substance abuse treatment participation and recovery. Evaluation Review, 32, 7–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. K. (2004). A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 74, 21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. K., & Dennis, M. L. (2009). Results from two randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of quarterly recovery management checkups with adult chronic substance users. Addiction, 104, 959–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. K., Dennis, M. L., & Foss, M. A. (2005). Utilizing recovery management checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment reentry, and recovery. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 78, 325–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, J. L., Guydish, J., Rawson, R. A., & Zweben, J. E. (2003). Introduction: The need for research-practice collaboration. In J. L. Sorensen, R. A. Rawson, J. Guydish, & J. E. Zweben (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment through collaboration: Practice and research partnerships that works (pp. 3–10). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Tansella, M., & Thornicroft, G. (1998). A conceptual framework for mental health services: The matrix model. Psychological Medicine, 28, 503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The IVZ Foundation. (2010). IVZ. Retrieved February 25, 2012, from http://www.sivz.eu/about-ivz
   Google Scholar
• Tober, G., Brearley, R., Kenyon, R., Raistrick, D., & Morley, S. (2000). Measuring outcomes in a health service addiction clinic. Addiction Research & Theory, 8, 169–182.
   Google Scholar
• Treatment Outcomes Profile. (2010). Treatment outcomes profile. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse, Treatment Outcomes and Effectiveness. Retrieved March 9, 2012, from http://www.nta.nhs.uk/who-healthcare-top.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley, M., & Frieze, D. (2006). Lifecycle of emergence: Using emergence to take social innovations to scale. Spokane, WA: The Berkana Institute. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from www.berkana.org/articles/lifecycle.htm
   Google Scholar