284
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measuring Current Drug Use in Female Sex Workers and Their Noncommercial Male Partners in Mexico: Concordance Between Data Collected From Surveys Versus Semi-Structured Interviews

, , , , , , & show all

References

  • Bongers, I. M. B., & Van Oers, J. A. M. (1998). Mode effects on self-reported alcohol use and problem drinking: Mail questionnaires and personal interviewing compared. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 280–285.
  • Buchan, B. J., Dennis, L. M., Tims, F. M., & Diamond, G. S. (2002). Cannabis use: Consistency and validity of self-report, on-site urine testing and laboratory testing. Addiction, 97(Suppl. 1), 98--108.
  • Catania, J., Gibson, D., Chitwood, D., & Coates, T. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influence on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339–362.
  • Colón, H. M., Robles, R. R., & Sahai, H. (2001). The validity of drug use responses in a household survey in Puerto Rico: Comparison of survey responses of cocaine and heroin use with hair tests. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 1042–1049.
  • Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Day, E., Best, D., Cantillano, V., Gaston, R. L., Nambamali, A., & Keaney, F. (2008). Measuring the use and career histories of drug users in treatment: Reliability of the Lifetime Drug Use History (LDUH) and its data yield relative to clinical case notes. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27, 171–177.
  • Del Boca, F. K. & Noll, J. A. (2000). Truth or consequences: The validity of self-report data in health services research. Addiction, 95(Suppl 2), S347–S360.
  • Denis, C., Fatseas, M., Beltran, V., Bonnet, C., Picard, S., Combourieu, I., … Auriacombe, M. (2012). Validity of the self-reported drug use section of the Addiction Severity Index and associated factors used under naturalistic conditions. Substance Use and Misuse, 47, 356–363.
  • Digiusto, E., Seres, V., Bibby, A., & Batey, R. (1996). Concordance between urinalysis results and self-reported drug use by applicants for methadone maintenance in Australia. Addictive Behaviors, 21, 319-329.
  • Fendrich, M., & Johnson, T. P. (2005). Race/ethnicity differences in the validity of self-reported drug use: Results from a household survey. Journal of Urban Health, 82(2 Suppl. 3), iii67–iii81.
  • Fendrich, M., Johnson, T. P., Sudman, S., Wislar, J. S., & Spiehler, V. (1999). Validity of drug use reporting in a high-risk community sample: A comparison of cocaine and heroin survey reports with hair tests. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149, 955–962.
  • Gibson, E. K., Exner, H., Stone, R., Linquist, J., Cowen, L., & Roth, E. A. (2011). A mixed methods approach to delineating and understanding injection practices among clientele of a Victoria, British Columbia needle exchange program. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(4), 360–365.
  • Houck, J. M., Forcehimes, A. A., Gutierrez, E. T., & Bogenschutz, M. P. (2013). Test-retest reliability of self-report measures in a dually diagnosed sample. Substance Use and Misuse, 48, 99–105.
  • Islam, M. M., Topp, L., Conigrave, K. M., van Beek, I., Maher, L., White, A., … Day, C. A. (2012). The reliability of sensitive information provided by injecting drug users in a clinical setting: Clinician-administered versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). AIDS Care, 24, 1496–1503.
  • King, M., & Bruner, G. (2003). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 79–103.
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. C. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
  • Ledgerwood, D. M., Goldberger, B. A., Risk, N. K., Lewis, C. E., & Price, R. K. (2008). Comparison between self-report and hair analysis of illicit drug use in a community sample of middle-aged men. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 1131–1139.
  • Lopez, A. M., Bourgois, P., Wenger, L. D., Lorvick, J., Martinez, A. N., & Kral, A. H. (2013). Interdisciplinary mixed methods research with structurally vulnerable populations: Case studies of injection drug users in San Francisco. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, 101–109.
  • Macalino, G. E., Celentano, D. D., Latkin, C., Strathdee, S. A., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14(5), 367–378.
  • Magura, S., Goldsmith, D., Casriel, C., Goldstein, P. J., & Lipton, D. S. (1987). The validity of methadone clients’ self-reported drug use. International Journal of the Addictions, 22, 727–749.
  • Magura, S. & Kang, S. Y. (1996). Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: A meta-review. Substance Use and Misuse, 31, 1131–1153
  • Mayhew, S., Collumbien, M., Qureshi, A., Platt, L., Rafiq, N., Faisel, A., … Hawkes, S. (2009). Protecting the unprotected: Mixed-method research on drug use, sex work, and rights in Pakistan's fight against HIV/AIDS. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 85(Suppl. 2), ii31–ii36.
  • McLellan, E., MacQueen, K. M., & Neidig, J. L. (2003). Beyond the qualitative interview: Data preparation and transcription. Field Methods, 15(1), 63–84.
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source-book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mirzazadeh, A., Nedjat, S., Navadeh, S., Haghdoost, A., Mansournia, M., McFarland, W., & Mohammad, K. (2014). HIV and related risk behaviors among female sex workers in Iran: Bias-adjusted estimates from the 2010 National Bio-Behavioral Survey. AIDS and Behavior, 18, S19–S24.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 351–385). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Palinkas, L. A. (2014). Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43, 851–861.
  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed method designs in mental health services research. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 255–263.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pollini, R. A., Lozada, R., Gallardo, M., Rosen, P., Vera, A., Macias, A., … Strathdee, S. A. (2010). Barriers to pharmacy-based syringe purchase among injection drug users in Tijuana, Mexico: A mixed methods study. AIDS and Behavior, 14(3), 679–687.
  • Ray, L. A., Hart, E. J., & Chin, P. F. (2011). Self-rating of the effects of alcohol (SRE): Predictive utility and reliability across interview and self-report administrations. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 241–243.
  • Rhodes, T., Wagner, K., Strathdee, S. A., Shannon, K., Davidson, P., & Bourgois, P. (2012). Structural violence and structural vulnerability within the risk environment: Theoretical and methodological perspectives for a social epidemiology of HIV risk among injection drug users and sex workers. In P. O'Campo & J. R. Dunn (Eds.), Rethinking social epidemiology: towards a science of change (pp. 205–230). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Rice, E. R., Holloway, I. W., Barman-Adhikari, A., Fuentes, D., Brown, C. H., & Palinkas, L. A. (2014). A mixed methods approach to network data collection. Field Methods, 26, 252–268.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables of tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 321–350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93-105.
  • Singer, M., Stopka, T., Siano, C., Springer, K., Barton, G., Khoshnood, K., … Heimer, R. (2000). The social geography of AIDS and hepatitis risk: Qualitative approaches for assessing local differences in sterile-syringe access among injection drug users. American Journal of Public Health, 90(7), 1049–1056.
  • Solbergsdottir, E., Bjornsson, G., Gundmundsson, L. S., Tyrfingsson, T., & Kristinsson, J. (2004). Validity of self-reports and drug use among young people seeking treatment for substance abuse or treatment. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 23(1), 29–38.
  • Syvertsen, J. L., Robertson, A. M., Abramovitz, D., Rangel, M. G., Martinez, G., Patterson, T. L. , … Strathdee, S. A. (2012). Proyecto Parejas. Study protocol: Eligibility screening for couple-based HIV research with female sex workers and their non-commercial partners. BMC Public Health, 12, 136.
  • Syvertsen, J. L., Robertson, A. M., Palinkas, L. A., Rangel, M. G., Martinez, G., & Strathdee, S. A. (2013). Where sex ends and emotions begin: Love and HIV risk among female sex workers and their intimate, non-commercial partners along the Mexico–U.S. border. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 15, 540--554.
  • Syvertsen, J. L., Robertson, A. M., Rolon, M. L., Palinkas, L. A., Martinez, M., Rangel, M. G., & Strathdee, S. A. (2013). “Eyes that don't see, heart that doesn't feel”: Coping with sex work in an intimate relationship context and the implications for HIV prevention. Social Science and Medicine, 87, 1--8.
  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 3–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wagner, K., Davidson, P. J., Pollini, R. A., Strathdee, S. A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2012). Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: Exemplars from research with drug using populations. International Journal of Drug Policy, 23, 54–61.
  • White, B., Day, C., & Maher, L. (2007). Self reported risk behaviour among injecting drug users: Self versus assisted questionnaire completion. AIDS Care, 19, 441--447.
  • Wilcox, C. E., Bogenschutz, M. P., Nakazawa, M., & Woody, G. (2013). Concordance between self-report and urine drug screening data in adolescent opiod dependent clinical trial participants. Addictive Behaviors, 38, 2568–2574.
  • Williams, M. L., Freeman, R. C., Bowen, A. M., Zhao, Z., Elwood, W. N., Gordon, C., … Signes, C. (2000). A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 199–213.
  • Williams, R. J., & Nowatzki, N. (2005). Validity of adolescent self-report of substance use. Substance Use and Misuse, 40, 299–311.
  • Windhusen, T. M., Somoza, E. C., Singal, B., Kim, S., Horn, P. S., & Rotrosen, J. (2003). Measuring outcome in cocaine clinical trials: A comparison of sweat patches with urine toxicology and participant self-report. Addiction, 98, 317–324.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.