42
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Miscellaneous Article

Drug-Crime Nexus Bibliography

Pages 1993-2003 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

References

  • Adlaf, E., Ivis, F. J., Smart, R. G., and Walsh, G. W. (1995). The Ontario Student Drug Use Survey: 1977-1995. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
  • Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (1991). Drug Misusers and the Criminal Justice System, Part I. London: HMSO.
  • Akers, R. L. (1984). Delinquent behavior, drugs, and alcohol: What is the relationship? Today's Delinq. 3: 19-46.
  • Akers, R. L. (1992). What do we do about drugs? Consequences and reform of public policy. Crim. Justice Rev. 17(2): 280-290.
  • Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning test of a general theory. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 636-655.
  • Alexander, C. (1987). From dreamtime to nightmare: The voices of 168 Aboriginal (ex-)prisoners in New South Wales. Aust. N. Z. J. Sociol. 23(3): 323-342.
  • Alksne, H. (1959). A Follow-up Study of Treated Adolescent Narcotics Users. New York, NY: Columbia University School of Public Health and Administrative Medicine.
  • Anglin, M. D., and Speckart, G. (1988). Narcotics use and crime: A multisample, multimethod analysis. Criminology 26(2): 197-233.
  • Anglin, M. D., Brecht, M. L., and Speckart, G. (1989). Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology 27(3): 537-557.
  • Anglin, M. D., and Hser, Y. (1987). Addicted women and crime. Criminology 25: 355-397, May.
  • Arano, G. (1990). Drug policy as a factor of trends in trade and use of different substances. J. Drug Issues 20(3): 443-449.
  • Austin, G. A., and Lettieri, D. J. (1976). Drugs and Crime: The Relationship of Drug Use and Concomifant Criminal Behavior. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  • Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., and O'Malley, P. M. (1990). Explaining the recent decline in cocaine use among adults: Further evidence that perceived risks and disapproval lead to reduced drug use. J. Health SOC. Behav. 31: 173-184.
  • Ball, J. C. (1965). Two patterns of narcotic addiction in the United States. J. Crim. Law, Crirninol. Police Sci. 52: 203-211.
  • Ball, J. C., Rosen, L., Flueck, J. A., and Nurco, D. N. (1981). The criminality of heroin addicts: When addicted and when off opiates. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The Drugs-Crime Connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Ball, J. C., Rosen, L., Flueck, J. A., and Nurco, D. N. (1982). The lifetime criminality of heroin addicts in the United States. J. Drug Issues 12: 225-239.
  • Ball, J. C., Shaffer, J. W., and Nurco, D. N. (1983). The day-to-day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore - A study in the continuity of offense rates. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1: 119-142.
  • Bean, P. T. (1976). Rehabilitation and Deviance. Boston, MA: Routledge & K. Paul.
  • Bean, P. T. (1984). Drugs and crime in Britain: An overview. Drug Educ. Prev. Policy l(2): 93-99.
  • Bean, P. T., and Wilkinson, C. K. (1988). Drug taking, crime and the illicit supply system. Br. J.
  • Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. London: Collier-Macmillan.
  • Beckett, K. (1994). Setting the public agenda: Street Crime and drug use in American politics. Soc. Probl. 41(3): 42-477
  • Belenko, S. (1990). The impact of drug offenders on the criminal justice system. In R. Weisheit (Ed.), Drugs. Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.
  • Bennett, T., and Wright, R. (1986). The impact of prescribing on the crimes of opiod users. Er. J. Addict. 81: 265-273.
  • Biernacki, P. (1986). Pathwaysfrom Heroin Addiction. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Blumstein, A., J. Cohen, 1. A. Roth, and C. A. Visher (Eds.) (1986). Criminal Careers and Career Criminals: Volume 11. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Brecker, E. M., and the Editors of Consumers Reports (1972). Licit and Illicit Drugs. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.
  • Brecht, M. L., Hser, Y. I., and Anglin, M. D. (1990-1991). A multimethod assessment of social intervention effects on narcotics use and property crime. In. J. Addict. 25: 1317-1340.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1988). Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice. Washington, DC; Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1990). Justice Expenditures and Employment, 1988. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1992). The Prosecution ofFelony Arrests, 1988. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1992). Criminal Victimization in the United States: 1973-1990 Trends. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1994). National Corrections Reporting Program, 1992. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1996). Federal Crime Case Processing. 1982-93 with Preliminary Data for 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
  • Burgess, P. K. (1972). Eysenck's theory of criminality: A test of some objections to disconfimatory evidence. Er. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2: 248-256.
  • Burr, A. (1987). Chasing the dragon: Heroin misuse, delinquency and crime in the context of south London culture. Er. J. Criminol. 27: 335-357.
  • Butler, W. E. (1992). Crime in the Soviet Union: Early glimpses of the true story. Er. J. Criminol. 32: 144-159.
  • Carmichael, B. G. (1975). Youth crime in urban communities-A descriptive analysis of street hustlers and their crimes. Crime Delinq. 21: 139-148.
  • Chaiken, M. R., and Chaiken, B. D. (1990). Drugs and predatory crime. In M. Tonry and J. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and Crime. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Chaiken, M. R., and Johnson, B. D. (1988). Characteristics of Different Types of Drug-Involved Offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
  • Chambers, C. D., Dean, S. W., and Pletcher, M. (1981). Criminal involvements of minority group addicts. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The Drugs-Crime Connecfion. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Chein, I., Gerard, D. L., Lee, R. S., and Rosenfeld, E. (1964). The Road to H: Narcotics, Delinquency, and Social Policy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Chein, I., and Rosenfeld, E. (1957). Juvenile narcotic use. Law Contemp. Probl. Winter: 52-68.
  • Cheung, Y. W., Erickson, P. G., and Landau, T. C. (1991). Experience of crack use: Findings from a community-based sample in Toronto. J. Drug Issues 21(1): 121-140.
  • Clarke, M. (1980). Syndicated crime in Britain? Contemp. Crises 4(4): 403-420. Addict. 83: 533-539.
  • Clayton, R. R. (1981). Federal drugscrime research: Setting the agenda. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The Drugs-Crime Connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Coates, J. F. (1972). The future of crime in the United States from now to the year 2000. Policy Sci. 3: 27-45.
  • Cohen, P. (1990). Drugs as a Social Construct. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Cohen, P., and Sas, A. (1993). Ten Years of Cocaine. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Collins, J. J. (1986). The relationship of problem drinkivg to individual offending sequences. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. A. Roth, and C. A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal Cpreers and Career Criminals: Volume II. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Collison, M. (1994). Drug crime, drug problems and criminal justice: Sentencing trends and enforcement targets. Howard J. Crim. Justice 33: 25-40.
  • Collison, M. (1994). Drug offenders and criminal justice: Careers, compulsion, commitment and penalty. Crime, Law SOC. Change 21 : 49-71.
  • Courtwright, D. T. (1982). Dark Paradise: Opiate Addiction in America before 1940. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Courtwright, D. T. (1991). Drug legalization, the drug war, and drug treatment in historical perspective. J. Policy His?. 3(4): 393-414.
  • Currie, E. (1993). Toward a policy on drugs. Decriminalization? Legalization? Dissent 40: 65-7 I.
  • Datesman, S. K. (1981). Women, crime, and drugs. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The Drugs-Crime Connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Datesman, S. K., and Inciardi, J. A. (1979). Female heroin use, criminality, and prostitution. Contemp. Drug Probl. 8: 455-473.
  • Dembo, R., Williams, L., Wothke, W., Schmeidler, J., Getreu, A., pstrellita, B., Wish, E. D., and Christensen, C. (1990). The relationship between cocaine use, dn+g sales, and other delinquency among a cohort of high-risk youths over time. In M. De La Rosa, E. Y. Lambert, and B. Gropper (Eds.), Drugs and Violence: Causes, Correlates and Consequences. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Dobson, I., and Ward, P. (1984). Drugs and Crime, Sydney, Australia: Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
  • Dombrink, J., and Meeker, J. W. (1986). Beyond buy and bust: Nontraditional sanctions in federal drug law enforcement. Contemp. Drug Probl. 13: 711-740.
  • Dorn, N., Murji, K., and South, N. (1991). Traffickers: Drug Markets and Law Enforcement. London: Routledge.
  • Dorn, N., and South, N. (1990). Drug markets and law enforcement. Br. J. Criminol. 30(2): 171-188.
  • Duzan, M. J. (1990). The cocaine crossfire. New Statesman SOC. 3(124): 10-12.
  • Elliot, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. (1985). Explaining Drug Use and Delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Engelsman, E. L. (1989). Dutch policy on the management of drug-related problems. Br. J. Addict. 84(2): 211-218.
  • Erickson, P. G. (1990-1991). Past, current and future directiohs in Canadian drug policy. Int. J. Addict 25(3A): 247-266.
  • Erickson, P. G. (1992). Recent trends in Canadian drug policy: The decline and resurgence of prohibitionism. Daedalus 121: 239-267.
  • Erickson, P. G. (1993). The law, social control, and drug policy: Models, factors, and processes. Int. J. Addict. 28: 1155-1176.
  • Erickson, P. G., Adlaf, E. M., Smart, R. G., and Murray, G. F. (1994). The Street Drug, Cocaine and Crack in Perspective, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
  • Erickson, P. G., and Cheung, Y. W. (1992). Drug crime and legal control: Lessons from the Canadian experience. Contemp. Drug Probl. 19: 247-277.
  • Erickson, P. G., and Murray, G. F. (1989). The undeterred cocaine user: Intention to quit and its relationship to perceived legal and health threats. Contemp. Drug Probl. 16: 141-156.
  • Faupel, C. E., and Klockars, C. B. (1987). Drugscrime connections: Elaborations from the life histories of hard-core heroin addicts. SOC. Probl. 34: 54-68, February.
  • Finestone, H. (1957). Narcotics and criminality. Law Contemp. Probl. Winter: 72-85.
  • Gandossy, R. P., Williams, J. R., Cohen, J., and Hanvood, J. (1980). Drugs and Crime: A Survey and Analysis of the Literature. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
  • Goldstein, P. J. (1979). Prostitution and Drugs. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Goldstein, P. J. (1981). Getting over: Economic alternatives to predatory crime among street heroin users. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The Drugsxrime Connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Goldstein, P. J. (1985). The drug/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. J. Drug Issues 15: 493-506, Fall.
  • Goldstein, P. J., Brownstein, H. H., Ryan, P. J., and Bellucci, P. A. (1989). Crack and homicide in New York City, 1988: A conceptually based event analysis. Contemp. Drug Probl. Winter: 651-687.
  • Goode, E. (1972). Drugs in American Society. New York, NY: Knopf.
  • Graham, M., and Zedlewski, E. (Eds.) (1990). Searching for Answers: Research and Evaluation on Drugs and Crime. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
  • Grapendaal, M., Leuw, E., and Nelen, H. (1992). Drugs and crime in an accommodating social context: The situation in Amsterdam. Contemp. Drug Probl. 19: 303-326.
  • Greenberg, S. W., and Adler, F. (1974). Crime and addiction: An empirical analysis of the literature, 1920-1973. Contemp. Drug Probl. 3: 221-270.
  • Gropper, B. A. (1985). Probing the Links between Drugs and Crime. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
  • Hammersley, R., and Morrison, V. L. (1987). The effects of poly drug use on the criminal activities of heroin users. Br. J. Addict. 82: 899-906.
  • Harrison, L. D. (1988). The Marijuana Movement: A Study of a Cohort on the Cutting Edge. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI International.
  • Harrison, L. D. (1992). International perspectives on the interface of drug use and criminal behavior. Contemp. Drug Probl. 19(2): 181-201.
  • Harrison, L. D. (1992). The drug-crime nexus in the USA. Contemp. Drug Probl. 19(2): 203-246.
  • Harrison, L. D. (1992). Trends in illicit drug use in the United States: Conflicting results from national surveys. Int. J. Addict. 27(7): 817-847.
  • Haskell, M., and Yablonsky, L. (1973). Crime and Delinquency. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Holden, C. (1986). Growing focus on criminal careers. Science 233: 1377-1378.
  • Home Affairs Committee (1989). Crack: The Threat ofHard Drugs in the Next Decade (Interim Report). London: Home Affairs Committee, House of Commons.
  • Home Office (1992). Statistics of Drug Addicts Notified to the Home Office. London: HMSO.
  • Home Office (1992). Statistics of Drug Seizures and Offenders Dealt with, United Kingdom: Bulletin. London: HMSO.
  • Hser, Y. I., Chou, C. P., and Anglin, M. D. (1990). The criminality of female narcotics addicts: A causal modeling approach. J. Quant. Criminol. 6(2): 207-228.
  • Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Hanvood, H. J., Cavanaugh, E. R., and Ginzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Huizinga, D. H., Menard, S., and Elliot, D. S. (1989). Delinquency and drug use: Temporal and developmental patterns. Justice Q. 6(3): 419-455.
  • Hunt, D. E., Lipton, D. S., and Spunt, B. (1984). Patterns of criminal activity among methadone clients and current narcotics users not in treatment. J. Drug Issues Fall: 687-701.
  • Hunt, D., Spunt, B., Lipton, D., Goldsmith, D., and Strug, D. (1986). The costly bonus: Cocaine related crime among methadone treatment clients. Adv: Alcohol Substance Abuse 6: 107-122.
  • Innes, C. A. (1988). Drug Use and Crime. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
  • Inciardi, J. A. (1979). Heroin use and street crime. Crime Delinq. July: 335-346.
  • Inciardi, J. A. (1980). Women, heroin, and property crime. In S. K. Datesman and F. R. Scarpitti (Eds.), Women, Crime, and Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Inciardi, J. A. (Ed.) (1981). The Drugs-Crime Connection. London: Sage.
  • Inciardi, J. A. (1982). The production and detection of fraud in street studies of crime and drugs. J. Drug Issues Summer: 285-291.
  • Inciardi, J. A. (1986). The War on Drugs: Heroin, Cocaine, Crime and Social Policy. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
  • Inciardi, J. A., and Pottieger, A. E. (1986). Drug use and crime among two cohorts of women narcotics users: An empirical assessment. J. Drug Issues 16(Winter): 91-106.
  • Inciardi, J. A., and Pottieger, A. E. (1991). Kids, crack and crime. J. Drug Issues 21(2): 257-270.
  • Inciardi, J. A., Pottieger, A. E., and Faupel, C. E. (1982). Black women, heroin and crime: Some empirical notes. J. Drug Issues Summer: 241-250.
  • Inciardi, J. A,, and Russe, B. R. (1977). Professional thieves and drugs. Int. J. Addict. 12: 1087-1095. Jarvis, G., and Parker, H. (1989). The relationship between crime and opiod use. Br. J. Addict. 29(2): 175-185.
  • Jarvis, G., and Parker, H. (1989). Young heroin users and crime: How do the new users finance their habits? Br. J. Criminol. 29(2): 175-185.
  • Jarvis, G., and Parker, H. (1990). Can medical treatment reduce crime amongst young heroin users? Home Office Res. Bull. 28: 29-32.
  • Jensen, E. L., and Gerber, J. (1993). State efforts to construct a social problem: The 1986 war on drugs in Canada. Can. J. Sociol. 18: 453-462.
  • Jessor, R., Chase, J. A., and Donovan, J. E. (1980). Psychosocial correlates of marijuana use and problem drinking in a national sample of adolescents. Am. J. Public Health 70(6): 604-613.
  • Johnson, B. D., Goldstein, P. J., Preble, E., Schmeidler, J., Lipton, D. S., Spunt, B., and Miller, T. (1985). Taking Care of Business: The Economics of Crime by Heroin Abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Johnson, B. D., Williams, T., Dei, K. A., and Sanabria, H. (1991). Drug abuse in the inner city: Impact on hard-drug users and the community. In M. Tonry and J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and Crime, Volume 13. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Johnson, E. H. (1984). Night patrol in Amsterdam's Warmoesstraat District. Police Stud. 7(3): 131-135.
  • Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1995). National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1994 (NIH Publication 95-4026). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Eveland, L. K. (1978). Drugs and delinquency: A search for causal connections. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Kandel, D. B. (1980). Drug and drinking behavior among youth. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 6: 235-285.
  • Kandel, D. B., Kessler, R. C., and Margulies, R. Z. (1978). Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Kaplan, H. B., Martin, S. S., and Johnston, R. J. (1986). Self-rejection and the explanation of deviance: Specification of the structure among latent constructs. Am. J. Sociol. 92: 384-41 l.
  • Kaplan, H. B., Martin, S. S., Johnston, R. J., and Robbins, C. A. (1986). Escalation of marijuana use: Application of a general theory of deviant behavior. J. Health Soc. Eehav. 27: 44-61.
  • Kavaler, F., Krug, D. C., Amsel, Z., and Robbins, R. A. (1968). A commentary and annotated bibliography on the relationship between narcotics addiction and criminality. Munic. ReJ Libr Notes 42: 4-3.
  • King, R. (1972). The Drug Hang-up: America's Forty-Year Folly. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
  • Klein, M. W., Maxson, C. L., and Cunningham, L. C. (1991). Crack, street gangs, and violence. Criminology 29(4): 623450.
  • Kleinman, M. (1989). Marijuana: Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Kuttner, R. (1991). Notes From underground: Clashing theories about the underclass. Dissent 38: 212-217.
  • Larson, A., Stevens, A., and Wardlaw, G. (1994). Indirect estimates of hidden populations: Capture-recapture methods to estimate the numbers of heroin users in the Australian capital territory. SOC. Sci. Med. 39: 823-840.
  • Lee, R. W. (1991). Soviet narcotics trade. Society 28(5): 4652.
  • Lee, R. W. (1992). Dynamics of the Soviet illicit drug market. Crime. Law Soc. Change 17(3): 177-233
  • Lenke, L. (1990). Alcohol and Criminal Violence: Time Series Analyses in a Comparative Perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
  • Leukefeld, C. G., and Tim, F. M. (1990). Compulsory treatment for drug abuse. Int. J. Addict. 25(6): 621-640.
  • Likhachev, G. (1987). Drug abuse called serious problem in Primorskey kray. Sol. Zakonnost No. 4. JPRS-UPA-87-014.
  • MacCoun, R. J., Kahan, J. P., Gillespie, J., and Rhee, J. (1993). A content analysis of the drug legalization debate. J. Drug Issues 23(4): 615-629.
  • MacDonald, D. C. (1989). The cost of corrections: In search of the bottom line. Res. Correct. February: 1-25.
  • Maloof, D. (1981). A review of the effects of the decriminalization of marijuana. Contemp. Drug Probl. Fall: 307-322.
  • Mann, C. R. (1990). Black female homicide in the United States. J. Interpers. Violence 5: 176-201.
  • Mann, C. R. (1990). Female homicide and substance use: Is there a connection? Women Crim. Justice 1: 87-109.
  • Marshall, E. (1988). Drug wars: Legalization gets a hearing. Science 241: 1157-1159.
  • McAllister, I., Moore, R., and Makkai, T. (1991). Drugs in Australian Society. Malaysia: Vinlin Press.
  • McBride, D. C. (1981). Drugs and violence. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The Drugs-Crime Connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • McBride, D. C., and Swam, J. A. (1990). Drugs and violence in the age of crack cocaine. In R. Weisheit (Ed.), Drugs, Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.
  • McGlothlin, W. H. (1978). The etiologic relationship between drug use and criminality. In Y. Israel, F. Glaser, H. Kalant, R. Popham, W. Schmidt, and R. Smart (Eds.), Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, Volume 4. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • McGlothlin, W. H., Anglin, M. D., and Wilson, B. D. (1978). Narcotic addiction and crime. Criminology 16(3): 295-315.
  • Meyer, A. S. (1952). Social and Psychological Factors in Opiate Addiction. New York, NY: Columbia University Bureau of Applied Social Research.
  • Milton, S. (1991). Youth investment and community reconstruction: Street lessons on drugs and crime. Notre Dame J. Law, Ethics, Public Policy 5: 503-624.
  • Montage, M. (1990). The social epidemiology of international drug trafficking: Comparison of source of supply and distribution networks. Int. J. Addict. 25: 557-577.
  • Moore, M. H. (1990). Supply reduction and drug law enforcement. In M. Tonry and J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and Crime. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Morgan, H. W. (1974). Yesterday's Addicts: American Society and Drug Abuse: 1865-1920. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Mosher, C., and Hagan, J. (1994). Constituting class and crime in upper Canada: The sentencing of narcotics offenders, circa 1908-1953. SOC. Forces 72(3): 613441.
  • Mott, J. (1986). Opioid use and burglary. Br. J. Addict. 81: 671-677.
  • Mott, J. (1991). Crime and heroin use. In D. K. Whynes and P. Bean (Eds.), Policing and frescribing. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Moxley, R. L. (1992). US rural drug abuse research needs and research policy. Drugs SOC. 7: 117-139.
  • Mugford, S. K. (1992). Licit and illicit drug use, health costs and the crime connection in Australia: Public views and policy implications. Contemp. Drug Probl. 19(2): 351-385.
  • Mugford, S. K., and Cohen, P. (1989). Drug Use, Social Relations and Commodity Consumption: A Study of Recreational Cocaine Users in Sydney, Canberra and Melbourne. Canberra: Report to the Research into Drug Abuse Advisory Committee, National Campaign Again Drug Abuse.
  • Murray, G. F., and Erickson, P. G. (1987). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal research: An empirical comparison of projected and subsequent criminology. SOC. Sci. Res. 16: 107-118.
  • Musto, D. F. (1973). The American Disease. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Nadelmann, E. A. (1989). Drug prohibition in the United States: Costs, consequences, and alternatives. Science 245(4921): 939-947.
  • Nadelmann, E. A,, Kaplan, J., and Reuter, P. (1988). The great drug debate. Public Interest 92: 3-65.
  • National Academy of Sciences (1982). An Analysis of Marijuana Policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Campaign Against Drug Abuse (1989). The National Campaign Against Drug Abuse 1985-88: Evaluation and Future Directions. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
  • National Drug Strategy (1994). Legislative Options for Cannabis in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
  • National Institute of Justice (1996). 1995 Drug Use Forecasting Annual Report on Adult and Juvenile Arrestees. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
  • Neuhauser, K. (1990). The Market for Illegal Drugs in the Soviet Union in the Late 1988s. Berkeley-Duke Occasional Papers on the Second Economy in the USSR. Paper No. 23.
  • Newcombe, R. (1992). The reduction of drug-related harm: A conceptual framework for theory practice and research. In E. Buning, E. Drucker, and P. O. Hare (Eds.), Reducing Drug-Related Harm. London: Routledge.
  • Nurco, D. N. (1989). The consistency of types of criminal behavior over preaddiction, addiction, and nonaddiction status periods. Compr. Psychiatry 30(5): 391-402.
  • Nurco, D. N., Ball, J. C., Shaffer, J. W., and Hanlon, T. (1985). The criminality of narcotic addicts. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 173: 94-102.
  • Nurco, D. N., Hanlon, T. E., Baiter, M. B., Kinlock, T. W., and Slaght, E. (1991). A classification of narcotic addicts based on type, amount, and severity of crime. J. Drug Issues 21(Spring): 429-448.
  • Nurco, D. N., Hanlon, T. E., Kinlock, T. W., and Duszynski, K. R. (1988). Differential criminal patterns of narcotic addicts over an addiction career. Criminology 26(3): 407423.
  • Nurco, D. N., Kinlock, T., and Hanlon, T. E. (1990). The drugscrime connection. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), Handbook of Drug Control in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (1991). Juveniles Taken into Custody: Fis-cal Year 1990 Report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, US Department of Justice.
  • O'Donnell, .I. A. (1967). The rise and decline of a subculture. SOC. Probl. Summer: 73-84.
  • O'Hare, P. O., et al. (1992). The Reduction of Drug-Related Harm. London: Routledge.
  • O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., and Johnston, L. D. (1988). Period, age, and cohort effects on substance use among young Americans: A decade of change, 197-6. Am. J. Public Health 78: 1315-1321.
  • ONDCP White Paper (1990). Leading Drug Indicutors. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
  • Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 81-93.
  • Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1989). Time trends and age trends in arrests and self-reported illegal behavior. Criminology 27: 38-17.
  • Parker, H., and Newcombe, R. (1987). Heroin use and acquisitive crime in an English community. Er. J. Sociol. 38(3): 331-350.
  • Pearson, G. (1990). Drug control policies in Britain: Continuity and change. In M. Tonry and N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Volume 14. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pearson, G. (1992). Drugs and criminal justice: A harm reductioh perspective. In E. Buning, E. Drucker, and P. O. Hare (Eds.), Reducing Drug-Related Harm. London: Routledge.
  • Pearson, G. (1992). The war on words: Reflections on the American war on drugs. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 29(3): 363-381.
  • Peele, S. (1985). The Meaning of Addiction. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Pettiway, L. (1987). Partnership in crime partnerships by female drug users: The effects of domestic arrangements, drug use, and criminal involvement. Criminology 25(August): 741-766.
  • Pihl, R. O., and Peterson, J. (1995). Drugs and aggression: Correlations, crime and manipulative studies and some proposed mechanisms. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 20: 141-161.
  • Plant, R. (1975). Drug Takers in an English Town. London: Tavistock.
  • Pottieger, A. E. (1981). Sample bias in drugskrime research: An empirical study. In 1. A. lnciardi (Ed.), The Drugs-Crime Connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Pottieger, A. E., and Inciardi, J. A. (1981). Aging on the street: Drug use and crime among older men. J. Psychoactive Drugs April-June: 199-211.
  • Powers, K.. Hanssens, D. M., Hser, Y. I., and Anglin, M. D. (1991). Measuring the long-term effects of public policy: The case of narcotics use and property crime. Manage. Sci. 37(6): 627-644.
  • Preble, E., and Casey, J. J. (1969). Taking care of business: The heroin user's life on the street. Int. J. Addict. 4: 1-25.
  • Radosevich, M., Lanza-Kaduce, L., Akers, R. L., and Krohn, M. D. (1980). The sociology of adolescent drug and drinking behavior: A review of the state of the field, Part 11. Deviant Eehav. 1: 15-35.
  • Rasmussen, O. (1992). Alcohol, drugs and other social problems in Denmark. NAD Publ. 21: 133-147.
  • Reasons, C. E. (1976). Image of crime and the criminal: The dope fiend mythology. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 13(2): 133-144.
  • Reuband, K. H. (1992). Drug addiction and crime in West Germany: A review of the empirical evidence. Contemp. Drug Probl. 19: 327-349.
  • Reuter, P. (1983). Disorganised Crime: The Economics of the Visible Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Reuter, P. (1988). Quantity illusions and paradoxes of drug interdiction: Federal intervention into vice policy. Law Contemp. Probl. 51: 233-252.
  • Reuter, P., and Kleiman, M. A. (1986). Risks and prices: An economic analysis of drug enforcement. In M. Tonry and N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice, Volume 7. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rice, D. P., Kelman, S., Miller, L. S., and Dunmeyer, S. (1990). The Economic Costs ofAlcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness: 1985. Rockville, MD: Report submitted to the Office of Financing and Coverage Policy of the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration.
  • Rosenberg, C. M. (1969). Young drug addicts: Background and personality. J. New. Ment. Dis. 148: 65.
  • Ryan, K. F. (1994). How we lost the war: Explorations of US drug policy and its consequences. Crim. Justice Rev. 19(1): 79-99.
  • Sanchez, J. E., and Johnson, B. D. (1987). Women and the drugscrime connection: Crime rates among drug abusing women at Rikers Island. J. Psychoactive Drugs 19(April-June): 205-216.
  • Sandwijk, J. P., Cohen, P. A., and Musterd, S. (1991). Licit and Illicit Drug Use in Amsterdam. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Saveland, W., and Bray, D. F. (1981). Trends in cannabis use among American states with different and changing legal regimes, 1972-77. Contemp. Drug Probl. Fall: 335-365.
  • Savitz, L. D. (1982). The maturing out of drug use (and deviance): Hypotheses and data. In J. Weissman and R. Dupont (Eds.), CriminalJustice and Drugs. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.
  • Shchekochikin, Y. (1988). Activity of Mafia, organize crime discussed. Lit. Gaz. FBIS-SOV.
  • Slaughter, J. (1988). Marijuana prohibition in the United States. Columbia J. Law SOC. Probl. 21(1): 417-475.
  • Smart, R. G. (1988). Crack cocaine use in Canada: A new epidemic? Am. J. Epidemiol. 127(6): 1315-1317.
  • Sparrow, M. K. (1991). The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: An assessment of the prospects. SOC. Networks 13: 251-274.
  • Speckart, G., and Anglin, M. D. (1985). Narcotics and crime: An analysis of existing evidence for a causal relationship. Behav. Sci. Law 3(3): 259-282.
  • Speckart, G., and Anglin, M. D. (1986). Narcotics and crime: A causal modeling approach. J. Quant. Criminol. 2(1): 3-28.
  • Speckart, G., and Anglin, M. D. (1986). Narcotics use and crime: An overview of recent research advances. Contemp. Drug Probl. 13(4): 741-769.
  • Spergel, I. A. (1992). Youth gangs: An essay review. SOC. Sci. Rev. 66: 121-140.
  • Staples, R. (1987). Black male genocide: A final solution to the race problem in America. Black xsScholar 18: 2-11.
  • Starr, J. M. (1986). American youth in the 1980s. Youth SOC. 17: 323-345.
  • Stein, H. F. (1990). In what systems do alcohoVchemical addictions make sense? Clinical ideologies and practices as cultural metaphors. SOC. Sci. Med. 30: 987-1000.
  • Stephens, R. C., and Ellis, R. D. (1974). Narcotics addicts and crime: Analysis of recent trends. Criminology 12: 474-488.
  • Strang, J., Griffiths, P., and Gossop, M. (1990). Crack and cocaine use in South London drug addicts: 1987-1989. Br. J. Addict. 85: 193-196.
  • Taylor, I. (1991). Big crime: The international drug trade. SOC. Shrd. Rev. 6(3): 121-124.
  • Taylor, I. (1992). The international drug trade and money-laundering: Border controls and other issues. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 8: 181-193.
  • Temple, M., and Ladouceur, P. (1986). The alcohol-crime relationship as an age-specific phenomenon: A longitudinal study. Contemp. Drug Probl. Spring: 89-115.
  • Tippel, S. (1989). Drug users and the prison system. In S. MacGregor (Ed.), Drugs and British Society. London: Routledge.
  • Tonry, M., and Wilson, J. Q. (Eds.) (1990). Drugs and Crime. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Trebach, A. (1987). The Great Drug War. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Turner, C. F., Lessler, J. T., and Gfroerer, J. C. (Eds.) (1992). Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies. National Institute on Drug Abuse, US,Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Wagstaff, A., and Maynard, A. (1988). Economic Aspects of the Illicit Drug Market and Drug Enforcement Policies in the United Kingdom (Home Office Research Study 95). London: HMSO.
  • Waldorf, D., Reinarman, C., and Murphy, S. (1991). Cocaine Changes. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Wardlaw, G. (1981). Drug use and crime in Australia. Aust. J. Sac. Issues 16(1): 3746.
  • Wardlaw, G. (1986). The realities of drug enforcement. J. Drug Issues 16: 171-182.
  • Wardlaw, G., McDowell. D., and Schmidt, J. (1991). Australia's Illegal Drug Problem: A Strategic Intelligence Assessment. Canberra: Criminal Environment Assessment Unit.
  • Watters, J. K., Reinarman, C., and Fagan, J. (1985). Causality, context, and contingency: Relationships between drug abuse and delinquency. Contemp. Drug Probl. Fall: 351-373.
  • Weisheit, R. (Ed.), Drugs, Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.
  • Weisman, I. (1972). Narcotics control by government clinics in England. Sac. Casework 53: 604-612.
  • Whynes, D. K., and Bean, P. (Ed;.) (1991). Policing and Prescribing: The British System of Drug Control. London: Macmillan.
  • Widom, K. (1989). Child abuse, neglect, and adult behavior: Research design and findings on criminality, violence, and child abuse. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 59(3): 355-367.
  • Wijngaart, G. F. van de (1988). A social history of drug use in the Netherlands: Policy outcomes and implications. J. Drug Issues 18: 481-495.
  • Wijngaart, G. F. van de (1988). Heroin use in the Netherlands. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 14: 125-136.
  • Wijngaart, G. F. van de, Grund, J. P. C., Dorn, N., and Berridge, V. (1989). Commentaries: Dutch policy on the management of drug-related problems: An Anglo-Dutch debate. Br. J. Addict. 84(9): 989-997.
  • Wilson, J. Q. (1990). Drugs and crime. In M. Tonry and J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and Crime. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wilson, J. Q. (1992). Crime, race, and values. Society 30: 90-93.
  • Wilson, S., and Mandelbrote, B. (1978). Drug rehabilitation and criminology. Br. J. Criminal. 18(4): 381-386.
  • Wish, E. D. (1988). Identifying drug-abusing criminals. In C. G. Leukefeld and F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Rockville, MD: National lnstitute on Drug Abuse.
  • Wish, E. D. (1990). Drug testing and the identification of drug-abusing criminals. In J. A. Inciardi, Handbook of Drug Control in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Wish, E. D. (1990-1). US drug policy in the 1990s: Insights from new data from arrestees. Int. J. Addict. 25(3a): 377-409.
  • Wish, E. D., and Gropper, B. A. (1990). Drug testing by the criminal justice system: Methods, research, and applications. In M. Tonry and J.Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and Crime. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wish, E. D., and Johnson, 8. D. (1986). The impact of substance abuse on criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. A. Roth, and C. A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal Careers and Career Criminals: Volume 11. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Wish, E. D., Klumpp, K. A., Moorer, A. H., Brady, E., and Williams, K. M. (1981). An Analysis of Drugs and Crime among Arresiees in the Disirici of Columbia. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
  • Zahn, M. A,, and Bencivengo, M. (1974). Violent death: A comparison between drug users and non-drug users. Addict. Dis. 1: 283-296.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.