Optimization of a polymer composite employing molecular mechanic simulations and artificial neural networks for a novel intravaginal bioadhesive drug delivery device

References

• Justin-Temu M, Damian F, Kinget R, Van Den Mooter, G. Intravaginal gels as drug delivery systems. J.Women’s Health 2004;7:834–843.
   Google Scholar
• Grassi G, Farra R, Caliceti P, Gianfranco G, Stefano S, Mario C, Mario G. Temperature-sensitive hydrogels: Potential therapeutic applications. Technology tool. Am J Drug Deliv 2005;4:239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharmaceut Biopharmaceut 2009;3:505–518.
   Google Scholar
• Rohan LC, Sassi AB. Vaginal drug delivery systems for HIV prevention. The AAPS Journal 2009;1:78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Serra L, Doménech J, Peppas NA. Engineering design and molecular dynamics of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems as targeting agents. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;3:519–528.
   Google Scholar
• Repka MA, Majumba S, Baltu SK, Syrirangam R, Upandhye S. Application of Hot-melt extrusion for drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Del 2008;12:1327–1376.
   Google Scholar
• Byron PR. Dosing reproducibility from experimental albuterol suspension metered-dose inhalers. Pharm Res 1994;4:580–584.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfield JJ, Tank DW. “Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biolog Cybernet 1985;55:141–146.
   Google Scholar
• Achanta AS, Kowalski JG, James KW, Rhodes CT. Artificial neural network: implications for pharmaceutical sciences. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1995;21:119–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parojčić J, Ibrić S, Djurić Z, Jovanović M, Corrigan OI. An investigation into the usefulness of generalized regression neural network analysis in the development of level A in vitro–in vivo correlation. Eur J Pharm Sci 2007;3-4:264–272.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanien A, Milanova MG, Smolinski TG, Abraham A. Computational intelligence in solving bioinformatics problems: Reviews, perspectives, and challenges. Computational Intelligence in Biomedicine and Bioinformatics 2008;151:3–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Khemka A, Yoo J, Lee CH. Assessment of diffusion coefficient from mucoadhesive barrier devices using artificial neural networks. Int J Pharm 2008; 1-2:119–26.
   Google Scholar
• Munasur AP, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Mackraj I, Govender T. ‘Comparing the mucoadhesivity and drug release mechanisms of various polymer-containing propranolol buccal tablets’. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2008; 2: 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Lancashire LJ, Lemetre C, Ball GR. An introduction to artificial neural networks in bioinformatics-application to complex microarray and mass spectrometry datasets in cancer studies. Brief Bioinform 2009;3:315–329.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Tai NL, Yu WY. ART artificial neural networks based adaptive phase selector. Electr Pow Syst Res 2005;1-3:115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Jiao T, McCall TW, Baichwal AR, Meyer MC. Comparison of four artificial neural network software programs used to predict the in vitro dissolution of controlled- release tablets. Pharm Dev Technol 2002;7:373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Peng Y, Chen Y, Chen Y, Shukla AJ. Application of artificial neural networks in the design of controlled release drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2003;55:1201–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizkalla N, Hildgen P. Artificial neural networks: comparison of two programs for modeling a process of nanoparticle preparation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005;10:1019–1033.
   Google Scholar
• Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Turner JV, Glass BD. Molecular structural characteristics as determinants of estrogen receptor selectivity. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2008;2:369–375.
   Google Scholar
• Najah A, Elshafie A, Karim OA, Jaffar O. Prediction of Johor river water quality parameters using artificial neural networks. Eur J Sci Res 2009;28:3.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama K, Takahara J, Fujikawa M, Ichikawa H, Nagai T. Formula optimization on artificial neural networks in transdermal drug delivery. J Control Rel 1999; 6:161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Takahara J, Takayama K, Nagai T. Multi-objective simultaneous optimization based on artificial neural networks in sustained release formulation. J Control Rel 1997;1:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Peh KK, Lim CP, Quek SS, Khoh KH. Use of artificial neural networks to predict drug dissolution profiles and evaluation of network performance using similarity factor. Pharm Res 2000;11:1384–1389.
   Google Scholar
• Hussian AS, Johnson RD, Vachhrajan N, Ritschel WA. Feasibility of developing a neural network for prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters from animal data. Pharm Res 1993;10:466–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leane MM, Cumming I, Corrigan OI. The use of artificial neural networks for the selection of the most appropriate formulation and processing variables in order to predict the in vitro dissolution of sustained release minitablets. AAPS PharmSciTech 2003;2:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Brier ME, Zurada JM, Aronoff G. Neural network predicted peak and trough gentamicin concentrations, Pharm Res 1995;2:406–412
   Google Scholar
• Reis MAA, Sinisterra RD, Belchior JC. An alternative approach based on artificial neural networks to study controlled drug release. J Pharm Sci 2004; 2:418–430.
   Google Scholar
• Mendyk A, Jachowicz R. Neural network as a decision support system in the development of pharmaceutical formulation-focus on solid dispersions. Expert Syst Appl 2005;2:285–294.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel GB. Computational intelligence approaches for pattern discovery in biological systems. Brief Bioinform 2008. doi:10.1093/bib/bbn021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jha BK, Tambe SS, Kulkarni BD. Estimating diffusion coefficients of micellar system using an ANN. J Coll I Sci 1995;170:392–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuzgec U, Becerikli Y, Turker M. Dynamic neural-networks-based-model-predictive control of an industrial baker’s yeast drying process. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2008;7:1231–1241.
   Google Scholar
• Nair TM, Tambe SS, Kulkarni BD. Application of artificial neural networks for prokaryotic transcription terminator prediction. FEBS Lett 1994;346:273–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, EC, Stone DJ, Gerwien, RW, Bento P, Heyes MP. Prediction of clinical drug efficacy by classification of drug-induced genomic expression profiles in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S a 2003; 16:9608–9613.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffari A, Abdollahi H, Khoshayand MR. Performance comparison of neural network training algorithms in modelling of biomodal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2006;327:126–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Kohn KW, Grever MR, Viswanadhan VN, Rubinstein, LV, Monks AP, Scudiero DA, Welch L, Koutsoukos AD, Chiausa AJ, Paull KD. Neural computing in cancer drug development: predicting mechanism of action. Science 1992;258:447–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith BP, Brier ME. Statistical approach to neural network model building for gentamicin peak predictions. J Pharm Sci 1996;85:65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu XC, Wang GP, Gap JQ, Zhan SY, Liang WQ. Prediction of plasma protein binding of cephalosporins using an artificial neural network. Pharmazie 2003;2:157–158.
   Google Scholar
• Bourquin J, Schmidli H, van Hoogevest P, Leuenberger H. Advantages of artificial neural networks (ANN) as alternative modelling technique for data sets showing non-linear relationship using data from a galenical study on a solid dosage form. Eur J Pharm Sci 1998;7:5–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo AC, Pelagagge PM. Parametric and neural methods for cost estimation of process vessels. Int J Product Econ 2008;2:934–954.
   Google Scholar
• Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Beresford R. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2000;5:717–727.
   Google Scholar
• Tada DB, Singh S, Nagesha D, Jost E, Levy CO, Gultepe E, Cormack, R, Makrigiorgos GM, and Sridhar S. Chitosan film containing poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles: A platform for localized dual-drug release. Pharm Res 2010;27:1738–1745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevariya H, Dharamsi A, Girhepunje, K, Pal R. Once a day ocular inserts for sustained delivery of levofloxacin: Design, formulation and evaluation. Asian J Pharm 2009;3:314–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hagar Labouta H, El-Khordagui L. Polymethacrylate microparticles gel for topical drug delivery. Pharm Res 2010; DOI: 10.1007/s11095-010-0212-9:1-13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolawole OA, Pillay V, Choonara YE, du Toit LC, Ndesendo VMK. The influence of polyamide 6,10 synthesis variables on the physicochemical characteristics and drug release kinetics from a monolithic tablet matrix. Pharm Dev Technol 2009; doi/abs/10.3109/10837450903397560:1-18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ndesendo VMK, Pillay V, Choonara YE, du Toit LC, Buchmann E, Leith CR, Meyer LCR, Khan RA and Rosin U. Investigation of the physicochemical and physicomechanical properties of a novel intravaginal bioadhesive polymeric device in the pig model AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:793–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndesendo VMK, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Khan RA, Meyer L, Buchmann E, Rosin U. In vitro and ex vivo bioadhesivity analysis of polymeric intravaginal caplets using physicomechanics and computational structural modeling. Int J Pharm 2009;370:151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndesendo VM, Pillay V, Choonara YE, du Toit LC, Buchmann E. Combination of biosorbable, relatively low and high compressible polymers in controlled drug delivery. 2008 AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition http://abstracts.aapspharmaceutica.com/ExpoAAPS08/CC/forms/attendee/index.aspx?content=sessionInfo&sessionId = 1510 [Accessed August 02, 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Kolawole OA, Pillay V, Choonara YE. Novel polyamide 6,10 variants synthesized by modified interfacial polymerization for application as a rate-modulated monolithic drug delivery System. J Bioact Comp Polym 2007;22:281–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umamaheshwari RB, Ramteke S, Jain NK. Anti–helicobacter pylori effect of bioadhesive nanoparticles bearing amoxicillin in experimental gerbils model. AAPS PharmSciTech 2004;5:2.
   Google Scholar
• Charde S, Mudgal M, Kumar L, Saha R. Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive controlled release tablets of lercanidipine. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008;1:182–190.
   Google Scholar
• Owen DH, Katz DF. A vaginal fluid stimulant. Contraception 1999;2:91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Notari S, Bocedi A, Ippolito G, Narciso P, Pucillo LP, Tossini G, Raffaele R.P, Gasparrini F., and Ascenzi P. Simultaneous determination of 16 anti-HIV drugs in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 2005;1-2:258–266.
   Google Scholar
• Durig T. Robust rapid disintegration tablet formulation. US Patent 424454. http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080305166 [accessed August 02, 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Jamzad S, Tutunji L, Fassihi R. Analysis of macromolecular changes and drug release from hydrophilic matrix systems. Int J Pharm 2005; 1-2:75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Zuleger S, Fassihi R, Lippold BC. Polymer particle erosion controlling drug release. II. Swelling investigations to clarify the release mechanism. Int J Pharm 2002; 1-2:23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg LE, Ron ES. Temperature-responsive gels and thermogelling polymer matrices for protein and peptide delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1998;3:197–221.
   Google Scholar
• Bettini R, Catellani PL, Santi P, Massimo G, Peppas NA, Colombo P. Translocation of drug particles in HPMC matrix gel layer: effect of drug solubility and influence on release rate. J Control Rel 2001;3:383–391.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Gu X. Correlation between drug dissolution and polymer hydration: A study using texture analysis. Int J Pharm 2007;1-2:18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Khamanga SM, Walker RB. Evaluation of rate of swelling and erosion of verapamil (vrp) sustained-release matrix tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2006;10:1139–1148.
   Google Scholar
• Sriamornsak P, Thirawong N, Weerapol Y, Nunthanid J, Sungthongjeen S. Swelling and erosion of pectin matrix tablets and their impact on drug release behavior. Eur J Pharmaceut Biopharmaceut 2007;1:211–219.
   Google Scholar
• Choonara YE, Pillay V, Singh N, Khan RA, Ndesendo VMK. Chemometric, physicomechanical and rheological analysis of the sol-gel dynamics and degree of crosslinking of glycosidic polymers. Biomed Mater 2008;2:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Conti S, Maggi L, Segale L, Ochoa ME, Conte U, Grenier P, Vergnault G. Matrices containing NaCMC and HPMC: 2. Swelling and release mechanism study. Int J Pharm 2007; 1-2:143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacucina G, Martelli S, Palmieri GF. Rheological, mucoadhesive and release properties of carbopol gels in hydrophilic cosolvents. Int J Pharm 2004;1-2:115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Gipson IK, Ho SB, Spurr-Michaud SJ, Tisdale AS, Zhan Qian Torlakovic, E, Pudney J, Anderson, DJ, Toribara NW, Hill JA. Mucin Genes Expressed by Human Female Reproductive Tract Epithelia. Biol Reprod 1997;56:999–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh MP, Lumpkin JA, Rosenblatt J. Effect of electrostatic interactions on polylysine release rates from collagen matrices and comparison with model predictions. J Control Rel 1995;2-3:165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Vishalakshi B. The effect of the charge density and structure of the polymer on the dye-binding characteristics of some cationic polyelectrolytes. J Polym Sci: Polym Chem 1995;33:365–371.
   Google Scholar