Development of enteric submicron particles formulation of α-amylase for oral delivery

References

• Dobrilla G. Management of chronic pancreatitis. Focus on enzyme replacement therapy. Int J Pancreatol 1989;5 Suppl:17–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuernberg E, Hamperl W. Decomposition kinetics of α-amylase in pancreatin under thermal and mechanical stress. Acta Pharm Technol 1986;32:182–187.
   Google Scholar
• Takagi T, Toda H, Isemura T. Bacterial and mold amylases. In: Boyer PD, ed. The enzymes, New York, Aademic Press, 1979: 235–271.
   Google Scholar
• Groves MJ, Teng CD. The effect of compaction and moisture on some physical and biological properties of proteins. In: Ahern TJ, Manning MC, ed. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals, New York, 1992:311–359.
   Google Scholar
• Uhling H. Description of enzymes. In: Industrial Enzymes and their Applications. A Wiley-Intersciences publication John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998:37–202.
   Google Scholar
• Allémann E, Leroux J, Gurny R. Polymeric nano- and microparticles for the oral delivery of peptides and peptidomimetics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1998;34:171–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmieri GF, Michelini S, Di Martino P, Martelli S. Polymers with pH-dependent solubility: Possibility of use in the formulation of gastroresistant and controlled-release matrix tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000;26:837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead RJ, Skypala I, Hodson ME, Batten JC. Enteric coated microspheres of pancreatin in the treatment of cystic fibrosis: Comparison with a standard enteric coated preparation. Thorax 1987;42:533–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnelt P, Mundlos S, Adler G. Effect of pellet size of a pancreas enzyme preparation on duodenal lipolytic activity. Z Gastroenterol 1991;29:417–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno MJ, Borm JJ, Hoek FJ, Delzenne B, Hofmann AF, de Goeij JJ et al. Gastric transit and pharmacodynamics of a two-millimeter enteric-coated pancreatin microsphere preparation in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai C, Wang B, Zhao H. Microencapsulation peptide and protein drugs delivery system. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005;41:117–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecaroz C, Gamazo C, Renedo MJ, Blanco-Prieto MJ. Biodegradable micro- and nanoparticles as long-term delivery vehicles for gentamicin. J Microencapsul 2006;23:782–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JX, Zhu KJ, Chen D. Preparation of bovine serum albumin loaded poly (D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres by a modified phase separation technique. J Microencapsul 2005;22:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung TW, Tsai YL, Hsieh JH, Tsai WJ. Different ratios of lactide and glycolide in PLGA affect the surface property and protein delivery characteristics of the PLGA microspheres with hydrophobic additives. J Microencapsul 2006;23:15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niwa T, Takeuchi H, Hino T, Kunou N, Kawashima Y. Preparations of biodegradable nanospheres of water-soluble and insoluble drugs with lactide/glycolide copolymer by a novel spontaneous emulsification solvent diffusion method, and the drug release behavior. J Control Release 1993;25:89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Park TG, Lee YB, Shin SC, Choi HK. Effect of adding non-volatile oil as a core material for the floating microspheres prepared by emulsion solvent diffusion method. J Microencapsul 2001;18:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernfeld P, Colowick SP, Kalpan NO. Amylase α and β. Method Enzymol 1962;1:149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper MM, Blanco D, Cruz ME, Alonso MJ. Formulation of L-asparaginase-loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles: Influence of polymer properties on enzyme loading, activity and in vitro release. J Control Release 1998;52:53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender T, Stolnik S, Garnett MC, Illum L, Davis SS. PLGA nanoparticles prepared by nanoprecipitation: Drug loading and release studies of a water soluble drug. J Control Release 1999;57:171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery H, Davis SS, O’Hagan DT. The preparation and characterization of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. II. The entrapment of a model protein using a (water-in-oil)-in-water emulsion solvent evaporation technique. Pharm Res 1993;10:362–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlicher EJAM, Postma NS, Zuidema J, Talsma H, Hennink W E. Preparation and characterization of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres containing desferrioxamine. Int J Pharm 1997;153:235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Deng X, Yuan M, Xiong C, Huang Z, Zhang Y et al. Investigation on process parameters involved in preparation of poly-DL-lactide-poly(ethylene glycol) microspheres containing Leptospira Interrogans antigens. Int J Pharm 1999;178:245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh MK, Tung SM, Lu DW, Chen JL, Chiang CH. Formulation factors for preparing ocular biodegradable delivery system of 5-fluorouracil microparticles. J Microencapsul 2001;18:507–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Re MI, Biscans B. Preparation of microparticles of ketoprofen with acrylic polymers by a quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion method. Powder Technol 1999;101:120–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain D, Majumdar DK, Panda AK. Insulin loaded eudragit L100 microspheres for oral delivery: Preliminary in vitro studies. J Biomater Appl 2006;21:195–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankalia MG, Mashru RC, Sankalia JM, Sutariya VB. Stability improvement of α-amylase entrapped in κ-carrageenan beads: Physicochemical characterization and optimization using composite index. Int J Pharm 2006;312:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankalia MG, Mashru RC, Sankalia JM, Sutariya VB. Reversed chitosan-alginate polyelectrolyte complex for stability improvement of α-amylase: Optimization and physicochemical characterization. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;65:215–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy RJ, Pristinski D, Migler K, Douglas JF, Prabhu VM. Dynamic light scattering investigations of nanoparticle aggregation following a light-induced pH jump. J Chem Phys 2010;132:194903–194906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan JE. Modified release coatings. In: Cole G, Aulton ME, Hogan J, ed. Pharmaceutical coating technology, Philadelphia, USA, 1995:430.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JH. Gastric emptying of ordinary food: Effect of antrum on particle size. Am J Physiol 1980;239:G133–G135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bykov VA, Demina NB, Kataeva NN, Kemenova VA, Bagirova VL. Enzyme preparations used for the treatment of digestion insufficiency (a review). Khimiko-Farmatsevticheskii Zhurnal 2000;34:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Shargel L, Yu A. Applied biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall International, Inc., UK, 1999:173.
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963;52:1145–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. Polymethacrylates. Published by American Pharmaceutical Assoiation, NW, USA and The Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London, England, pp. 214–216.
   Google Scholar
• Maghsoodi M. Physicomechanical properties of naproxen-loaded microparticles prepared from Eudragit l100. AAPS PharmSciTech 2009;10:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar