Comparison of film-coated retarded release pellets manufactured by layering technique or by bed rotor pelletization

References

• Kleinebudde P. Pharmazeutische Pellets – Herstellung, Eigenschaften und Anwendung. Düsseldorf: Jahrbuch der Heinrich Heine Universität; 2003:161–174
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman A, Donbrow M, Gross ST, et al. Fundamentals of the release mechanism interpretation in multiparticulate systems: determination of substrate release from single microcapsules and relation between individual and ensemble release kinetics. Int J Pharm 1986;29:195–211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross ST, Hoffman A, Donbrow M, Benita S. Fundamentals of the release mechanism interpretation in multiparticulate systems: the prediction of the commonly observed release equations from statistical population models for particle ensembles. Int J Pharm 1986;29:213–222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowitz E, Kreitz MR, Brannon-Peppas L. Microencapsulation. In: Mathiowitz E, ed. Encyclopedia of controlled drug delivery. Wiley: New York; 1999:493–546
   Google Scholar
• Borgquist P, Nevsten P, Nilsson B, et al. Simulation of the release from a multiparticulate system validated by single pellet and dose release experiments. J Control Release 2004;97:453–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechgaard H, Nielson GH. Controlled-release multiple-units and single-unit doses a literature review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1978;4:53–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaus F, Huber HJ. Different drug delivery systems in bioavailability studies. In: Müller BW, ed. Controlled drug release. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 1987:56–68
   Google Scholar
• Lecomte F, Siepmann J, Walther M, et al. Polymer blends used for the aqueous coating of solid dosage forms: importance of the type of plasticizer. J Control Release 2004;99:1–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseling M, Bodmeier R. Release from beads coated with an aqueous colloidal ethylcellulose dispersion, Aquacoat®, or an organic ethylcellulose solution. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1999;47:33–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner SRL, Jones JR, Paterson AHJ, et al. Air-suspension coating in the food industry: part II – micro-level process approach. Powder Technol 2007;171:34–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman A, Hounslow M, Seville J. eds. Granulation, handbook of powder technology Vol. 11. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007
   Google Scholar
• KuShaari K, Pandey P, Song Y, Turton Y. Monte Carlo simulations to determine coating uniformity in a Wurster fluidized bed coating process. Powder Technol 2006;166:81–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jono K, Ichikawa H, Miyamoto M, Fukumori Y. A review of particulate design for pharmaceutical powders and their production by spouted bed coating. Powder Technol 2000;113:269–277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen KW, Mehta AM. Fluid bed agglomerating and coating technology – state of art. Int J Pharm Technol Prod Manuf 1985;6:18–24
   Google Scholar
• Jones D. Air suspension coating for multiparticulates. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1994;20:3175–3206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetchý D, Rabišková M. Some variables influencing rotoagglomeration in the multiprocessor MP-1. Int J Pharm 2002;242:353–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard J, Dumont H, Bertrand F, Legros R. Optimization and scale-up of a fluid bed tangential spray rotogranulation process. Int J Pharm 2007;335:54–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen J, Schaefer T, Kleinebudde P. Direct pelletization in a rotary processor controlled by torque measurements. I: influence of process variables. Pharm Dev Technol 2000;5:247–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm P, Bonde M, Wigmore T. Pelletization by granulation in a rotoprocessor rp-2. Part 1: effects of process and product variables on granule growth. Pharm Technol Eur 1996;8:22–36
   Google Scholar
• Rashid HA, Heinämäki J, Antikainen O, Yliruusi J. Effects of process variables on the size, shape, and surface characteristics of microcrystalline cellulose beads prepared in a centrifugal granulator. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25:605–611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu L, Liew CV, Heng PW. Wet spheronization by rotary processing – a multistage single-pot process for producing spheroids. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2004;30:111–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertomrnen J, Kinget R. The influence of five selected processing and formulation variables on the particle size, particle size distribution, and friability of pellets produced in a rotary processor. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1997;23:39–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid HA, Heinämäki J, Antikainen O, Yliruusi J. Influence of the centrifugal granulating process on the properties of layered pellets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001;51:227–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard J, Wong K. Interdiffusion of polymer chains and molecular dynamics in dried latex films. J Polym Sci 1995;33:1395–1407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JW. Cellulose derivatives and natural products utilized in pharmaceutics. In: Swarbrick J, Boylan JC, eds. Encyclopaedia of pharmaceutical technology, Vol. 2. New York: Dekker; 1990:319–339
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. Materials used in film coating of oral dosage forms. In: Florence AT, ed. Materials used in pharmaceutical formulations. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication; 1984:1–36
   Google Scholar
• Fukumori Y. Coating of multiparticulates using polymeric dispersions. In: Ghebre-Sellassie I, ed. Multiparticulate oral drug delivery. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1994:79–111
   Google Scholar
• Parikh NH, Porter SC, Rohera BD. Aqueous ethylcellulose dispersion of ethylcellulose I. Evaluation of coating process variables. Pharm Res 1993;10:525–534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshikawa T, Nakagami H. Film formation with coating systems of aqueous suspensions and latex dispersions of Ethylcellulose. Chem Pharm Bull 1994;42:656–662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan CA, Li Wan Po A. Factors affecting drug release from a pellet system coated with an aqueous colloidal dispersion. Int J Pharm 1991;73:51–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ph.Eur. 2011; 7th ed. Stuttgart: Deutscher Apotheker Verlag; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Wolf B. Friability of fluid bed coated pellets. 5th International Granulation Workshop; paper 78; 2011; Lausanne
   Google Scholar
• Costa P, Lobo JMS. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;13:123–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen K, Jacobsen L. Factorial design used for ruggedness testing of flow through cell dissolution method by means of Weibull transformed drug release profiles. Int J Pharm 1992;88:23–29
   Google Scholar
• Langenbucher F. Parametric representation of dissolution-rate curves by the RRSBW distribution. Pharm Ind 1976;38:472–477
   Google Scholar
• Priese F, Wolf B. Development of high drug loaded pellets by design of experiment and population balance model calculation. Powder Technol 2013;241:149–157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemati M, Cherif R, Saleh K, Pont V. Fluidized bed coating and granulation: influence of process-related variables and physicochemical properties on the growth kinetics. Powder Technol 2003;130:8–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf B, Horsch W, Finke I. Einsatz der Perlcellulose zur kontrollierten Arzneistoff-Freigabe. 2. Mitteilung: Methoden der Charakterisierung von Perlcellulosen und an einem einheimischen Produkt gewonnene Ergebnisse. Pharmazie 1991;46:788–792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzika M, Alexandridou S, Kiparissides C. Evaluation of the morphological and release characteristics of coated fertilizer granules produced in a Wurster fluidized bed. Powder Technol 2003;132:16–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar