Statistical optimization of controlled release microspheres containing cetirizine hydrochloride as a model for water soluble drugs

References

• Sastry SV, Reddy IK, Khan MA. Atenolol gastrointestinal therapeutic system: optimization of formulation variables using response surface methodology. J Control Release 1997;45:121–130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzal S, Khan MA. Response surface methodology for the optimization of ubiquinone self-nanoemulsified drug delivery system experimental design. AAPS Pharmscitech 2002;3:1–9
   Google Scholar
• Ertan G, Ozer O, Baloğlu EG. Sustained-release microcapsules of nitrofurantoin and amoxicillin: preparation, in-vitro release rate, kinetic and micromeritic studies. J Microencapsul 1997;4:379–388
   Google Scholar
• Chinna G, Shyam S, Vimal K, et al. Formulation and evaluation of indomethacin microspheres using natural and synthetic polymers as controlled release dosage forms. Int J Drug Discov 2010;2:8–16
   Google Scholar
• Raffin RP, Colomé LM, Schapoval EES, et al. Increasing sodium pantoprazole photostability by microencapsulation: effect of the polymer and the preparation technique. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;69:1014–1018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özyazici M, Sevgi F, Ertan G. Micromeritic studies on nicardipine hydrochloride microcapsules. Int J Pharm 1996;138:25–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Shun P, Kowarski CR, et al. Recent advances in microencapsulation technology and equipment. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1988;14:353–376
   Google Scholar
• Sultana Y, Mall S, Maurya DP, et al. Preparation and in vitro characterization of diltiazem hydrochloride loaded alginate microspheres. Pharm Dev Technol 2009;14:321–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Hwang SJ, Park JB, Park HJ. Preparation and characterization of drug-loaded polymethacrylate microspheres by an emulsion solvent evaporation method. J Microencapsul 2002;19:811–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu KJ, Li Y, Jiang HL, et al. Preparation, characterization and in vitro release properties of ibuprofen-loaded microspheres based on polylactide, poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and their copolymers. J Microencapsul 2005;22:25–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Say KM, El-Helw AM, Ahmed OAA, et al. Novel controlled release of antihypertensive drug: preparation, in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 2013;7:1744–1756
   Google Scholar
• Haznedar S, Dortunc B. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of Eudragit microspheres containing acetazolamide. Int J Pharm 2004;269:131–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliçarslan M, Baykara T. The effect of the drug/polymer ratio on the properties of the verapamil HCl loaded microspheres. Int J Pharm 2003;252:99–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo SK, Mallick AA, Barik BB, Senapati PC. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of Eudragit® microspheres of stavudine. Trop J Pharm Res 2005;4:369–375
   Google Scholar
• Obeidat W, Price J. Viscosity of polymer solution phase and other factors controlling the dissolution of theophylline microspheres prepared by the emulsion solvent evaporation method. J Microencapsul 2003;20:57–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Tsay S, Tsiang R. Encapsulating aspirin into a surfactant-free ethyl cellulose microsphere using non-toxic solvents by emulsion solvent-evaporation technique. J Microencapsul 2001;18:223–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song M, Li N, Sun S, et al. Effect of viscosity and concentration of wall former, emulsifier and pore-inducer on the properties of amoxicillin microcapsules prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation. Farmaco 2005;60:261–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmieri G, Grifantini R, Di Martino P, Martelli S. Emulsion/solvent evaporation as an alternative technique in pellet preparation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000;26:1151–1158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan M, Price J. Solvent, emulsifier and drug concentration factors in poly(d,l-lactic acid) microspheres containing hexamethylmelamine. J Microencapsul 2002;19:95–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang F, Singh J. Effect of additives on the release of a model protein from PLGA microspheres. AAPS PharmSciTech 2001;2:86–92
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki Y, Onuki Y, Yakou S, Takayama K. Effect of temperature-increase rate on drug release characteristics of dextran microspheres prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation process. Int J Pharm 2006;324:144–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincl M, Turk S, Vrecer F. Application of experimental design methodology in development and optimization of drug release method. Int J Pharm 2005;291:39–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma RN, Pancholi SS. Optimization techniques in pharmaceutical industry: a review. J Curr Pharm Res 2011;7:21–28
   Google Scholar
• Gohel M, Amin A. Formulation design and optimization of modified-release microspheres of diclofenac sodium. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25:247–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlKhatib H, Sakr A. Optimization of methacrylic acid ester copolymers blends as controlled release coatings using response surface methodology. Pharm Dev Technol [Internet]. 2003;8:87–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y-B, Tsai Y-H, Lee S-H, et al. Optimization of pH-independent release of nicardipine hydrochloride extended-release matrix tablets using response surface methodology. Int J Pharm 2005;289:87–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Chakkal SK, Ahuja N. Formulation and optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of atenolol using response surface methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech 2006;7:E19–E28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant J, Bernstein D, Buckley C, et al. Double-blind comparison of terfenadine, chlorpheniramine, and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;81:574–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons F. Recent advances in H1-receptor antagonist treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;86:995–999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi H, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Iizuka H. Effects of bepotastine, cetirizine, fexofenadine, and olopatadine on histamine-induced wheal-and flare-response, sedation, and psychomotor performance. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004;29:526–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Pearce KJ. An investigation of the effects of some process variables on the microencapsulation of propranolol hydrochloride by the solvent evaporation method. Int J Pharm 1995;118:199–205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo SK, Behera AL, Mallik B, Patil S. Effect of plasticizers on various characteristics of eudragit microspheres formulated by solvent evaporation method. Int J Drug Dev Res 2011;3:285–290
   Google Scholar
• Martin A, Bustamante P, Chun AHC. Micromeritics. In: Mundorff GH, ed. Physical pharmacy; Physical and chemical principles of pharmaceutical science. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1993:423–452
   Google Scholar
• Wagner J. Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules. J Pharm Sci 1969;58:1253–1257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai SJ, Singh P, Simonelli AP, Higuchi W. Investigation of factors influencing release of solid drug dispersed in inert matrices III. Quantitative studies involving the polyethylene plastic matrix. J Pharm Sci 1966;55:1230–1234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963;52:1145–1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, et al. Mechanisms of potassium chloride release from compressed, hydrophilic, polymeric matrices: effect of entrapped air. J Pharm Sci 1983;15:1189–1191
   Google Scholar
• Ritger P, Peppas N. A simple equation for description of solute release. II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J Control Release 1987;5:37–42
   Google Scholar
• Paul K, Nagarajan JSK. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies of cetrizine tablets in healthy human volunteers. Int J Res Pharm Chem 2011;1:1212–1235
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan C. Excipients general chapter. USP29-NF24. 2013. p. 3017. Available from: http://www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_c1174.html
   Google Scholar
• Rekhi GS, Nellore RV, Hussain AS, et al. Identification of critical formulation and processing variables for metoprolol tartrate extended-release (ER) matrix tablets. J Control Release 1999;2:327–342
   Google Scholar
• Solanki A, Parikh J, Parikh R. Formulation and optimization of piroxicam proniosomes by 3-factor, 3-level Box-Behnken design. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:43–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco M, Ford J, Rowe P, Rajabi-Siahboomi A. Influence of drug:hydroxypropylmethylcellulose ratio, drug and polymer particle size and compression force on the release of diclofenac sodium from HPMC tablets. J Control Release 1999;57:75–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit SS, Hase DP, Bankar MM, et al. Ketoprofen-loaded Eudragit RSPO microspheres: an influence of sodium carbonate on in vitro drug release and surface topology. J Microencapsul 2009;26:195–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar