Formulation and quality control of semi-solid containing harmless bacteria by-products: chronic wounds pro-healing activity

References

• Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:489–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding KG, Morris HL, Patel GK. Healing chronic wounds. Br Med J 2002;324:160–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg 1998;176:26S–38S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Rep Reg 2008;16:37–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos AN, Peral MC, Valdez JC. Differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a clinical sample and in a colony isolated from it: comparison of virulence capacity and susceptibility of biofilm to inhibitors. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;33:267–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Moller K, Jensen P, et al. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Rep Reg 2008;16:2–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdez JC, Peral M, Rachid M, et al. Interference of Lactobacillus plantarum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in infected burns. The potential use of probiotic in wound treatment”. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11:472–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos AN, Sesto Cabral ME, Noseda D, et al. Antipathogenic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the potential use of its supernatants in the treatment of infected chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2012;20:552–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos AN, Gobbato N, Rachid M, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture supernatants on polymorphonuclear damage and inflammatory response. Int Immunopharmacol 2010;10:247–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdez JC, Ramos AN, Fernández D, et al. Probiotics and their potential use in wound treatment. In: Alvarez S, ed. Probiotics: inmunobiotics and inmunogenics. Florida: Science publishers/CRC; 2013:296–333
   Google Scholar
• Rosner K, Ross C, Karlsmark T, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of the cutaneous cellular infiltrate in different areas of chronic leg ulcers. Apmis 1995;103:293–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnuzzer RW, Schultz GS. Biochemical analysis of acute and chronic wound environments. Wound Repair Regen 1996;4:321–325
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falanga V. Introducing the concept of wound bed preparation. Int Forum Wound Care 2001;16:1–4
   Google Scholar
• Falanga V, Grinnell F, Gilchrest B, et al. Workshop on the pathogenesis of chronic wounds. J Invest Dermatol 1994;102:125–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falanga V. Classifications for wound bed preparation and stimulation of chronic wounds. Wound Rep Reg 2000;8:347–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos AN, Sesto Cabral ME, Arena ME, et al. Compounds from Lactobacillus plantarum culture supernatants with potential pro-healing and anti-pathogenic properties in skin chronic wounds. J Pharm Biol (in press)
   Google Scholar
• VijayaBhanu P, Shanmugam V, Lakshmi PK. Development and optimization of novel diclofenac emulgel. Pharmacie Globale (IJCP) 2011;1–4
   Google Scholar
• Chakole CM, Shende MA, Khadatkar SN. Formulation and evaluation of novel combined halobetasol propionate and fusidic acid ointment. Int J Chem Tech Res 2009;1:103–116
   Google Scholar
• Liebenberg W, Engelbrecht E, Wessels A, et al. A comparative study of the release of active ingredients from semisolid cosmeceuticals measured with franz, enhancer or flow-through cell diffusion apparatus. J Food Drug Anal 2004;12:19–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Neves J, Bahia MF. Gels as vaginal drug delivery systems. Int J Pharmaceut 2006;318:1–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sesto Cabral ME, Ramos AN, Cabrera CA, et al. Equipment and method for in vitro release measurements on topical dosage forms. Pharm Dev Technol 2014 (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera CA, Ramos AN, Sesto Cabral ME. Biotecnología Farmacéutica: Medicamentos de origen biológico. Desarrollo tecnológico, calidad fisicoquímica, farmacéutica y biológica del Ingrediente Farmacéutico Activo. Editorial Académica Española 2013:113–114
   Google Scholar
• Trentin DS, Giordani RB, Zimmer KR, et al. Potential of medicinal plants from the Brazilian semi-arid region (Caatinga) against Staphylococcus epidermidis planktonic and biofilm lifestyles. J Ethnopharmacol 2011;137:327–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preeti GK, Shah Rohit R, Chougule DD, Bhise SB. Formulation and evaluation of Celecoxib gel. J Drug Deliv Therapeut 2012;2:132–135
   Google Scholar
• Matousek JL, Campbell KL. A comparative review of cutaneous pH. Veter Dermatol 2002;13:293–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percival SL, McCarty S, Hunt JA, Woods EJ. The effects of pH on wound healing, biofilms, and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Rep Reg 2014;22:174–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccia EJ, Lunardib LO, Nanclaresb DMA, Marchetti JM. Sustained release of lidocaine from Poloxamer 407 gels. Int J Pharmaceut 2005;288:235–244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SNH, Hussain T, Khan IU, et al. Formulation study of topically applied lotion: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. BI 2013;3:11–19
   Google Scholar
• Wester R, Maibach H. Percutaneous absorption of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992;23:253–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungersted JM, Hellgren LI, Jemec GB, Agner T. Lipids and skin barrier function – a clinical perspective. Contact Dermat 2008;58:255–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey ME, Caiazza NC, O’Toole GA. Rhamnolipid surfactant production affects biofilm architecture in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 2003;185:1027–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, et al. Microbiology. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 2000;146:2395–2407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turakhia MH, Cooksey KE, Characklis WG. Influence of a calcium-specific chelant on biofilm removal. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983;46:1236–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar