In vitro evaluation of some parameters involved in mucoadhesion of aqueous polymeric dispersions

References

• Shaikh R, Raj Singh TR, Garland MJ, et al. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2011;3:89–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khutoryanskiy VV. Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol Biosci 2011;11:748–764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremecker KD. Modell zur Bestimmung der Haftdauer von Schleimhaftsalben in vitro. Pharm Ind 1983;45:417–419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Cyr GN. Composition producing adhesion through hydration. In: Manly RS, ed. Adhesion in biological systems. New York: Academic Press; 1970:163–181
   Google Scholar
• Peppas NA, Buri PA. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues. J Control Release 1985;2:257–275
   Google Scholar
• Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;71:505–518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:1556–1568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saettone MF, Chetoni P, Torracca MT, et al. Evaluation of muco-adhesive properties and in vivo activity of ophthalmic vehicles based on hyaluronic acid. Int J Pharm 1989;51:203–212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fefelova NA, Nurkeeva ZS, Mun GA, Khutoryanskiy VV. Mucoadhesive interactions of amphiphilic cationic copolymers based on [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride. Int J Pharm 2007;339:25–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Ferrari F, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C. Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride-mucin interaction by means of viscosimetric and turbidimetric measurements. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000;10:251–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thongborisute J, Takeuchi H. Evaluation of mucoadhesiveness of polymers by BIACORE method and mucin-particle method. Int J Pharm 2008;354:204–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramella C, Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, Ferrari F. Rheological and tensile tests for the assessment of polymer–mucin interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1994;40:213–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburic S, Craig DQM. An investigation into rheological, dielectric and mucoadhesive properties of poly(acrylic acid) gel systems. J Control Rel 1995;37:59–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Fuente H, Vila-Dorrio B, Anguiano-Igea S, et al. Tanned leather: a good model for determining hydrogels bioadhesion. Int J Pharm 1996;138:103–112
   Google Scholar
• Szücs M, Sandri G, Bonferoni MC, et al. Mucoadhesive behaviour of emulsions containing polymeric emulsifier. Eur J Pharm Sci 2008;34:226–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laulicht B, Cheifetz P, Tripathi A, Mathiowitz E. Are in vivo gastric biosdhesive forces accurately reflected by in vitro experiments? J Control Rel 2009;134:103–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Robinson JR. Physico-chemical properties of water insoluble important to mucin/epithelial adhesion. J Control Rel 1985;2:47–57
   Google Scholar
• Chickering DE, Mathiowitz E. Bioadhesive microspheres: I. A novel electrobalance-based method to study adhesive interactions between individual microspheres and intestinal mucosa. J Control Release 1995;34:251–261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner C, del Campo A, Arzt E. Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect radius, and preload. Langmuir 2007;23:3495–3502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF. Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers. Int J Pharm 1997;151:223–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H, Edsman K. Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength methods. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001;53:1589–1599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks D, Lindner A, Creton C, Bonn D. Cohesive failure of thin layers of soft model adhesive under tension. J Appl Phys 2003;93:1557–1566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H, Edsman K. Limitations of the rheological mucoadhesion method: the effect of the choice of conditions and the rheological synergism parameter. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003;18:349–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri G, Bonferoni MC, Chetoni P, et al. Ophthalmic delivery systems based on drug-polymer-polymer ionic ternary interaction: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;62:59–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Marciello M, Bonferoni MC, et al. Thermally sensitive gels based on chitosan derivatives for the treatment of oral mucositis. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010;74:248–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edsman K, Hägerström H. Pharmaceutical applications of mucoadhesion for the non-oral routes. J Pharm Pharmacol 2005;57:3–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral-controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion. Int J Pharm 1984;19:107–127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HEC. An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol 1984;36:295–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonferoni MC, Giunchedi P, Scalia S, et al. Chitosan gels for the vaginal delivery of lactic acid: relevance of formulation parameters to mucoadhesion and release mechanisms. AAPS PharmSciTech 2006;7:E141–E147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirawong N, Kennedy RA, Sriamornsak P. Viscosimetric study of pectin–mucin interaction and its mucoadhesive bond strength. Carbohy Polym 2008;71:170–179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SC, Kim JY, Oh IJ. Mucoadhesive and physicochemical characterization of carbopol-poloxamer gels containing triamcinolone acetonide. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000;26:307–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun DB. Poly(ethylene oxide). In: Davidson RL, ed. Handbook of water-soluble gums and resins. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1980: Ch. 19
   Google Scholar
• Cottrel IW, Kang KS, Kovacs P. Xanthan gum. In: Davidson RL, ed. Handbook of water-soluble gums and resins. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1980: Ch. 24
   Google Scholar
• Dow Brochure, form no. 326-00013-0804 AMS. Midland (MI): Dow Chemical Company; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Horie V. Materials for conservation: organic consolidants, adhesives and coatings. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2010:206–211
   Google Scholar
• Keary CM. Characterization of METHOCEL cellulose ethers by aqueous SEC with multiple detectors. Carbohyd Polym 2001;45:293–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowys MP, Desbrieres J, Rinaudo M. Rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibril suspensions. Role of polymeric additives. Food Hydrocolloid 2001;15:25–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gennes PG. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 1985;57:827–863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Leong KC. Influences of substrate wettability and liquid viscosity on isothermal spreading of liquid droplets on solid surfaces. Exp Fluids 2002;33:728–731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zisman WA. Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes F, ed. Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion. Advances in Chemistry Series. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1964: Ch. 1
   Google Scholar
• Lehr CM, Boddè HE, Bouwstra JA, Junginger HE. A surface energy analysis of mucoadhesion II. Prediction of mucoadhesive performance by spreading coefficients. Eur J Pharm Sci 1993;1:19–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchene D, Touchard F, Peppas NA. Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of bioadhesive systems for drug administration. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1988;14:283–318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurny R, Meyer JM, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive intraoral release systems: design, testing and analysis. Biomaterials 1984;5:336–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar