A study of a novel coprocessed dry binder composed of α-lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose and corn starch

References

• Gupta P, Nachaegari SK, Bansal AK. Improved excipient functionality coprocessing. In: Katdare KA, Chaubal MV, eds. Excipient developement for pharmaceutical biotechnology, and drug delivery systems. New York: Taylor & Francis, USA, 2006:109–126
   Google Scholar
• Saha S, Shahiwala AF. Multifunctional coprocessed excipients for improved tabletting performance. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2009;6:197–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachaegari SK, Bansal AK. Coprocessed excipients for solid dosage forms. Pharm Technol 2004;28:112–122
   Google Scholar
• Gohel MC, Jogani PD. A review of co-processed directly compressible excipients. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2005;8:76–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolhuis GK, de Waard H. Compaction properties of directly compressible materials, In: Çelik M, ed. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2011:143–204
   Google Scholar
• Van der Voort Maarschalk K, Bolhuis GK. Improving properties of materials for direct compaction. Pharm Technol 1999;23:34–42
   Google Scholar
• Garr JS, Rubinstein MH. Compaction properties of a cellulose-lactose direct compression excipient. Pharm Tech Int 1991;3:24–27
   Google Scholar
• Michoel A, Rombaut P, Verhoye A. Comparative evaluation of co-processed lactose and microcrystalline cellulose with their physical mixtures in the formulation of folic acid tablets. Pharm Dev Tech 2002;7:79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerry. Product document. Disintequik™ MCC 25. [online], 2015, Available from: http://www.sheffieldbioscience.com/disintequikMCC25/ [last accessed 28 Mar 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Belda PM, Mielck JB. The tabletting behaviour of Cellactose compared with mixtures of celluloses with lactoses. Eur J.Pharm Biopharm 1996;42:325–330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mužíková J, Lišková S. A study of the properties of compacts from directly compressible fructose. Ceska Slov Farm 2009;58:14–20
   Google Scholar
• SPI Pharma. Compresol™ SM. Technical bulletin. [online], 2015, Available from: http://www.spipharma.com/content/documents//Compressol-SM_T135.pdf [last accessed on 20 Jun 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Allen JD. Improving DC with SMCC. Manuf chemist 1996;67:19–23
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood BE, Becker JW. A new class of high-functionality excipients: silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Pharm Tech 1998;22:78–88
   Google Scholar
• Tobyn MJ, McCarthy GP, Staniforth JN, Edge S. Physicochemical comparison between microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm 1998;169:183–194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian JL, Tian C, Ke X. Comparative evaluation of a co-processed self-lubricating excipient LubriTose SD as a direct compression vehicle. J Drug Del Sci Tech 2012;22:562–567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mužíková J, Holubová K. New coprocessed dry binders based on lactose in direct compression of tablets. Chem Listy 2013;107:66–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mužíková J, Muchová S. A study of a coprocessed dry binder composed of microcrystalline cellulose and glycerol monostearate. Ceska Slov Farm 2012;61:229–233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aljaberi A, Ardakani A, Khdair A, et al. Tableting functionality evaluation of Prosolv Easytab in comparison to physical mixtures of its individual components. J Drug Del Sci Tech 2013;23:499–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mužíková J, Mašatová J. Prosolv Easytab as a new multifunctional co-processed dry binder: a study of the properties of tablets and energy evaluation of the compression proces. Ceska Slov Farm 2011;60:182–188
   Google Scholar
• Meggle. Combilac®. Technical brochure [Online] 2015; 1-8. Available from: http://www.meggle-pharma.com/en/viewDocuments/upload/159/brochure-combilac.pdf. [last accessed on 25 Jun 2015]
   Google Scholar
• European Pharmacopoeia. 8th edition, Vol. 1, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2013:346–349
   Google Scholar
• European Pharmacopoeia. 8th edition, Vol. 1, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2013:343–345
   Google Scholar
• Ragnarsson G. Force displacement and network measurements. In: Alderborn G, Nyström Ch, eds. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1996:77–96
   Google Scholar
• Stamm A, Mathis C. Verpressbarkeit von festen Hilfsstoffen fűr Direkttablettierung. Acta Pharm Technol 1976;22:7–16
   Google Scholar
• Manas C, Salil KR. Plastic properties and testing. In: Hudgin DE, ed. Plastics technology handbook. Florida: CRC Press, 2006:3–17
   Google Scholar
• Pai DA, Hayes AA, Okos MR. Modeling pharmaceutical compacts tensile strength based on viscoelastic properties. Powder Technol 2013;239:441–450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell JT, Newton JM. Determination of tablet strength by the diametral-compression test. J Pharm Sci 1970;59:688–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos CE, Bolhuis GK, Van Doorne H, Lerk CF. Native starch in tablet formulations: properties on compaction. Pharm Weekbl Sci 1987;9:274–282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Pharmacopoeia. 8th edition, Vol. 1. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2013:285–286
   Google Scholar
• Belousov VA. K voprosu o vybore optimalnikh davlenii pressovania pri tabletirovanii. Khim Farm Zh 1976;10:105–111
   Google Scholar
• Picker-Freyer KM. Tablet production systems. In: Gad SC, ed. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing handbook production and processes. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2008:1053–1098
   Google Scholar
• Lum SK, Duncan-Hewitt WC. Powder densification. 1. Particle-particle basis for incorporation of viscoelastic material properties. J Pharm Sci 1999;88:261–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehula M, Adamek R, Spacek V. Stress relaxation study of fillers for directly compressed tablets. Powder Technol 2012;217:510–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govedarica B, Ilic I, Sibanc R, et al. The use of single particle mechanical properties for predicting the compressibility of pharmaceutical materials. Powder Technol 2012;225:43–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busignies V, Tchoreloff P, Leclerc B, et al. Compaction of crystallographic forms of pharmaceutical granular lactoses. II. Compacts mechanical properties. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004;58:577–586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Ruiz A, Perales MCM, Antequera MVV, et al. Rheology and compression characteristics of lactose based direct compression excipients. Int J Pharm 1993;95:201–207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem Sheikh MFJT, Alkaysi HN, Muhsin NA. Stress relaxation of pharmaceutical powders. Acta Pharm Technol 1984;30:312–316
   Google Scholar
• Bolhuis GK, Hölzer AW. Lubrication issues in direct compaction. In: Celik M, ed. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2011:205–234
   Google Scholar