Reaching Emergency Medical Services Providers: Is One Survey Mode Better than Another?

References

• Dawson DE. National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS). Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10:314–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely M, Hyde LK, Donaldson A, Furnival R, Mann NC. Evaluating state capacity to collect and analyze emergency medical services data. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10:14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States General Accounting Office. Emergency Medical Services: Reported Needs Are Wide-Ranging, With A Growing Focus on Lack of Data. Washington, DC: GAO-02-28, October 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner EB, Fernandez AR, Shah MN. Do emergency medical services professionals think they should participate in disease prevention? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Markenson D, Tunik M, Cooper A, A national assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and confidence of prehospital providers in the assessment and management of child maltreatment. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e103–e108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt TA, Nelson M, Daya M, DeIorio NM, Griffiths D, Rosteck P. Emergency medical service providers' attitudes and experiences regarding enrolling patients in clinical research trials. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:160–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAMA. Instructions for Authors: Survey Research. Available at: http://jama.ama-assn.org/misc/ifora.dtl#SurveyResearch . Accessed July 17, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Informa Healthcare. Prehospital Emergency Care: Instructions for Authors. Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title∼db=all∼content=g912030209∼tab=submit∼mode=paper_submission_instructions . Accessed July 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research. Best Practices for Survey and Public Opinion Research. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/bestpractices?s=best%20practices%20for%20survey . Accessed July 16, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the journal. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson T, Owens L. Survey response rate reporting in the professional literature. Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. August 16, 2003, Nashville, TN. Available at: http://www.srl.uic.edu/publist/Conference/rr_reporting.pdf . Accessed July 16, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Third ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite D, Emery J, DeLusignan S, Sutton S. Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract. 2003;20:545–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini RM, Hayek JC, Kuh GD, Kennedy JM, Ouimet JA. College student responses to Web and paper surveys: does mode matter? Res Higher Educ. 2003;44(1):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobanoglu C, Warde B, Moreo PJ. A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods. Int J Market Res. 2001;43:441–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper MP. Internet surveys. In: Lewis-Beck M, Bryman AE, Liao TF, ed. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Methods. Second Edition. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA, Smyth JD. Design effects in the transition to Web-based surveys. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5 suppl):S90–S96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner MD, Wingenbach GJ, Raven MR. Internet and paper based data collection methods in agricultural education research. J South Agricultural Educ Res. 2002;52(1):40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Litvin SW, Kar GH. E-surveying for tourism research: legitimate tool or a researcher's fantasy? J Travel Res. February 2001;39:308–14.
   Google Scholar
• Manfreda KL, Bosnjak M, Berzelak J, Haas I, Vehovar V. Web surveys versus other survey modes. Int J Market Res. 2008;50(1):79–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppermann M. E-mail surveys—potentials and pitfalls. Marketing Res. 1995;7(3):29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N. A comparison of responses to Internet and postal surveys in a public engagement context. Sci Commun. 2006;27:352–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truell AD, Goss P. Business education leaders compare e-mail and regular mail survey research. J Technol Stud. 2002;XXVIII(1):81–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Laskey N. Internet based marketing research: a serious alternative to traditional research methods? Marketing Intell Plann. 2003;21(2):79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta R, Sivadas E. Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. J Market Res Soc. 1995;37:429–39.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer DR, Dillman DA. Development of a standard e-mail methodology: results of an experiment. Public Opin Q. 1998;62:378–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Resources and Services Administration. Office of Rural Health Policy. List of Rural Counties and Designated Eligible Census Tracts in Metropolitan Counties. Available at: ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/Eligibility2005.pdf . Accessed 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker RD, Schonlau M. Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: evidence from the literature. Field Methods. 2002;14:347–65.
   Google Scholar
• Link MW, Mokdad A. Can Web and mail survey modes improve participation in an RDD-based national health surveillance? J Off Stat. 2006;22:293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Porter SR, Whitcomb ME. Mixed-mode contacts in Web surveys: paper is not necessarily better. Public Opin Q. 2007;71:635–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R. A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates. Public Opin Q. 2004;68:94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studnek JR, Fernandez AR, Margolis GS, O'Connor RE. Physician medical oversight in emergency medical services: where are we? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:53–8.
   Google Scholar
• DeMaio TJ. Refusals: who, where, and why. Public Opin Q. 1980;44:223–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House J, Wolf S. Effects of urban residence on interpersonal trust and helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1978;36:1029–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TW. The hidden 25 percent: an analysis of nonresponse on the 1980 General Social Survey. Public Opin Q. 1983;47:386–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman VA, Patterson D, Slifkin R. Issues in staffing emergency medical services: a national survey of local rural and urban EMS directors. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, May 2008. Report No. 93.
   Google Scholar
• Bell P, Reddy P, Rainie L. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Rural areas and the Internet: Rural Americans' Internet use has grown, but they continue to lag behind others. Available at: www.pewinternet.org . Accessed September 18, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Day JC, Janus A, Davis J. Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, October 2005.
   Google Scholar
• State of Utah. Department of Workforce Services. Utah Occupational Wages—Published June 2009 (data from May 2008) —Annual. Available at: http://jobs.utah.gov/jsp/wi/utalmis/gotoOccwage.do . Accessed July 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fink A. How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. Fourth ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth JD, Dillman DA, Christian LM, McBride M. Open-ended questions in Web surveys: can increasing the size of answer boxes and providing extra verbal instructions improve response quality? Public Opin Q. 2009;73:325–37.
   Google Scholar