Neurologically Intact Survival in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest: Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation vs. LifeBelt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

References

• American Heart Association. Heart Disease & Stroke Statistics, 2009 Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/123565990943909Heart%20and%20Stroke%20Update.pdf . Accessed March 13, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow BJ, Clark LL, Ewy GA, Minimally interrupted cardiac resuscitation by emergency medical services for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2008;299:1158–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen K, Kvaloy JT, Kramer-Johansen J, Steen PA, Eftestol T. Development of the probability of return of spontaneous circulation in intervals without chest compressions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study. BMC Med. 2009;7(1):6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polentini MS, Pirrallo RG, McGill W. The changing incidence of ventricular fibrillation in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (1992–2002). Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10:52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kette F, Pellis T. Increased survival despite a reduction in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in north-east Italy. Resuscitation. 2007;72:52–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch TJ, White RD, Friedman PA, Kottke TE, Wu LA, Packer DL. Trends in treated ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a 17-year population-based study. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1:255–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hess EP, Campbell RL, White RD. Epidemiology, trends, and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin. Resuscitation. 2007;72:200–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Olsufka M, Copass MK. Changing incidence of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation, 1980–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:3008–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigginton JG, Isaacs SM, Kay JJ. Mechanical devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:273–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geocadin RG. Understanding and enhancing functional outcomes after cardiac arrest: the need for a multidisciplinary approach to refocus on the brain. Resuscitation. 2009;80:153–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann JT, Rosborough JP, Kassabian L, Salami B. A new device producing manual sternal compression with thoracic constraint for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2006;69:295–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gliner BE, White RD. Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation. 1999;41:133–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idris AH, Becker LB, Ornato JP, Utstein-style guidelines for uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American College of Cardiology, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Institute of Critical Care Medicine, the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Writing Group. Circulation. 1996;94:2324–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg RA, Wilcoxson D, Hilwig RW, The need for ventilatory support during bystander CPR. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:342–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs I. Mechanical chest compression devices—will we ever get the evidence? Resuscitation. 2009;80:1093–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewy GA, Zuercher M, Hilwig RW, Improved neurological outcome with continuous chest compressions compared with 30:2 compressions-to-ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2007;116:2525–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2001;104:2465–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson J, Andrusiek D, Everson-Stewart S, Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;120:1241–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich JW, Berg RA, Higdon TA, Ewy GA, Kern KB, Sanders AB. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:1020–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjorshol CA, Soreide E, Torsteinbo TH, Lexow K, Nilsen OB, Sunde K. Quality of chest compressions during 10 min of single-rescuer basic life support with different compression: ventilation ratios in a manikin model. Resuscitation. 2008;77:95–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjöberg T. Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2002;55:285–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen S, Sjöberg T, Olsson P, Young M. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005;67:25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin HR, Paradis N, Ornato JP, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: improved hemodynamics and mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2214–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2620–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong MEH, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, Use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. JAMA. 2006;295:2629–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern KB, Carter AB, Showen RL, Comparison of mechanical techniques of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: survival and neurologic outcome in dogs. Am J Emerg Med. 1987;5:190–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar