Comparative Tracking Error Analysis of Five Different Optical Tracking Systems

References

• Adler J R, Jr. Indications and limitations of stereotactic radiosurgery. West J Med 1993; 158: 66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• An K N, Jacobsen M C, Berglund W, Chao E YS. Application of a magnetic tracking device to kinesiologic studies. J Biomech 1988; 21: 613–620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett G H, Steiner C P, Roberts D W. Surgical navigation system technologies. Image Guided Neurosurgery: Clinical Applications of Surgical Navigation, G H Barnett, D W Roberts, F U Maciunas. Quality Medical Publishing, St Louis 1998
   Google Scholar
• Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, Wanschitz F, Enislidis G, Truppe M, Ewers R, Bergmann H. (1998) Concepts and results in the development of a hybrid tracking system for CAS. Proceedings of First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI'98), Cambridge, MA, October, 1998, W M Wells, A Colchester, S Delp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 343–351, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1496
   Google Scholar
• Bucholz R D, Ho H W, Rubin J P. Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localization using computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1993; 79: 667–673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caversaccio M, Ladrach K, Bachler R, Schroth G, Nolte L P, Hausler R. Computer-assisted surgical navigation with a dynamic mobile framework for the nasal fossae, sinuses and base of the skull (in French). Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1998; 115: 253–258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chassat F, Lavallte S. (1998) Experimental protocol of accuracy evaluation of 6-D localizers for computer-integrated surgery: Application to four optical localizers. Proceedings of First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI'98), Cambridge, MA, October, 1998, W M Wells, A Colchester, S Delp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 277–284, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1496
   Google Scholar
• Day J S, Dumas G A, Murdoch D J. Evaluation of a long-range transmitter for use with a magnetic tracking device in motion analysis. J Biomech 1998; 31: 957–961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp S L., Stulberg S D, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clinical Orthopaedics 1998; 354: 49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGioia A M, Jamaraz B, O'Toole R V, Simon D., Kanade T. Medical robotics and computer assisted surgery in orthopaedics. Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, K Morgan, R M. Satava, H B Sieberg, R Mattheus, J P Christensen. 1OS Press, Burke, VA 1994; 88–90
   Google Scholar
• Friets E M, Strohbehn J W, Hatch J F, Roberts D W. A frameless stereotaxic operating microscope for neurosurgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989; 36: 608–617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimson E, Leventon M, Ettinger G, Chabrerie A, Ozlen F, Nakajima S, Atsumi H, Kikinis R, Black P. (1998) Clinical experience with a high precision imageguided neurosurgery system. Proceedings of First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI'98), Cambridge, MA, October, 1998, W M Wells, A Colchester, S Delp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 63–73
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie B L, Adler J R, Jr. Computer-assisted preoperative planning, interactive surgery, and frameless stereotaxy. Clin Neurosurg 1992; 38: 112–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haller J W, Smith K, Ryken T, Caplan J, Vannier M W. (1999) Validation of an image-guided surgical navigation system. Computer Aided Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress and Exhibition (CARS'99), Paris, June, 1999, H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 711–714
   Google Scholar
• Hassfeld S, Burghart C, Bertovic I, Raczkowsky J, Rembold U, Worn H, Muhling J. (1998) Intraoperative navigation techniques: Accuracy tests and clinical report. Computer Aided Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium and Exhibition (CAR'98), Tokyo, June, 1998, H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 670–675
   Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Westermann B. Optical tracking of a microscope for image-guided intranasal sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhino1 Laryngol 1999; 108: 54–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun M P, McDonald P, Wiker C, Koehler S, Peters W. Stereotactic localization and guidance using a machine vision technique. Stereotact Functional Neurosurg 1992; 58: 94–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu H C, Luo Z P, Rand J A, An K N. Influence of patellar thickness on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 69–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kai J, Shiomi H, Sasama T, Sato Y, Inoue T., Tamura S. (1998) An optical high-precision 3D position measurement system suitable for head motion tracking in frameless stereotactic radiosurgery. Computer Aided Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium and Exhibition (CAR'98), Tokyo, June, 1998, H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 599–604
   Google Scholar
• Kato A, Yoshimine T, Hayakawa T, Tomita Y, Ikeda T, Mitomo M, Harada K, Mogami H. A frameless. armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 1991; 74: 845–849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaus M, Steinmeier R, Sporer T, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R. Technical accuracy of a neuronavigation system measured with a high-precision mechanical micromanipulator. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 1431–1436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch S, Schilling C, Seiler P G. (1998) Miniaturized five degree-of-freedom magnetic tracker. Computer Aided Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium and Exhibition (CAR'98), Tokyo, June, 1998, H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 928
   Google Scholar
• Li Q, Zamorano L, Jiang Z, Vinas F, Diaz F. (1998) The application accuracy of the frameless implantable marker system and analysis of related affecting factors. Proceedings of First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI'98), Cambridge, MA, October, 1998, W M Wells, A Colchester, S Delp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 253–260, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1496
   Google Scholar
• Li Q, Zamorano L, Jiang Z, Gong J X, Pandya A, Perez R, Diaz F. Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system - a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and Flashpoint tracking systems. Comp Aid Surg 1999; 4: 314–321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liener U C, Reinhart C., Kinzl L, Gebhard F. A new approach to computer guidance in orthopedic surgery using real time volume rendering. J Med Syst 1999; 23: 35–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maciunas R J, Fitzpatrick J M, Galloway R L, Allen G S. Beyond stereotaxy: Extreme levels of application accuracy are provided by implantable fiducial markers for interactive image-guided neurosurgery. Interactive Image-Guided Surgery, R J Maciunas. AANS Publications Committee, Park Ridge, IL 1993; 259–270
   Google Scholar
• Meskers C G, Fraterman H, van der Helm F C, Vermeulen H M, Rozing P M. Calibration of the “Flock of Birds” electromagnetic tracking device and its application in shoulder motion studies. J Biomech 1999; 32: 629–633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne A D, Chess D G, Johnson J A, King G J. Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: A study of the optimal range and metal interference. J Biomech 1996; 29: 791–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder A GE. Human Movement Tracking Technology -Technical Report. NSERC Hand Centered Studies of Human Movement Project, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, SC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Nomura T., Kobayashi E, Masamuna K, Sakuma I, Dohi T, Iseki H, Takakura K. (1999) Development of an active wireless optical marker system for optical tracking system in computer aided surgery. Computer Aided Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress and Exhibition (CARS'99), Paris, June, 1999, H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 813–817
   Google Scholar
• Rohling R, Munger P, Hollerbach J M, Peter T. Comparison of relative accuracy between a mechanical and an optical position tracker for image-guided neurosurgery. J Image Guid Surg 1995; 1: 30–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan M J, Erickson R K, Levin D N, Pelizzari C A, Macdonald R L, Dohann G J. Frameless stereotaxy with real-time tracking of patient head movement and retrospective patient-image registration. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 287–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasama T, Nakahodo K, Ohzono K, Sato Y, Yoden S, Ochi T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Tamura S. (1999) Accuracy evaluation in computer assisted hip surgery. Computer Aided Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress and Exhibition (CARS'99), Paris, June, 1999, H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 772–776
   Google Scholar
• Smith K R, Frank K J, Bucholz R D. The NeuroStation: A highly accurate, minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994; 18: 247–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobaugh J W, Richard W D, Smith K R, Bucholz R D. Frameless stereotactic ultrasonography: Method and applications. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994; 18: 235–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe E., Watanabe T, Manaka S, et al. Threedimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): New equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery. Surg Neurol 1987; 27: 543–547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zylka W, Sabczynski J. Effect of localization devices and registration methods on the accuracy of stereotactic frame systems predicted by the Gaussian approach. Comp Aid Surg 1999; 4: 77–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar