Intra-operative Tracking of the Trunk during Surgical Correction of Scoliosis: A Feasibility Study

References

• Deacon P, Flood B M, Dickson R A. Idiopathic scoli-osis in three dimensions. A radiographie and morpho-metric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66: 509–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdriolle R. La scoliose. Son étude tridimensionnelle. Maloine, Paris 1979
   Google Scholar
• Nachemson A L, Peterson L-E. Effectiveness of treat-ment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the brace study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 815–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridwell K H. Spinal instrumentation in the management of adolescent scoliosis. Clin orthop 1997; 335: 64–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeller R, Dubousset J. Traitement chirurgical des scolioses idiopathiques. Rachis 1999; 11: 87–101
   Google Scholar
• Cobb J R. outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional Course Lectures 5, J W Edwards. American Academy of orthopaedic Surgeons, Michigan 1948; 261–275
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell W P. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 1381–1387
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Côté P, Kreitz B G, Cassidy J D, Dzus A K, Martel J. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's Forward Bend Test. Spine 1998; 23: 796–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burwell R G, James N J, Johnson F, Webb J K, Wilson Y G. Standardisee trunk asymmetry scores. A study of back contour in healthy schoolchildren. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983; 65: 452–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki N, Ono T, Tezuka M, Kamiishi S. Moiré topography and back shape analysis. Clinical application. International Symposium on 3-D Scoliotic Deformities, J Dansereau. Éditions de l'École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal 1992; 124–130
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki N, Inami K, Ono T, Kohno K. Analysis of posterior trunk symmetry index in scoliosis (Part 1). Research into Spinal Deformities 2, I AF Stokes. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1999; vol. 59: 81–84
   Google Scholar
• Raso V J, Lou E, Hill D L, Mahood J K, Moreau M J, Durdle N G. Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr orthop 1998; 18: 222–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theologis T N, Jefferson R J, Simpson A HRW, Turner-Smith A R, Fairbank J CT. Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995; 18: 909–912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson E G, Kropf M A, Purcell G, Kabo J M, Kanim L EA, Burt C. optoelectronic evaluation of trunk de-formity in scoliosis. Spine 1993; 18: 326–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes I AF, Moreland M S. Concordance of back surface asymmetry and spine shape in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1989; 14: 73–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theologis T N, Fairbank J CT, Turner-Smith A R, Pan-tazopoulos T. Early detection of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by measurement of changes in back shape with the Integrated Shape Im-aging System scanner. Spine 1997; 22: 1223–1228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Smith A R, Harris J D, Houghton G R, Jefferson R J. A method for analysis of back shape in scoliosis. J Biomech 1988; 21: 497–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao T-V, Labelle H, Le Blanc R. Intratester reproduc-ibility of postural evaluation with 3D digitization [in French]. Ann Chir 1997; 51: 848–853
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De la Huerta F, Leroux M A, Zabjek K F, Coillard C, Rivard C H. Postural geometry of control subjects and scoliotic patients using stereovideography [in French]. Ann Chir 1998; 52: 776–783
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Blanc R, Labelle H, Poitras B, Rivard C H, Krat-zenberg J. Tridimensional (3-D) postural evaluation of normal and scoliotic subjects [in French]. Ann Chir 1996; 50: 631–636
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ployon A, Lavaste F, Maurel N, Skalli W, Dubousset J, Zeller R, Rolland-Gosselin A. A protocol of in vivo 3D experimental evaluation of global posture and motion of the spine [in French]. Rev Chir orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 1997; 83: 719–729
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zabjek K F, Simard G, Leroux M A, Coillard C, Rivard C H. Comparaison de la fidélité de deux systèmes d'acquisition 3D sur l'étude de paramètres anthropométriques et posturaux. Ann Chir 1999; 53: 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Asher M, Manna B. optimizing surgical improvement of trunk asymmetry from idiopathic scoliosis. Research into Spinal Deformities 2, I AF Stokes. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1999; vol. 59: 250–253
   Google Scholar
• Thulboume T, Gillespie R. The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurements, analysis and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1976; 58: 64–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherley C R, Draycott V, Benson D R, Go-palakrishnan K C, Evans J H, O'Brien J P. The rib de-formity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective study to evaluate changes after Harrington distraction and posterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69: 179–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willers U, Transfeldt E E, Hedlund R. The segmental effect of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation on vertebral rotation, rib hump and the thoracic cage in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1996; 5: 387–393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inami K, Suzuki N, Ono T, Yamashita Y, Kouno K, Fujimura A. Analysis of posterior trunk symmetry index (POTSI) in scoliosis. Part 2. Research into Spinal Deformities 2, I AF Stokes. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1999; vol. 59: 85–88
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson R J, Weisz I, Tumer-Smith A R, Harris J D, Houghton G R. Scoliosis surgery and its effect on back shape. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70: 261–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes I AF. Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society working group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine 1994; 19: 236–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein S L, Zavala D C, Ponseti I V. Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63: 702–712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson L, Norén L. Trunk rotation in scoliosis. The influence of curve type and direction in 150 children. Acta orthop Scand 1997; 68: 273–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme S, Labelle H, Aubin C E, De Guise J A, Rivard C H, Poitras B, Dansereau J. Intraoperative com-parison of two instrumentation techniques for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999; 24: 2011–2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiot L-P, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and com-puter-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 2000; 25: 606–614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, Wanschitz F, Enislidis G, Kollmann C, Rafolt D, Nowotny R, Ewers R, Bergmann H. Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers. Med Phys 1998; 25: 2242–2248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar