3D finite element simulation of Cotrel–Dubousset correction

References

• Belytschko TB, Andriacchi TP, Schultz AB, Galante JO. Analog studies of forces in the human spine: computational techniques. J Biomech 1973;6(4):361–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz AB, Belytschko TB, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. Analog studies of forces in the human spine: mechanical properties and motion segment behavior. J Biomech 1973;6(4):373–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz AB, Hirsch C. Mechanical analysis of Harrington rod correction of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55(5):983–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz AB, Hirsch C. Mechanical analysis of techniques for improved correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1974;100:66–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stokes IA, Laible JP. Three-dimensional osseo-ligamentous model of the thorax representing initiation of scoliosis by asymmetric growth. J Biomech 1990;23(6):589–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M. Three-dimensional simulation of Harrington distraction instrumentation for surgical correction of scoliosis. Spine 1993;18(16):2457–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes I, Gardner-Morse M. Simulation of surgical maneuvers with CD instrumentation. In: D’Amico M, Merolli A, Santambrogio GC, editors. Three dimensional analysis of spinal deformities. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin F, Aubin CE, Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M, Labelle H. Biomechanical modeling of instrumentation for the scoliotic spine using flexible elements: a feasibility study. Ann Chir 1998;52(8):761–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Borgne P, Skalli W, Dubousset J, Dansereau J, Zeller R, Lavaste F. Finite element model of scoliotic spine: Mechanical personalization. In: International Research Society of Spinal Deformities. Burlington, VT: IOS Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderby R Jr, Daniele M, Patwardhan A, Bunch W. A method for the identification of in-vivo segmental stiffness properties ofthe spine. J Biomech Eng 1986;108(4):312–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viviani GR, Ghista DN, Lozada PJ, Subbaraj K, Barnes G. Biomechanical analysis and simulation of scoliosis surgical correction. Clin Orthop 1986;(208):40–7.
   Google Scholar
• Le Borgne P, Skalli W, Lecire C, Dubousset J, Zeller R, Lavaste F. Simulation of CD surgery on a personalized finite element model: Preliminary results. In: International Research Society of Spinal Deformities. Burlington, VT: IOS Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Descrimes J-L, Aubin CE, Skalli W, Zeller R, Dansereau J, Lavaste F. Introduction des facettes articulaires dans une modélisation par éléments finis de la colonne vertébrale et du thorax scoliotique: aspects mecaniques. Rachis 1995;7(5):301–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mitton D, Dumas R, Laporte S, Le Borgne P, Bataille P, Quidet D, Skalli W. Simplified calibration system for stereoradiography in scoliosis. In: Proceedings of International Research Society of Spinal Deformities, Clermond–Ferrand, France, May 2000. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• De Guise J, Martel Y. 3D biomedical modelling: merging image processing and computer aided design. In: Proceedings of 10th Annual International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, New Orleans; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Mitulescu A, Semaan I, de Guise JA, Le Borgne P, Adamsbaum C, Skalli W. Validation of the non-stereo corresponding points (NSCP) stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 2001;39(2):152–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin CE, Descrimes J-L, Dansereau J, Skalli W, Labelle H, Lavaste F. Modelling of facet joints in a global finite element model of the spine: geometrical aspects. In: D’Amico M, Merolli A, Santambrogio GC, editors. Three dimensional analysis of spinal deformities. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Portier L, Thibault A, Skalli W, Santin JJ, Zeller R, Lavaste F. Approche d’une modélisation globale, tridimensionnelle par éléments finis, du rachis pour l’étude de la scoliose. Rachis 1993;5(5):227–32.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes IA. Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D Terminology of Spinal Deformity. Spine 1994;19(2):236–48.
   Google Scholar
• Martin F. Analyse expérimentale du comportement du rachis lombaire. In: Mémoire de DEA de génie biologique et médical, option biomécanique. Paris: ENSAM; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreault F. Comportement mecanique des unités fonctionnelles: T3–T4, T7–T8 et T12–L1 saines et lésées du rachis humain. In: Memoire de Maîtrise ès sciences appliques de l’Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Skalli W, Lavaste F, Descrimes J-L. Quantification of 3D vertebral rotations in scoliosis: what are the true values? Spine 1995;20(5):546–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubousset J, Cotrel Y. Application technique of Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation for scoliosis deformities. Clin Orthop 1991;(264):103–10.
   Google Scholar
• Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, de Guise J, Rivard CH, Poitras B. Peroperative three-dimensional correction of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure. Spine 1995;20(12):1406–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner-Morse M, Stokes IA. Three-dimensional simulations of the scoliosis derotation maneuver with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. J Biomech 1994;27(2):177–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transfeldt EE, Bradford DS, Coscia M, Cohen M, Thompson J. Changes in segmental coupling and vertebral rotation following Cotrel–Dubousset for idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Trans 1989;13:80.
   Google Scholar
• Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Blanke K. Analysis of pulmonary function and axis rotation in adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel–Dubous-set instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 1992;5(1):16–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krismer M, Bauer R, Sterzinger W. Scoliosis correction by Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. The effect of derotation and three dimensional correction. Spine 1992;17(suppl 8): S263–9.
   Google Scholar
• Moens P, Vanden Berghe L, Fabry G, Bellemans J. The Cortel–Dubousset device: prospective study on derotation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1995;81(5):428–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ecker ML, Betz RR, Trent PS, Mahboubi S, Mesgarzadeh M, Bonakdapour A, Drummond DS, Clancy M. Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1988;13(10):1141–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundy PJ, Paterson DC, Hillier TM, Sutherland AD, Stephen JP, Foster BK. Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation and vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72(4):670–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecire Lilloni C, Skalli W, Zeller R, Dubousset J, Lavaste F. Optoelectronic analysis of the Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. Hum Movement Sci 1999;(18):713–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanem IB, Hagnere F, Dubousset JF, Watier B, Skalli W, Lavaste F. Intraoperative optoelectronic analysis of threedimensional vertebral displacement after Cotrel–Dubousset rod rotation. A preliminary report. Spine 1997;22(16):1913–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zeller R, Dubousset J. Comment nous opterons une scoliose de l’adolescent: la nouvelle technique CD Horizon. Maitrise orthopedique 1996; 55.
   Google Scholar