Today's state of the art in surgical robotics

References

• Cleary K, Nguyen C. State of the art in surgical robotics: Clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 312–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor R, Stoianovici D. Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 2003; 19(5)765–781
   Google Scholar
• Nolte LP, Langlotz F. Intraoperative Navigationssysteme. Trauma Berufskrankheit 1999; 1: 108–115
   Google Scholar
• Suhm N, Messmer P, Jakob AL, Regazzoni P. Navigationssysteme in der Unfallchirurgie-ein Überblick. OP J 2000; 16: 144–149
   Google Scholar
• Pott PP, Schwarz M. Robotik, Navigation. Telechirurgie: Stand der Technik und Marktübersicht. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie 2002; 140(5)218–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Detter C, Arnold M, Gulbins H, Meiser B, Reichart B. Clinical use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 48: 198–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadeddu JA, Stoianovici D, Kavoussi L. Robotics in urologic surgery. Urology 1997; 49: 501–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr FW, Onnasch JF, Falk V. The evolution of minimally invasive valve surgery—2 year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 233–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkelman P, Cinquin P, Troccaz J, Ayoubi J, Letoublon C, Bouchard F. A compact, compliant laparoscopic endoscope manipulator. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. May, 11–15, 2002; 1870–1875
   Google Scholar
• Berkelman P, Cinquin P, Boidard E, Troccaz C, Letoublon C, Ayoubi J-M. Design, control, and testing of a novel compact laparoscopic endoscope manipulator. Proc Instn Mech Engrs Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2003; 217(14)329–341
   Google Scholar
• Masuda K, Kimura E, Tateishi N, Ishihara K. Three dimensional motion mechanism of ultrasound probe and first application for tele-echography system. ternational Conference of the IEEE Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS. Maui, 2001; 1112–1116
   Google Scholar
• Masuda K, Tateishi N, Suzuki Y, Kimura E, Wie Y, Ishihara K. Experiment of wireless tele-echography system by controlling echographic diagnosis robot. 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002. Tokyo 2002; 130–137
   Google Scholar
• Menciassi A, Dario P. Bio-inspired solutions for locomotion in the gastrointestinal tract: background and perspectives. Philos Transact Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 2003; 361(1811)2287–2298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiono S, Gilbert J, Soin B, Finlay P, Gordon A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholectystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(9)1267–1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buess GF, Arezzo A, Schurr MO, Ulmer F, Fischer H, Gumb L, Testa T, Nobman C. A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery—The FIPS endoarm. Surg Endosc-Ultrasound Interven Tech 2000; 14(4)395–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgorges C, Al Bassit L, Novales C. OETLO Project: mObile Tele-Echography using an ultra-light rObot. Telemed'02. London, UK 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi E, Masamune K, Sakuma I, Dohi T, Hashimoto D. A new safe laparoscopic manipulator system with a five-bar linkage mechanism and an optical zoom. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4(4)182–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkelmann P, Boidard E, Cinquin P, Troccaz J. From the laboratory to the operating room: usability testing of LER the light endoscope robot. Workshop on Medical Robotics, Navigation and Visualization (MRNV). RemagenGermany 2004, 11–12 March
   Google Scholar
• Lauer W, Serefoglou S, Behrend H, Hüwel N, Fischer M, Radermacher K. Entwicklung einer neuartigen, semirobotischen Handhabungsplattform für ein elektronisches OP-Mikroskop. Biomedizinische Technik 2003; 48/1: 520–521
   Google Scholar
• Carrozza M, Lencioni L, Magnani B, D'Attanasio S, Dario P. The development of a microrobot system for colonoscopy. CVRMed and MRCAS. Grenoble 1997; 779–789
   Google Scholar
• Dario P, Carrozza MC, Pietrabissa A. Development and in vitro testing of a miniature robotic system for computer-assisted colonoscopy. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4(1)1–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radermacher K, Westrich D, Heilige M, Brandt G, Jungk A, Rau G. PAROMIS—Ein Parallelrobotersystem für die sprachgesteuerte Kameraführung in der MIC. Biomedizinische Technik 2001; 46/1: 366–367
   Google Scholar
• Vilchis A, Masuda K, Troccaz J, Cinquin P. Robot-based tele-echography: the TER system. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 95: 212–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abolmaesumi P, Salcudean S, Zhu W, Sirouspour M, DiMaio SP. Image-guided control of a robot for medical ultrasound. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation. February, 2002; 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Salcudean S, Zhu W, Abolmaesumi P, Bachmann S, Lawrence PD. A robot system for medical ultrasound. ISRR 1999; 195–202
   Google Scholar
• Binder N, Matthäus L, Berger A, Schweikard A. The inverse kinematics of fluoroscopic C-arms. 3 jahrestagung der CURAC. MünchenGermany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz V, Gómez de Gabriel J, Fernández-Lozano J, García-Morales I, Molina-Mesa R, Pérezdel-Pulgar C, Serón-Barba J, Azouaghe M. Design and control of a robotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. SIRS. ToulouseFrance July, 2001; 18–21
   Google Scholar
• Slatkin A, Burdick J. The development of a robot endoscope. IEEE/RSJ Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS. August, 5–9. Pittsburgh, PAUSA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Oleynikov D, Rentschler M, Hadzialic A, Dumpert J, Platt S, Farritor S. In vivo camera robots provide improved vision for laparoscopic surgery. CARS. Chicago 2004; 787–792
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Chiyoda S, Watabe K, Masafumi O, Nakamura Y. Small occupancy robotic mechanisms for endoscopic surgery. 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing And Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002. TokyoJapan, 2002; 75–82
   Google Scholar
• Rasmus M. Ein neues Telemanipulatorsystem. 3 Jahrestagung der CURAC. München, cGermany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Voges U, Holler E, Neisius B, Schurr M, Vollmer T. Evaluation of ARTEMIS, the advanced robotics and telemanipulator system for minimally invasive surgery. IARP 2nd Workshop on Medical Robotics. Karlsruhe 1997; 137–148
   Google Scholar
• Surry K, Smith W, Mills G, Downey D, Fenster A. A mechanical, three-dimensional ultrasound-guided breast biopsy apparatus. 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001. UtrechtThe Netherlands, October, 14–17, 2001; 232–239
   Google Scholar
• Madhani A, Niemeyer G, Salisbury J. The Black Falcon: A teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS. Victoria B.CCanada, October, 13–17, 1998; 936–944
   Google Scholar
• Rosen J, Brown J, Chang L, Barreca M, Sinanan M, Hannaford B. The BlueDRAGON—a system for measuring the kinematics and the dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in vivo. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2002; 1876–1881
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Sinanan M. A passive mechanical pantograph system for measuring tool position during minimally invasive surgery (Poster). Bioengineering 2000; 28, Supplement 1
   Google Scholar
• Kronreif G, Fürst M, Kettenbach J, Birkfellner W, Figl M, Hanel R, Hummel J. Integriertes Robotersystem für perkutane Interventionen. 1 Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Computer- und Roboterassistierte Chirurgie 2002, Leipzig, D
   Google Scholar
• Kronreif G, Fürst M, Kornfeld M, Ptacek W, Vogele M. Modular programmable targeting device for percutaneous interventions. 3 Jahrestagung der CURAC. MünchenGermany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Maurin B, Piccin O, Bayle B, Gangloff J, de Mathelin M, Soler L, Gangi A. A new robotic system for CT-guided percutaneous procedures with haptic feedback. CARS. Chicago 23–26July, 2004; 515–520
   Google Scholar
• Bauernschmitt R. Robotik in der Herzchirurgie. 3 Jahrestagung der CURAC. MünchenGermany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Bauernschmitt R, Knol A, Mayer H, Nagy I, Schirmbeck E, Wildhirt S, Lange R. Towards robotic heart surgery: Introduction of autonomous procedures into an experimental surgical telemanipulator system. 3 Jahrestagung der CURAC. MünchenGermany 2004
   Google Scholar
• van Meer F, Estève D. Micromachined silicon 2-axis force sensor for teleoperated surgery. Workshop on Medical Robotics, Navigation and Visualization (MRNV). RemagenGermany 11–12 March, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Green PS, Hill JH, Satava R. Telepresence: Dextrous procedures in a virtual operating field. Surg Endosc 1991; 192: 192
   Google Scholar
• Ikuta K, Daifu S, Hasegawa T, Higashikawa H. Hyper-finger for remote minimally invasive surgery in deep area. 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002. Tokyo, 2002; 173–181
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen J, Malila M, Louhisalmi Y, Hyvärinen P, Nevala K. Machine vision based fiber optic joint sensor for MR- compatible robot. CARS. Chicago 2004; 555–560
   Google Scholar
• Franzino R. The Laprotek surgical system and the next generation of robotics. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83(6)1317–1320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Düpree H. Das Master Slave System Laprotek als digitale Weiterentwicklung für die moderne minimal-invasive Chirurgie. 2 Jahrestagung der CURAC. NürnbergGermany 2002
   Google Scholar
• Bzostek A, Schreiner S, Barnes A., et al. An automated system for precise percutaneous access of the renal collecting system. Lecture Notes in computer science. Springer-Verlag;, Heidelberg 1997; 299–308, 1205
   Google Scholar
• Goradia T, Taylor R, Auer L. Robot-assisted minimally invasive neurosurgical procedures: first experimental experience. First Joint Conference of CVRMed and MRCAS. Grenoble 1997; 319–322
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RH, Funda J, Eldridge B. A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1995; 14; 279–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillant E, Avila-Vilchis JC, Allegrini C, Bricault I, Cinquin P. CT and MR compatible light puncture robot: architectural design and first experiments. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2004. St MaloFrance. Springer;, Heidelberg 2004; 145–152
   Google Scholar
• Dombre E, Michelin M, Poignet P, Bidaud P, Morel G, Salle D, Mederic P, Gravez P, Karouia M, Bonnet N. Projet MARGE: Modélisation, Apprentissage et Reproduction du Geste Endochirurgical. Actes des Journées du Programme Interdisciplinaire CNRS, ROBEA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Michelin M, Dombre E, Poignet P, Eckert L. Achieving motion under a penetration point constraint. IROS'02: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Lausanne, 2002; 1475–1480
   Google Scholar
• Zemiti N, Ortmaier T, Vitrani M, Morel G. A force controlled laparoscopic surgical robot without distal force sensing. 9th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, ISER 2004. Singapore 18–12 June, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Krupa A, de Mathelin M, Doignon C, Gangloff J, Morel G, Soler L, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Automatic 3-D positioning of surgical instruments during robotized laparoscopic surgery using automatic visual feedback. MS4CMS'02. Rocquencourt 2002; 9–16
   Google Scholar
• Ang W, Riviere C, Khosla P. An active handheld instrument for enhanced microsurgical accuracy. 3rd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2000. Pittsburgh, PAUSA, October, 11–14, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Riviere C, Khosla P. Active handheld instrument for error-compensation in microsurgery. telligent Systems and Manufacturing, Technical Conference on Microrobotics and Microsystems Fabrication. Pittsburgh, October, 16–17, 1997; 86–95
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Berkelman P, Gupta P, Barnes A, Jensen P, Withcomb L, Taylor R. Preliminary experiments in cooperative human/robot force control for robot assisted microsurgical manipulation. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. San FranciscoUSA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Meier P, Preuß R, Oberthür S. Development of an artificial worm for minimal invasive surgery. 38 Jahrestagung der DGBMT. Ilmenau 2004; 116–117
   Google Scholar
• Schneider O, Troccaz J. A six-degree-of-freedom passive arm with dynamic constraints (PADyC) for cardiac surgery application: preliminary experiments. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6(6)340–351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Das H, Charles S, Ohm T, Boswell C, Rodriguez G, Steele R, Paljug E. A telerobotics workstation for microsurgery. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 5th Conferenc. San Diego, CAUSA, January, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser WA, Fischer H, Vagner J, Selig M. Robotic system for biopsy and therapy of breast lesions in a high-field whole-body magnetic resonance tomography unit. Invest Radiol 2000; 35(8)513–519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Nishida Y, Kobayashi E, Tsuji T, Fukuyo T, Kenada M, Konishi K, Hashizume M, Sakuma I. Development of a robotic laser surgical tool with integrated video endsocope. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2004. St MaloFrance. Springer;, Heidelberg 2004; 25–32
   Google Scholar
• Patronik N, Zenati M, Riviere C. Crawling on the heart: A mobile robotic device for minimally invasive cardiac interventions. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2004. St MaloFrance, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Patronik N, Zenati M, Riviere C. Development of a tethered epicardial crawler for minimally invasive cardiac therapies. IEEE;. IEEE 30th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference. 2004; 239–240
   Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu MC, Williams W, Tendick F, Sastry S. Robotics for telesurgery: second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications. 39th Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing. Monticello, IL, October, 3–5, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Mosso-Vázquez JL, Minor MA, Pérez GR, Lara VV, Mosso VA, Torres OJG, Castañeda CI, Padilla SL, García PR, González CC, Rocha MR, et al. From Puma of Unimation 6000 Robot to Tonatiuh Robot and Hand Free Navigation System. Laparoscopic assistant 1996–2003. EU-LAt Workshop e-health. Cuernavaca, México 1–4 December, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Mosso-Vázquez J. Navegación endoscópica asistida por un robot. Experiencia en un animal de experimentación. Cirugía y Cirujanos 2002; 346–349
   Google Scholar
• Hong J-S, Dohi T, Hasizume M, Konishi K, Nobuhiko H. Ultrasound guided motion adaptive instrument for percutaneous needle insertion therapy. 6th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Engineering. GuilinChina, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Salcudean S, Ku S, Bell G. Performance measurement in scaled teleoperation for microsurgery. 1st Joint Conference CVRMed and MRCAS. Springer, Grenoble 1997; 789–798
   Google Scholar
• Guo-Qing W, Arbter K, Hirzinger G. Real-time visual servoing for laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1997; 16(1)40–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel N, Schmidt G, Petzold P, Kalender W. Motion detection and prevention for a robot-assisted needle positioning system. 3 Jahrestagung der CURAC. München, Germany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hoerauf H, Wollnack J, Laqua H, Schweikard A. Development of a microsurgical technique for retinal endovascular surgery. 3 Jahrestagung der CURAC 2004
   Google Scholar
• Palombara P, Fadda M, Martelli S, Nofrini L, Marcacci M. A minimally invasive 3-D data registration protocol for computer and robot assisted total knee arthroplasty. CVRMed-MRCAS'97 1997
   Google Scholar
• Chinzei K, Hata N, Jolesz F, Kikinis R. MR compatible surgical assist robot: system integration and preliminary feasibility study. 3rd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2000. Springer Verlag, Pittsburgh 2000; 921–930
   Google Scholar
• Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D, Cormak R, Gering D, Nabavi A, Silverman SG, D'Amico AV, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, Tempany C. MRI-guided prostate biopsy using surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. Radiology 2001; 220(1)263–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daeyoung K., Etsuko K., Dohi T, Sakuma I. A new, compact MR-compatible surgical manipulator for minimally invasive liver surgery. 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. TokyoJapan, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hatori A, Suzuki N, Hayashibe M, Suzuki S, Otake Y, Sumiyama K, Tajiri H, Kobayashi S. Navigation system for a developed endoscopic surgical robot system. CARS. ChicagoUSA 2004
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Aoki E, Kobayashi E, Tsuji T, Konishi K, Hashizume M, Sakuma I. Development of forceps manipulator for assisting laparoscopic surgery. CARS. Chicago 2004; 1338
   Google Scholar
• Shimachi S, Fujiwara Y, Hakozaki Y. New sensing method of force acting on instrument for laparoscopic robot surgery. CARS. Chicago 2004; 775–780
   Google Scholar
• Hata N, Ohara F, Hashimoto R, Hashizume M, Dohi T. Needle guiding robot with five-bar linkage for MR-guided thermotherapy of liver tumor. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. St MaloFrance. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2004 2004; 161–168
   Google Scholar
• Wudelete R, Kassim I, Bock W, Sing W. Combined tracking system for augmented reality assisted treatment device. Workshop on Medical Robotics, Navigation and Visualization (MRNV). RemagenGermany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Yanof J, Haaga J, Klahr P, Bauer C, Nakamoto D, Chaturvedi A, Bruce R. CT integrated robot for interventional procedures: preliminary experiment and computer–human interfaces. Comp Aided Surg 2001; 6(6)352–359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charles S, Stuart J, Bronisz L.. Patent US2002/0133174 A1. 19.09.2002, 2002, Surgical Manipulator
   Google Scholar
• Bumm K, Steinhart H, Wurm J, Vogele M, Nimsky CH, Iro H. A novel robot system for fully automated and telemanipulation surgery of the paranasal sphenoid sinus. InterlakenSwitzerland 2003, Computer Aided Surgery around the Head
   Google Scholar
• Hein A, Kneissler M, Mätzig M, Lüth T. Navigated Control—Ein neuer Ansatz für das exakte Fräsen. 1 Jahrestagung der CURAC. Leipzig, Germany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Schauer D, Lüth T. RoboPoint—Ein sterilisierbarer interaktiver Miniatur-Roboter zur Instrumentenführung. 1 Jahrestagung der CURAC. Leipzig 4–6 November, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Lueth TC, Hein A, Albrecht J, Demirtas M, Zachow S, Heissler E, Klein M, Menneking H, Hommel G, Bier J. A surgical robot system for maxillofacial surgery. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation (IECON. Aachen/Germany, September, 1998; 2470–2475
   Google Scholar
• Engel D, Raczkowsky J, Wörn H. A safe robot system for craniofacial surgery. IEEE International Conference On Robotics And Automation. SeoulKorea, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Engel D, Raczkowsky J, Wörn H. RobaCKa: Ein Robotersystem für den Einsatz in der Chirurgie. Symposium des SFB 414: Rechner- und sensorgestützte Chirurgie. 2001, Köllen Verlag
   Google Scholar
• Korb W, Engel D, Boesecke R, Eggers G, Kotrikova B, Marmulla R, O'Sullivan N, Raczkowsky J, Hassfeld S. Chirurgieroboter für Kraniotomien–Risikoanalyse und erster Patientenversuch. Automatisierungstechnik 2004; 6: 288–295
   Google Scholar
• Dammann F, Bode A, Schwaderer E, Schaich M, Heuschmid M, Maassen M. Computer-aided surgical planning for implantation of hearing aids based on CT-data in a VR-environment. Radiographics 2001; 21: 184–190
   Google Scholar
• Federspil P, Geisthoff U, Henrich D, Plinkert P. Development of the first force-controlled robot for otoneurosurgery. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 465–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau E, Taha F, Gravez P, Lamy S. SURGICOBOT: Surgical Gesture Assistance COBOT for maxillo-facial interventions. Workshop on Medical Robotics, Navigation and Visualization (MRNV). RemagenGermany 11–12 March, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Dressler S, Strauss G, Krabbes M, Pretschner A, Pfeiffer E, Böttcher M, Dietz A. Mechatronical systems for microlaryngoscopy. 3 Jahrestagung der CURAC. MünchenGermany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Simaan N, Taylor R, Flint P. High dexterity snake-like robotic slaves for minimally invasive telesurgery of the upper airway. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. St. MaloFrance. Springer, Heidelberg 2004; 17–24, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Stuart J.. USA patent US 6702805. 09.03.04, 2004, Manipulator
   Google Scholar
• Bast P, Engelhardt M, Popovic A, Schmieder K, Radermacher K. CRANIO—Entwicklung eines Systems zur computer- und roboterunterstützten Kraniotomie. Biomedizinische Technik 2002; 47/1(1)9–11
   Google Scholar
• Cinquin P, Troccaz J, Demongeot J, Lavallee S, Champleboux G, Brunie L, Leitner F, Sautot P, Mazier B, Perez A, Djaid M, Fortin T, Chenic M, Chapel A. IGOR: Image guided operating robot. Innovation et Technol Biol Med 1992; 13: 374–394
   Google Scholar
• Glauser D, Frankhauser H, Epitaux M, Hefti J, Jaccottet A. Neurosurgical Robot Minerva: first results and current developments. Second Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, MRCAS'95. BaltimoreUSA 4–7 November, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland G, McBeth PB, Louw D. NeuroArm: an MR compatible robot for microsurgery. 17th international meeting of CARS. Elesevier, London, GB 2003; 504–508
   Google Scholar
• Louw DF, Fielding T, McBeth PB, Gregoris D, Newhook P, Sutherland G. Surgical robotics: a review and neurosurgical prototype development. Neurosurgery 2004; 54: 525–537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizun PR, McBeth PB, Louw DF, Sutherland G. Robot-assisted neurosurgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 2004; 11(2)99–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hongo K, Goto T, Kakizawa Y, Koyama J, Kawai T, Kan K, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi S. Micromanipulator system (NeuRobot) clinical application in neurosurgery. 17th international meeting of CARS. Elsevier, London 2003; 509–513
   Google Scholar
• Hongo K, Kobayashi S, Kakizawa Y, Koyama J, Goto T, Okudera H, Kan K, Fujie MG, Iseki H, Takakura K. NeuRobot: telecontrolled micromanipulator system for minimally invasive microneurosurgery—preliminary results. Neurosurgery 2002; 51(4)985–988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavallee S, Troccaz J, Gaborit L, Cinquin P, Benabid AL, Hoffmann D. Image-guided operating robot: a clinical application in stereotactic neurosurgery. Computer-integrated surgery: technology and clinical applications, RH Taylor, S Lavallee, GC Burdea, R Mösges. MIT Press;, Cambridge, MA 1996; 343–351
   Google Scholar
• Quaid A, Abovitz A. Haptic information displays for computer-assisted surgery. Robotics and Automation (ICRA '02) 2002; 2092–2097
   Google Scholar
• Loser M, Navab N. A new robotic system for visually controlled percutaneous interventions under CT fluoroscopy. 3rd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2000. PittsburghUSA, 2000; 887–896
   Google Scholar
• Korb W, Barthold S, Bendl R, Echner G, Grosser K, Pastyr O, Treuer H, Sturm V, Schlegel W. Entwicklung eines Hochpräzisions-Manipulators für die stereotaktische Neurochirurgie. Rechner- und Sensorgestützte Chirurgie. Heidelberg 19–20 July, 2001; 336–343
   Google Scholar
• Korb W, Barthold S, Bendl R, Echner G, Pastyr O, Treuer H, Sturm V, Schlegel W. Modelling, simulation and control of high-precision neurosurgical robot. EMBEC2002. ViennaAustria 2002
   Google Scholar
• Goetz M, Fischer S, Velten A, Bille J, Sturm V. Computer-guided laser probe for ablation of brain tumours with ultrashort laser pulses. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44(6)119–127
   Google Scholar
• Masamune K, Stoianovici D, Sakuma I, Dohi T, Iseki H. Direct MR image guided positioning manipulator for percutaneous needle puncturing therapy. 32nd International Symposium on Robotics. Seoul 2001; 619–624
   Google Scholar
• Fichtinger G, DeWeese TL, Patriciu A, Tanacs A, Mazilu D, Anderson JH, Masamune K, Taylor RH, Stoianovici D. Robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intra-operative CT guidance. J Acad Radiol 2001; 9(1)30–74
   Google Scholar
• Tajima F, Kishi K, Kan K, Ishii H, Nishizawa K, Fujie M, Dohi T, Sudo K, Takamoto S. An MR-compatible master–slave manipulator with interchangeable surgical tools. 17th international meeting of CARS. Elsevier, London 2003; 529–537
   Google Scholar
• Okamoto J, Iida M, Nambu K, Okayasu H, Fujie M, Umezu M, Iseki H. Development of multi-DOF brain retract manipulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery. 17th international meeting of CARS. Elsevier, London 2003; 522–528
   Google Scholar
• Masamune K, Kobayashi E, Masutani Y, Suzuki M, Dohi T, Iseki H, Takakura K. Development of an MRI-compatible needle insertion manipulator for stereotactic neurosurgery. J Image Guided Sur 1995; 1: 242–248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koseki Y, Toshikatsu W, Chinzei K, Iseki H. Endocope manipulator for trans-nasal neurosurgery, optimized for and compatible to vertical field open MRI. 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. Tokyo, 2002; 114–121
   Google Scholar
• Ikuta K, Sasaki K, Yamamoto K, Shimada T. Remote microsurgery system for deep and narrow space—development of new surgical procedure and micro-robotic tool. 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. Tokyo, 2002; 163–172
   Google Scholar
• Asai D, Katopo S, Arata J, Warisawa S, Mitsuishi M, Morita A, Sora S, Kirino T, Mochizuki R. Micro-neurosurgical system in the deep surgical field. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. Springer, HeidelbergFrance 2004; 33–40
   Google Scholar
• Cobb JP, Hencke J, Harris SJ, Jakopec M, Baena FR, Gomes M, Davies B. An active constraint robot improves outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS. Marbella 18–21 June, 2003; 64–65
   Google Scholar
• Jakopec M, Harris SJ, Baena FR, Gomes P, Cobb J, Davies B. The first clinical application of a ‘hands-on’ robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6(6)329–339
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleary K, Stoianovici D, Watson V, Cody R, Hum B, Lindisch D. Robotics for percutaneous spinal procedures: Initial report. Computer Aided Radiology and Surgery. San FranciscoUSA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kwon D-S, Lee J-J, Yoon Y-S, Ko S-Y, Kim J, Chung J-H, Won C-H, Jong-Hwa K. The mechanism and the registration method of a surgical robot for total hip arthroplasty. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. Washington DCUSA, 11–15 May, 1889–1894
   Google Scholar
• Nahum B, Blondel L, Tassel E, Dombre E, Poignet P, Maillet P, Maury P. A cutting guide positioner robot to improve bone-cutting precission in knee osteotomy. 4th annual meeting of CAOS. USA, Chicago, IL, 16–19 June
   Google Scholar
• Ritschl P, Machacek F, Fuiko R. Computer assisted ligament balancing in TKR using the Galileo system. 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS, FDB Langlotz, A Bauer. Steinkopf, Marbella, Spain 18–21 June, 2003; 304–305
   Google Scholar
• Pott PP, Schwarz MLR, Köpfle A, Schill M, Wagner A, Badreddin E, Männer R, Weiser P, Scharf H-P. Ein Handgehaltener Operationsroboter—Grundlagen, Spezifikationen und Lösungsentwurf. 1 Jahrestagung der CURAC. Leipzig, Germany 4–5 October, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Pott PP, Schwarz MLR, Köpfle A, Schill M, Wagner A, Badreddin E. ITD—A handheld manipulator for medical applications—Concept and design. In: Langlotz F, Davies B, Bauer A, editors. 3rd annual meeting of CAOS. MarbellaSpain. Steinkopf, Darmstadf, Männer R, Weiser P, Scharf H-P, 290–291
   Google Scholar
• Koepfle A, Schill M, Schwarz MLR, Pott PP, Wagner A, Männer R, Badreddin E, Weiser P, Scharf H-P. A modular scalable approach to occlusion-robust low-latency optical tracking. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. St. MaloFrance, 26–30 September
   Google Scholar
• Pott PP, Weiser P, Scharf H-P, Schwarz M. Getriebe mit 4 Freiheitsgraden für robotische Anwendungen in der Medizin. Zeitschrift für Biomedizinische Technik 2004; 49(6)176–179
   Google Scholar
• Shoham M, Burman M, Zehavi E, Joskowicz L, Batkilin E, Kunicher Y. Bone mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures—concept and applications. In: Langlotz BD, Bauer A, editors. 3rd annual meeting of CAOS. Spain. Steinkopf, Darmstadt, 18–21 June, 330–331
   Google Scholar
• Shoham M, Burman M, Zehavi E, Kunicher Y. MARS: miniature bone-mounted robot. ISRACAS 2003. Tel Aviv, Israel 15 May, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Joskowicz L, Milgrom C, Shoham M, Yaniv Z, Simkin A. (2003) A robot-assisted system for long bone intramedullary distal locking: concept and preliminary results. 17th international meeting of CARS. 2003. Elsevier Science, London, 485–491
   Google Scholar
• Dario P, Paggetti C, Troisfontaine N, Papa E, Ciucci T, Carrozza M, Marcacci M. A miniature steerable end-effector for application in an integrated system for computer-assisted arthroscopy. ICRA'97. 1997; 1573–1579
   Google Scholar
• Dario P, Carrozza M, Marcacci M, D'Attanasio S, Magnani B, Tonet O, Megali G. A novel mechatronic tool for computer assisted arthroscopy. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 2000;; 4: 15–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonet O, Megali G, D'Attanasio S, Dario P, Carrozza M, Marcacci M, Martelli S, Palombara PL. An augmented reality navigation system for computer assisted arthroscopic surgery of the knee. 3rd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. Pittsburgh, PA 2000; 1158–1162
   Google Scholar
• de la Fuente M, Ohnsorge J, Bast P, Wirtz DC, Radermacher K. MINARO—Neue Ansätze für die minimalinvasive röntgenbildbasierte Revisionshüftendoprothetik. Biomedizinische Technik. 2002; 47/1(1)44–46
   Google Scholar
• Wahrburg J, Kerschbaumer F. Überlegungen zum Einsatz mechatronischer Implantationshilfen bei Minimalzugängen für Hüftendoprothesen. Der Orthopäde 2000; 29(7)650–657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konietschke R, Ortmaier T, Weiss H, Hirzinger G, Engelke R. Manipulability and accuracy measures for a medical robot in minimally invasive surgery. 9th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics International Federation for the Promotion of Mechanism and Machine Science. Sestri Levante, Italy 2004
   Google Scholar
• Brisson G, Kanade T, DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B. Precision freehand sculping of bone. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. 3rd annual meeting of CAOS, MarbellaSpain. Springer, Heidelberg 2003; 36–37
   Google Scholar
• Plaskos C, Stindel E, Cinquin P, Hodgson AJ, Faguer B, Lavallee S. PRAXITELES: A universal bone-mounted robot for image-free knee surgery—report on first cadaver trials. CAOS. USA, Chicago, IL 2004
   Google Scholar
• Yanagihara M, Okamoto J, Fujie M, Yano H, Mitsui N. Development of RAO assisant manipulator. CARS. ChicagoUSA 2004
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RH, Mittelstadt BD, Paul HA, Hanson W, Kazanzides P, Zuhars JF, Williamson B, Musits BL, Glassman E, Bargar W. An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery. IEEE Trans Robotics Automat 1994; 10: 261–273
   Google Scholar
• Barger W, Bauer A, Börner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using the robodoc system. Clin Orthop Related Res 1998; 354: 82–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nogler M, Wimmer C, Lass-Flörl C, Mayr E, Trobos S, Gegenhuber C. Contamination risk of the surgical team through Robodoc's high-speed cutter. Clin Orthop Related Res 2001; 387: 225–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellengahr C, Refior H. Rotations- und translationsabweichung in der roboterunterstützten Hüftschaftimplantation. Robotic und Navigation int Symposium. Nürnberg 8–9 March, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Witherspoon L. ROBONAV®-Robotic-systems for minimally invasive surgery. Robotic und Navigation. Internationales Symposium, Dr-Erler-Klinik. NuernbergGermany 8 March, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Börner M, Wiesel U. Erste Ergebnisse der roboterassistierten Kniegelenkendoprothetik mit dem ROBODOC®-System. Trauma Berufskrankh 2001; 3: 355–359
   Google Scholar
• Wapler M, Bräucker M, Dürr M, Hiller A, Stallkamp J, Urban V. A voice-controlled robotic assistant for neuroendoscopy. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 1999
   Google Scholar
• Plinkert PK, Plinkert B, Hiller A, Stallkamp J. Applications for a robot in the lateral skull base. Evaluation of robot-assisted mastoidectomy in an anatomic specimen. HNO 2001; 49(7)514–522
   Google Scholar
• Glozman D, Shoham M, Fischer A. Efficient registration of 3-D objects in robotic-assisted surgery. CAOS/USA. Pittsburgh, PAUSA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Fadda M, Malvisi A, Valleggi R, Bioli G, Martelli S. A new robotic system for operating theatre. J Comp Control Eng 2001; 12(3)129–136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masamune K, Fichtinger G, Patriciu A, Susil RC, Taylor RH, Kavoussi LR, Anderson JH, Sakuma I, Dohi T, Stoianovici D. System for robotically assisted percutaneous procedures with computed tomography guidance. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6(6)370–383
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugita N, Warisawa S, Mitsuishi M, Suzuki M, Moriya H, Kuramoto K. Development of a novel robot-assisted orthopaedic system designd for total knee arthroplasty. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. St. MaloFrance. Springer, Heidelberg 2004; 153–160
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Choi K, Yi B, Kim Y. Movement of vertebra spine surgery. CARS. Chicago 2004; 1332
   Google Scholar
• Chang S, Main W, Martin D, Gibbs I, Heilbrun M. An analysis of the accuracy of the CyberKnife: a robotic frameless stereotactic radiosurgical system. Neurosurgery 2003; 52(1)146–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweikard A, Shiomi H, Dötter M, Roth M, Berlinger K, Adler J. Fiducial-less compensation of breathing motion in lung cancer radiosurgery. delete 2003, Technical Report A-02–23, Informatik, Universität Lübeck
   Google Scholar
• Noel G, Ferrand R, Feuvret L, Boisserie G, Meyroneinc S, Mazeron J. Automatization and robotization of the setup and treatment for patients treated for a brain and base skull of the skull tumor. Cancer/Radiotherapie 2003; 7(1)33–41
   Google Scholar
• Yamauchi B, Pook P, Gruber A. Bloodhound: A semi-autonomous battlefield medical robot. 23th Army Science Conferenc. Orlando, FLUSA, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Duchemin G, Dombre E, Pierrot F, Poignet P, Urbain L, Téot L. DERMAROB: robot de prélèvement cutané. 15ème Journées des Jeunes Chercheurs en Robotique (JJCR '02). StrasbourgFrance 2002
   Google Scholar
• Téot L, Duchemin G, Poignet P, Dombre E. DERMAROB: A partial thickness skin harvesting robot: technical and experimental data. 13th Annual Meeting of the European Tissue Repair Society. AmsterdamThe Netherlands 20–23 September, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Seide K, Wolter D. Entwicklung und klinischer Einsatz eines ‘intelligenten’ Fixateur externe. Trauma Berufskrankheit 2000; 2(Suppl 1)35–37
   Google Scholar
• Seide K, Weinrich N, Schürmann U, Faschingbauer M, Jürgens C. Automatic external fixator based on parallel robot kinematics for the optimized and telemedically supported outpatient fracture and deformity treatment. 38 Jahrestagung der DGBMT. Ilmenau 2004; 118–119
   Google Scholar
• Fuchtmeier B, Nerlich M, Monkman G, Egersdörfer S, Raja K. Development of a robotic navigation and fracture fixation system. 23 September 2002. European J Medical Research Abstracts. 7th International Conference on Medical Aspects of Telemedicine, 28–29
   Google Scholar
• Fuchtmeier B, Egersdoerfer S, Mai R, Hente R, Dragoi D, Monkman G, Nerlich M. Reduction of femoral shaft fractures in vitro by a new developed reduction robot system ‘RepoRobo’. Injury 2004; 35(1)113–119
   Google Scholar
• Westphal R, Faulstich J, Gösling T, Winkelbach S, Hüfner T, Krettek C, Wahl F. Fracture reduction using a telemanipulator with haptical feedback. 17th Meeting of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. London, 2003; 1369
   Google Scholar
• Sudelete LM, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW, Patriciu A, Roberts WW, Cadeddu JA, Ramakumar S, Solomon SB, Kavoussi L. Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol 2002; 16(7)471–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, Hibberd RD, Davies BL, Wickham JEA, Nathan MS, Kundu B. The Probot—an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Engrs 1997; 211(4)317–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z. et al. Robot-assisted 3D-TRUS guided prostate brachytherapy: system integration and validation. Med Phys 2004; 31(3): 539–548)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan G, Wei Z, Gardi L, Downey D, Fenster A. Needle Steering for 3D TRUS-guided robot-aided brachytherapy. CARS. Chicago 2004; 1325
   Google Scholar
• Krieger A, Susil RC, Fichtinger G, Atalar E, Whitcomb L. Design of a novel MRI-compatible manipulator for image guided prostate intervention. IEEE 2004 Conference on Robotics and Automation. New Orleans, LA, 2004; 2517–2522
   Google Scholar
• Fichtinger G, Krieger A, Susil R, Tancas A, Withcomb L, Atalar E. Transrectal prostate biopsy inside closed MRI scanner with remote actuations under real-time image guidance. 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. Tokyo, 2002; 91–98
   Google Scholar
• Riviere C, Khosla P. Microscale tracking of surgical instrument motion. 2nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. CambridgeUK, September, 19–22, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Dewan M, Marayong P, Okamura A, Hager G. (2004) Vision-based assistance for ophthalmic micro-surgery. 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCA. St. MaloFrance, 2004. Springer, Heidelberg, 49–57
   Google Scholar
• Hong J., et al. An ultrasound-driven needle-insertion robot for percutaneous cholecystostomy. Phys Med Biol 2004;49; 441–455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki N. Development of an endoscopic robot system with two hands for various gastric tube surgeries. MMVR 2003; 11: 110–116
   Google Scholar
• de la Fuente M, Radermacher K, Lutz P, Wirtz D. 3D reconstruction and navigated removal of femoral bone cement in revision THR based on few fluoroscopic images. CARS. Chicago, ILUSA 2004
   Google Scholar
• Simaan N, Glozman D, Shoham M. Design considerations of new six degrees-of-freedom parallel robots. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1998; 1327–1333
   Google Scholar
• Federspil P, Stallkamp J, Plinkert P. Robotik—eine neue Dimension in der HNO-Heilkunde. HNO 2001; 49: 501–513
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lueth TC, Bier J. Robot assisted intervention surgery. Neuronavigation—neurosurgical and computer scientific aspects, J Gilsbach, H Stiehl. Springer-Verlag;, Heidelberg 1999
   Google Scholar
• Visarius H, Nolte LP. Computergestützte Chirurgie: Planung, Simulation, Navigation. Das Krankenhaus 1997; 335–338
   Google Scholar
• Gosse F, Brack C, Götte H, Roth M, Rühmann O, Schweikard A, Vahldiek M. Roboterunterstützung in der Knieendoprothetik. Der Orthopäde 1997; 26: 258–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honl M, Schwieger K, Gauck CH, Carrero V, Dierk O, Dries S, Hille E, Morlock M. Comparison of robotic versus manual implantation of cementless primary total hip replacement—a prospective clinical study. 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. New Orleans, LAUSA, 2–5 February
   Google Scholar
• Pott PP, Schwarz MLR, Dürr A, El-Ganadi K, Kramer S, Klandt H, Scharf H-P, Golla S. Market potential of robotic—an empirical pre study of customers, acceptance among CURAC members. Jahrestagung der CURAC. NürnbergGermany 4–7 November, 2003
   Google Scholar