A-mode ultrasound-based intra-femoral bone cement detection and 3D reconstruction in RTHR

References

• Wirtz DC, Niethard FU. Ursachen, Diagnostik und Therapie der aseptischen Hüftendoprothesenlockerung – eine Standortbestimmung. Z Orthopädie 1997; 135(4)270–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A(Suppl 2)2–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malchau H. Prognosis of total hip replacement: Update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Orlando, FL March 2000; 1979–1998
   Google Scholar
• Li PL, Ingle PJ, Dowell JK. Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty: Should it be done?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78(5)809–811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor RH, Joskowicz L, Williamson B, Gueziec A, Kalvin A, Kazanzides P, Van Vorhis R, Yao J, Kumar R, Bzostek A, Sahay A, Börner M, Lahmer A. Computer-integrated revision total hip replacement surgery: Concept and preliminary results. Med Image Anal 1999; 3(3)301–319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders R, Koval K, DiPasquale T, Schmelling G, Stenzler S, Ross E. Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75-A(3)326–330
   Google Scholar
• Mehlman C, DiPasquale T. Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: How far away is far enough?. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11(6)392–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CL, Roberts C, Litsky AS. Laser ablation of dyed acrylic bone cement. Lasers Surg Med 1997; 20(3)280–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer M, Klobl R, De Toma G, Jansson V, Refior HJ, Heimkes B, Kuhne JH. Bone cement removal with the excimer laser in revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1992; 112(1)15–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz C, Matthes M, Kar H, Boenick U. Removal of bone cement with laser. Biomed Technol (Berl) 1991; 36(5)120–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt J, Nordmann K. Removal of bone cement from the femoral canal using an acoustic emission-controlled milling device. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1994; 32(3)258–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaller CA, Elke R. Cement removal with ultrasound in revision or total hip prosthesis. Der Orthopäde 2001; 30(5)310–316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honnart F. Use of ultrasound for the removal of cement in hip prosthesis reoperations. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1996; 82(2)171–174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SH, Park JB, Weinstein JN, Loening S. Application of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter (ECSWL) in orthopedics. I. Foundations and overview. J Appl Biomater 1991; 2(2)115–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schreurs BW, Bierkens AF, Huiskes R, Hendrikx AJ, Slooff TJ. The effect of the extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor on bone cement. J Biomed Material Res 1991; 25(2)157–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May TC, Krause WR, Preslar AJ, Smith MJ, Beaudoin AJ, Cardea JA. Use of high-energy shock waves for bone cement removal. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5(1)19–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt J, Porsch M, Hackenbroch MH, Koebke J, Brimmers P. Modified intracorporeal lithotripsy for cement removal in hip prosthesis exchange operations: Experimental principles. Z Orthopädie 1998; 136(1)44–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster G, Willert H, Buchhorn GH. Endoscopy of the femoral canal in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A new method for improving the operative technique and analysis of implant failure. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999; 119(5–6)245–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah ET, Bradley CM. Arthroscopic removal of acrylic cement from unreduced hip prosthesis. Aust N Z J Surg 1992; 62(6)508–510
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA, Jr, Hopper RH, Engh CA. Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A(7)1107
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald SJ, Cole C, Guerin J, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, McCalden RW. Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2003; (417): 210–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de la Fuente M, Ohnsorge JA, Schkommodau E, Jetzki S, Wirtz DC, Radermacher K. Fluoroscopy-based 3-D reconstruction of femoral bone cement: A new approach for revision total hip replacement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005; 52(4)664–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck FA. Physical properties of tissue. Academic Press, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Maurer CR, Jr, Gaston RP, Hill DL, Gleeson MJ, Taylor MG, Fenlon MR, Edwards PJ, Hawkes DJ. AcouStick: An optically tracked A-mode ultrasonography system for registration in image-guided neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999; 72(2–4)143–144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moulder C, Sati M, Wentkowski MV, Nolte LP. A transcutaneous bone digitizer for minimally invasive registration in orthopedics: A real-time focused ultrasound beam approach. Comput Aided Surg 2003; 8(3)120–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heger S, Portheine F, Ohnsorge JA, Schkommodau E, Radermacher K. User-interactive registration of bone with A-mode ultrasound. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2005; 24(2)85–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cysewska-Sobusiak A., Sowier A., Skrzywanek P. Application of rotating EUS micro-probes for deep penetration of upper gastrointestinal tract. Proceedings of IEEE Sensors. ViennaAustria October 2004; Vol 3: 1492–1495
   Google Scholar
• Horas U, Seidel P, Heiss C, Kilian O, Dingeldein E, Schnettler R. Vacuum mixing systems for bone cement completion – comparison of different systems. Z Orthopaedie und ihre Grenzgebiete 2002; 140(6)603–610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JS, Franzen H, Jonsson E, Lidgren L. Porosity of bone cement reduced by mixing and collecting under vacuum. Acta Orthop Scan 1993; 64(2)143–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahav A, DiMaio FR. Evaluation of a new power-operated PMMA vacuum mixing and delivery system for cemented femoral stem insertion. Orthopaedics 2004; 27(1)57–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52(6)852–859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1992; 14(2)239–256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn BKP. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Amer A 1987; 4(4)629–642
   Google Scholar
• Hahndorff M, de la Fuente M., Wirtz DC., Radermacher K. Development of a new miniaturized robotic device for the removal of femoral bone cement. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS-International), F Langlotz, BL Davies, D Schlenzka, HelsinkiFinland June 2005; 138–139
   Google Scholar
• Krautkrämer J, Krautkrämer H. Werkstoffprüfung mit Ultraschall. Springer, Berlin 1986
   Google Scholar
• Wixson RL. Do we need to vacuum mix or centrifuge cement?. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992, 285: 84–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar