Evaluation of a computerized measurement technique for joint alignment before and during periacetabular osteotomy

References

• Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh T, Mast J. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 232: 26–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Lessons learned after more than 250 periacetabular osteotomies. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74(2)119–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaue K, Wallin A, Ganz R. CT evaluation of coverage and congruency of the hip prior to osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 232: 15–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complication of osteoarthitis. Acta Chir Scand 1939; 83(Suppl 58)1–132
   Google Scholar
• Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia. The acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg 1961; 43-B(2)268–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaunay S, Dussault R, Kaplan P, Alford B. Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26(2)75–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy S, Kijewski P, Millis M, Harless A. Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 261: 214–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue J, Kersten M, Ma B, Stewart J, Rudan J, Ellis R. Fast assessment of acetabular coverage using stereoscopic volume rendering. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 13. Studies in health technology and informatics 111, J Westwood, R Haluck, H Hoffman, G Mogel, R Phillips, R Robb, K Vosburgh. IOS Press, Amsterdam 2005; 225–227
   Google Scholar
• Mechlenburg I, Nyengaard J, Romer L, Soballe K. Changes in load-bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy evaluated by multislice CT scanning and stereology. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75(2)147–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kleuver M, Kapitein P, Kooijman M, van Limbeek J, Pavlov P, Veth R. Acetabular coverage of the femoral head after triple pelvic osteotomy: No relation to outcome in 51 hips followed for 8–15 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70(6)583–588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armand M, Lepistö J, Tallroth K, Elias J, Chao E. Outcome of periacetabular osteotomy: Joint contact pressure calculation using standing AP radiographs, 12 patients followed for average 2 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(3)303–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsumura H, Kaku N, Ikeda S, Torisu T. A computer simulation of rotational acetabular osteotomy for dysplastic hip joint: Does the optimal transposition of the acetabular fragment exist?. J Orthop Sci 2005; 10: 145–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp JA, Sugano N, Millis MB, Murphy SB. Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 364: 134–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompe B, Daniel M, Sochor M, Vengust R, Kralj-Iglic V, Iglic A. Gradient of contact stress in normal and dysplastic human hips. Med Eng Phys 2003; 25(5)379–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlotz F, Bächler R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP, Ganz R. Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 354: 92–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen D, Aippersbach S, Munk P, Sallomi D, Garbuz D, Werier J, Duncan C. Three-dimensional CT measurement of adult acetabular dysplasia: Technique, preliminary results in normal subjects, and potential applications. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27(7)352–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad F, Garbuz D, Duncan C, Janzen D, Munk P. CT evaluation of periacetabular osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82(4)526–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tallroth K. Developmental dysplasia of the hip 2: Adult. Imaging of the Hip & Bony Pelvis: Techniques and Applications, AM Davies, K Johnson, RW Whitehouse. Springer, Berlin 2005
   Google Scholar
• Tönnis D. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Springer, Berlin 1987
   Google Scholar
• Lepistö J, Tallroth K, Alho A. Three-dimensional measures of acetabulum in periacetabular osteotomy. In: Transactions of the 44th. Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. New Orleans, LA March, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA. Computed tomography measurements of the acetabulum in adult dysplastic hips: Which level is appropriate?. Skeletal Radiol 1991; 20(4)267–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA, Svenningsen S. Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15(1)115–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallroth K, Lepistö J. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular dimensions: Normal values for correction of dysplasia. Acta Orthopaedica 2006; 77(4)598–602
   Google Scholar
• Genda E, Konishi N, Hasegawa Y, Miura T. A computer simulation study of normal and abnormal hip joint contact pressure. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995; 114(4)202–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida H, Faust A, Wilckens J, Kitagawa M, Fetto J, Chao EY. Three-dimensional dynamic hip contact area and pressure distribution during activities of daily living. J Biomech 2006; 39(11)1996–2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konishi N, Mieno T. Determination of acetabular coverage of the femoral head with use of a single anteroposterior radiograph. A new computerized technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75(9)1318–1333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Kleuver M. Changes in load-bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(1)141, author response 141–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (438): 182–190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langlotz F, Stucki M, Bächler R, Scheer C, Ganz R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP. The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 1997; 2(6)317–326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayman DJ, Rudan J, Yach J, Ellis R. The Kingston periacetabular osteotomy utilizing computer enhancement: A new technique. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7(3)179–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jäger M, Westhoff B, Wild A, Krauspe R. [Computer-assisted periacetabular triple osteotomy for treatment of dysplasia of the hip] [German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142(1)51–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar