References
- Sikorski JM, Chauhan S. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS? [Review]. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85(3)319–323
- Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 818–823
- Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 433: 152–159
- Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 832–839
- Krackow KA, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Serpe L, Mihalko WM. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: navigation in TKA. Orthopedics 2003; 26: 1017–1023
- Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 830–835
- Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 426: 180–186
- Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 428: 131–139
- Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 132–137
- Kim SJ, MacDonald BS, Hernandez JB, Wixson RL. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 123–131