Surgery with cooperative robots

References

• Treat M. A surgeon's perspective on the difficulties of laparoscopic surgery. Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, RH Taylor, S Lavallée, GC Burdea, R Mösges. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1996; 559–560
   Google Scholar
• Tendick F, Jennings R, Tharp G, Stark L. Perception and manipulation problems in endoscope surgery. Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, RH Taylor, S Lavallée, GC Burdea, R Mösges. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1996; 567–576
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe B, Gardiner B, Leary BF, Frey CF. Endoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of complications. Arch Surg 1991; 126: 1192–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1073–1078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Lapareoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2001; 11(6)415–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack MJ. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 2001; 285(5)568–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RW, Flowers JL. Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery. Quality Medical Publishers, Inc, St. Louis 1995
   Google Scholar
• Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery, LW Way, S Bhoyrul, T Mori. Churchill Livingstone. 1995
   Google Scholar
• Lo P, Ahmed N, Chung NH, Which laparoscopic operations are the fastest growing in residency programs? Surg Endosc 2001;15(Suppl 1):S145
   Google Scholar
• Kallo AN, Sing VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: A novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 114–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, Chung S, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Scorpio DG, Magee CA, et al. Per oral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 449–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC. Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 892–896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Chung S, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Magee CA, Vaughn CA, et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 287–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield BF, Wagh MS, Thompson CC. Peroral transgastric organ resection: A feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 693–697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park PO. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model [with video]. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 307–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Ikeda K, Swain P. Endoscopic transgastric lymphadenectomy by using EUS for selection and guidance. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 302–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC. Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 473–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima E, Rolanda C, Pego JM, Henriques-Coelho T, Silva D, Carvalho JL, Correia-Pinto J. Transvesical endoscopic peritoneoscopy: A novel 5-mm port for intra-abdominal scarless surgery. J Urol 2006; 175: 802–805
   Google Scholar
• Fong DG, Al RD, Thompson CC. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: A NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2007; 65: 312–318
   Google Scholar
• Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: A NOTES survival study in a porcine model [with video]. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 428–434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Columbia University Department of Surgery, Incisionless surgery with natural orifice techniques. http://www.columbiasurgery.org/news/2007_notes.html
   Google Scholar
• Medical USGI. Inc. USGI announces first NOTES transgastric cholecystectomy procedures, http://www.usgimedical.com/pr_transgastric_cholecystectomy.html
   Google Scholar
• ASGE, SAGES. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper, October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 199–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko CW, Kalloo AN. Per-oral transgastric abdominal surgery. Chin J Dig Dis 2006; 7: 67–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park P, Bergström M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61(4)601–606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satava RM. Surgical robotics: The early chronicles. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 2002; 12(1)6–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1389–1402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U. Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 375–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 790–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu MC, Williams W, Tendick F, Sastry SS. Robotics for telesurgery: Second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 2003; 30(1)22–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi D, Riviere C. Flexure-based manipulator for active handheld microsurgical instrument. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), ShanghaiChina, September, 2005, 5085–5088
   Google Scholar
• Riviere C, Ang W, Khosla P. Toward active tremor canceling in handheld microsurgical instruments. IEEE Trans Robotics Automation 2003; 15(5)793–800
   Google Scholar
• Rosen J, Lum M, Trimble D, Hannaford B, Sinanan M (2005) Spherical mechanism analysis of a surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery – analytical and experimental approaches. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 13 (MMVR13) Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 111, Long Beach, CA, January, 2005. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 422–428
   Google Scholar
• Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane M, Sinanan M. Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery – experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999; 46: 1212–1221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda T, Guo S, Kosuge K, Arai F, Negoro M, Nakabayashi K. Micro active catheter system with multi degrees of freedom. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, May, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Suzumori K, Iikura S, Tanaka H. Development of flexible microactuator and its applications to robotics mechanisms. Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, April, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Phee L, Accoto D, Menciassi A, Stefanini C, Carrozza M, Dario P. Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002; 49(6)613–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundfest SW, Burdick JW, Slatkin AB. The development of a robotic endoscope. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, NagoyaJapan, May, 1995, 162–171
   Google Scholar
• Breedveld P, Danielle E. Van Gorp M. Locomotion through the intestine by means of rolling stents. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Glukhovsky A, Jacob H. The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2004; 1: 114–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olympus, http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_2150.html
   Google Scholar
• Menciassi A, Dario P. Microrobotic technologies in endoluminal applications. Proceedings of the IARP-IEEE/RAS-EURON Joint Workshop on Micro & Nano Robotics, ParisFrance, October, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Patronik N, Zenati MA, Riviere C. Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart. Comput Aided Surg 2005; 10(4)225–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rentschler M, Hadzialic A, Dumpert J, Platt S, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2004) In vivo robots for laparoscopic surgery. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12 (MMVR12) Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 98, Newport Beach, CA, January, 2004. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 316–322
   Google Scholar
• Oleynikov D, Rentschler M, Hadzialic A, Dumpert J, Platt S, Farritor S. Miniature robots can assist in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2005; 9(4)473–476
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, Iagnemma K, Oleynikov D, Farritor S. Modeling, analysis, and experimental study of in vivo wheeled robotic mobility. IEEE Trans Robotics 2006; 22(2)308–321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentschler ME, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor S, Oleynikov D. Mobile in vivo camera robots provide sole visual feedback for abdominal exploration and cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2006; 20(1)135–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, Iagnemma K, Oleynikov D, Farritor SM. An in vivo mobile robot for surgical vision and task assistance. ASME J Med Devices 2007; 1(1)23–29
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler ME, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor SM, Oleynikov D. Natural orifice surgery with an endoluminal mobile robot. Surg Endosc 2007; 21(7)1212–1215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar