2,188
Views
87
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Biomedical Papers

Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes

, &
Pages 188-199 | Received 09 Nov 2007, Accepted 25 Apr 2008, Published online: 06 Jan 2010

References

  • Eufinger H, Wehmöller M, Machtens E, Heuser L, Harders A, Kruse D. Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD-CAM-manipulated CT-data. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1995; 23: 175–181
  • Carr JC, Fright WR, Beatson RK. Surface interpolation with radial basis functions for medical imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16(1)96–107
  • Jans G, Vander Sloten J, Gobin R, Van der Perre G, Van Audekercke R, Mommaerts M. Computer-aided craniofacial surgical planning implemented in CAD software. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4(3)117–128
  • Pattijn V, Gelaude F, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R. Medical image based preformed titanium membranes for bone reconstruction. Medical Imaging Systems Technology. Volume 3: Methods in General Anatomy, C Leondes. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore 2005; 43–78
  • Verschueren P, Gelaude F, Moens P, Fabry G, Vander Sloten J. Simulation and biomechanical evaluation of reconstructive surgery of the hip in children. Proceedings of the 3rd European Medical & Biological Engineering Conference (EMBEC ‘05), PragueCzech Republic, November, 2005. IFMBE Proceedings, 11: 2130
  • Clijmans T, Gelaude F, Suetens P, Lauwers B, Vander Sloten J. A contour based algorithm to produce shell models of the neurocranium for skull reconstruction applications. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering (CMBBE), AntibesFrance, March, 2006
  • Wu T, Engelhardt M, Fieten L, Popovic A, Radermacher K (2006) Anatomically constrained deformation for design of cranial implant: methodology and validation. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2006), CopenhagenDenmark, October, 2006, R Larsen, M Nielsen, J Sporring. Springer, Berlin, 9–16, Part I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4190
  • Gelaude F, Broos PL, Mulier M, Vandenbroucke B, Kruth JP, Lauwers B, Vander Sloten J. Treatment of massive acetabular defects with excessive bone loss: from automated computer-based reconstruction proposal to biomechanically justified defect-filling Triflange Cup implant. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS-International), HeidelbergGermany, June, 2007, 514–517
  • Gelaude F, Clijmans T, Broos PL, Lauwers B, Vander Sloten J. Computer-aided planning of reconstructive surgery of the innominate bone: automated correction proposals. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12(5)286–294
  • Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK, Fischer M, Dequeker J, Reeve J. The European Spine Phantom–a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 1995; 20(2)83–92
  • Prevrhal S, Engelke K, Kalender WA. Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 751–713
  • Kang Y, Engelke K, Kalender WA. A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22: 586–612
  • Marmulla R, Wörtche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 28–31
  • Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 291–294
  • Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, Marchal G, Jacobs R, Suetens P. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 225–234
  • Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 410–416
  • Metzger MC, Schön R, Weyer N, Rafii A, Gellrich NC, Schmelzeisen R, Strong BE. Anatomical 3-dimensional pre-bent titanium implant for orbital floor fractures. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1863–1868
  • Cavalcanti MGP, Yang J, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 137–140
  • Aspert N. MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference in Multimedia and Expo (ICME), LausanneSwitzerland, August, 2002. 1: 705–708
  • Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J. Active shape models–their training and application. Comput Vis Image Underst 1995; 61(1)38–59
  • Kaus MR, Lorenz C, Truyen R, Lobregt S, Weese J. Automated 3D PDM construction from segmented images using deformable model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22(8)1005–1013
  • Rajamani KT, Joshi SC, Styner MA. Bone model morphing for enhanced surgical visualization. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Arlington, VA, April, 2004. 2: 1255–1258
  • Wang LI, Greenspan M, Ellis R. Validation of bone segmentation and improved 3D registration using contour coherency in CT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25(3)324–334
  • Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching Cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graphics 1987; 21(3)163–169
  • Gelaude F, Vander Sloten J, Lauwers B. Semi-automated segmentation and visualisation of outer bone cortex from medical images. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2006; 9(1)65–77
  • Besl P, McKay N. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1992; 14(2)239–256
  • Fleute M, Lavallée S, Julliard R. Incorporating a statistically based shape model into a system for computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Med Image Anal 1999; 3(3)209–222
  • Gelaude F, Vander Sloten J, Lauwers B. Automated design and production of cranioplasty plates: outer surface methodology, accuracies and a direct comparison to manual techniques. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 2006; 3(1–4)193–202

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.