A computer aided method for closed reduction of diaphyseal tibial fracture using projection images: A feasibility study

References

• Alho A, Benterud JG, Hogevold HE, Ekeland A, Stromsoe K. Comparison of functional bracing and locked intramedullary nailing in the treatment of displaced tibial shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, 277: 243–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P, 3rd, Hanson B, Weaver B, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. Surgeons' preferences for the operative treatment of fractures of the tibial shaft. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 383-A: 1746–1752
   Google Scholar
• Lawyer RB, Jr, Lubbers LM. Use of the Hoffmann apparatus in the treatment of unstable tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62: 1264–1273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green SA. Complications of external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983, 180: 109–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay SM, Rickman M, Saleh M. Fracture of the tibial diaphysis treated by external fixation and the axial alignment grid: A single surgeon's experience. Injury 1997; 28: 437–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger EL, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Palmer J, Aro HT, Chao EY. Effects of axial dynamization on bone healing. J Trauma 1993; 34: 185–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders R, Koval KJ, DiPasquale T, Schmelling G, Stenzler S, Ross E. Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 326–330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Krettek C, Koppen G, Sati M, Nolte LP. Computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based reduction of femoral fractures and antetorsion correction. Comput Aided Surg 2000; 5: 311–325
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Sati M, Nolte LP. Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4: 65–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weil YA, Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, Helfet DL, Pearle AD. Long bone fracture reduction using a fluoroscopy-based navigation system: A feasibility and accuracy study. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12: 295–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Helfet DL, Pearle AD. Computer navigation allows for accurate reduction of femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 460: 185–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüfner T, Pohlemann T, Tarte S, Gänsslen A, Citak MSM, Bazak N, Culemann U, Nolte LP. Computer-assisted fracture reduction: Novel method for analysis of accuracy. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 153–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ron O, Joskowicz L, Milgrom C, Simkin A. Computer-based periaxial rotation measurement for aligning fractured femur fragments from CT: A feasibility study. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7: 332–341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joskowicz L, Milgrom C, Simkin A, Tockus L, Yaniv Z. FRACAS: A system for computer-aided image-guided long bone fracture surgery. Comput Aided Surg 1998; 3: 271–288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campopiano A. Manipulator for external bone fixation devices. 1995, US Patent 5,397,322
   Google Scholar
• Dewar ME. Fracture reduction apparatus. 1986, US Patent 4,628,922
   Google Scholar
• Moorcroft CI, Thomas PB, Ogrodnik PJ, Verborg SA. A device for improved reduction of tibial fractures treated with external fixation. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2000; 214: 449–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorcroft CI, Ogrodnik PJ, Thomas PB. Fracture reduction device. 2001, US Patent 6,328,737
   Google Scholar
• Helland P, Boe A, Molster AO, Solheim E, Hordvik M. Open tibial fractures treated with the Ex-fi-re external fixation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 326: 209–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Sayyad MJ. Taylor Spatial Frame in the treatment of pediatric and adolescent tibial shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 26: 164–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JC. Perioperative planning for two- and three-plane deformities. Foot Ankle Clin 2008; 13: 69–121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seide K, Wolter D, Kortmann HR. Fracture reduction and deformity correction with the hexapod Ilizarov fixator. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 364: 186–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seide K, Wolter D. [Universal 3-dimensional correction and reposition with the ring fixator using the hexapod configuration]. Unfallchirurg 1996; 99: 422–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Mak AF. A knowledge-based computer-aided system for closed diaphyseal fracture reduction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007; 22: 884–893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Chao EY, Mak AF. Development and validation of a new approach for computer-aided long bone fracture reduction using unilateral external fixator. J Biomech 2006; 39: 2104–2112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Papuga MO, Taylor J, Mak AF. X-ray based computer-aided correction of fracture deformity with novel unilateral fixator system. Proceedings of the XXI Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics, TaipeiTaiwan, July, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Chao EY, Rim K, Smidt GL, Johnston RC. The application of 4 × 4 matrix method to the correction of the measurements of hip joint rotations. J Biomech 1970; 3: 459–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JJ. Spatial descriptions and transformations. Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control, JJ Craig. Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA 1989; 19–67
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Statistical measures of reliability. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice, 2nd, LG Portney, MP Watkins. Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall 2000; 557–586
   Google Scholar
• Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A, Suzuki N. Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 1248–1253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeter S, Bongers EM, de Rooij J, van Kampen A. Minimal rotation aberrations cause radiographic misdiagnosis of trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14: 713–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke TD, Li J, Scudamore RA. Radiographic assessment of bony contributions to knee deformity. Orthop Clin North Am 1994; 25: 387–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt MA, Fowler PJ, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR, Giffin JR. Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment. Can J Surg 2006; 49: 401–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementz BG. Assessment of tibial torsion and rotational deformity with a new fluoroscopic technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 245: 199–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puloski S, Romano C, Buckley R, Powell J. Rotational malalignment of the tibia following reamed intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 397–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementz BG. Fluoroscopy of rotation in tibial fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 204–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementz BG, Magnusson A. Assessment of tibial torsion employing fluoroscopy, computed tomography and the cryosectioning technique. Acta Radiol 1989; 30: 75–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementz BG, Magnusson A. Fluoroscopic measurement of tibial torsion in adults. A comparison of three methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989; 108: 150–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementz BG. Tibial torsion measured in normal adults. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59: 441–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edge AJ, Denham RA. External fixation for complicated tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981; 63-B: 92–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalli W, Lavaste F, Descrimes JL. Quantification of three-dimensional vertebral rotations in scoliosis: What are the true values?. Spine 1995; 20: 546–553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar