Navigation of artificial disc replacement: evaluation in a cadaver study

References

• Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001; 26(23)2521–2532, discussion 2532–2524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, McAfee P. General principles of total disc replacement arthroplasty: seventeen cases in a nonhuman primate model. Spine 2003; 28(20)S118–S124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner-Janz K, Hochshuler S, McAfee P. The Artificial Disk. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2003
   Google Scholar
• Link H. History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc. Eur Spine J 2002; 11(Suppl 2)S98–S105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996; 21(8)995–1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, Sauty V, Laloux E. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 337: 64–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM. Cunningham BW. SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16(4)424–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999; 8(3)210–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, Dmietriev A, Maxwell JH, Regan JJ, Isaza J. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part II. Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005; 30(14)1576–1583, discussion E1388–E1590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITÉ artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 2007; 32(6)661–666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner-Janz K. Optimal minimally traumatic approach for the SB Charité Artificial Disc. Eur Spine J 2002; 11(Suppl 2)S111–S114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Büttner-Janz K, Hahn S, Schikora K, Link H. [Basic principles of successful implantation of the SB Charité model LINK intervertebral disk endoprosthesis]. Orthopade 2002; 31(5)441–453
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gertzbein S, Seligman J, Holtby R, Chan K, Ogston N, Kapasouri A, Tile M. Centrode characteristics of the lumbar spine as a function of segmental instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 208: 48–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White A, Panjabi M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. Willams, & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott 1990
   Google Scholar
• Smith HE, Vaccaro AR, Yuan PS, Papadopoulos S, Sasso R. The use of computerized image guidance in lumbar disk arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19(1)22–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara A, Tamai K, An HS, Lim TH, Yoshida H, Kurihashi A, Saotome K. Orientation and osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 385: 88–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlenzka D, Laine T, Lund T. [Computer-assisted spine surgery: principles, technique, results and perspectives]. Orthopade 2000; 29(7)658–669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews HH, Eisermann L, Le Huec J-C. Total disc arthroplasty using Maverick total disc replacement. Spinal Arthroplasty, a New Era in Spine Care, RD Guyer, JE Zigler. Quality Medical, St. Louis, MO 2005; 224–238
   Google Scholar
• Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, Nachwalter R, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ. Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine 2002; 27(22)2503–2508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerling J, Gösling T, Gösling A, Ortega G, Kendoff D, Citak M, Krettek C, Hüfner T. Navigated pedicle screw placement: Experimental comparison between CT- and 3D fluoroscopy-based techniques. Comput Aided Surg 2008; 13(3)157–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiot LP, Bellefleur C, Labelle H. [In vitro evaluation of computer-assisted pedicle screw system]. Ann Chir 1997; 51(8)854–860
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolger C, Wigfield C, Melkent T, Smith K. Frameless stereotaxy and anterior cervical surgery. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4(6)322–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacob AL MP, Baumann B, Suhm N, Steinbrich W, Regazzoni P (1999) Interactive single-step navigation in iliosacral screw fixation of sacral fractures and fracture dislocations. Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS ’99), DavosSwitzerland, March, 1999, LP Nolte, R Ganz. Hogrefe & Huber, GöttingenGermany, 147–192
   Google Scholar
• Kalfas IH, Kormos DW, Murphy MA, McKenzie RL, Barnett GH, Bell GR, Steiner CP, Trimble MB, Weisenberger JP. Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. J Neurosurg 1995; 83(4)641–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine T, Makitalo K, Schlenzka D, Tallroth K, Poussa M, Alho A. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J 1997; 6(6)402–405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavallée S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 39–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirza SK, Wiggins GC, Kuntz C, IV, York JE, Bellabarba C, Knonodi MA, Chapman JR, Shaffrey CI. Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study. Spine 2003; 28(4)402–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 2007; 32(3)E111–E120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honl M, Schwieger K, Gauck CH, Lampe F, Morlock MM, Wimmer MA, Hille E. [Comparison of total hip replacements cup orientation and position. Navigation vs. conventional manual implantation of hip prostheses]. Orthopade 2005; 34(11)1131–1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honl M, Schwieger K, Salineros M, Jacobs J, Morlock M, Wimmer M. Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(10)1401–1405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stiehl JB, Heck DA, Jaramaz B, Amiot LP. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12(2)116–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange S, Bunker T, Cooper J, Waldhausen S (1999) Comparing electro-optical and electromagnetic guidance in the preparation in minimal access surgical training enviroments. Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS ’99), DavosSwitzerland, March, 1999, LP Nolte, R Ganz. Hogrefe & Huber, GöttingenGermany, 36
   Google Scholar
• Guyer RD, Burd TA, Hochschuler SH. Total disc replacement: implants and clinical results. Spinal Arthroplasty a New Era in Spine Care, RD Guyer, JE Zigler. Quality Medical, St. Louis, MO 2005; 180–222
   Google Scholar
• McAfee P, Cunningham B, Hayes V, Sidiqi F, Dabbah M, Sefter J, Hu N, Beatson H. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 2006; 31(19 Suppl)S152–S160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar