4,055
Views
91
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment of optical localizer accuracy for computer aided surgery systems

, MBA, &
Pages 1-12 | Received 17 Feb 2009, Accepted 16 Jan 2010, Published online: 17 Mar 2010

References

  • ISO 5725-1: Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions. International Standards Organization, 1994.
  • Wiles AD, Thompson DG, Frantz DD. Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2004: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures and Display, San Diego, CA, February 2004. Proceedings of SPIE 2004;5367:421–432.
  • VDI/VDE Guideline 2634: Optical 3D measuring systems–Imaging systems with point-by-point probing. VDI/VDE, 2002.
  • Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20(9)917–927
  • West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, Maurer CR, Maciunas RJ. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001; 48(4)810–816, discussion 816–817
  • West JB, Maurer CR. Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23(5)533–545
  • Chassat F, Lavallée S. Experimental protocol of accuracy evaluation of 6-D localizers for computer-integrated surgery: Application to four optical localizers. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S, editors. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI ’98), Cambridge, MA, October 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1496. Berlin: Springer; 1998. 277–284.
  • Schmerber S, Chassat F. Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6(1)1–13
  • Khadem R, Yeh CC, Sadeghi-Tehrani M, Bax MR, Johnson JA, Welch JN, Wilkinson EP, Shahidi R. Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems. Comput Aided Surg 2000; 5(2)98–107
  • Maier-Hein L, Franz A, Meinzer HP, Wolf I. Comparative assessment of optical tracking systems for soft tissue navigation with fiducial needles. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2008: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, San Diego, CA, February 2008. Proceedings of SPIE 2008;6918:691870.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.