Validation of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation

References

• Sakai T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Ochi T, Ohzono K. Optimizing femoral anteversion and offset after total hip arthroplasty, using a modular femoral neck system: An experimental study. J Orthop Sci 2000; 5(5)489–494
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Burkhart R, Carnahan C, Blair S, Wu YX, Grunkemeier GL. Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: Hitting the bulls-eye more accurately. Am J Orthop 2010; 39(S10)2–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stöckl B. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: The effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87(6)762–769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Wan Z. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 355: 144–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60(2)217–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaoka T, Yamamoto K, Shishido T, Katori Y, Mizoue T, Shirasu H, Nunoda D. Study of hip joint dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2006; 30(1)26–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 261: 159–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai T, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system. J Orthop Sci 2002; 7(1)62–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998; 16(4)513–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004; 22(4)815–821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimine F. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. J Biomech 2005; 38(1)125–132
   Google Scholar
• Yoon YS, Hodgson AJ, Tonetti J, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Resolving inconsistencies in defining the target orientation for the acetabular cup angles in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2008; 23(3)253–259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75(2)228–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(8)1832–1842
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widmer KH. Containment versus impingement: Finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2007; 31(S1)29–33
   Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 119–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(3)282–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ. Modern technique of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 1991; 6(3)17–25
   Google Scholar
• Malchau H, Callanan M, Bragdon C, Zurakowski D, Jarrett B, Rubash H. An analysis of cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: Quality improvement by use of a local joint registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 93(S2)88–89
   Google Scholar
• Honl M, Schwieger K, Salineros M, Jacobs J, Morlock M, Wimmer M. Orientation of the acetabular component: A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(10)1401–1405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: Is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(2)163–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelley TC, Swank ML. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(S1)153–158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parratte S, Argenson JNA. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(3)494–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Sato Y, Tamura S. Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(4)455–460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69(8)1169–1176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D'Antonio JA. Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: Anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 393: 52–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D'Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion. Part I: Ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 2002; 35(4)543–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshioka Y, Cooke TDV. Femoral anteversion: Assessment based on function axes. J Orthop Res 1987; 5(1)86–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr E, Thaler M, Williams A, Moctezuma De La Barrera J, Krismer M, Nogler M. The figure-of-four axis as a reference to determine stem rotation in hip arthroplasty. What does it really measure? A cadaver study. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(4)458–462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachli W, Richards R, Sauret V, Cobb JP. The transverse pelvic plane: A new and practical reference frame for hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2006; 11(6)322–326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luttgens K, Wells KF. Kinesiology: Scientific Basis of Human Movement. , 7th Edition. Brown & Benchmark, DubuqueIA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Rowley DI, Dent JA. The Musculoskeletal System: Core Topics in the New Curriculum. Hodder Arnold. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Camomilla V, Cereatti A, Vannozzi G, Cappozzo A. An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method. J Biomech 2006; 39(6)1096–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen K. Bias compensated least squares estimate of the center of rotation. J Biomech 2003; 36(7)999–1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy KR, Myors B, Wolach AH. Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests. , 2nd Edition. Psychology Press. 2008
   Google Scholar
• Ko BH, Yoon YS. Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation. Clin Biomech 2008; 23(8)996–1003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley GA, Ahmed SMY, Williams MA, Griffin DR. Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2011; 225(8)769–782
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshimine F, Ginbayashi K. A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. J Biomech 2002; 35(7)989–993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubiak-Langer M, Tannast M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA, Langlotz F. Range of motion in anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 117–124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tannast M, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz F, Puls M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Non-invasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 2007; 25(1)122–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar