Morphometric analysis of anatomical implant forms for minimally invasive acetabular fracture osteosynthesis

References

• Porter SE, Russell GV, Dews RC, Qin Z, Woodall Jr J, Graves ML. Complications of acetabular fracture surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22(9)589–594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell GV Jr, Nork SE, Chip Routt ML Jr. Perioperative complications associated with operative treatment of acetabular fractures. J Trauma 2001; 51(6)1098–1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenbuhl P, Meadeb J, Chalès G. Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus, pelvis, and ankle: epidemiology and diagnosis. Joint Bone Spine 2005; 72(5)372–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton LJ, 3rd, Sampson JM, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM. Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;, 155: 43–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderschot P. Treatment options of pelvic and acetabular fractures in patients with osteoporotic bone. Injury 2007; 38(4)497–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo KA, Letournel E, Matta JM, Mast JW, Johnson EE, Martimbeau CL. Surgical revision of malreduced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;, 305: 47–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weise K. [30 years of osteosynthesis: developments in surgical fracture treatment over the last three decades] [In German]. Orthopade 2010; 39(2)122–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen RC, O’Toole RV, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Frisch HM, Turen CW. Modified stoppa approach for acetabular fractures with anterior and posterior column displacement: quantification of radiographic reduction and analysis of interobserver variability. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24(5)271–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr AJ, Jones AL, Reinert CM, Borer DS. Preliminary results and complications following limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. Injury 2001; 32(Suppl 1)SA45–SA50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf H, Wieland T, Pajenda G, Vecsei V, Mousavi M. Minimally invasive ilioinguinal approach to the acetabulum. Injury 2007; 38(10)1170–1176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimerman M, Kristan A. Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules. Injury 2007; 38(4)442–449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs BG, Gonser C, Shiozawa T, Badke A, Weise K, Rolauffs B, Stuby FM. Computer-assisted periacetabular screw placement: Comparison of different fluoroscopy-based navigation procedures with conventional technique. Injury 2010; 41(12)1297–1305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestler W, Sidler R, González Ballester MA, Nolte LP, Suedkamp NP, Maier D. A feasibility study of computer-assisted bone graft implantation for tissue-engineered replacement of the human ankle joint. Comput Aided Surg 2008; 13(4)207–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamer L, Noser H, Schramm A, Hammer B. Orbital form analysis: problems with design and positioning of precontoured orbital implants: a serial study using post-processed clinical CT data in unaffected orbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39(7)666–672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kääb M, Luo C, Plecko M, Wendt K, Köstler W, Konrad G. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(6)1320–1328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein FL. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1997; 1(3)225–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heimann T, Meinzer HP. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Med Image Anal 2009; 13(4)543–563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noser H, Hammer B, Kamer L. A method for assessing 3D shape variations of fuzzy regions and its application on human bony orbits. J Digit Imaging 2010; 23(4)422–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen RR, Hilger KB. Shape modelling using Markov random field restoration of point correspondences. Inf Process Med Imaging 2003; 18: 1–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumann A, Lorenz C. Statistical shape model based segmentation of medical images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1998; 22(2)133–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golland P, Grimson WE, Shenton ME, Kikinis R. Detection and analysis of statistical differences in anatomical shape. Med Image Anal 2005; 9(1)69–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur P, Mosimann JE. Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis. Growth 1960; 24: 339–354
   Google Scholar
• Daruwalla ZJ, Courtis P, Fitzpatrick C, Fitzpatrick D, Mullett H. An application of principal component analysis to the clavicle and clavicle fixation devices. J Orthop Surg Res 2010; 5: 21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Correia H, Balseiro S, De Areia M. Sexual dimorphism in the human pelvis: testing a new hypothesis. Homo 2005; 56(2)153–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;, 305: 112–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowl AC, Kahler DM. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7(3)169–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornaro J, Keel M, Harders M, Marincek B, Székely G, Frauenfelder T. An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results. J Orthop Surg Res 2010; 5: 50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüfner T, Pohlemann T, Tarte S, Gänsslen A, Citak MSM, Bazak N, Culemann U, Nolte LP, Krettek C. Computer-assisted fracture reduction: novel method for analysis of accuracy. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6(3)153–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stöckle U, Schäffler A, König B, Haas NP. [Integrated navigation. Preclinical evaluation and initial clinical experience]. Unfallchirurg 2006; 109(11)925–931
   Google Scholar
• Kendoff D, Gardner MJ, Citak M, Kfuri M Jr, Thumes B, Krettek C, Hüfner T. Value of 3D fluoroscopic imaging of acetabular fractures comparison to 2D fluoroscopy and CT imaging. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128(6)599–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR. Metric assessment of race from the pelvis in South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 2002; 127(1–2)104–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutz B, Wullschleger ME, Kim H, Noser H, Schütz MA. Fit assessment of anatomic plates for the distal medial tibia. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22(4)258–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozic N, Weber S, Büchler P, Lutz C, Reimers N, González Ballester MA, Reyes M. Optimisation of orthopaedic implant design using statistical shape space analysis based on level sets. Med Image Anal 2010; 14(3)265–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar