References
- Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 282–288
- Hvid I, Nielsen S. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 160–165
- Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 709–714
- Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8: 419–426
- Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299: 31–43
- Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299: 153–156
- Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 261–269
- Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J. Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 331–339
- Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 372–377
- Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 560–569
- Ek ET, Dowsey MM, Tse LF, Riazi A, Love BR, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Comparison of functional and radiological outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A matched-control retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008; 16: 192–196
- Hsu WH, Hsu RW, Weng YJ. Effect of preoperative deformity on postoperative leg axis in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18: 1323–1327
- Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 1097–1106
- Maniar RN, Johorey AC, Pujary CT, Yadava AN. Margin of error in alignment: A study undertaken when converting from conventional to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 82–87
- Smith BR, Deakin AH, Baines J, Picard F. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: The learning curve. Comput Aided Surg 2010; 15: 40–48
- Jenny JY, Miehlke RK, Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 2008; 15: 80–84
- Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 14–19
- Xie C, Liu K, Xiao L, Tang R. Clinical outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2012; 35: e647–e653
- Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: Aspects of a single unit's experience of 777 cases. Comput Aided Surg 2011; 16: 188–195
- Burnett RS, Barrack RL, Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:264–276