Use of finite element analysis of a Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis case to assess possible surgical outcomes

References

• Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A(8)1169–1181
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss HR, Goodall D. The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008; 44(2)177–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JL, Parnianpour M, Shirazi-Adl A, Engin AE, Li S, Patwardhan A. Development and validation of a viscoelastic finite element model of an L2/L3 motion segment. Theor Appl Fract Mech 1997; 28: 81–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viviani GR, Ghista DN, Lozada PJ, Subbaraj K, Barnes G. Biomechanical analysis and simulation of scoliosis surgical correction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 208: 40–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lafage V, Dubousset J, Lavaste F, Skalli W. 3D finite element simulation of Cotrel-Dubousset correction. Comput Aided Surg 2004; 9: 17–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumas R, Lafage V, Lafon Y, Steib JP, Mitton D, Skalli W. Finite element simulation of spinal deformities correction by in situ contouring technique. Comput Method Biomec 2005; 8: 331–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lafon Y, Steib JP, Skalli W. Intraoperative three dimensional correction during in situ contouring surgery by using a numerical model. Spine 2010; 35: 453–459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlmann A, Richter M, Zander T, Klöckner C, Bergmann G. Effect of different surgical strategies on screw forces after correction of scoliosis with a VDS implant. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 457–464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z-Y, Liu Z-D, Wang Z, Wang D-M, Wang C-T, Li X-F. Research on biomechanics of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by the ventral derotation spondylodesis (VDS). Chin J Experimental Surg 2007; 24: 669–671
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H-Q, Guo C-F, Chen L-Q, Liu S-H, Tang M-X, Chen J. Establishment and validation of 3-dimensional finite element model of Lenke 1 BN idiopathic scoliosis. Chin J Orthopaedics 2010; 30: 768–772
   Google Scholar
• Tang M-X, Zhang H-Q, Wang Y-F, Zhao D, Liu S-H, Chen L-Q, Guo C-F, Wang Y-X. Predict therapeutic efficacy of brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using finite element method. J Spinal Surg 2010; 8: 108–113
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z-Y, Liu Z-D, Wang Z, Wang C-T, Ming YE, Li X-F. Development of finite element model for the scoliotic spine and its parameters optimization. Beijing Biomed Eng 2008; 27: 28–32
   Google Scholar
• Wang R-X. Mathematical Statistics. Xi’an Jiao Tong University Press, Xi’an 2006; 150–160
   Google Scholar
• Aubin C-E, Petit Y, Stokes IAF. Biomechanical modeling of posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. Comput Method Biomec 2003; 6: 27–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Sangole A, Labelle H. Computer simulation for the optimization of instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009; 47: 1143–1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H, Chen H, Luo X-Z. Research progress in biomechanics of bone mineral intensity. Chin J Trauma 2005; 21: 952–954
   Google Scholar
• Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T, Liljenqvist U. Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 191–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE. The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine 2004; 29(3)269–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fei Q, Qiu G, Lee CI, Shen J, Zhang J, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Wang H, Yuan S. Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2008; 33: 2166–2172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu G-X, Wang Y-P, Fei Q, Shen J-X, Zhang J-G, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Zhao D, Li J-Y. Anterior spine fusion versus posterior spine fusion with pedical screws for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chin J Orthop 2007; 27: 743–747
   Google Scholar
• Yu B, Wang Y-P, Qiu G-X, Zhang J-G, Shen J-X, Li Q-Y, Yang X-Y, Zhao L-J. Comparison of correction outcomes after anterior or posterior approach with lowest end vertebra instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis. Natl Med J China 2009; 89: 2621–2621
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Gu SX, Zhu XD, Yang J-D, Zhang Q, Zhao Y-F, Wu D-J, Wang J-J, Ni J-Q, Yang X-M, Cao H-H. Use of posterior pedicle instrumentation on lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord 2007; 17: 261–265
   Google Scholar
• Monney G, Kaelin AJ. Short posterior fusion for patients with thoracolumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1999; 364: 32–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B-H (translator). Biomechanics of scoliosis three-dimensional correction [M]. In: Hu Y-G (main translator). Spine Surgery. First edition. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2000. pp 158–164.
   Google Scholar
• Akçali O, Alici E, Koşay C. Apical instrumentation alters the rotational correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 124–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29(3)343–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu G, Kawakami N, Goto M, Tsuji T, Ohara T, Imagama S. Comparison of vertebral rotation corrected by different techniques and anchors in surgical treatment of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 182–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laohacharoensombat W, Jaovisidha S, Wajanavisit W, Suppaphol S. Apical derotation in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88: S58–S64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar