Computer-assisted measurements of coronal knee joint laxity in vitro are related to low-stress behavior rather than structural properties of the collateral ligaments

References

• Coytes PC. 1999. Revision knee placement in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg 81A:773–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng EL, Stulberg SD, Wixson RL. 1994. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:60–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. 1991. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:709–14
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. 2002. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. 2010. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 92A:2143–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski JM. 2008. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 90B:1121–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside LA. 2002. Soft tissue balancing: the knee. J Arthroplasty 17:23–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grood ES, Noyes FR, Butler DL, Suntay WJ. 1981. Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg 63A:1257–69
   Google Scholar
• Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstutz HC. 1976. Stiffness and laxity of the knee – the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:583–94
   Google Scholar
• Engh GA. 2003. The difficult knee: severe varus and valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme G, Defoort K, Ducoulombier Y, et al. 2005. What should the surgeon aim for when performing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty? J Bone Joint Surg 87A:52–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. 2009. Knee arthroplasty: are patients’ expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 80:55–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, et al. 1998. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsen FA, Garbini JL, Sidles JA, et al. 1993. Robotic assistance in orthopaedic surgery. A proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 296:178–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D. 2000. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Oper Tech Orthop 10:25–39
   Google Scholar
• Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. 2009. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:560–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge WH. 2007. Mini-symposium: Computer-assisted surgery in orthopaedics (iv): Computer-assisted knee replacement techniques. Curr Orthopaed 21:200–6
   Google Scholar
• Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, et al. 2009. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24:570–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüring C, Oczipka F, Perlick L, et al. 2009. Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:228–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingart M, Lüring C, Bäthis H, et al. 2008. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:44–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokuhara Y, Nakagawa S, Kobayashi A, et al. 2004. The flexion gap in normal knees; an MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:1133–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. 2004. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:682–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. 2004. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:372–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny J, Boeri C. 2001. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: A case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg 6:217–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, et al. 2007. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg 89A:236–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparman M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, et al. 2003. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg 85B:830–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor J, Hoste D. 2004. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:131–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny J-Y. 2010. Coronal plane knee laxity measurement: Is computer-assisted navigation useful? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:583–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard F, Deakin AH, Clarke JV, et al. 2007. A quantitative method of effective soft tissue management for varus knees in total knee replacement surgery using navigational techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221:763–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakki S, Coleman S, Saleh K, et al. 2009. Navigational predictors in determining the necessity for collateral ligament release in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 91B:1178–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luring C, Hüfner T, Perlick L, et al. 2006. The effectiveness of sequential medial soft tissue release on coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: using a computer navigation model. J Arthroplasty 21:428–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luring C, Oczipka F, Grifka J, Perlick L. 2008. The computer-assisted sequential lateral soft-tissue release in total knee arthroplasty for valgus knees. Int Orthop 32:229–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saragaglia D, Chaussard C, Rubens-Duval B. 2006. Navigation as a predictor of soft tissue release during 90 cases of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 29:137–8
   Google Scholar
• Wilson WT, Deakin AH, Payne AW, et al. 2012. Comparative analysis of the structural properties of the collateral ligaments of the human knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42:345–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter DA. 1990. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp 51–74
   Google Scholar
• Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. 2002. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:90–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland ME, Bell GD, Mohtadi NG, Herzog W. 1995. Quantitative analysis of anterior cruciate ligament instability. Clin Biomech 10:93–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke JV, Riches PE, Picard F, Deakin AH. 2012. Non-invasive computer-assisted measurement of knee alignment. Comput Aided Surg 17:29–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke JV, Wilson WT, Wearing SC, et al. 2012. Standardising the clinical assessment of coronal knee laxity. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 226:699–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes FR, Grood ES, Butler DL, Raterman L. 1980. Knee ligament tests: what do they really mean? Phys Ther 60:1578–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar