Providing haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: A direct optical force-sensing solution for haptic rendering of deformable bodies

References

• Trejos AL, Patel RV, Naish MD. 2010. Force sensing and its application in minimally invasive surgery and therapy: a survey. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 224(7):1435–1454
   Google Scholar
• Akinbiyi T, Reiley CE, Saha S, Burschka D, Hasser CJ, Yuh DD, Okamura AM. 2006. Dynamic augmented reality for sensory substitution in robot-assisted surgical systems. Proccedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS ‘06), New York, NY, September 2006. pp 567–570
   Google Scholar
• Gerovich O, Marayong P, Okamura AM. 2004. The effect of visual and haptic feedback on computer-assisted needle insertion. Comput Aided Surg 9(6):243–249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peirs J, Clijnen J, Reynaerts D, Van Brussel H, Herijgers P, Corteville B, Boone S. 2004. A micro optical force sensor for force feedback during minimally invasive robotic surgery. Sensors and Actuators A 115(2–3):447–455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro A, Spano F, Cazzato P, Cingolani R, Athanassiou A. 2011. Innovative optical tactile sensor for robotic system by gold nanocomposite material. Progress in Electromagnetics Research M 16:145–158
   Google Scholar
• Hagn U, Konietschke R, Tobergte A, Nickl M, Jörg S, Kübler B, Passig G, Gröger M, Fröhlich F, Seibold U, et al. 2010. DLR MiroSurge: A versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(2):183–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tavakoli M, Aziminejad A, Patel RV, Moallem M. 2006. Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment. Surg Endosc 10(2):1570–1579
   Google Scholar
• Weiss H, Ortmaier T, Maass H, Hirzinger G, Kuehnapfel U. 2003. A virtual-reality-based haptic surgical training system. Comput Aided Surg 8(5):269–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim HK, Rattner DW, Srinivasan MA. 2004. Virtual-reality-based laparoscopic surgical training: The role of simulation fidelity in haptic feedback. Comput Aided Surg 9(5):227–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maass H, Chantier BBA, Cakmak HK, Trantakis C, Kuehnapfel UG. 2003. Fundamentals of force feedback and application to a surgery simulator. Comput Aided Surg 8(6):283–291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su H, Fischer GS. A 3-axis optical force/torque sensor for prostate needle placement in magnetic resonance imaging environments. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA 2009), Woburn, MA, November 2009. pp 5–9
   Google Scholar
• Rosen J, Solazzo M, Hannaford B, Sinanan M. 2002. Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents’ learning curve using hidden Markov model. Comput Aided Surg 7:49–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puangmali P, Althoefer K, Seneviratne LD, Murphy D, Dasgupta P. 2008. State-of-the-art in force and tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Sensors J 4:371–381
   Google Scholar
• Hu T, Castellanos AE, Tholey G, Desai JP. 2002. Real-time haptic feedback in laparoscopic tools for use in gastro-intestinal surgery. In: Dohi T, Kikinis R, editors. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002), Tokyo, Japan, September 2002. Part I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2488. Berlin: Springer. pp 66–74
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence DA. 1993. Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation. IEEE Trans Robotics Automation 9(5):624–637
   Google Scholar
• Hannaford B. 1989. A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback. IEEE Trans Robotics Automation 5(4):426–434
   Google Scholar
• Salcudean SE, Zhu M, Zhu WH, Hashtrudi-Zaad K. 2000. Transparent bilateral teleoperation under position and rate control. Int J Robotics Res 19:1185–1202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiley CE, Akinbiyi T, Burschka D, Chang DC, Okamura AM, Yuh DD. 2008. Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 135(1):196–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley R, Abildskov JA, Mcfee R. 1963. Resistivity of body tissues at low frequencies. Circ Res 12:40–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip MC, Yuen SG, Howe RD. 2010. A robust uniaxial force sensor for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(5):1008–1011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Seneviratne LD, Razavi R, Schaeffter T, Althoefer K. 2013. Triaxial catheter-tip force sensor for MRI-guided cardiac procedures. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 18(1):386–396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassert R, Moser R, Burdet E, Bleuler H. 2006. MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 11(2):216–224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Ataollahi A, Schaeffter T, Razavi R, Seneviratne LD, Althoefer K. 2011. MRI-compatible intensity-modulated force sensor for cardiac catheterization procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(3):721–726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puangmali P, Hongbin L, Seneviratne LD, Dasgupta P, Althoefer K. 2012. Miniature 3-axis distal force sensor for minimally invasive surgical palpation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 17(4):646–656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Seneviratne LD, Althoefer K. 2011. Modeling of light intensity-modulated fiber-optic displacement sensors. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 60(4):1408–1415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puangmali P, Althoefer K, Seneviratne LD. 2010. Mathematical modeling of intensity-modulated bent-tip optical fiber displacement sensors. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(2):283–291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AJ, Ramirez OAD, Vega VP, Oliver JPO. 2009. PHANToM OMNI haptic device: kinematic and manipulability. Proceedings of the Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA ‘09), Cuernavaca, Mexico, September 2009. pp 193–198
   Google Scholar
• Craig J. 2005. Introduction to Robotics: Mechanism and Control (3rd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall
   Google Scholar
• Ranganath R, Nair PS, Mruthyunjaya TS, Ghosald A. 2004. A force-torque sensor based on a Stewart platform in a near-singular configuration. Mechanism and Machine Theory 39(9):971–998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold U, Kuebler B, Hirzinger G. 2001. Prototype of instrument for minimally invasive surgery with 6-axis force sensing capability. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2001), Seoul, Korea, May 2001. pp 498–503
   Google Scholar
• Mueller MS, Hoffmann L, Buck TC, Koch AW. 2009. Fiber Bragg grating-based force-torque sensor with six degrees of freedom. Int J Optomechatronics 3(3):201–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar