3D atlas-based registration can calculate malalignment of femoral shaft fractures in six degrees of freedom

References

• Arneson TJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Lewallen DG, O’Fallon WM. 1988. Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res 234:188–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Haidukewych GJ. 2009. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:296–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaarsma RL, Pakvis DF, Verdonschot N, et al. 2004. Rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:403–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I. 1993. Torsional deformity after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Measurement of anteversion angles in 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:799–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris I, Hatfield A, Walton J. 2005. Assessing leg length discrepancy after femoral fracture: clinical examination or computed tomography? ANZ J Surg 75:319–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush WA, Steiner HA. 1946. A study of lower extremity length inequality. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther 56:616–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thoresen BO, Alho A, Ekeland A, et al. 1985. Interlocking intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures. A report of forty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1313–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb LX, Gristina AG, Fowler HL. 1988. Unstable femoral shaft fractures: a comparison of interlocking nailing versus traction and casting methods. J Orthop Trauma 2:10–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiss DA, Brien WW, Stetson WB. 1990. Interlocked nailing for treatment of segmental fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:724–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. 1984. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:529–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, et al. 2001. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:161–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf H, Schauwecker F, Tittel K. 1984. Malrotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur. Unfallchirurgie 10:133–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendoff D, Citak M, Gardner MJ, et al. 2007. Navigated femoral nailing using noninvasive registration of the contralateral intact femur to restore anteversion. Technique and clinical use. J Orthop Trauma 21:725–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Krettek C, et al. 2000. Computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based reduction of femoral fractures and antetorsion correction. Comput Aided Surg 5:311–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Citak M, Kendoff D, Pearle AD, et al. 2009. Navigated femoral anteversion measurements: general precision and registration options. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:671–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA, Edmundson GK, et al. 2001. Flatpanel cone-beam CT: A novel imaging technology for image-guided procedures. Proc SPIE 4319:435–44
   Google Scholar
• Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J. 2005. The ITK Software Guide 2005
   Google Scholar
• Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, et al. 1997. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:187–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenaz P, Unser M. 2000. Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process 9:2083–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsberg JH. 1995. Advanced Engineering Dynamics, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Giles LG, Taylor JR. 1981. Low-back pain associated with leg length inequality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6:510–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moed BR, Watson JT, Cramer KE, et al. 1998. Unreamed retrograde intramedullary nailing of fractures of the femoral shaft. J Orthop Trauma 12:334–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Lewis R, et al. 2001. Angular malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:90–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosheiff R, Weil Y, Peleg E, Liebergall M. 2005. Computerised navigation for closed reduction during femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury 36:866–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast-Butler O, Lutz MJ, Angelini M, et al. 2012. Computer navigation in the reduction and fixation of femoral shaft fractures: a randomized control study. Injury 43:749–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Helfet DL, Pearle AD. 2007. Computer navigation allows for accurate reduction of femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460:185–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matthews F, Hoigne DJ, Weiser M, et al. 2007. Navigating the fluoroscope’s C-arm back into position: an accurate and practicable solution to cut radiation and optimize intraoperative workflow. J Orthop Trauma 21:687–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gösling T, Oszwald M, Kendoff D, et al. 2009. Computer-assisted antetorsion control prevents malrotation in femoral nailing: an experimental study and preliminary clinical case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1521–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosheiff R, Weil Y, Peleg E, Liebergall M. 2005. Computerised navigation for closed reduction during femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury 36:866–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joskowicz L, Milgrom C, Simkin A, et al. 1998. FRACAS: a system for computer-aided image-guided long bone fracture surgery. Comput Aided Surg 3:271–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ron O, Joskowicz L, Milgrom C, Simkin A. 2002. Computer-based periaxial rotation measurement for aligning fractured femur fragments from CT: a feasibility study. Comput Aided Surg 7:332–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hazan EJ, Joskowicz L. 2003. Computer-assisted image-guided intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Techniques in Orthopaedics 18:191–200
   Google Scholar
• Khoury A, Whyne CM, Daly M, et al. 2007. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for correction of periaxial malrotation of the femoral shaft: a surface-matching approach. Med Phys 34:1380–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao J, Chiodo CP, Williamson DS, et al. 1998. Computer-assisted quantification of periaxial bone rotation from X-ray CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:615–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghari MH, Abolmaesumi P. 2008. Global registration of multiple bone fragments using statistical atlas models: feasibility experiments. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:5374–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crookshank M, Beek M, Singh D, et al. 2013. Can a semi-automated surface matching and principal axis-based algorithm accurately quantify femoral shaft fracture alignment in six degrees of freedom? Med Eng Phys 35(7):1028–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar