1,435
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty

, , &
Pages 52-60 | Received 28 Oct 2014, Accepted 02 Jul 2015, Published online: 20 Aug 2015

References

  • Iida H, Kaneda E, Takada H, et al. Metallosis due to impingement between the socket and the femoral neck in a metal-on-metal bearing total hip prosthesis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:400–403.
  • Gambera D, Carta S, Crainz E, et al. Metallosis due to impingement between the socket and the femoral head in a total hip prosthesis. A case report. Acta Biomed 2002;73:85–91.
  • Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003;11:89–99.
  • Bader R, Steinhauser E, Zimmermann S, et al. Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:711–718.
  • Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, et al. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:427–435.
  • Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, et al. Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:1072–1078.
  • Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004;22:815–821.
  • Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, et al. Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:455–460.
  • Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, et al. Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:3054–3059.
  • DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;355:8–22.
  • Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, et al. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;426:159–163.
  • Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, et al. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;354:28–38.
  • Hananouchi T, Saito M, Koyama T, et al. Tailor-made surgical guide reduces incidence of outliers of cup placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1088–1095.
  • Sugano N. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2013;5:1–9.
  • Ghelman B, Kepler CK, Lyman S, Della Valle AG. CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:2362–2370.
  • Lin F, Lim D, Wixson RL, et al. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008;23:1004–1011.
  • Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, et al. Position of the acetabular cup—accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 2006;58:294–300.
  • Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:674–679.
  • Beaumont E, Beaumont P, Odermat D, et al. Clinical validation of computer-assisted navigation in total hip arthroplasty. Adv Orthop 2011;2011:171783.
  • Hasart O, Poepplau BM, Asbach P, et al. Ultrasound-based navigation and 3D CT compared in acetabular cup position. Orthopedics 2009;32:6–10.
  • Kim TH, Lee SH, Yang JH, Oh KJ. Computed tomography assessment of image-free navigation-assisted cup placement in THA in an Asian population. Orthopedics 2012;35:13–17.
  • Sugano N, Tsuda K, Miki H, et al. Dynamic measurements of hip movement in deep bending activities after total hip arthroplasty using a 4-dimensional motion analysis system. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27:1562–1568.
  • Watanabe Y, Matsumoto J, Sasama T, et al. Preprocessing method for rigid registration between pre- and postoperative CT images in total hip replacement. Med Imag Technol 2003;21:358–368 [in Japanese].
  • Iwana D, Nakamura N, Miki H, et al. Accuracy of angle and position of the cup using computed tomography-based navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2013;18:187–194.
  • Ryan JA, Jamali AA, Bargar WL. Accuracy of computer navigation for acetabular component placement in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:169–177.
  • Hayashi S, Nishiyama T, Fujishiro T, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of femoral component orientation by the CT-based fluoro-matched navigation system. Int Orthop 2013;37:1063–1068.
  • Fukunishi S, Fukui T, Imamura F, Nishio S. Assessment of accuracy of acetabular cup orientation in CT-free navigated total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008;31.
  • Ybinger T, Kumpan W, Hoffart HE, et al. Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements: methods and results. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:812–817.
  • Hirasawa N, Matsubara M, Ishii K, et al. Effect of CT slice thickness on accuracy of implant positioning in navigated total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2010;15:83–89.
  • Sugano N, Sasama T, Sato Y, et al. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 2001;6: 195–203.