Neoperitoneal Formation after Implantation of Various Biomaterials for the Repair of Abdominal Wall Defects in Rabbits

References

• Bellón JM, Buján J, Contreras L, Hernando A, Jurado F. Macrophage response to experimental implantation of polypropylene prosthesis. Eur Surg Res 1994; 26: 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bellón JM, Hernando A, Contreras L, Buján J, CampoC. Importance of the peritoneal interface following implantation of biomaterials into the abdominal wall. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 69.
   Google Scholar
• Bellón JM, Buján J, Contreras LA, Hernando A. Integration of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall process of scar formation and macrophage response. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 381–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellón JM, Buján J, Contreras LA, Hernando A. Interface formed between visceral peritoneum and experimental polypropylene or polytetrafluoroethylene abdominal wall implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1996; 7: 331–336.
   Google Scholar
• Bellón JM, Buján J, Contreras LA, Carrera-San Martin A, Jurado F. Comparison of a new type of polytetra-fluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183: 11–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellón JM, Buján J, Contreras LA, Carrera-San Martin A, Hernando A, Jurado F. Improvement of the tissue integration of a new modified polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis: Mycro Mesh. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1265–1271.
   Google Scholar
• Bellón JM, Contreras LA, Buján J, Carrera-San Martin A. Experimental assay of a Dual Mesh polytetrafluor-oethylene prosthesis (non-porous on one side) in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 2367–2372.
   Google Scholar
• Bellón JM, Contreras LA, Sabater C, Buján J. Pathological and clinical aspects of repair of large incisional hernias after implant of a polytetrafluoroethy-lene prosthesis. World J Surg 1997; 21: 402–407.
   Google Scholar
• Chan STF, Esufali ST. Extended indications for polypropylene mesh closure of the abdominal wall. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 3–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dabrowiecki S, Svanes K, Lekven J, Grong K. Tissue reaction to polypropylene mesh: a study of oedema, blood flow, and inflammation in the abdominal wall. Eur Surg Res 1991; 23: 240–249.
   Google Scholar
• Law N, Ellis H. Adhesion formation and peritoneal healing on prosthetic materials. Clin Mat 1988; 3: 95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Law NW. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglyco-lic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects. Acta Chir Scand 1990; 156: 159–162.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J1, Freeman JB, Dionne PG. Comparison of Marlex and Gore-Tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat. Can J Surg 1989; 32: 244–247.
   Google Scholar
• Pans A, Pierard GE. A comparison of intraperitoneal prostheses for the repair of abdominal muscular wall defects in rats. Eur Surg Res 1992; 24: 54–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers BM, Maher JVV, Talbert JL. The use of preserved human dura for closure of abdominal wall and diaphragmatic defects. Ann Surg 1981; 193: 606–610.
   Google Scholar
• Root M, Lockhart JL, Vorstman A, Oiticica C, Buckner D. Long term follow-up with the use of lyophilized dura mater for abdominal wall closure in children: report of 3 cases. J Urol 1992; 148: 858–860.
   Google Scholar
• Smith S, Gantt N, Rowe MI, Lloyd DA. Dura versus Gore-Tex as an abdominal wall prosthesis in an open and closed infected model. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24: 519–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrell J, Silberman H, Chandrasoma P. Niland J, Shull J. Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations. Surg Gyn Obs 1989; 168: 227–232.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Lei B, Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RKJ, Van Schilfgaarde R. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of large abdominal wall defects. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 803–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar