Content validation of a Danish version of “The McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment” for dysphagia management

References

• Meriano C, Latelle D. Occupational therapy interventions: Function and occupation. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cichero JYA, Murdoch BE. Dysphagia: Foundation, theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold NA, Kagel MA. Dysphagia – ingestion or deglutition? A proposed paradigm. Dysphagia 1997;12:202–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOTA. Specialized knowledge and skills in feeding, eating, and swallowing for occupational therapy practise. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:686–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler S, James MD, Kelly MD. Swallowing disorders in the elderly: State of the art review. Laryngoscope 2002;122:589–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achem SR, DeVeault KR. Dysphagia in aging. J Clin Gastroentero 2005;39:357–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller N, Carding P. Dysphagia: Implications for older people. Rev Clin Gerontol 2007;17:177–90.
   Google Scholar
• Chen PH, Golup JS, Hapner ER, Johns MM. Prevalence of perceived dysphagia and quality-of-life impairment in a geriatric population. Dysphagia 2009;24:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslick GD, Talley HJ. Dysphagia: Epidemiology, risk factor and impact on quality of life – a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;27:971–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjærsgaard, A. Undersøgelse af synkeproblemer hos senhjerneskadede patienter (Assessment of dysphagia in patients with acquired brain damage) 2002. Available at: http://www.vfhj.dk/admin/write/files/824.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Measurement issues and practices. In: Law M, Baum C, Dunn W, editors. Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2005. p. 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model: A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centred, and occupation-based interventions. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert HC, Gisel EG, Wood-Dauphine S, Groher ME, Abrahamowicz M. McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment: User's manual. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Treats TT. Use of the ICF in dysphagia management. Seminars in speech and Language 2007;28:323–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matino R, Pron G, Diamant N. Screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke: Insufficient evidence for guidelines. Dysphagia 2000;15:19–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swigert NB. Update on current assessment practices for dysphagia. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2007;23:185–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert HC, Gisel EG, Groher ME, Wood-Dauphine S. McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA): Development and first field test of an evaluation of functional ingestive skills of elderly persons. Dysphagia 2003;18:101–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert HC, Abrahamowicz M, Groher ME, Wood-Dauphine SM, Gisel EG. The McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment predicts time to death in an elderly population with neurogenic dysphagia: Preliminary evidence. Dysphagia 2005;20:123–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert HC, Gisel EG, Groher ME, Abrahamowicz M, Wood-Dauphine S. Psychometric testing of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment. Am J Occup Ther 2006;60:409–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisinger KF. Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1994;4:304–12.
   Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: The universalist approach. Qual Life Res 1998;7:323–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sireci SG. The construct of content validity. Social Indicators Res 1998;45:83–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes SN, Richard DCS, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess 1995;3:238–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35:82–5.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong T, Hartley S. Challenges in linking health-status outcome measures and clinical assessment tools to the ICF. Arch Physio 2008;10:152–6.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas SP, Craig CS. Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. J Int Mark 2007;15:30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish ICF network via Hanne Melchiorsen, MarselisborgCentret (Homepage on the internet) (cited 21 September 2009). Available at: http://www.marselisborgcentret.dk/kontakt-os/forskning-udvikling/hanne-melchiorsen/#c1569.
   Google Scholar
• Grant JS, Davis LL. Focus on quantitative methods: Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 1997;20:269–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DE, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2007;30:459–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke MJ, Dunlap WP. Estimating interrater agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A user's guide. Organ Res Methods 2002;5:159–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckstead JW. Content validity is naught. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46:1274–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney IG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Application to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm T, Gey S, Cieza A, Machold K, Kollerits B, Kloppenburg M, Measuring function in patients with hand osteoarthritis – content comparison of questionnaires based on the International Classification of Function, Disability and health (ICF). Rheumatology 2006;45:1134–1541.
   Google Scholar
• Beckstead JW, Yang CY, Lengacher CA. Assessing cross-cultural validity of scales: A methodological review and illustrative example. Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45:110–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker J, Dallmaijer AJ, Lankhost GJ. Clinimetrics in rehabilitation medicine: Current issues in developing and applying measurement instruments 1. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:193–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek J C, Chignell K, Kramer AE, The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults, III: Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia 2002;17:97–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:105–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedin PJ, Mckenny SP, Meads DK. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of life (RAQol) for Sweden: Adaptation and validation. Scand J Rheumatol 2008;35:117–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85:257–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar