Aspects affecting occupational therapists' reasoning when implementing research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation

References

• Kielhofner G. Ergoterapi – det begrebsmæssige grundlag (Occupational therapy – a conceptual framework ). FADL's forlag, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Chapparo C, Ranka J. Clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2008. p. 265–78.
   Google Scholar
• European Stroke Organisation. Available at: http://www.eso-stroke.org./ [September 25, 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko H, editors. Enabling occupation II. Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, justice through occupation. Rev. ed. CAOT Publications ACE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Law M. Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, Harvey G, Kitson A, McCormack B. What counts as evidence in evidence0based practice? J Adv Nurs 2004;47:81–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett S, Bennett JW. The process of evidence-based practice in occupational therapy: Informing clinical decisions. Austr Occup Ther Jo 2000; 47:171–80.
   Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge translation is the use knowledge in health care decision making. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62,6:617–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finleyson M, Shevil E, Luo P, Chen HY, Mathiowetz V. Reflections of occupational therapists working as members of a research team. Austr Occup Ther J 2005;52:101–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Research concepts in clinical scholarship – scholarship and practice: Bridging the divide. Am J Occupa Ther 2005;59:231–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell E, Whitehead M, Fleming J, Moes L. Evidence-based practice in everyday clinical practice: Strategies for change in a tertiary occupational therapy department. Austr Occup Ther J 2008;55:79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARIHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Sci 2008;3:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework: A framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Quality 2004;19:297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Titchen A. Practice knowledge, expertise in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman J, Llewellyn G. Clinical outcomes research from the occupational therapist's perspective. Occupational Therapy International 2002;9:145–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cusick A, McCluskey A. Becoming an evidence-based practitioner through professional development. Austr Occup Ther J 2000;47:159–70.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Thomas E, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay C, Vale L. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Medi J Austr 2004;180(suppl. 6):S57–S60.
   Google Scholar
• Franx G, Kroon H, Grimshaw J, Drake R, Grol R, Wensing M. Organizational change to transfer knowledge and improve quality and outcomes of care for patients with severe mental illness: A systematic overview of reviews. Can J Psychiatry 2008;53:294–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willman A, Stoltz P& Bathsevani C. Evidence-based nursing. 2nd ed. Gads Forlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder L, Reynolds S. Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal. Oxford: Blackwell; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rappolt S. The role of professional expertise in evidence-based occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:589–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Jones MA, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly C, Fleming M. Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman A. Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. J Rehab Med 2005;37:273–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MC. Evidence-based practice for occupational therapists. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer ET. Action research. 3rd ed. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Persson D, Nygren C, Boll M, Matzen P. Evaluation of evidence within occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther 2010; Epub ahead of publication:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bahtsevani C, Udén G, Willman A. Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:427–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner P. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Meno Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth C. The clinical reasoning of novice and expert occupational therapists. Scand J Occup Ther 2001;8:163–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur P. Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur P. Fortolkningsteori (Interpretation Theory). Vintens Forlag, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci 2004;18:145–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer PS, Pedersen BD. Distanciation in Ricoeur's theory of interpretation: Narrations in a study of life experiences of living with chronic illness and home mechanical ventilation. Nursing Inquiry 2009;16:64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan H, Wilson A, Olver I. Ricoeur's Theory of Interpretation: an instrument for data interpretation in hermeneutic phenomenology. Int J Qualitative Methods 2009;8:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsgaard L. Potentiel sygdom sætter spor. Kvinders oplevelse af sygdom i et forløb med celleforandringer efter screening for livmoderhalskræft. Ph.d. afhandling, Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet (Potentiel illness sets marks. Ph.d. thesis. Health Science Faculty). Århus University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsgaard L, Kjeld Petersen L, Pedersen BD. Facing possible illness detected through screening: Experiences of healthy women with pathological cervical smears. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2007;11:417–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson-Lidman E, Norberg A, Strandberg G. Meanings of being a female co-worker to a person developing burnout. Scand J Caring Sci 2007; 21:155–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spradley J. Participant observation. Wadsworth, CA: Thomson :earning Academic Resource Center; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing Etnographic Fieldnotes. The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T. Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice: Linking evidence to action. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Seers K. Getting evidence into practice: The meaning of ‘context’. J Adv Nurs 2002;38:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estabrooks CA, Floyd JA, Scott-Finley S, O'Leary K, Gushta M. Individual determinants of research utilization: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2003;43:506–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia. F.A. Davis; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 2006;53:304–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter SM, Little M. Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2007;17:1316–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358;4838.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interview: Introduktion til et Håndvæk.2.udg (Interview. Introduction to a craft, 2nd ed). Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hovmand B, Lund H, Albert H. Writing and evaluating case reports. Nyt om forskning; 2001:10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier B. Focus groups. Samfundslitteratur Roskilde Universitetsforlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health, Illness 1994;16:103–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar