Developing a Danish version of the “Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire”

References

• World Health Organisation. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. Br Med J 2000;320:1385–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. The international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In Pope A, Tarlow A, editors. Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991. p 309–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion SA, St Michel G. Social consequences of long-term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res 1998;21:127–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Un.org [home page on the Internet]. United Nations. Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. Adopted by the General Assembly 4 March 1994 [cited 2010 Feb 12]. Available from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=75.
   Google Scholar
• Un.org [home page on the Internet]. United Nations. UN Conventions on the rights of persons with disabilities. Adopted by the General Assembly 13 December 2006 [cited 2010 Feb 12]. Available from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=259.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: An overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S5–S16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutenbrunner C, Ward AB, Chamberlain MA. editors. White book on physical and rehabilitation medicine in Europe. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Marseligsborgcentret.dk [home page on the Internet]. Denmark: Marseligsborgcentret. Rehabilitering i Danmark – Hvidbog om rehabiliteringsbegrebet [cited 2009 Feb 4]. Available from http://www.marselisborgcentret.dk/funktioner/publikationer/.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Melvin J, Stucki G. Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehab Med 2011;43:765–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Löfquist C, Jónsdottir I, Sund T, Salminen AL, Werngren-Elgström M, Towards an instrument targeting mobility-related participation: Nordic cross-national reliability. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:766–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: Conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Post MW. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S17–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Tulsky D, Dijkers M, Brown M, Magasi S, Gordon W, Issues in participation measurement in research and clinical applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S72–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson T, Hammel J. Measurement of participation: Intersecting person, task, and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S29–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG. Issues affecting the selection of participation measurement in outcomes research and clinical trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S54–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:2335–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Dekker J, Terwee CB. A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: Challenges in defining participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:983–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GAM, de Jong BA, de Groot JM. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999;13:411–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivel.nl [home page on the internet]. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. Translations of the IPA. IPA questionnaire (English). IPA Manual (English). [cited 2011 Jan 26]. Available from http://www.nivel.eu/ipa/.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD, White B, Mehta R, George S. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: Validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:793–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund ML, Fischer AG, Lexell J, Bernspång B. Impact on participation and Autonomy Questionnaire: Internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:156–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Guglielmi V, Picco D. Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:451–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fallahpour M, Jonsson H, Joghaaei MT, Kottorp A. Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA): Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version to use for persons with stroke. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:59–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Chan A, Mâsse LC, Comparing the content of participation instruments using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009;7:93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmin.nl [home page on the internet]. Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments. COSMIN definitions of domains, measurement properties, and aspects of measurement properties. [cited 2012 March 22]. Available from http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/File/Tabel%20met%20definities–new.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, Alonso J, Bucquet D, Niero M, Wiklund I, McKenna S. Cross-cultural adaptations of health measures. Health Policy 1991;19:33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet HCW, Terwee BC, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn RL, Goldfarb AI, Pollack M, Peck A. Brief objective measures for the determination of mental status in the aged. Am J Psychiatry 1960;117:326–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarit SH, Miller NE, Kahn RL. Brain function, intellectual impairment and education in the aged. J Am Geriatr Soc 1978;26:58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Uses, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85:257–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. J Maryland State Med 1965;14:61–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: The bare essentials. 3rd ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GC. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
   Google Scholar